1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT APPEAL No.305 OF2023(GM-CC) C/W WRIT APPEAL No.300 OF2023(GM-CC) WRIT APPEAL No.337 OF2023(GM-CC) WRIT APPEAL No.482 OF2023(GM-CC) WRIT APPEAL No.591 OF2023(GM-CC) WRIT APPEAL No.886 OF2023(GM-CC) WRIT APPEAL No.939 OF2023(GM-CC) IN WA No.305 OF2023BETWEEN:
1. . NARENDRA BABU G.V. S/O K.V. VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/AT GUDIBANDE TOWN, A BLOCK HOUSING BOARD COLONY CHIKKABALLAPUR-561 209. 2 . YALLAPPA BAGALI S/O RAVUTAPPA AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT CHIKKABEVANUR INDI TALUK, VIJAYAPURA - 586 211. 2 3 . VANI R S W/O SUBRAMANI B G AGED ABOUT34YEARS R/A CHINNAMMA LAYOUT1T CROSS, CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI R T NAGAR POST HEBBALA, BENGALURU - 560 032. 4 . CHAITHRA A.J.
W/O BASAVARAJU B N AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/A18HONGIRANA17H CROSS17H MAIN ROAD ANDRAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 091. 5 . ASHWINI S., W/O PRAKASH T T AGED ABOUT35YEARS R/A31 NANDA GOKULA APARTMENT1T MAIN ROAD PALACE GUTTAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 003. 6 . SIDDALINGESHWARA PATTANASHETTI S/O SOMALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT35 VIJAYA COLONY NAVARASAPURA VIJAYAPURA - 586 108. 7 . BASAVARAJ HALAKI S/O SATAPPA AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/A GOTYAL, JEVOOR POST CHADACHAN TALUK VIJAYAPURA - 586 204. 8 . NANDISH S., S/O SIDDARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT30YEARS3R/A JODIPURA VILLAGE BAVANAHALLI POST MALUR TQ KOLAR - 563 130. 9 . VASEEM A S/O AMEER AHAMAD AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/A TAMARIND MERCHANT JAYANAGAR MAIN ROAD SHIKARIPURA TALUK SHIMOGHA - 577 427. 10 . PARVATIBAI SANGANNA BIDARI W/O MALLIKARJUNA K SAJJAN AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/A TANGADAGI POST MUDEEBIHAL TALUK BIJAPURA - 586 129. 11 . MALLIKARJUN B RAKKASAGI S/O BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/A HAVARAGI POST HUNAGUND TALUK BAGALKOTE - 587 118. 12 . DADAKHALANADAR DHAVANAKATTI S/O IBRAHIMSAB AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT KADUR HIREKERUR HAVERI - 581 116. 13 . SHRUTHI B W/O SATHISHA N AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT D.NO.9 BASAWESHWARA TEMPLE ROAD MUTTHUR VILLAGE AND POST PIRIYAPATTANA TALUK MYSORE - 571 107. 4 14 . SUMA B M W/O SHIVKUMAR H S AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/A HONNEMADU VILLAGE DODDA HOBALI G MALLIGERE MANDYA - 571 416. 15 . SAVITA MASKANAL W/O RAJ KUMAR BANNI AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/A GANESHNAGAR, TALIKOTI MUDDEBIHALA TALUK VIJAYAPURA - 586 214. 16 . ANITHA R W/O PRAMOD REDDY M B AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/A MARENAHALLI HOLUR POST KOLAR - 563126. 17 . SHWETA PUTTANNAVAR W/O MAHAVEER SHEBANNANAVAR AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A189, BASTI ONI, DEVARASHIGEHALLI BELAGAVI - 591 153. 18 . MANJUNATH P MENEDAL S/O PARASHURAM MENEDAL AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/A153 NEKAR COLONY ILKAL HUNAGUND TALUK BAGALKOTE DISTRICT - 587 125. 19 . SANTOSH MALLIGAWAD S/O HONNAPPA MALLIGAWAD AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/A GANGADHAR NAGAR SHIGLI POST, LAXMESHWARA TALUK GADAG - 582 210. 5 20 . GANGADHARAIAH K C S/O CHANDRASHEKARAIAH AGED ABOUT39YEARS R/A BANNIKODI POST HONNALLI TALUK DAVANAGERE - 577 516. 21 . RAVI MALLAPPA BEVINAGIDAD S/O MALLAPPA PANCHAPPA BEVINAGIDAD AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/A MANOLLI, PARASGAD BELAGAVI - 591 117. 22 . HURAN BI KHAZI D/O ALLAHUDDIN AGED ABOUT25YEARS R/A ISLAMPURA STREET RANEBENNUR TALUK HAVERI - 581 115. 23 . SAVITHA KORI D/O SOMANINGA AGED ABOUT34YEARS R/A205 YATNAL BIJAPURA - 586 104. 24 . MAMATHA M I W/O MALLIKARJUNA H N AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/A311 V R GOKULUM NEAR MILANA CONVENTION HALLI KANNUR HALLI MAIN ROAD HOSKOTE - 562 114. 25 . LEELAVATHI N., W/O SUBRAMANYA G AGED ABOUT34YEARS R/A87 1ST MAIN ROAD JC NAGAR MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BENGALURU - 560 086. 6 26 . RASHMI B N W/O GANESH K., AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/AT No.60 BELAKU1T FLOOR, 6TH MAIN, 6TH CROSS BAIRAVESHWARA NAGAR NAGARBHAVI MAIN ROAD BENGALURU -560 072. 27 . MUBEEN LALMIYA W/O IMAMASAB KILLEDAR AGED ABOUT34YEARS R/AT SIDDANABHAVI ONI NARAGUND TALUK GADAG-582 207. 28 . NISHA RANI D/O DIGAMBER RAO AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT HAJNAL BHALKI TALUK BIDAR DISTRICT-585 444. 29 . MANJULA B., W/O SANTOSH U N AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/AT MYLARPATTANA ROAD SANTHOSH NILAYA, UPPARAHALLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA -571 432. 30 . UMESH BALLUR S/O SHREESHAIL AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/AT INGALIGE POST MUDHOL TALUK BAGALKOTE -587 313. 31 . LOKESH TUKARAM BHANGER S/O TUKARAM AGED ABOUT35YEARS R/AT SAUNDATTI PARASAGAD BELGAVI-591 224. 7 32 . JAYADHEEP T PARUTAGALE S/O TUKARAM AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/AT No.1701, BASAVANAGAR SHEDBAI, KAGWAD CHIKKODI TALUK BELAGAVI -591 315. 33 . SACHIN JUNJARAWAD S/O SURESH JUNJARAWAD AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT SAUNDATTI, PARASAGAD BELAGAVI-591 126. 34 . AMBARISH ONTETEEN S/O IRANNA, AGED ABOUT33YEARS DEVARA HIPPARAGI POST SINDHAGI TALUK VIJAYAPURA-586 115. 35 . LAVANYA R W/O LOKESH H AGED ABOUT30YEARS KABBALA VILLAGE AND POST HOSADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA-577 597. 36 . RENUKA HADAPAD W/O IRANNA AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/AT AB NAGARA MUNDARGI GADAG-582 118. 37 . CHANDRASHEKARAGOUDA KAREGOUDA S/O FHAKKIRAGOUDAR NINGANGOIUDAR AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/AT KUSAGUR, RANEBENNUR HAVERI-581208. 8 38 . RUBIYA BEGUM KOPPAL D/O BASHUSAB AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/AT MUNDARGI, GADAG-582 118. 39 . SUBHASGOUDA PATIL S/O LINGANAGOUDA AGED ABOUT39YEARS R/AT MARADUR POST HALAGI HAVERI-581 213. 40 . MANJUNATH ANDAVAGOL S/O APPASAHEB AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/AT POST TONASHYAL VIJAYAPURA RURAL -586 121. 41 . MANJULA T K W/O CHIRANJEEVE B AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT KALAMMANA GUDI BEEDI CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TUMKUR -572 214. 42 . BASAPPA KURI C/O CHUNAPPA N. SARVI AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/AT SHARADA NILAYA, 13TH CROSS GOKUL NAGAR, MUTAGA BELAGAVI-591 124. 43 . SHEETAL SAVADI SAJJAN S/O NAGARAJ SAVADI AGED ABOUT35YEARS R/AT PLOT No.3, 1ST CROSS BESIDE CHAITRA APARTMENT SHRINAGAR DHARWAD-580 003. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. V. LAKSHMINARAYANA SR. ADVOCATE FOR SMT. ANUSHA L., ADVOCATES) 9 AND1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY UNDER SECRETARY DEPT. OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION2D GATE, 6TH FLOOR M.S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . DEPARTMENT OF PERSONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ROOM NO.245, 2ND FLOOR VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001. 3 . CENTRALISED ADMISSION CELL SPECIAL OFFICER OPP. CAUVERY BHAVAN BENGALURU-560 002. 4 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPT CHIKKODI-591 232. 5 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI CHIKKODI-591 232. 6 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPT MYSORE-570 007. 7 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI MYSURU-570 007. 10 8 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPT KALABURAGI-585103. 9 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI KALABURAGI-585 103. 10 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPT DAKSHINA KANNADA-575 003. 11 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI DAKSHINA KANNADA-575003. 12 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPT RAMANAGAR-562 159. 13 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI RAMANAGARA-562 159. 14 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPT BENGALURU NORTH-560 026. 15 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI BENGALURU NORTH-560 026. 16 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPT BENGALURU SOUTH- 562 106. 11 17 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI BENGALURU SOUTH-562 106. 18 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION HAVERI-581 110. 19 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI HAVERI-581 110. 20 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT SIRSI UTTAR KANNADA-581 401. 21 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI SIRSI-581 401. 22 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT RAICHUR-584101. 23 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RAICHUR-584 101. 24 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BAGALKOTE-587101. 25 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI BAGALKOTE-587 101. 12 26 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI VIJAYAPURA-586 101. 27 . AKSHATA CHOUGALA W/O BHARAMU P TEERTH AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT PARAMANANDAWADI POST RAIBAG TALUK BELGAVI BELAGAVI-591 311. 28 . PRIYANKA W/O MANJESH AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/A B R KAVAL VILLAGE HANAGODU POST AND HOBLI HUNSUR, MYSORE-571 105. 29 . JYOTHI A., W/O MAHESHA P. AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/AT NO.4718 NEELAKANTA NAGAR NANJANGUD MYSURU-571 301. 30 . RANI H N W/O NANJESHA AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/A NO.307, NAGAWALA POST ILVALA HOBLI MYSURU-571 130. 31 . JYOTHI CHANDRASHEKHAR KARIKAL W/O VISHWANATH AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/A SEDAM ROAD RTO OFFICE SAI NAGAR KALABURAGI-585 105. 13 32 . CHAITRA V.Y. W/O RAGHU K.S. AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/A VADDARAHALLI VILLAGE BELAVADI POST CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 146. 33 . GURULAKSHMI N W/O THIMMAPPA RAJU AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A SADARAHALLI VILLAGE AKKUR POST CHANNAPATNA RAMANAGARA-562 138. 34 . SUNEETHA R W/O JAGADEESHA AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A DODDA YERAMGERE VILLAGE BIJJAHALLI POST KODIHALLI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK. 35 . KALPANA BEERAPPA NAIK W/O MAHESH G NAIK AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/A VANNALLI POST KUMTA UTTARA KANNADA-581 343. 36 . GAYATHRI NAIK W/O SHIVARAJ SHANTAPPA NAIK AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A ARAMANEKOPPA POST KODKANI, KUMTA UTTARAKANNADA-581 440. 37 . NISHA W/O SATHISH AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/A5155, THAREMAR HOUSE14DKOLAVOOR, MURTHUR VILLAGE KOLAVAR POST, MANGALORE NORTH DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 144. 38 . SAVITHA HOSATTI W/O MAHESH MALI AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A POAIGALI, ATHANI, CHIKKODI - 591 248. 39 . PRATHIBA BEERAPPA YANKANCHI W/O MURASIDDA GAVADE AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/A SHIVANUR POST, ATHANI CHIKKODI - 591232. 40 . RAMYARANI W/O PRABHAKAR RAJU POOJARY AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/A1218, SAPTHAGIRI BELAVE POST AND VILLAGE UDUPI - 576 212. 41 . NANDA B GOUDAR W/O MANJUNATH N GHATTI AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/A2408 SIMHASAN PLOT GAJENDRAGAD GADAG - 582 114. 42 . SHEEBA ANJUM W/O MOHAMMED ETHESHAM ULLA AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/A778222 BEHIND POLICE STATION BUR ROAD, BANGARPET KOLAR - 563 114. 43 . ASHA S., W/O VINAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT31YEARS15R/A19, REDDI LINGAYATH ONI DOOPADAHALLI POST KOTTUR, VIJAYANAGAR KARNATAKA - 583 134. 44 . PRAMILA T., W/O GOPALA R AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/AT# 97, SWAMIVIVEKANANDA BADAVANE, BAHADURPURA ANEKAL, BENGALURU - 562 106. 45 . PATIMA BABAKKANAVAR W/O ABDUL KHADAR R/A JILANI AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT # 2579, SAVALA BAVIONI MULGUND RURAL GADAG - 582117. 46 . SHRUTHI W/O VEERAREDDY AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/A92 CHINTAKUNTA POST YADGIRI - 585 214. 47 . LEELA HIREMATH W/O SANTOSH KUMAR AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/A PLOT NO.2, 10-934/21/2A/2 OPP. VIVEKANANDA COLLEGE NEAR FIRE STATION MAHALAXMI LAYOUT KALABURAGI - 585 101.
48. SMT. RUKIYA BANU M.V. D/O MUSHTAK AHMED W/O LIYAKATH AGED ABOUT28YEARS PERMANENT R/O: No.14/1287, JAYANAGAR JANATHA QUATRESS16DHARWAD - 580 001.
49. SMT. NAJAMOON MULLA D/O IBRAHIMSAB MULLA W/O SUBHANI AGED ABOUT35YEARS PERMANENT R/O: NADUVINAPETH, MANIHAL POST SUREBAN TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 591 127.
50. SMT. SHAILA LAKSHMAN KABBUR D/O LAKSHMAN W/O DATTATREYA BIRAJADAR AGED ABOUT28YEARS PERMANENT R/O: PETKARCHAWL MARUTHI GALLI GATAPRABHA MALLAPURA POST GOKAK BELGAUM - 591 306.
51. SMT. THARA G.E., D/O ESHAWARAPPA G.S., W/O MOHAN KUMAR N., AGED ABOUT27YEARS PERMANENT R/O CHIKKANAHALLI SIRA, TUMKURU - 572 125.
52. SMT. ARPITHA S., D/O SURENDRA S.K., W/O B.M. VARANESH AGED ABOUT29YEARS No.136, HALLIKERE BALLUR MUDIGERE CHIKKAMAGALRU - 577 122.
53. SMT. TRIVENI M.G., D/O GIRIJA MAHESH W/O YOGESHA AGED ABOUT33YEARS17PERMANENT R/O WARD No.02 BEHIND APMC NAIDU LAYOUT NEHRUNAGAR BELUR, HASSAN - 573 115.
54. SMT. NAVEEDA KHANNUM D/O ASSADULLA KHAN W/O HAYATH BASHA S., AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O NEAR JAMIYA MASJID KERE BILACHI POST CHENNAGIRI, DAVANAGERE - 577 218.
55. SMT. VIDYA G., D/O GHANARAJ D., W/O VASU R., AGED ABOUT31YEARS PERMANENT R/O HUNASINAKERE LAYOUT BEHIND SANTHEPETE SCHOOL HASSAN - 573 201.
56. SMT. SALMA JABEEN D/O NUSRATH ALI W/O RAVI M.L., AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O B-1, 21, ANTHARIKSHA NAGAR MCF HOUSING COLONY HARALAHALLI HASSAN - 573 202.
57. SMT. SHILPA H.R., D/O RAJASHEKAR H.K., W/O SHREE HARSHA AGED ABOUT33YEARS PERMANENT R/O HEBBALE VILLAGE SOMAVARPET TALUK18KODAGU - 571 232.
58. SMT. MEENAKSHI M., D/O MAYAPPA W/O SHIVARAJA K., AGED ABOUT31YEARS PERMANENT R/O No.111, HOSABEEDI HINKAL, MYSURU RURAL KARNATAKA - 570 017.
59. SMT. SARASWATHI TIWARI D/O KESHAVA TIWARI W/O RAGHAVENDRA RAJAPUT AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O No.3278, 4TH CROSS SARASWATHI NAGAR GANESHPURA, HINDALAGA BELGAVI - 591 108.
60. SMT. NETRA P., D/O PUTTASWAMY W/O VIJAYA SHANKAR M., AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O No.518, 18TH CROSS4H MAIN, VIDYARANYAPURA MYSORE - 570 008.
61. SMT. MADUSHREE NAIK D/O MAHABALESHWAR W/O NAGARAJ BEERAPPA NAIK AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O No.42/B, MIRJA KUMATA UTTARAKANNADA - 581 440.
62. SMT. NOORAIN SULTANA W/O KAFEEL AHMED AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O10H CROSS, 1ST STAGE19BEHIND QUBAMASJID RML NAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201.
63. SMT. S. SHAHWAR UNNISA D/O SANULLA SHARIFF S., W/O ASLAM SAIKALGAR AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O CHENNAGIRI DAVANGERE - 577 213.
64. SMT. KANEEZ FATTIMA D/O GHOUSE PASHA W/O MOHAMMED I AGED ABOUT28YEARS PERMANENT R/O SECOND STAGE COTTON PETE MG ROAD KOLAR - 517 247.
65. SMT. SHAMALA A.S., D/O. SHIVANNA GOWDA K., W/O GAJENDRA L., AGED ABOUT37YEARS PERMANENT R/O No.10,11 WARD1564GEETHASHALA ROAD VTC PEENYA DASARAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 057.
66. SMT. TABASSUM JHA D/O SHIVAPUTRAPPA MALGI W/O MAHALINGAPPA TALUK AGED ABOUT35YEARS PERMANENT R/O No.340, NEAR POST OFFICE DOTHIHAL, KUSTAGI KOPPAL - 583 287.
67. SMT. GULFAM D/O PEERKHAN T.M., W/O AASIF PASHA AGED ABOUT26YEARS20PERMANENT R/O TALAGUNDHA VILLAGE MEDIHALA POST KOLAR - 563 101.
68. SMT. VARSHA PATIL W/O FHAKKIR @ TRISHUL HIRAGANNAVAR AGED ABOUT33YEARS PERMANENT R/O HIRAGANNAVAR BUILDING UNDER RAIWAY BRIDGE HAVERI - 581 110.
69. SMT. SMEETHA SUBEDAR D/O ASHOK W/O RAWUTH KANAKANA WADI AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O HALEPET GALLI, TERADHAL RABAKAVI TALUK BANNAHATTI BAGALKOT - 587 315.
70. SMT. SOUMYA N.S., D/O SHEKARAPPA N.H., W/O SUDHARSHANA R.V., AGED ABOUT28YEARS PERMANENT R/O ULLASA NILAYA KUVEMPU NAGAR T.H. ROAD, RIPPANPET HOSANAGARA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA - 577 426.
71. SMT. SNEHALATHA DEVAREDDY D/O MALLANAGOUDA W/O SANTOSH AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O No.1227, BADAVADAGI STREET WARD No.03, HUNGUND BAGALKOT - 587 118. 21
72. SMT. SWELEHA NAZNEEN D/O NAZEER AHMED W/O FAYAAZ AGED ABOUT30YEARS PERMANENT R/O SAGARA, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 401.
73. SMT. SANDHYARANI B D/O BABU W/O RAMESH S., AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O10H WARD, BEHIND JUNIOR COLLEGE PLD BANK ROAD BAGEPALLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA - 561 207.
74. SMT. NAGARATHNA VENKANNA NAYAK D/O VENKANNA NAYAK W/O ASHWIN KUMAR AGED ABOUT27YEARS PERMANENT R/O SAGADA GIRI, ANKOLA TALUK UTTARAKANNADA - 581 319.
75. SMT. JYOTHI H.N., D/O NAGARAJU W/O SHASHI KUMAR AGED ABOUT27YEARS PERMANENT R/O CHINNADA GUDI HUNDI VILLAGE AND POST NANJANAGUD, MYSORE - 571 312.
76. SMT. DIVYASHREE K., D/O B. KRISHNA W/O ADITYA NAIRY AGED ABOUT27YEARS PERMANENT R/O3131, HERANJE5SENSE52HEROOR KUNJALU POST UDUPI - 576 213. 22
77. SMT. VATSALA R.G., D/O LATE GANGANNA W/O NAGARAJU H.A., AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O ROPPADA PALYA SWANDENA HALLI POST TUMAKUR - 572 104.
78. SMT. SUDHARANI D/O YALAGUNDAPPA BEERADAR W/O SHRI AMARESHA AGED ABOUT39YEARS PERMANENT R/O JAYABHAVANI NILAYA SARASWATHI VIDYA MANDIR COTNOOR, KALABURGI - 585 102.
79. SMT. USHA C.M., D/O SHREE MALLIKARJUNAPPA W/O SANDEEP H.E., AGED ABOUT27YEARS PERMANENT R/O CHIKKABANUR, BANUR POST SAKARAYANAPATNA HOBLI, KADUR CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 135.
80. SMT. SHWETHA V., D/O VENKATESHAPPA V.C., W/O VENKATESH N., AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O A BLOCK, NEAR KAUVERY HARDWARE SHOP NARASAPURA ROAD VEMGAL, KOLAR - 563 101.
81. SMT. LAKSHMI S., D/O SUBRAMANI W/O JAGADEESH E., AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O BANNAHATTI VILLAGE TEKALE POSE, MALUR TALUK KOLAR - 563 137. 23
82. SMT. SHAILA KAKHANADAKI D/O KASHINATH KAKANADAKI W/O SHREE SHAILA M., AMBALAL AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O CHELUVANARAYANA SWAMY NILAYA RANGAPPA ROAD BANASHANKARI BANGALORE - 560 085.
83. SMT. SAVITHA V., D/O VENTAKESH R., W/O KOTESHWARA REDDY C., AGED ABOUT33YEARS PERMANENT R/O No.07/58, R VENKATESHA NILAYA KOLAR - 563 101.
84. SMT. RAMYA S., D/O SURESH W/O MAHESH P., AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O KENCHAMMANA HALLI SASALA KUNTE PAVAGADA MUDUGIRI - 561 202.
85. SMT. SHAHANAZ A., D/O ABDUL KALEEL W/O SYED MAOHAMMED AKEEL HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT30YEARS PERMANENT R/O No.50 PALANAJOGI HALLI DODDABALLAPUR BENGALURU - 561 203. 86 SMT. SANGEETHA A.N., D/O NINGEGOWDA W/O RADHAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT35YEARS24PERMANENT R/O AKKUR VILLAGE & POST CHENNAPATNA RAMANAGARA - 562 138. 87 SMT. DIVYASHREE B.J., D/O JAYARAMAIAH B., W/O CHANDRASHEKAR H.A., AGED ABOUT31YEARS PERMANENT R/O GUBBI, TUMKUR - 572 216.
88. SMT. ZAIBA TARANNUM W/O MUKTHIYA BASHA PERMANENT R/O HELE MEDARKERI NEW CHAMPA BUILDING SHIKARIPURA SHIVAMOGGA - 577 427.
89. SMT. KALAVATHI B.M., D/O MAHADEVAIAH W/O NAGABHUSHAN AGED ABOUT33YEARS PERMANENT R/O No.84, 3RD CROSS SARASWATIPURAM WAVERS COLONY NELAMANGALA BENGALURU RURAL- 562 123.
90. SMT. KALPANA T.G., D/O SHREE GOPALAPPA A W/O SHREE SANTHOSH N., AGED ABOUT30YEARS PERMANENT R/O R/No.7322, RAMA MANDIR TEMPLE ROAD WEAVERS COLONY NELAMANGALA BANGALORE RURAL - 562 123. 91 SMT. SUMA B.L., W/O VIJAYAKUMAR N.D., 25 AGED ABOUT28YEARS PERMANENT R/O BILEKAL HALLI VILLAGE UDDEBORANHALLI POST CHIKKABALLAPURA - 577 168.
92. SMT. SAVITHA D/O SHREE SIVAPUTRAPPA MALAGI W/O MAHALLINGAPPA TIRAKI AGED ABOUT35YEARS PERMANENT R/O No.340, NEAR POST OFFICE, DOTHIHAL KUSTAGI, KOPPALA - 583 278.
93. SMT. GANGUBHAI JALAPUR D/O SHREE BASANNA W/O SHREE MAHANTESH AGED ABOUT30YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O KONNUR TALIKOTE, MUDDEBIHAL VIJAPUR - 586 208.
94. SMT. SEEMA SORAGANVI W/O ANNA SAAB BELAGALI AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O POST SATTI, TALUK ATANI BELGAVI, CHIKKODI - 591 240.
95. SMT. ARCHANA B.P. D/O PUTTASWAMY W/O ROHITH K., AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O No.9, ADARSH NAGAR KOLLEGALA CHAMARAJ NAGAR - 571 440.
96. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI D/O RAJKUAR W/O VISHWANATH B., 26 AGED ABOUT30YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O3113/688 NAGONDANAHALLI BENGALORE NORTH WHITE FIELD BANGALORE - 560 066.
97. SMT. JYOTHI N., W/O LOKESH N.R., AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O61SANTHE BEEDI OPPOSITE PARIYAPPA SWAMY MATHA DOMMASANDRA ANEKAL TALUK BENGALORE SOUTH - 562 125.
98. SMT. BASIRA BEGUM D/O SRI. MALLIKSAB MULLA W/O SRI. JAKEER HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT30YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O BALASHETTY HALLI POST KAMANATAGI HUNSAGI SHORAPUR, YADGIRI - 585 291.
99. SMT. RATHNA K.P., D/O PARAMESHWARAPPA W/O MAHANTHESH AGED ABOUT30YEARS PERMANENT R/O:
123. 10 NARASIMHA COMPOUND1T MAIN ROAD T. DASARAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 057.
100. SMT. MALA M., D/O SRI. MALLAIAH W/O SRI. SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/I120 2ND MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI27VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 040.
101. SMT. DEEKSHITHA Y.E., D/O EKAMBARACHAR W/O CHANDRASHEKAR P., AGED ABOUT27YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O6061 NEXT TO BBMP OFFICE DEVASANDRA KRISHNARAJA PURAM BANGALORE NORTH - 560 036.
102. SMT. SUDHA S.R., D/O RAMA AGED ABOUT36YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O DEVIPURA TEMPLE ROAD SRI. RAMA NAGARA TALAPADI POST MANGALORE - 575 023.
103. SMT. JYOTHI G., D/O GANAPATHY ACHARYA W/O CHANDRASHEKARA AGED ABOUT36YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O YERMAL THAENKA KAAPU TALUK UDUPI - 574 119.
104. SMT. SUMALATHA D/O KOTYAPPA SALIAN W/O SANTHOSH U., AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O423, PULLITHADI HOUSE NAARINGANA, BANTWALA DAKSHINA KANNADA - 575 018.
105. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI ARALIKATTI D/O CHANDRASHEKAR ARALIKATTI W/O JAGADEESH HANDADAKATTI AGED ABOUT38YEARS28PERMANENT R/O: R/O2D CROSS, NEAR DTC GANCHI NAGAR DHARWAD - 580 004.
106. SMT. JAYAPADMA DESAI D/O SANATH KUMAR DESAI W/O BRAMHA SUHAS MUTTIN AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O MARKET ROAD UPPINABELAGERI DHARWAD - 581 206.
107. SMT. ASHABI BHASHASAB MEERANNAVAR D/O BHASHASAB W/O MOULALI NASHIKUDI AGED ABOUT31YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O KALAS POST KUNDAGOL DHARWAD - 581 107.
108. SMT. SUMA KRISHNAPPA SAWUKAR D/O KRISHNAPPA SAWUKAR W/O RAMESH AGED ABOUT35YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O HEBSUR POST HUBLI TALUK DHARWAD DISTRICT - 581 209.
109. SMT. SHYAMALA D/O NARAYANA KULAL W/O SURESH KULAL AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O No.2-87, HANIGADDE MUDDUMANE POST SHIRURMANDATTI UDUPI - 576 223. 29
110. SMT. PRIYA N. KARADIN D/O SRI. NAMADEVAPPA KARADIN W/O AMRUT KARAJAGI AGED ABOUT31YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O S.P. KARAJAGI HOUSE No.1/2, HDMC BELAMKAR ONI HUBBALI - 580 024.
111. SMT. JAYASHREE D/O RAMACHANDRA W/O SANTHOSH KUMAR AGED ABOUT33YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O LACHINCHOLI POST ALAND TQ KALABURGI DISTRICT - 585 302.
112. SMT. KAVYA B.R. D/O RAVEENDRA D., W/O JYOTHISH K., AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O NERTHANE HOUSE DHARMASTALA BELTANGADI TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 216.
113. SMT. TAJASWINI TANVASHI D/O SIDDALINGAPPA W/O SUNIL JAGATI AGED ABOUT35YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O No.5659, MALLAMMA NAGAR NEAR DURGADEVI TEMPLE MUDHOL BAGALKOT - 587 313.
114. SMT. ANITHA Y.V., D/O VENKATARAVANAPPA W/O MURALIDHAR H., 30 AGED ABOUT35YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/A VYACHAPURA HALLI GOWRIBIDANUR CHIKKABALLAPUR - 561 210.
115. SMT. SAVITHRI BASAPPA GEDAGERI D/O BASAPPA W/O CHANDRASHWKAR HOSMANI AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/A No.27, BEVOOR POST YALBURGA TALUK KOPPALA - 583 237.
116. SMT. HARSHA KAMATE D/O BHEEMAPPA W/O SANTHOSH KUMAR AGED ABOUT27YEARS PERMANENT R/O: C/O G.S. SAMANI H.NO.140 NEAR J J HOSPITAL HUKKERI ROAD GHATAPRABHA GOKAK, BALAGHAVI - 591 306.
117. SMT. RAMYA H.M., D/O MANCHE GOWDA W/O KIRAN KUMAR R., AGED ABOUT31YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O No.111, 5TH CROSS ULLAL MAIN ROAD JJ NAGAR JNANBHARATHI BANGALORE - 560 056.
118. SMT. SHEETHAL RAMACHANDRA NAIK D/O RAMCHANDRA NAIK W/O TIRUMALA NAIK AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O:
31. R/O ELUMUDI HAKLU HADEEN POST, BELAKE TQ UTTARA KANNADA - 581 320.
119. SMT. PRIYANKA DESAI D/O BASANGOUDA W/O MANOJ KUMAR BIDARI AGED ABOUT30YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O KHANAPUR VIJAYAPURA SINDAGI BIJAPUR - 586 128.
120. SMT. NAYANA NAIK D/O VENKAPPA S. NAIK W/O VIDYADHARA R NAIK AGED ABOUT30YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O BAAD POST KUMUTA TQ UTTARAKANNADA - 581 351.
121. SMT. DIVYA Y., D/O YALLAPPA POOJARI W/O HARISHCHANDRA AGED ABOUT30YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O RANGANAPAL BILAKALI VILLAGE MUDIGERE TQ CHIKMAGALURU - 577 121.
122. SMT. SOWMYA D/O SHOBANANDA KUMAR H., W/O SHRIKANTH AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O SRI. SAI KRUPA NERALAKATTE KUVETTU, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 224.
123. SMT. SULOCHANA S., D/O SANJEEVA POOJARI32W/O NAVEEN K., AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O No.2-57, NEAR CHAARMADI SCHOOL CHAARMADI, BELTANGADI DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 228.
124. SMT. PARVEEN M., PATEL D/O MOULALI PATEL W/O ABDUL RAHIM BABAR M. DAKHANI AGED ABOUT38YEARS PERMANENT R/O R/O BADI KAMAN JM ROAD VIJAYAPURA - 586 101.
125. SMT. SHRUTHI BELLUNDAGI D/O KALLAPPA BELLUNDAGI W/O SHANKREPPA P. MASALI AGED ABOUT27YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O KANNUR POST VIJAYAPURA TQ & DISTRICT - 586 101.
126. SMT. SAMEENA KOUSAR MAISTRY D/O FAQRUDDIN MAISTRY W/O MOHAMMED YASIN HAVALAGI AGED ABOUT34YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O J.M. ROAD BEHIND JAMIYA MASJID PATEL GARDEN, VIJAYAPURA - 586 104.
127. SMT. ASHA D.M. D/O MANJAPPA W/O GOVINDARAJU S.D., AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O KUMBALLURU, HONNALI DAVANAGERE - 577 219.
128. SMT. KRIPA HEGDE K., D/O RAGHU HEGDE K., 33 W/O AJITH HEGDE AGED ABOUT34YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O SRI. VINAYAK KRUPA KAADUBETTAMALA KAARKALA UDUPI - 574 122.
129. SMT. ASHWINI KEMMPANNAVAR D/O NEELAPPA W/O GURU SIDDANAGOUDA POLICE PATIL AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O HIRE MYAGERI KOPPAL - 583 236.
130. SMT. SHREEDEVI D/O SATHYANARAYAN BHATT W/O ANANTH K., AGED ABOUT33YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O ANANTH DHAMA NEAR NET COLLEGE NITTE, KAARKALA UDUPI DISTRICT - 574 110.
131. SMT. SWATHI D/O NITHYANANDA SHETTY W/O DEEPAK SHETTY PERMANENT R/O: R/O ANANDA NILAYA GOLIYADI, MELMANE PADU ANJAR, HIRIYADKA POST UDUPI - 576 113.
132. SMT. JAYASHRI SIDARAY LANGOT D/O SIDARAY LANGOT W/O MAHANTESH METRI AGED ABOUT27YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O KURUBA GALLI, ATHANI CHIKKODI - 591 304. 34
133. SMT. CHANDRKANTHI HEGDE D/O RAGHAV HEGDE W/O RANJITH HEGDE AGED ABOUT27YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O HARAVATTLU HOUSE KADATALA KAARKALA UDUPI - 574 108.
134. SMT. SHRI. SHANKARI W/O SANDEEP PADMASALI AGED ABOUT33YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O SANGABITTU VILLAGE BANTWALA TQ DAKSHINAKANNADA - 574 237.
135. SMT. POORNIMA D/O MANJUNATHA W/O SUBHASH AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O BIJOOR BYNDDOR TQ UDUPI - 576 232.
136. SMT. RAJANI KUMARI M.G., W/O VINAY KUMAR L., AGED ABOUT31YEARS PERMANENT R/O: MALLAPUR VILLAGE MADEHALLI CHITRADURGA - 515 281.
137. SMT. SUNITHA KOLLI W/O CHANDRANATH AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O KIMS QUATRESS BLOCK No.2 HOUSE No.15, VIDYANAGARA HUBBLI, DHARWAD - 580 031. 35
138. SMT. LALITHA DARGAD W/O MALLIKARJUNA AGED ABOUT27YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O DEVARADDI STREET HUNGUND BAGALKOT - 587 102.
139. SMT. VANI S., W/O SATHISHA AGED ABOUT33YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O JODIMANE HAANE HALLI, BARKUR DHARMAVARA UDUPI - 576 210.
140. SMT. SHIVABASAMMA MADIWALAR W/O HONAKEREPPA MADIWALAR AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O HALGATTI RAMADURGA BELAGAVI - 591 123.
141. SMT. LATHA G.D., W/O MANJUNATHA AGE(MAJOR) PERMANENT R/O: R/O GADDEHALLI POST MAAVINAHALLI, C.S. PURA HOBLI TUMKUR - 572 213.
142. SMT. USHA ALAVANDI D/O NINGAPPA A.T., W/O P. DEVENDRAPPA AGED ABOUT31YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O HIMALAPURA ROAD BADIGERA ONI DOOPADA HALLI VILLAGE KOTTUR VIJAYANAGARA - 583 134. 36
143. SMT. RADHIKA D/O SHARANEGOUDA W/O SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT27YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O HINGALAGI HEVOORU, HILAKAL BAGALKOT - 587 154.
144. SMT. YASHODAMMA N., W/O SHASHIKUMAR A., AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O Y KAGGAL POST BALLARI TALUK BALLARI - 583 111.
145. SMT. JYOTHI ANGADI D/O VIRUPAXAPPA ANGADI W/O SHIVARUDRAPPA V. BANDIWAD AGED ABOUT34YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O No.795, NEAR BANNIKATTI RAJIV GHANDI NAGAR GADAG - 582 101.
146. SMT. RAJESHWARI HIREMAT D/O MALLAYYA HIREMAT W/O PANCHAXARAYYA ARADYAMATH AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O JALALPUR POST SAVANOOR TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT - 581 118.
147. SMT. TASKEEN KOUSAR SANADI A D/O ABDUL KAREEM SANADI W/O MAAZAHMED BELAJUMKAR AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O HASHMIN NAGAR4H CROSS, KWB - 6738/04 37 DHARWAD - 580 008.
148. SMT. PARVATHI NINGAPPA ANGADI D/O NINGAPPA ANGADI W/O MANUNATH HUDDAR AGED ABOUT25YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O NELLUR POST MUSHIGERI TALUK GAJENDRAGAD, GADAG - 582 211.
149. SMT. JYOTI PANCHAKSHARAYYA HIREMAT D/O PANCHAKSHARAYYA HIREMAT W/O BASAYYA D . MATHAPATI AGED ABOUT28YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O A.P. NARENOOR BADAMI TALUK BAGALKOT - 587 206.
150. SMT. BASAVVA HEMAREDDY YARAGATTI D/O HEMAREDDY YARAGATTI W/O RAGHAVENDRA V. HARLAPUR AGED ABOUT31YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O KONGWAD, TADAHAL NAVALGUNDH DHARWAD - 580 001.
151. SMT. PUSHPALATH P., W/O VIJAYAKUMAR R.K., AGED ABOUT30YEARS PERMANENT R/O: R/O KERETONNUR POST & VILLAGE PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA - 571 434.
152. SMT. RESHMA BAGWAN W/O IRSHAD BAGWAN AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O R/O ITAGI COLONY38TORAVI ROAD VIJYAPUR - 586 102.
153. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI BASAPPA BADIGER W/O MANJUNATH BADIGER AGED ABOUT32YEARS PERMANENT R/O R/O YADWAD ROAD HULKUND, RAMDURGA BELGAVI - 591 114.
154. SMT. SONIKA W/O BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT30YEARS PERMANENT R/O R/O MADANIPARAGA POST ALAND TALUK KALBURGI - 585 236.
155. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O KIRAN AGED ABOUT28YEARS PERMANENT R/O R/O ROUDAL BAND CAMP LINGASUGUR RAICHUR - 584 127.
156. SMT. UMADEVI W/O BHEEMASHANKAR AGED ABOUT35YEARS PERMANENT R/O R/O No.11-421/16 SAMATHA COLONY BRAHMPUR KALBURGI SOUTH KALBURGI - 585 302.
157. SMT. VIDYA SHERUGAR D/O NAGESHSHERUGAR W/O VIJAY SERVGARA AGED ABOUT33YEARS PERMANENT R/O R/O No.13-198/2 SANTHANAKERI GANGOLLI VILLAGE & POST39KUNDAPUR TALUK UDUPI - 576 216.
158. SMT. GOURAMMA D/O SHIVABASAPPA W/O RAVISHANKAR AGED ABOUT31YEARS PERMANENT R/O R/O GUNJALLI CAMP K. HOSAHALLI POST SINDANOOR TALUK RAICHUR - 584 132.
159. SMT. POORNIMA GARADIMANI D/O GURUNATH W/O CHANDRASHEKAR B., AGED ABOUT31YEARS PERMANENT R/O No.7/2, SRI. BANASHANKARI NILAYA RATHAPURPETH RAMADURGA BELAGAVI DISTRICT - 591 123. 160 .SMT. REKHA KURI D/O MAHANTESH KURI W/O NINGAPPA PUJARI AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O R/O BEERALIGESHWARA TEMPLE ROAD BASAVANA BAGEWADI VIJAYAPURA - 586 203.
161. SMT. VEENA GADDAD D/O VEERAPPA GADDAD W/O DAYANAND B.N., AGED ABOUT29YEARS PERMANENT R/O R/O BIJAWARA POST MUDUGIRI TALUK TUMKURU - 572 132.
162. SMT. SUNEETHA TUMBAL40D/O MALLANNA W/O SANDEEP AGED ABOUT34YEARS PERMANENT R/O R/O No.1203/A MANIHAL, SUREBAN RAMADURGA TALUK BELAGAVI - 591 127.
163. SMT. NETRAVATHI SOMANATH SULIBHAVI D/O SOMNATH SULIBHAVI W/O VISHWANATH AGED ABOUT31YEARS PERMANENT R/O R/O RAMADURGA BELGAVI - 591 123.
164. JAYASHREE GOTYAL D/O MAHADEVAPPA GOTYAL AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT POST ATHARGA INDI VIJAYAPURA - 586 112.
165. GOURAVVA HAJERI S/O SHANKARSING AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT POST TONASHYAL VIJAYAPURA - 586 108.
166. SUNANDA BADIGER D/O MANAPPA AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT OPP UMASHANKAR KARYALAY CHANDA BAWADI ROAD SHIRIYAL SHETTI CHOCK VIJAYAPURA -586 101.
167. MANJULA PATIL D/O NETAJI AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/AT GOTAKHINDAKI POST BHANTANURA TALIKOTE MUDDEBIHAL VIJAYAPURA - 586 214. 41
168. GEETA BHEEMANAGOUD BIRADAR D/O BHEEMANAGOUD BIRADAR AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT PLOT NO.16 BAGAVANTI HOSPITAL BACKSIDE BASAVANA BAGEWADI ROAD VIJAYAPURA KARNATAKA - 586 109.
169. POTADAR SHRUTI RAMESH D/O RAMESH AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT PATIL NAGAR AT POST CHADACHAN VIJAYAPURA - 586 205.
170. DEEPIKA GONGADI D/O AJITKUMAR GONGADI AGED ABOUT34YEARS R/AT PADMA NILAYA20H CROSS KHB COLONY HUDCO MUDDEBIHAL VIJAYAPUR - 586 212.
171. JYOTI MOOLIMANI D/O BEEMANAGOUD MOOLIMANI AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT BEEMANAGOUD MOOLIMANI KUDARI SALAWADAGI VIJAYAPURA - 586 208.
172. RAMA S. MANTHAL S/O SHIVASHARNAPPA AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT4120/38 DASIMAYYA COLONY KAMALAPUR KALABURGI - 585 313.
173. AMBIKA DO SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/AT CHITKUNTA POST NAVADGI TALUK CHINCHOLI KALBURGI - 585 324. 42 174 MADHUMATI D/O DHARMANNA AGED ABOUT35YEARS R/AT H.NO.6-1-14 REVANASIDDESHWAR COLONY ALAND KALABURGI - 585 302.
175. SHASHIKALA D/O SHIVANANDA AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/AT H.NO.2-910/78/58 I BLOCK IT MAIN ROAD5H CROSS VEERANDRA PATI BADAVANE KALABURGI-585 101.
176. MALLAMMA D/O NAGANNA AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT NO.1/181 VEERAHADRESHWARA TEMPLE ROAD AT/OI DIGGAON CHITTAPUR KALABURGI- 585 211.
177. GURUBAI S/O GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT35YEARS R/AT VITTEM SHARAQI MOHALLA TIMMAPUR SHORAPUR TALUK YADGIR DISTRICT - 585 220.
178. POOJA D/O SHARANAPPA AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT PLOT NO.68 17/74 RAMAYYA LAYOUT KOTNOOR MUTH KALBURAGI- 585 102.
179. NIRMALA D/O SHIVARAMREDDY AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT570 KODLI POST CHINCOLI VILLAGE43KALAGI TALUK KALABURAGI - 585 312.
180. SHRUTI SANGANAGOUDA D/O SANGANAGOUDA AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT POST HADANOOR HADANOOR SHORAPUR YADGIRI - 585 216.
181. BHOODEVI D/O VEERBHADRAPPA AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT HOUSE No.5-5-113/4 SHIVANAGRA STATION YADGIRI - 585 202. 182 SUNITA MAHANANDA D/O NARASAREDDY AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT WARD No.RADDERONI KANAKAGIRI GANGAVATHI KOPPAL - 583 283.
183. VANI D., D/O THIPPANNA AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/AT No.1-37 32ND WARD AGASARA ONI HOSPETE VIJAYANAGAR - 583 201.
184. NETRAVATI D/O NEELAPPA AGED ABOUT25YEARS R/AT DOOR No.L12 SHINTRA HATTI KOPPAL -583 231.
185. KUSUMA D/O VENKATESH KARADAKAL AGED ABOUT34YEARS R/AT WARD No.1 HULIHYDER TALUK44GANGAVATHI TALUK KOPPAL DISTRICT - 583 283.
186. SUNITA BASETEPPA D/O BASETAPPA KUMBLAVATI AGED ABOUT34YEARS D.NO.115 GIRIJA NILAYA AMARVATHI HOSPET VIJAYANAGAR - 583 201.
187. NAGEENA BANU D/O MAHABUBALI AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT CHANNAVIRESHWARA NAGAR AKKI ALUR HANAGAL TALUK HAVERI - 581 102.
188. TALAT KHANUM PATHAN S/O KAMAL KHAN AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT40 2ND CROSS MANTUR ROAD, BYALI PLOT HUBLI HUBLI CITY, DHARWAD - 580 020.
189. ANITHA SHIVALINGAPPA D/O SHIVALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT YAMMIGANUR POST KACHAVI HIREKERUR HIREKERUR HAVERI - 581 120.
190. SUNITA Y. HIREKURUBAR D/O YAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT SECTOR No.8 PLOT No.70B NAVANAGAR BAGALKOTE - 587 102.
191. AKSHATA D/O MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT35YEARS R/AT No.32, SHIVAMOGGA ROAD45IST WARD HOSANAGAR SHIVAMOGGA - 577 418.
192. MAHADEVI BANNIMARAD D/O KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT PO VENKATAAPUR MUNDARAGI TALUK GADAG - 582 113.
193. KAVYA MANJUNATH NAIK D/O MANJUNATH MURKUNDI NAIK AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/AT No.490/1 SHADHIHITTAL VILLAGE KUMTA TALUK, UTTARA KANNADA - 581 343.
194. ROOPA D/O GURUVA POOJARY AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT No.1/55, HARADI SALIKERI BRAHAMAVARA UDUPI - 576 213.
195. SAVITHA D/O THUKAAMA SHETTY AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT143 NEAR MARIGUDI KOWDOOR BILURU POST KARKALA UDUPI - 574 102.
196. DEEPA B.P. D/O PARASHURAMA AGED ABOUT35YEARS R/AT No.63 AISHWARYA GOLDEN NEST LAYOUT (NORTH BLOCKS) KOPPA GATE ANEKAL BENGALURU SOUTH460105.
197. LAKSHIMI V., D/O VIJAYAKUMAR K., AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT414 MAIN ROAD46THORAVANDA AGASANHALLI ANAVATTI SORAB SHIVMOGGA -577 413.
198. MYTHRI E.S., D/O SOME GOWDA AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT SINGANAHALLI VILLAGE JAINAHALLI POST AKKIHEBBAL HOBLI K.R. PETE, MANDYA - 571 605.
199. VIDYAVTI YALABURGI D/O GANGADHAR YALABURGI AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/AT No.25, JAYASHREE COLONY BAGALAKOTE - 587 112.
200. POORNIMA D/O SOMANNA AGED ABOUT35YEARS R/AT NEAR ALEMANE MALLAPURA ALUR POST CHAMARAJA NAGAR - 571 117.
201. RESHMA G. BAGAWAN D/O GIDDUSAB BAGAWAN AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT1541HIREMANI LAYOUT AT POST GAJENDRAGAD GAJENDRAGAD TALUK GADAG - 582 114.
202. ARSHIYA TABASSUM C.A. D/O SAYED AHAMED S., AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT No.9/320 KARINANJANAPURA ROAD MUBARAK MOHALLA CHAMARAJA NAGAR - 571 313.
203. RASHIDA BEGUM PINJAR D/O MALIKSA PINJAR47AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT K.M. HUNDI VILLAGE KADAKOLA POST JAYAPURA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK & DISTRICT - 571 311.
204. RANJITHA G.B., D/O BASAVARAJAPPA G.S., AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT BEDARASHIVANAKERE VILLAGE BASAVASHIVANAKERE POST CHITRADURGA - 577 541.
205. MAMATHA K., D/O LATE KHANDOBARAO AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/AT No.139, 3RD MAIN11H CROSS, ALANAHALLY LAYOUT MYSORE - 570 028.
206. ARPITHA G.R., D/O RAGHUNATHA G.H., AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT MEERASABIHALLI CHALLAKERE CHITRADURGA - 577 522. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL A/W SMT. MAMATHA SHETTY. AGA FOR RESPONDENTS1 2 & 4 TO26 SRI. K. ANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. K.N. PHANINDRA, SR. ADVOCATE A/W SMT. LATHA S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R27 TO47 SRI. VIJAYA SIMHA REDDY D.V. ADVOCATE FOR R48 TO163SRI. DILIP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R164 TO207THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE48
ORDEROF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED:30.01.2023 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION.NO.23752/2022 (ANNEXURE -A) AND DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO IMPLEMENT FROM THE STAGE OF PROVISIONAL LIST DATED:18.11.2022 (ANNEXURE -A TO A18 IN WRIT PETITION No.23752/2022) IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW STRICTLY AS PER THE NOTIFICATION. IN WA. NO.300 OF2023BETWEEN :
1. . SMT. BHARATHI PATIL W/O RAMESH CHINCHAGADI AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/AT ARAKURAHATTI NAVAGUNDA TALUK DHARWAD - 582 03. 2 . SRI. BALAPPA BANAJIGER S/O SHIVAPPA BANAJEEGER AGED ABOUT41YEARS R/AT SATHI, ATHANI TALUK BELAGAVI-591240.
3. SMT. DIVYA M.K. D/O KRISHNA G. AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT MALLAPAN HALLI HOLLENARASIPURA HASSAN-573211. 49
4. SMT. PARAVEEN BEGUM D. HANAMASAGAR D/O DADEPEER AGED ABOUT34YEARS R/AT WARD NO.1 NEAR KANTI CIRCLE ILAKAL TALUK BAGALKOTE-587 125. 5 . SMT. REKHA D.K. W/O HARISH .L AGED ABOUT35YEARS R/AT MAYALLARA LINGESHWARA NILAYA WARD NO.1, DON BOSCO SCHOOL D.M. PALYA, SHIRA GATE TUMAKURU-572 106. 6 . SRI. BASAVARAJ N. SIDARADDI S/O NEELAKANTARAYA AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/AT SASANURU TALIKOTE TALUK VIJAYAPURA-586 216. 7 . SMT. SHAILA BIRADAR W/O BAPU GOWDA NAGAPPA CHICHOLI AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT VADAVADAGI BASAVANA BAGEVADI TALUK VIJAYAPURA - 586216. 8 . SMT. PUSHPA KAMATAGI W/O JAMPANNA AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/AT WARD No.11 MAIN ROAD, KAMATAGI HUNAGUNDA BAGALKOTE - 587120. 50 9 . SMT. ANITHA VASANADA D/O HANUMANTH VASANADA AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT KHAJJINDONI TALUK KALADAGI BAGALAKOTE - 587 204. 10 . SMT. LALITHA CHOWDARY W/O B.B. MAKANAPUR AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT OTIHAL SINDAGI VIJAYAPURA - 586115. 11 . SMT. RADHA B.S. W/O MANU B. AGED ABOUT34YEARS R/AT No.48, BEGUR AJJAMPURA, TARIKERI CHIKKAMAGALURU KARNATAKA - 577550. 12 . SMT. SHOBHA N. W/O RAMESH AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/AT No.7/2, NEW No.8 1ST CROSS, KARAGAPPA GARDEN MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU KARNATAKA - 560027. 13 . SRI. KUMAR ASUTI S/O SRI BASAVARAJA AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT MADALAGERI TALUK - RON DISTRICT GADAG - 582209. 14 . SRI. SANTHOSH KUMAR B. BELLAVATHI S/O BASAVANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/AT KANCHINGALURUL51HANGAL TALUK-581101 HAVERI DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VISHWANATHA SHETTY V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY UNDER SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION2D GATE6H FLOOR M.S. BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001. 2 . DEPARTMENT OF PERSONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ROOM No.245, 2ND FLOOR VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001. 3 . CENTRALISED ADMISSION CELL SPECIAL OFFICER OPP CAUVERY BHAVAN BANGALORE - 560 002. 4 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT CHIKKODI CHIKKODI DISTRICT - 591 232. 5 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADM) DEPT. OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI CHIKKODI - 591232. 6 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES52WELFARE DEPARTMENT MYSROE MYSORE DISTRICT - 570 007. 7 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADM) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDBI MYSORE - 570007. 8 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT KALABURGI KALBURGAI DISTRICT - 585 103. 9 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADM) DEPT. OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI KALBURAGI - 585 103. 10 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT DAKSHINA KANNADA DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTIRCT - 575 003. 11 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADM) DEPT. OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI, DAKHSINA KANNADA - 575 003. 12 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT RAMANAGAR RAMANAGAR - 562 159. 53 13 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI RAMANAGARA – 562 159. 14 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE NORTH - 560026. 15 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADM) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI BANGALORE NORTH - 560026. 16 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BANGALORE SOUTH BANGALORE SOUTH - 562106. 17 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADM) DEPT OF PUBIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI BANGALORE SOUTH-562106. 18 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT OF HAVERI HAVERI-581110. 19 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION(ADM) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI HAVERI-581110. 54 20 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT SIRSI SIRSI UTTAR KANNADA-581401. 21 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION(ADM) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI SIRSI-581 401. 22 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT-RAICHUR RAICHUR-584 101. 23 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADM) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI RAICHUR-584 101. 24 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT-BAGALAKOTE BAGALAKOTE-587 101. 25 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADM) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI BAGALAKOTE-587 101. 26 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADM) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCITON OFFICE OF DDPI VIJAYAPURA-586 101. 27 . AKSHATA CHOUGALA W/O BHARAMU P TEERTH55AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/A1POST, PARAMANDAWADI TALUK RAIBAG DISTRICT BELAGAVI-591 311. 28 . PRIYANKA W/O MANJESH AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/AT B.R. KAVAL VILLAGE HANAGODU POST AND HOBLI HUNSURU, MYSORE-571105. 29 . JYOTHI A W/O MAHESH P AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/A NO.4718, NEELAKANTA NAGAR NANJANGUD, MYSURU-571301. 30 . RANI H N W/O NANJESHA AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/A NO.307, HUYILALU VILLAGE NAGAWALA POST, ILVALA HOBLI MYSORE-571130. 31 . JYOTHI CHANDRASHEKAR KARIKAL W/O VISHWANATH AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT SEDAM ROAD RTO OFFICE, SAI NAGAR KALBURGI58510. 32 . CHAITHRA V Y W/O RAGHU K S AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT VADDARAHALLI VILLAGE BEDAVADI POST CHIKKAMANGALURU TALUK CHIKKAMANGALURU57714. 56 33 . GURULAKSHMI N., W/O THIMMAPPARAJU AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT SADARAHALLI VILLAGE AKKUR POST CHANNAPATANA RAMANAGARA – 562 138. 34 . SUNEETHA R W/O JAGADEESHA AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT DODDA YERAMGERE VILLAGE BIJJAHALLI POST KODIHALLI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK – 562 117. 35 . KALPANA BEERAPPA NAIK W/O MAHESH G NAIK AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT VANNALLI POST KUMTA UTTARA KANNADA – 581 343. 36 . GAYATHRI NAIK W/O SHIVARAJ SHANTAPPA NAIK AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT ARAMANEKOPPA POST KODKANI KUMTA UTTARA KANNADA – 581 440. 37 . NISHA W/O SATHISH AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT5155 THAREMAR HOUSE DKOLAVOOR MURHTUR VILALGE KOLAVAR POST MANGALORE NORTH DAKSHINA KANNADA – 574 144. 38 . SAVITHA HOSATTI W/O MAHESH MALI AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT POAIGALI ATHANI57CHIKKODI – 591 248. 39 . PRATHIBA BEERAPPA YANKANCHI W/O MURASIDDA GAVADE AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT POST SHIVANUR ATHANI CHIKKODI-591 232. 40 . RAMYARANI W/O PRABHAKAR RAJU POOJARY AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT1218, SAPTHAGIRI BELAVE POST AND VILLAGE UDUPI-576 212. 41 . NANDA B GOUDAR W/O MANJUNATH N GHATI AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT HOUSE NO.2408 SIMHASAN PLOT GAJENDRAGAD GAJENDRAGAD GADAG-583 114. 42 . SHEEBA ANJUM W/O MOHAMED ETHESHAM ULLA AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/AT NO.778/222 BEHIND POLICE SATION BUR ROAD, BANGARPET BANGARPET KOLAR-563 114. 43 . ASHA S W/O VINAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT19 REDDI LINGAYATH ONI DOOPADAHALLI POST KOTTUR, VAJAYANAGAR KARNATAKA - 583134. 44 . PRAMILA T W/O GOPALA R AGED ABOUT37YEARS58R/AT NO.97 SWAMIVIVEKANANDA BADAVANE BAHADURPURA, ANEKAL BENGALURU-562106. 45 . PATIMA BABAKKANAVAR W/O ABDULKHADARJILANI AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT2579SAVALABAVIONI MULGUND RURAL MULGUND GADAG – 582 117. 46 . SHRUTI W/O VEERAREDDY AGED ABOUT27YEARS RESIDING AT H.NO.92 POST CHINTAKUNTA YADGIR DISTRICT YADAGIRI – 585 214. 47 . LEELA HIREMATH W/O SANTOSH KUMAR AGED ABOUT31YEARS RESIDING AT PLOT NO.2 H.NO.10-934/21/2A/2 OPP. VIVEKANAND COLLEGE NEAR FIRE STATION MAHALAXMI LAYOUT KABURAGI – 585 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, AAG a/w SMT. MAMTHA SHETTY, AGA FOR R1, R2, R4 TO R26; SRI. K. ANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. K.N.PHANINDRA, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SMT. LATHA S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-34.) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE SINGLE JUDGE IN WRIT PETITION NO.23752 OF2022AND BE PLEASED TO SET59ASIDE THE
ORDERDATED3001.2023 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SINGLE JUDGE IN WRIT PETITION NO.23752 OF2022BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE APPEAL ON MERITS. IN WA NO.337 OF2023BETWEEN:
1. . GANESHA PRASAD K., S/O LATE DEVADASA NAYAK AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/AT KODI HOUSE KUDI-82, KODIBETTU UDUPI - 576113. 2 . HALAPPA MANTUR S/O YALLAPPA AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/A POST JAGANUR TQ-CHIKKODI DISTRICT-BELAGAVI-591305. 3 . PAWAN KUMAR N G S/O GANGADHARA N B AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/A NO.9, SANGAMA NILAYA GOWTHAMA BUDHA ROAD OPP.CANARA BANK CHOWKAHALLY KRISHNARAJANAGR MYSORE-571602. 4 . RAMYA.B.S. W/O SANTOSH NAYAK AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT NO.75 NEAR POST OFFICE AT AND POST VASAR KUDRIGE TQ ANKOLA UTTAA KANNADA DISTRICT-581 357. 60 5 . MALATHI S/O GOPALA MOOLYA AGED ABOUT39YEARS R/AT NO.3-103 KOKALA HOUSE MANCHI, BANTWAL DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-574 323. 6 . ASHWITHA.S W/O ABHIJITH KUMAR AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT NO.2-306 (1) SHREE DEVIKRIPA VARAKABE KUVETTU BELTHANGADY TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-574 224. 7 . MAHESHWARI H.M. D/O MAHADEVAPPA M AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT AJANTHA PARADISE D-10, 3RD CROSS CHOWDESHWARI LAYOUT MARATHAHALLI BENGALURU-560 037. 8 . MADHUSHREE M W/O VASANTHA KUMAR AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT NO.11-156 SHIVA SADANA PALLADKA KOILA VILLAGE, K.C.FARM POST KADABA TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA -574 241. 9 . SHOBHA H.S. W/O RAVI M.B AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/AT NO.66/113 6TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN JNANJYOTHI NAGARA61NEAR SVK KALYANA MANTAPA MALLATHAHALLI BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU-560 056. 10 . CHETHANA N D/O NAGESHAPPA N.S. AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT HIREHARAKA VILLAGE GOWTHAMAPURA POST SAGARA, SHIVAMOGGA-577 412. 11 . SOWMYA D/O L. JAGANNATH SHETTY AGED ABOUT32YEARS GURUKRUPA HOUSE KAROLGUDDE, JODUKATTE MIJAR POST AND VILLAGE DAKSHINA KANNADA-574107. 12 . SWAPNA MAHADEV NAIK W/O VIKESH VINOBA NAIK AGED ABOUT28YEARS NEAR SHANKAR NARAYAN TEMPLE LAXMESHWAR ANKOLA-581 314. 13 . ASHWINI MAHADEV NAIK D/O MAHADEV NAIK AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/AT SHEDIKULI POST BABRUWADA TALUK ANKOLA UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT-581 314. 14 . HARINAKSHI D/O NARAYANA W/O B.RAJESH AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/AT NATTIBAIL HOUSE UPPINANGADY PUTTUR TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-574 241. 62 15 . JYOTI UMESH NAIK D/O UMESH NAIK AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/AT MARKANDESHWAR BAILUR BHATKAL UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT -581350. 16 . MAMATHA KUMARI D/O THIMMAPPA POOJARY V AGED ABOUT44YEARS R/AT No.2-157,/2, “SAMYAK” 6TH CROSS, JAYANTHI NAGAR KUKKUNDOOR KARKALA UDUPI -574104. 17 . VINOD RAMESH NAYAK S/O RAMESH P NAYAK AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/AT KANAGIL PO HINCHAKAD TQ ANKOLA DIST UTTARA KANNADA -581353. 18 . REENA GOPALKRISHNA NAYAK D/O GOPALAKRISHNA NAYAK W/O VENKATESH HAMMANNA NAYAK AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT No.42, NEAR MARUTHI TEMPLE VTC BELEKERI, PO BELEKERI ANKOLA TALUK UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT-581321. 19 . SUDHARANI KARANI D/O DEVANANDA AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT H No.1-11-46/54 RANAPRATAP SINGH COLONY RAMPUR ROAD RAICHUR-584101. 20 . RESHMA KUMARI D/O SUNDARA BANGERA63AGED ABOUT37YEARS RESIDING AT NO1180 HALEGETU HOUSE NAVOOR BANTWAL DK DISTRICT – 574211. 21 . NOOR ARSHIYA S/O SIDDIQ PASHA AGED ABOUT37YEARS RESIDING AT KOLATHURU VILLAGE YELDURU POST SRINIVASAPURA TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 138. 22 . PADMAVATHI AGED ABOUT36YEARS D/O RAMA RESIDING AT C /O GANGA POOJARI MATHOSHREE KRISHNA NILAYA DODDAMANE HOUSE UPPUNDA BYNDOOR UDUPI – 576 232. 23 . SMITHA A W/O BHASKARA SHETTY D/O GOPALA SHETTY AGED ABOUT34YEARS RESIDING AT2162 ARPINI GUTHU HOUSE, KANYANA POST AND VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK D K DISTRICT – 574 279. 24 . RANI KAPATAKAR D/O SEETARAM KAPATAKAR W/O VINESH KRISHNA ALORE AGED ABOUT30YEARS RESIDING AT NO337 KOLHAR BASAVANA BAGEWADI VIJAYAPURA – 586 210. 64 25 . MAHADEVI D/O YAMANAPPA W/O YAMANURAPPA AGED ABOUT31YEARS RESIDING AT SINGANAHAL KARATAGI GANGAVATHI KOPPALA- 583 282. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. NAIK NITYANAND VENKATARAMAN, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY UNDER SECRETARY DEPT. OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION2D GATE, 6TH FLOOR M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001. 2 . DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ROOM NO.245, 2ND FLOOR VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560001. 3 . CENTRALIZED ADMISSION CELL SPECIAL OFFICER OPP. CAUVERY BHAVAN BENGALURU - 560002. 4 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT CHIKKODI CHIKKODI DISTRICT – 591201. 5 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADMN) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI65CHIKKODI – 591201. 6 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT OF MYSORE MYSORE DISTRICT – 570007. 7 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADMN) DEPT. OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI MYSORE - 570007. 8 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, KALABURAGI KALABURAGI DISTRICT - 585103. 9 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADMN) DEPT. OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI KALABURAGI - 585103. 10 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT DAKSHINA KANNADA DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT – 575 003. 11 . THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADMN) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICER OF DDPI DAKSHINA KANNADA – 575 003. 12 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT RAMANAGAR RAMANAGAR – 562 159. 66 13 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADMN) DEPT OB PUBLIC INSTUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI RAMANAGAR – 562 159. 14 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE NORTH – 560 026. 15 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADMN) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI BANGALORE NORTH – 560 026. 16 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BANGALORE SOUTH BANGALORE SOUTH – 562 106. 17 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTURCITON (ADMN) DEPT OF PUBLIC INTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI BANGALORE SOUTH – 562 106. 18 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT HAVERI HAVERI – 581 110. 19 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADMN) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI, HAVERI – 581 110. 20 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT67SIRSI, UTTARA KANNADA – 581 401. 21 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADMN) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI, SIRSI – 581401. 22 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT RAICHUR, RAICHUR58410. 23 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION(ADMN) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI RAICHUR – 584101. 24 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BAGALKOTE, BAGALKOTE - 587101. 25 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION(ADMN) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI BAGALAKOTE – 587101. 26 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION(ADMN) DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI VIJAYAPURA – 586 101. 27 . AKSHATHA CHOUGALA W/O BHARAMU P TEERTH AGED ABOUT29YEARS RESIDING AT1POST PARAMANANDAWADI TQ RAIBAG DIST BELAGAVI BELAGAVI – 591 311. 68 28 . PRIYANKA W/O MANJESH AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT B R KAVAL VILLAGE HANAGODU POST AND HOBLI HUNSUR, MYSORE57110. 29 . JYOTHI A W/O MAHESHA P AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/AT NO4718 NEELAKANTA NAGAR NANJANGUD. 30 . RANI H N W/O NANJESHA AGED ABOUT30YEARS, R/AT NO307 HUYILALU VILLAGE NAGAWALA POST, ILAVALA HOBLI MYSORE57113. 31 . JYOTI CHANDRASHEKHAR KARIKAL W/O VISHWANATH AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT SEDAM ROAD RTO OFFICE, SAI NAGAR KALABURGI - 585105. 32 . CHITRA V Y W/O RAGHU K S AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT VADDARAHALLI VILLAGE BELAVADI POST CHIKMAGALURU TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU – 577 146. 33 . GURULAKSHMI N W/O THIMMAPPARAJU AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/AT SADARAHALLI VILLAGE AKKUR POST, CHANNAPATNA RAMANAGARA – 562 138. 69 34 . SUNEETHA R W/O JAGADEESHA AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/AT DODDA YERAMGERE VILLAGE BIJJAHALLI POST KODIHALLI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK. 35 . KALPANA BEERAPPA NAIK W/O MAHESH G NAIK AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT VANNALLI POST, KUMTA UTTARA KANNADA58134. 36 . GAYATRI NAIK W/O SHIVARAJ SHANTAPPA NAIK AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT ARAMANEKOPPA POST KODKANI, KUMTA UTTARA KANNADA – 581 440. 37 . NISHA W/O SATHISH, AGED ABOUT32YEARS, R/AT5155, THAREMAR HOUSE, KOLAVOOR, MUTHURU VILLAGE, KOLAVOOR POST, MANGALORE NORTH, DAKSHINA KANNADA – 574 144. 38 . SAVITA HOSATTI W/O MAHESH MALI, AGED ABOUT33YEARS, R/AT POAIGALI, ATHANI, CHIKKODI - 591248. 39 . PRATIBHA BEERAPPA YANKANCHI W/O MURASIDDA GAVADE, AGED ABOUT30YEARS, R/AT POST SHIVANUR, ATHANI, CHIKKODI -591232. 70 40 . RAMYARANI W/O PRABHAKAR RAJU POOJARY AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/A1218, SAPTHAGIRI BELVE POST AND VILLAGE UDUPI-576212. 41 . NANDA B GOUDAR W/O MANJUNATH N GHATTI AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A HOUSE NO.2408 SIMHASAN PLOT GAJENDRAGAD GAJENDRAGAD GADAG-582114. 42 . SHEEBA ANJUM W/O MOHAMED ETHESHAM ULLA AGED ABOUT34YEARS R/A7782 BEHIND POLICE STATION BUR ROAD, BANGARPET KOLARA-563 114. 43 . ASHA S W/O VINAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A19, REDDY LINGAYATH ONI DOOPADAHALI OPST KOTTURU, VIJAYANAGAR KARNATAKA-583 134. 44 . PRAMILA T W/O GOPALA R AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/A NO.97, SWAMIVIVEKANANDA BADAVANE BAHADURPURA, ANEKAL BENGALURU-562106. 45 . PATIMA BABAKKANAVAR W/O ABDULKHADARJILANI AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/A NO.2579 71 SAVALABAVIONI MULGUND RURAL, MULGUND GADAG-582117. 46 . SHRUTI W/O VEERAREDY AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/A H.NO.92, POST CHINTAKUNTA YADGIR DISTRICT YADAGIRI-585 214. 47 . LEELA HIREMATH W/O SANTHOSH KUMAR AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A PLOT NO.2, H.NO.10-934/21/2A/2 OPP.VIVEKANANDA COLLEGE NEAR FIRE STATION MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT KALABURAGI-585 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, AAG a/w SMT. MAMTHA SHETTY, AGA FOR R1, R2, R4 TO R26; SRI. K. ANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. K.N.PHANINDRA, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SMT. LATHA S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-34.) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDERDATED3001.2023 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SINGLE JUDGE IN WRIT PETITION NO.23752 OF2022BY ISSUING FURTHER NECESSARY DIRECTION,
ORDERAS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. 72 IN WA NO.482 OF2023BETWEEN :
1. . MAMTHA M.M. W/O GIREESHA M.S., AGED ABOUT36YEARS No.G636, 1ST MAIN , 10TH CROSS HAL CENTRAL TOWNSHIP BEHIND HAL POLICE STATION MARATHAHALLI POST MARATHAHALLI, BENGALURU – 560 037. 2 . SANNA KARIYAMMA SANNAKARIYAMMA W/O N T PALAKSHAIAH AGED ABOUT35YEARS R/AT THOGARIGUNTE CHELUR (HOBLI) ANKASANDRA (POST), GUBBI TUMAKURU - 572 117. 3 . SUNITA D/O DASHARATH AGED ABOUT31YEARS RESIDING AT H No.11784 BASAVNAGAR MSK MILL ROAD KALABURAGI – 585 103. 4 . AMRUTAMMA D/O KISHTAYYA, AGED ABOUT31YEARS, NO122, KADTAL KADCHERLA SEDAM, KALABURAGI – 585 318. 5 . ANUSUJA D/O RAMLAPPA AGED ABOUT36YEARS H NO211 AT POST KADCHARLA SEDAM TQ KALABURAGI – 585 318. 73 6 . BHAGYASHRI GURALINGAPPA TELI W/O GURAPPA GOTAGUNAKI AGED ABOUT29YEARS AT SHAKYAPUR (SY) POST SADKOL TQ JEWARAGI KALABURAGI – 585 325. 7 . DEEPA W/O SUDHAKAR AGED ABOUT35YEARS H NO193 AT NANDUR K POST HIRENANDUR KALABURAGI NORTH KALABURAGI – 585 228. 8 . KALPANA W/O MANJUNATH REDDY AGED ABOUT39YEARS AT POST H NO1567 BHAGIRTHI NILAYA BASAVESHWARA NAGAR JEWARGI TQ KALABURAGI – 585 310. 9 . KAVITA W/O MALAPPA AGED ABOUT26YEARS E/178 TQ DIST KALABURAGI – 585 308. 10 . SUREKHA D/O BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT29YEARS H NO81565/7 TAJ NAGAR ROAD CHANNAVEER NAGAR KALABURAGI – 585 104. 74 11 . HANUMAVVA SHIVANAGOUDA PATEL D/O SHIVANAGOUDA PATIL AGED ABOUT31YEARS GOPASHANI POST HERUR HUNAGUND BAGALAKOTE – 587 154. 12 . BASAVRAJ MORDI S/O RAVASAB AGED ABOUT29YEARS AP SHIRGUR TQ RAIBAG DISTRICT BELAGAVI59131. 13 . JAYASHREE A HATTI W/O PRASHANT D KANDRATTI AGED ABOUT31YEARS NO1882C, PLOT NO24BASAV NAGAR GOKAK BELAGAVI - 591307. 14 . RAVIKUMAR KOPPAL S/O SHIVARUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT35YEARS SANKESHWAR JAYANAGAR JSECOND CLASS NEAR NESARI GARDEN HUKKERI TALUK BELAGAVI-591313. 15 . USHA S K W/O GIRISH AGED ABOUT35YEARS KAGGALA VILLAGE, HADYA POST CHUNCHANAKATTE HOBLI K R NAGARA TALUK MYSURU-571617. 16 . SAMEENA BANO W/O ROSHAN ZAMIR DHALAYATH AGED ABOUT44YEARS C/O ROSHAN ZAMIR I DHALAYATH75PLOT NO.12 KGN GALLI NEW GANDHI NAGAR BELAGAVI-590016. 17 . ROOPA R W/O CHANNAKESHAVA M AGED ABOUT39YEARS07KONAGHATTA KASABA HOBALI DODDABALLAPURA BENGAGULRU RURA-561203. 18 . MILJA N J W/O AJEESH NJ AGED ABOUT35YEAR NELLIVILA HOUSE NOOJIBALTHILA VILLAGE RENJILADY POST KADABA TALUK, PUTTUR DAKSHINA KANNADA-574 221. 19 . PAVITHRA H S W/O GANESH KUMAR K AGED ABOUT32YEARS4232 KODIMBALA HOUSE KODIMBALA VILLAGE AND POST PUTTUR DAKSHINA KANNADA-574 221. 20 . SARASVATI CHANDRAGOUDA PATIL W/O SHIDDHALINGESH AGED ABOUT30YEARS NUMBER11SOTAKANAL, NAVALGUND DHARWAD-582 208. 21 . KAMARUNABI MABUSAB NAGARAHALLI D/O MABUSASB NAGARAHALLI AGED ABOUT25YEARS A B NAAR NEAR BUS STAND ROAD MUNDARAGI DT GADA GADAG-582 118. 76 22 . TABASUM VADDATTI D/O ABDULVAHAB AGED ABOUT33YEARS TABASUM VADDATTI GARADIMANI ONI MUNDARAGI GAGDA-582 118. 23 . NAYANA M D/O MANJUNATH C.S., AGED ABOUT28YEARS NO2301 BEHIND KUMAR NURSIN HOME MYSORE ROAD, CHANNARAYAPATNA HASSAN-573 116. 24 . PAVITRA D/O SIDDAPPA SANGATI AGED ABOUT32YEARS AT YALAMAERI POST IRAKALGADA KOPPAL-583 237. 25 . PRATIBHA D/O SIDDAPPA SANGATI AGED ABOUT27YEARS AT YALAMAGERI POST IRAKALADA, KOPPAL-583 237. 26 . SUMITRA S/O NAGESH BINGI AGED ABOUT37YEARS C/O GYANAPPA MAJJIGI NEAR ANJINEYA TEMPLE WARD No.2, ALLANAGAR KOPPAL-583 228. 27 . PAVITRA S NAIK D/O SUBHAS NAIK AGED ABOUT32YEARS AT KENI POST KENI, TALUK ANKOLA ANKOLA, UTTARAKANNADA KARNATAKA-581 314. 77 28 . NAGALAKSHMI D., W/O UDAYA ACHARYA AGED ABOUT36YEARS CHANDRESHWARA NILAYA VARANGA POST AND VILLAGE HEBRI, KARKALA UDUPI-574108. 29 . SANJAY S/O MANJESH H B AGED ABOUT33YEARS NO.724, SHIVAJYOTHI NAGARA HUNSUR TOWN, HUNSUR MYSORE-571 105. APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MITHUN G A., ADVOCATE ) AND:
1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY UNDER SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION2D GATE, 6TH FLOOR M.S. BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001. 2 . THE DEPARTMENT OF PERSONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS REP BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ROOM No.245 2ND FLOOR, VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001. 3 . CENTRALISED ADMISSION CELL SPECIAL OFFICER OPP CAUVERY BHAVAN BANGALORE - 560 002. 4 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES78WELFARE DEPARTMENT BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU SOUTH – 562 106. 5 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI BENGALURU SOUTH – 562 106. 6 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT KALABURGI KALBURGI DISTRICT – 585 103. 7 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS ADM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI KALBURGI – 585 103. 8 . THE DISTRICT OFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BAGALAKOTE BAGALAKOTE – 587 101. 9 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI BAGALAKOTE – 587 101. 10 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT CHIKKODI CHIKKODI DISTRICT – 591 232. 11 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM)., 79 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI CHIKKODI – 591 232. 12 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT DAKSHINA KANNADA DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT – 575 003. 13 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT – 575 003. 14 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT MYSURU -570 007. 15 . DEPUTY DIRCTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI MYSURU – 570 007. 16 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT RAMANAGAR – 562159. 17 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI RAMANAGAR – 562159. 80 18 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BENGALURU NORTH – 560026. 19 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI BENGALURU NORTH – 560 026. 20 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT HAVERI - 581 110. 21 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI HAVERI581110. 22 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT SIRSI, UTTAR KANNADA - 581 401. 23 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI, SIRSI581401. 24 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSESS WELFARE DEPARTMENT RAICHUR - 584 101. 25 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS DEPARMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS RAICHUR - 584 101. 81 26 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI VIJAYAPURA - 586 101. 27 . AKSHATHA CHOUGALA W/O BHARAMU P TEERTH AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT PARAMANANDWADI POST RAIBAG TALUK , BELAGAVI591311. 28 . PRIYANKA W/O MANJESH AGED ABOUT27YEARS R.AT B R KAVAL VILLAGE HANAGODU POST AND HOBLI HUNSUR , MYSURU - 571 105. 29 . JYOTHI A W/O MAHESHA P AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/AT4718 NEELAKANTA NAGAR NANJANGUD MYSURU - 571 301. 30 . RANI H N W/O NANJESHA AGED ABOUT29YEARS, R/AT No.307, NAGAWALA POST ILVALA HOBLI , MYSURU571130. 31 . JYOTHI CHANDRASHEKHAR KARIKAL W/O VISHWANATH AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT SEDAM ROAD RTO OFFICE SAI NAGAR KALABURGI - 585 105. 32 . CHAITRA V Y W/O RAGHU K.S82AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT VADDARAHALLI VILLAGE BELAVADI POST CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 146. 33 . GURULAKSHMI N W/O THIMMAPPA RAJU AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT SADARAHALLI VILLAGE AKKUR POST CHANNAPATNA RAMANAGARA - 562 138. 34 . SUNEETHA R., W/O JAGADEESHA AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT DODDA YERAMAGERE VILLAGE BIJJAHALLI POST KODIHALLI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK. 35 . KALPANA BEERAPPA NAIK W/O MAHESHA G NAIK AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT VANNALLI POST KUMTA, UTTARA KANNADA - 581 343. 36 . GAYATHRI NAIK W/O SHIVARAJA SHANTAPPA NAIK AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/ATT ARAMANEKOPPA POST KODKANI KUMTA UTTARA KANNADA - 581 440. 37 . NISHA W/O SATHISH AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT5155, THAREMAR HOUSE DKOLAVOOR MURTHUR VILLAGE KOLAVAR POST, MANALORE NORTH DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 144. 83 38 . SAVITHA HOSATTI W/O MAHESH MALL AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT PAIGALI, ATHANI CHIKKODI - 591 248. 39 . PRATHIBA BEERAPPA YANCHANCHI W/O MURASIDDA GAVADE AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT SHIVANUR POST, ATHANI CHIKKODI591232. 40 . RAMYARANI W/O PRABHAKAR RAJU POOJARY AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT1218, SAPTHAGIRI BELAVE POST AND VILLAGE UDUPI – 576 212. 41 . NANDA B GOUDAR W/O MANJUNATH N GHATTI AGED AOUT31YEARS R/AT2408 SIMHASAN PLOT GAJENDRAGAD GADAG - 582 114. 42 . SHEEBA ANJUM W/O MOHAMMED ETHESHAM ULLA AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/AT778222, BEHIND POLICE STATION BAR ROAD, BANGARPET KOLAR – 563 114. 43 . ASHA S W/O VINAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT NO19REDDI LINGAYATH ONI DOOPADAHALLI POST KOTTUR, VIJAYANAGAR KARNATAKA – 583 134. 84 44 . PRAMILA T W/O GOPALA R., AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/AT NO97SWAMIVIVEKANANDA BADAVANE BAHADURPURA, ANEKAL BENGALURU – 562 106. 45 . PATIMA BABAKKANAVAR W/O ABDUL KHADAR JILANI AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT2579 SAVALA BAVIONI MULGUND RURAL GADAG – 582 117. 46 . SHRUTHI W/O VEERAREDDY AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/AT NO92, CHINTAKUNTA POST YADGIRI – 585 214. 47 . LEELA HIREMATH W/O SANTOSH KUMAR AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT PLOT NO2 NO10934/21/2AA/2 OPP VIVEKANAND COLLEGE NEAR FIRE STATION MAHALAXMI, LAYOUT KALABURGI585-101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, AAG a/w SMT. MAMTHA SHETTY, AGA FOR R1, R2, R4 TO R26; SRI. K. ANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. K.N.PHANINDRA, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SMT. LATHA S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR27TO47 THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO a) TO QUASH THE
ORDEROF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED3001.2023 85 PASSED IN WP237522022 AND DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS Nos. 1, 2 AND3PROCEED WITH THE PROVISIONAL LIST DATED1811.2022 (ANNEXURE A TO A18 IN W. P. No.23752/2022) IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW STRICTLY AS PER THE CIRCULARS EXISTING AS ON DATE OF CALLING OF THE RECRUITMENT AND ETC. IN WA NO.591 OF2023BETWEEN :
1. . G K CHANDRA SHEKAR S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT44YEARS R/A WARD NO.28 YELE PETE CHIKKABALLAPUR CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT- 562 101. 2 . SHOBHA N. W/O UMESH N AGED ABOUT35YEARS R/A AKSHAYA NADTHIKAL MOODUKODI VILLAGE MOODUKODI POST BELTHANGADY TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA- 574242. 86 3 . SUNEETHA W/O LAKSHMANA AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A SHASHI KRIPA HOUSE ARASAKATTE VILLAGE BELTHANGADY TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA- 574 109. 4 . SUMITHRA W/O K.S. NAVEEN KUMAR AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/A AKSHYA BADAVANE INDIRANAGAR, KOPPA CHIKKAMANGALURU- 577 126. 5 . ANNAPOORNESHWARI K.H., W/O HEMANTH J KAMATH AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/A NO.2-10-780/3 BEJAI NEW ROAD5H CROSS, BEJAI, MANGALURU DAKSHINA KANNADA - 575 004. 6 . SHEERINA BAHU W/O JAHANGIR PASHA AGED ABOUT34YEARS R/A RICE MILL ROAD ALDUR, CHIKKAMANGALURU CHIKKAMANGALURU DISTRICT -577111. 7 . ANANT M DEVADIGA S/O MANJAYYA R DEVADIGA AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/A MATADAKERI VILLAGE HALDIPURA POST HONNAVAR TALUK UTTARA KANNADA – 581327. 8 . SNEHAL NARAYAN PATIL D/O NARAYAN PATIL AGED ABOUT27YEARS87R/A LAXMI GALLI IDALHAND POST KHANAPUR TALUK BELAGAVI- 591302. 9 . SMT. RATNA SHETTY W/O SANTOSHA GANIGA AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/A NO.1-51, GURUNAGAR SHIROOR, BYNDOOR UDUPI- 576 228. 10 . SHWETHA BIRADAR W/O SANGAPPA RADDER AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/A WARD NO.2 RADDER STREET AMARAWATI, HUNGUND BAGALKOT- 587118. 11 . NASAREN BHAN ALLAPUR D/O NAJEER AHAMAD ALLAPUR AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/A NEAR WATER TANK CHIKKALINGADAHALLI HAVERI HAVERI DISTRICT – 581110. 12 . HEENAJ NADAF D/O IQBAL AHAMAD AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A No.704/B, NADAF GALLI ITAGI, KHANAPUR TALUK BELAGAVI- 591 112. 13 . MUTTAPPA GUTTAL S/O BASAPPA AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/A HALERITTI VILLAGE HOSARITTI TALUK, HAVERI TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT - 581 213. 88 14 . SMT. DEEPA SURESH DOLLI W/O JYOTHIRAJ YALLAPPA TAYAPPAGOL AGED ABOUT26YEARS R/A NO.O285, TANAJI GALLI MAJAGAVI, BELAGAVI- 590 008. 15 . KUBRA JABEEN A.R. W/O ATIQUR RAHAMAN SHERIFF AGED ABOUT46YEARS R/A SHABBIR LAYOUT BEHIND VANI SCHOOL TANK BUND ROAD CHINTAMANI CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 563 125. 16 . IDUDDI SUBHAS S/O IDUDDI TAMMANA AGED ABOUT39YEARS R/A RAJAPUR VILLAGE ARAHAVI HOBLI MUDALAGI POST BALAGAVI DISTRICT - 591 224. APPELLANTS (BY SRI. B. RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY UNDER SECRETARY DEPT. OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION2D GATE, 6TH FLOOR M.S.BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU- 560 001. 2 . DEPARTMENT OF PERSONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REPORMS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ROOM NO.245, 2ND FLOOR VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU- 560001. 89 3 . DENTRALISED ADMISSION CELL SPECIAL OFFICER OPP. CAUVERY BHAVAN BENGALURU- 560 002. 4 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPT. CHIKKODI – 591 232. 5 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI CHIKKODI – 591 232. 6 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT MYSORE- 570 007. 7 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, OFFICE OF DDPI MYSURU- 570 007. 8 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT KALABURAGI- 585 103. 9 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI KALABURAGI – 585 103. 10 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT DAKSHINA KANNADA – 575 003. 11 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI DAKSHINA KANNADA – 575 003. 90 12 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT RAMANAGAR -562159. 13 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI RAMANAGARA – 562159. 14 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BENGALURU NORTH - 560026. 15 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI BENGALURU NORTH – 575003. 16 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BENGALURU SOUTH – 562106. 17 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI, BENGALURU SOUTH – 562106. 18 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION HAVERI- 581110. 19 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI HAVERI – 581 110. 20 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT SIRSI, UTTAR KANNADA- 581401. 91 21 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI, SIRSI – 581401. 22 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT RAICHUR - 584101. 23 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RAICHUR – 584101. 24 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BAGALKOTE PIN – 587101. 25 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI BAGALKOTE PIN – 587 101. 26 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE OF DDPI VIJAYAPURA PIN – 586101. 27 . AKSHATA CHOUGALA W/O BHARAMU P TEERTH AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/A PARAMANANDAWADI POST RAIBAG TALUK BELAGAVI - 591 311. 28 . PRIYANKA W/O MANJESH92AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/A B R KAVAL VILLAGE HANAGODU POST AND HOBLI HUNSUR, MYSURU- 571105. 29 . JYOTHI A W/O MAHESHA P AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/A No.4718, NEELAKANTA NAGAR NANJANGUD MYSURU- 571301. 30 . RANI H.N W/O NANJESHA AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/A No.307, NAGAWALA POST ILVALA HOBLI MYSURU- 571 130. 31 . JYOTHI CHANDRASHEKAR KARIKAL W/O VISHWANATH AGED ABOUT290YEARS R/A SEDAM ROAD RTO OFFICE SAI NAGAR KALABURAGI – 585 105. 32 . CHAITRA V Y W/O RAGHU K.S., AGED ABOUT28YEARS DR/A VADDARAHALLI VILLAGE BELAVADI POST CHIKKAMAGALURU – 577 146. 33 . GURULLAKSHMI N W/O THIMMAPPA RAJU AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A SADARAHALLI VILLAGE AKKUR POST, CHANNAPATNA RAMANGARA – 562138. 93 34 . SUNEETHA R W/O JAGADEESHA AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A DODDA YERAMGERE VILLAGE BIJJAHALLI POST KODIHALLI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT -562117. 35 . KALPANA BEERAPPA NAIK W/O MAHESH G NAIK AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/A VANNALLI POST, KUMTA UTTARA KANNADA - 581343. 36 . GAYATHRI NAIK W/O SHIVARAJ SHANTAPPA NAIK AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A ARAMANEKOPPA POST KODKANI, KUMTA UTTARA KANNADA – 581440. 37 . NISHA W/O SATHISH AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/A NO.5-155, THAREMAR HOUSE DKOLAVOOR, MURTHUR VILLAGE KOLAVAR POST, MANGALORE NORTH DAKSHINA KANNADA – 574144. 38 . SAVITHA HOSATTI W/O MAHESH MALI AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/A POAIGALI, ATHANI CHIKKODI- 591248. 39 . PRATHIBA BEERAPPA YANKANCHI W/O MURASIDDA GAVADE AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/A SHIVANUR POST, ATHANI CHIKKODI – 591 232. 94 40 . RAMYARANI W/O PRABHAKAR RAJU POOJARY AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/A1218, SAPTHAGIRI BELAVE POST AND VILLAGE UDUPI- 576 212. 41 . NANDA B GOUDAR W/O MANJUNATH N GHATTI AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/A No.2408, SIMHANSAN PLOT GAJENDRAGAD, GADAG- 582114. 42 . SHEEBA ANJUM W/O MOHAMMED ETHESHAM ULLA AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/A No.778/222 BEHIND POLICE STATION BUR ROAD, BANGARPET KOLAR- 563.114. 43 . SMT. ASHA S W/O VINAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/A No.1/9 REDDI LINGAYATH ONI DOOPADAHALLI POST KOTTUR, VIJAYANAGAR - 583134. 44 . PRAMILA T W/O GOPALA R., AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/A No.97 SWAMIVIVEKANANDA BADAVANE, BAHADURPURA ANEKAL, BENGALURU – 562106. 45 . PATIMA BABAKKANNAVAR W/O ABDUL KHADAR JILANI AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/A No.2579 SAVALA BAVIONI95MULGUND RURAL GADAG- 582 117. 46 . SMT. SHRUTHI W/O VEERAREDDY AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/A NO.92 CHINTAKUNTA POST YADGIRI – 585 214. 47 . SMT. LEELA HIREMATH W/O SANTOSH KUMAR AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/A PLOT NO.2 NO.10-934/21/2A/2 OPP. VIVEKANAND COLLEGE NEAR FIRE STATION MAHALAXMI LAYOUT KALABURAGI – 585 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, AAG a/w SMT. MAMTHA SHETTY, AGA FOR R1, R2, R4 TO R26; SRI. K. ANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3; THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO a)SET ASIDE THE
ORDERDATED3001/2023 PASSED IN WP NO.23752/2022 BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE BY DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO IMPLEMENT FROM THE STAGE OF PROVISIONAL LIST DATED1811/2022 (ANNEXURES-A TO A18 IN WP NO.23752/2022) IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW STRICTLY AS PER THE NOTIFICATION. 96 IN WA NO.886 OF2023BETWEEN :
1. . ARCHANA NAIK W/O UDAY NAIK, AGED ABOUT32YEARS MUGWA VILLAGE AND POST SURAKATTE HONNAVAR TALUK UTTARAKANNADA-581 334. 2 . AMMRIN MADIHALLI D/O MADARSAB AGED ABOUT36YEARS PACHHAPUR POST SUNAGAR GALLI, HUKKERI BELAGAVI – 591122. 3 . KANTAMMA WATHAR W/O SHANTAGOUDAPATIL AGED ABOUT34YEARS B SALAWADAGI POST TALIKOTI VIJAYAPURA – 586 214. 4 . HANAMANT JAGADEV S/O MAHADEVJAGADEV AGED ABOUT35YEARS A/P- SATTI, ATHANI TALUK BELAGAVI – 591 240. 5 . DEEPIKA M W/O PRADEEP M N, AGED ABOUT31YEARS NO32 VEERABHADRESHWARA NILAYA HOUSING BOARD ALUR, HASSAN -573213. 6 . JHANAVI K S97W/O BASAPPA SHETTY K R AGED ABOUT30YEARS, KURUVANGI VILLAGE AND POST CHIKKAMAGALURU – 577102. 7 . RAJAPPA S S/O SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT28YEARS KEBBERPURA VILLAGE HUNDIPURA POST GUNDLUPET TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR – 571 111. 8 . SUDHARANI D/O CHANDRAPPA, H No.2/96/1 BEHIND DEVAMMA TEMPLE DUGANOOR POST SEDAM TALUK KALABURAGI- 585 318. 9 . RENUKA W/O BHEEMARAYA, AGED ABOUT32YEARS, H.No.2/9, AT KOTAGERA POST KOTAGERA, YADAGIRI- 585 214. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. P.S. RAJAGOPLA, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SRI. MITHUN G.A. ADVOCATE) AND:
1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY UNDER SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION2D GATE, 6TH FLOOR M.S. BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI98BANGALORE560001. 2 . THE DEPARTMENT OF PERSONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS REP. BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ROOM No.245 2ND FLOOR VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001. 3 . CENTRALISED ADMISSION CELL REP. BY SPECIAL OFFICER OPP CAUVERY BHAVAN BANGALORE - 560 002. 4 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT C HIKKODI CHIKKODI DISTRICT-591232. 5 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI CHIKKODI591232. 6 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, MYSURU MYSURU DISTRICT - 570 007. 7 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI MYSURU - 570 007. 8 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT KALABURGI99KALABURGI DISTRICT-585 103. 9 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS(ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI, KALABURGI-585 103. 10 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT DAKSHINA KANNADA DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 575 003. 11 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI DAKSHINA KANNAD- 575 003. 12 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT RAMANAGARA RAMANAGARA- 562 159. 13 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI RAMANAGARA- 575 003. 14 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE NORTH-560 026. 15 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS100OFFICE OF DDPI BANGALORE NORTH- 570 026. 16 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BANGALORE SOUTH BANGALORE SOUTH -562 159. 17 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI BENGALURU SOUTH- 562 106. 18 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT OF HAVERI HAVERI- 561 110. 19 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI HAVERI -581 110. 20 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT SIRSI SIRSI, UTTAR KANNADA- 581 401. 21 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI SIRSI - 581 401. 22 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT RAICHUR RAICHUR- 584 101. 101 23 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI RAICHUR- 584 101. 24 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT BAGALAKOTE BAGALAKOTE- 587 101. 25 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI BAGALAKOTE- 587 101. 26 . DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF DDPI VIJAYAPURA- 586 101. 27 . AKSHATA CHOUGALA W/O BHARAMU P. TEERTH AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT PARAMANANDAWADI POST RAIBAG TALUK BELAGAVI- 591 311. 28 . PRIYANKA W/O MANJESH, AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/AT B.R. KAVAL VILLAGE HANAGODU POST AND HOBLI HUNSUR, MYSURU - 571 105. 29 . JYOTHI A. W/O MAHESHA P. AGED ABOUT36YEARS102R/AT NO.4718 NEELAKANTA NAGAR NANJANGUD, MYSURU -571 301. 30 . RANI H.N. W/O NANJESHA AGE ABOUT29YEARS R/AT NO.307, NAGAWALA POST ILVALA HOBLI MYSURU -571 130. 31 . JYOTHI CHANDRASHEKHAR KARIKAL W/O VISHWANATH AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT SEDAM ROAD RTO OFFICE SAI NAGAR KALABURAGI - 585 105. 32 . CHAITRA V.Y. W/O RAGHU K.S. AGED ABOUT28YEARS R/AT VADDARAHALLI VILLAGE BELAVADI POST CHIKKAMAGALURU- 577 146. 33 . GURULAKSHMI N. W/O THIMMAPPA RAJU AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT SADARAHALLI VILLAGE AKKUR POST, CHANNAPATNA RAMANAGARA- 562 138. 34 . SUNEETHA R. W/O JAGADEESHA AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT DODDA YERAMGERE VILLAGE BIJJAHALLI POST KODIHALLI HOBLI KANAKAPURRA TALUK. 103 35 . KALPANA BEERAPPA NAIK W/O MAHESH G NAIK AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT VANNALLI POST, KUMTA UTTARA KANNADA -581 343. 36 . GAYATHRI NAIK W/O SHIVARAJ SHANTAPPA NAIK AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT ARAMANEKOPPA POST KODKANI, KUMTA UTTARA KANNADA- 581 440. 37 . NISHA W/O SATHISH AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT NO.5-155 THAREMAR HOUSE DKOLAVOOR, MURTHUR VILLAGE KOLAVAR POST MANGALORE NORTH DAKSHINA KANNADA -574 144. 38 . SAVITHA HOSATTI W/O MAHESH MALL AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT POAIGALI, ATHANI CHIKKODI - 591 248. 39 . PRATHIBA BEERAPPA YANKANCHI W/O MURASIDDA GAVADE AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT SHIVANUR POST, ATHANI CHIKKODI- 591 232. 40 . RAMYARANI W/O PRABHAKAR RAJU POOJARY AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT1218, SAPTHAGIRI BELAVE POST AND VILLAGE UDUPI - 576 212. 104 41 . NANDA B GOUDAR W/O MANJUNATH N. GHATTI AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT No.2408, SIMHASAN PLOT GAJENDRAGAD GADAG - 582 114. 42 . SHEEBA ANJUM W/O MOHAMMED ETHESHAM ULLA AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/AT No.778/222 BEHIND POLICE STATION BAR ROAD, BANGARPET KOLAR- 563 114. 43 . ASHA S W/O VINAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT NO.19 REDDI LINGAYATH ONI DOOPADAHALLI POST KOTTUR, VIJAYANAGAR- 583 134 KARNATAKA. 44 . PRAMILA T W/O GOPALA R. AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/AT NO.97, SWAMIVIVEKANANDA BADAVANE, BAHADURPURA ANEKAL, BENGALURU - 562 106. 45 . PATIMA BABAKKANAVAR W/O ABDUL KHADAR JILANI AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT NO.2579 SAVALA BAVIONI MULGUND RURAL GADAG -582 117. 46 . SHRUTHI W/O VEERAREDDY AGED ABOUT27YEARS105R/AT NO.92 CHINTAKUNTA POST YADGIRI- 585 214. 47 . LEELA HIREMATH W/O SANTOSH KUMAR AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/AT PLOT NO.2 NO.10-934/21/2A/2 OPP. VIVEKANAND COLLEGE NEAR FIRE STATION, MAHALAXMI LAYOUT, KALABURGI - 585-101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, AAG a/w SMT. MAMTHA SHETTY, AGA FOR R1, R2, R4 TO R26; SRI. K. ANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. K.N.PHANINDRA, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SMT. LATHA S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR27TO47 THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDEROF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED3001.2023 PASSED IN WP.No.23752/2022 AND DISMISS THE WP AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT No-1, 2 AND3PROCEED WITH THE PROVISIONAL LIST DATED1811.2022 (ANNEXURE-A TO A18 IN WP.No.23752/2022) IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW STRICTLY AS PER THE CIRCULARS EXISTING AS ON DATE OF CALLING OF THE RECRUITMENT AND ETC. IN WA NO.939 OF2023BETWEEN :
1. . RASHMITHA KARKERA N., CARE OF PRADEEP KUMR P R106AGED ABOUT34YEARS RESIDENT OF PODUMBA HOUSE AJJAVARA SULIA DAKSHINA KANNADA -574 239. KARNATAKA2. NIVEDITA CHANDRAKANT NAIK D/O CHANDRAKANT NAIK AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/O NO165NEAR OM PRAKASH ICE FACTORY LAXMESHWAR ANKOLA ANKOLA -581314 KARNATAKA. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. HARISH M.G., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY DEPT OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION2D GATE, 6TH FLOOR MULTISTORIED BULDINGS DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE – 560 001. 2 . DEPARTMENT OF PERSONEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ROOM NO245 2ND FLOOR VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU – 560 001. 3 . CENTRALIZED ADMISION CELL SPECIAL OFFICER OPP CAUVERY BHAVAN BENGALURU – 560 002. 107 4 . THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT DAKSHINA KANNADA – 575 003. 5 . THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTURCTION (ADMN) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTURCTION OFFICE OF DDPI DAKSHINA KANNADA – 575 003. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, AAG a/w SMT. MAMTHA SHETTY, AGA FOR R1, R2, R4 & R5; SRI. K. ANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO A) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDEROF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED3001.2023 PASSED IN WP No-23752/2022 AND DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO IMPLEMENT FROM THE STAGE OF THE PROVISIONAL LIST DATED1811.2022 (ANNEUXURE-A TO A18 IN WP No-23752/2022) IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW STRICTLY AS PER THE NOTIFICATION. THESE APPEALS BEING HEARD AND RESERVED, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF
JUDGMENT, THIS DAY, M.G.S.KAMAL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
108.
JUDGMENTThese writ appeals arise out of order dated 30.01.2023 passed in W.P.No.23752/2022(GM-CC) filed by private respondents/petitioners by which learned Single Judge of this Court while allowing the said writ petition has quashed the provisional selection list dated:18.11.2022 insofar it relates to the petitioners being brought under the General Merit category and has directed the petitioners to be treated as belonging to category to which they applied for, qua the caste and income certificates appended to the applications. Further liberty has been reserved to the State to regulate its procedure by continuing recruitment and taking it to its logical conclusion.
2. Facts leading up to filing of these writ appeals briefly stated are; By notification dated 21.03.2022 issued district wise, applications were invited from the eligible candidates for recruitment to the post of Graduate Primary School Teachers from sixth standard to eight standard classes in 109 the Government and Aided institutions. Competitive examinations were held on 21.05.2022 and 22.05.2022 and results were announced on 17.08.2022. A provisional list was published on 18.11.2022. Petitioners being aggrieved by exclusion of their names in the provisional list, filed the above writ petition seeking following reliefs; (a) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction quashing the provisional selection list dated 18.11.2022 by respondent No.3-(Annexure -A to A18). (b) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing respondent No.3 to consider the case of the petitioner Nos.1 to 15 under category 2A, petitioner No.16 under category 2B, petitioner Nos.17 and 18 under category 3A and petitioner Nos. 19 to 21 under category 3B in the final selection list, taking note of the caste certificate issued by the Tahsildar without insisting on the income certificate from the husband of the petitioner (B to B20). (c) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring that the action of the respondents herein changing the category of the petitioners from OBC to GM without intimation for the reason they and income certificate in the name of the husband of the petitioners without considering the caste and income certificates in the name of the father of the petitioners is highly arbitrary, illegal and without authority of law. (d) Pass such other and further orders as may be necessary in the interest of justice. 110
3. It is the contention of the petitioners that they belong to OBC category having completed their B.Ed., and D.Ed., and being eligible had applied for the post of teachers in respective subjects under reservation category of OBC through online application and had also submitted necessary documents as sought for. That after accepting the applications the concerned DDPI had invited the petitioners to appear for written and descriptive examination wherein the petitioners secured good score and ranking and were thus qualified for 1:2 document verification. It is further contended that in the notification dated 21.03.2022 calling for recruitment for Graduate Primary School Teachers there was no specification provided with respect to production of income and caste certificate of the husband of the petitioners. That on verification of the documents furnished by the petitioners, for some of the petitioners OBC categories was changed to General Merit and for some of the petitioners documents were returned back with no intimation with regard to defect in documents or otherwise. That the concerned 111 DDPI had rejected the caste cum income certificate of some of the candidates on the basis that though they were married, the certificates which they produced had been issued in the name of their father. That some of the candidates had approached this Court by filing the writ petition in W.P.No.22429/2022 and that this Court by order dated 15.11.2022 and on 18.11.2022 had directed that the names of the petitioners enlisted therein would be considered under the different categories of OBC and that in spite of the same, the provisional list had been issued without complying with the directions of this Court. That in the said provisional list, names of the petitioners were not included even though they had good ranking and the candidates who are below the petitioners were selected. That on an enquiry the petitioners were informed that the DDPI had rejected their income and caste certificates as they had obtained the same in their father's name. Being aggrieved by the same, the above writ petition is filed seeking the relief as extracted hereinabove. 112
4. The said writ petition was resisted by the state contending inter alia that the petition as presented was not maintainable and that the petitioners had to approach the Administrative Tribunal in terms of Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. That the authorities had rightly considered the documents furnished by the petitioners in accordance with the norms and policies of the Government which prescribed that in the case of married women candidates income of the spouse shall be taken into consideration and that it cannot be speculated that the spouse after the marriage is dependent on the parents. That the selection policy adopted by the respondent authorities is in accordance with the norms laid down by DPAR. That out of total 5978 married women candidates who had submitted income certificates of their spouse along with the application have been considered for verification in the ratio of 1:2. Among them 3700 meritorious married women candidates have been selected for provisional list of 1:1. That the married women candidates who had submitted income certificate of the 113 parents have been in fact short listed in the ratio of 1:1 in the provisional list by bringing such candidates under general merit category. That in the application a declaration had been provided that incorrect and incomplete application would be rejected and accordingly authorities on verification of the records have rejected the applications of the married women candidates who had furnished the income certificates of their parents instead of their spouse. That the State Government has issued Government order dated 19.09.1985 and 12.12.1986 regarding determination of income of the married women and the rejection of the candidature is on account of the defective certificates and the same is neither arbitrary or illegal. Hence, sought for dismissal of the petition.
5. Learned Single Judge on hearing respective counsel for the parties framed following points for consideration: (i) Whether writ petitions challenging the action of interpretation of caste and income certificates by selecting authority-DDPI would be maintainable?. 114 (ii) Whether the caste and income of the husband of the female applicant should be taken into consideration or the caste and income of the parents?. (iii) Whether the selecting authority-DDPI would get jurisdiction to interpret caste and income certificates issued by competent authorities?.
6. While answering the issue No.(i) on maintainability learned Single Judge though has taken note of the Judgments of the Apex Court in the case of L.Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India reported in (1997)3 SCC261regarding jurisdiction of the Tribunal in the matters relating to process of recruitment to the service under the Services of the State, however relying upon the Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of T.K.Rangarajan Vs State of Tamil Nadu and others reported in (2003) 6 SCC581has held that in the fact situation of the matter writ petition is entertainable. While answering the issue No.(ii) learned Single Judge relying upon the Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Surinder Singh Vs Punjab State Electricity Board and others reported in (2014) 15 SCC767and Sunitha Singh Vs State of UP reported 115 in (2018) 2 SCC493and State of Karnataka Vs Smt.Yoeshwari and anr in W.P.No.24115/2018 and connected cases decided on 19.11.2018, came to the conclusion that the decision of the selecting authority-DDPI in interpreting and holding the caste and income of the husband is to be taken into consideration is contrary to law and directed the respondent Authorities to consider the applications of the petitioners on the basis of caste and income certificates of the parents and not of their spouse and as belonging to their respective categories against which they have applied for. While answering issue No.(iii) relying upon the Judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Executive Director, Karnataka Examination Authority and Selection Authority, Malleswaram, Bangalore Vs State of Karnataka and anr reported in (2018) SCC Online Karnataka 4112 held that the Selecting Authority-DDPI has no jurisdiction to interpret the caste certificate issued by the competent authority. Thus, having held as above, learned Single Judge quashed the provisional selection list so far as it 116 relates to the petitioners being brought under General Merit Category and issued further directions as noted above. Being aggrieved by the same, the present writ appeals are filed.
7. These appeals are filed by the appellants who are not parties to the writ petition. The principal grounds urged amongst other by the appellants in these writ appeals are: (a) Whether the writ petition is maintainable in view of the bar contained under Article 323A of the Constitution of India and in view of Section 15 of the Act, 1985; (b) Whether a validly issued income certificate in terms of Government Order dated 12.12.1986, which order had been passed by the State in exercise of its power conferred under Article 16(4) of Constitution of India laying down classification of backward classes for the purpose of reservation of appointments and posts defining eligibility for reservation, could have been invalidated by the learned 117 Single Judge without there being challenge to the said Government Order; (c) Whether without impleading the appellants who are the selected candidates, as party/respondents to the writ petition, the provisional list could have been set aside; 8. Before adverting to the grounds urged in these appeals, it is necessary to note that an identical writ petition was filed in W.P.No.200032/2023 before Kalaburagi Bench of this Court and the same was dismissed by order dated:12.01.2023 as not maintainable reserving liberty to the petitioner therein to approach the Tribunal constituted under Act, 1985. Similarly, writ petitions filed before the Principal Bench of this court in W.P.No.5009/2023 C/w W.P.Nos.5820/2023, 5833/2023, 5879/2023, 5916/2023, 5926/2023, 5987/2023, 6237/2023, 6258/2023 and 6640/2023 were also disposed of as not maintainable with liberty to the petitioners therein to urge all grounds contended in the petitions before the Tribunal. 118
9. Sri.Lakshminarayana, learned Senior counsel appearing for the appellants in W.A.No.305/2023 reiterating the grounds urged in the memorandum of appeal and the contents of written synopsis submitted that; (a) That the Graduate Primary School Teachers post is a civil post governed by Karnataka Education Department Services (Department of Public Instructions) (Recruitment) Rules, 1967, as such the said recruitment would fall within the provisions of Rules framed under Section 8 of the Karnataka State Civil Services Act, 1978 and the service as defined thereunder comes within the conditions of service specified under Article 323A(1)(c) of the Constitution of India. (b) That in furtherance to the provisions of Article 323(A)(1) of the Constitution of India, the Parliament enacted the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. Section 15 of the said Act, 1985 conferred the jurisdiction on the Administrative Tribunal in respect of matters pertaining 119 to recruitment to Civil Services or to any Civil Post of the State. (c) That the Administrative Tribunal is the Court of first instance and the High Court would get the jurisdiction under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution only in exercise of its power of judicial review over the order that may be passed by the Administrative Tribunal. He relied upon the Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of L.Chandra Kumar (supra). Thus, he submitted the learned Single Judge in the first place had no jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition and in the second place even exercise of judicial review of the order passed by the Administrative Tribunal could be exercisable only by the Division Bench and not by learned Single Judge. (d) That the writ jurisdiction cannot be converted as an alternate forum enlarging the scope to include the disputes which are specifically excluded under the provisions of Constitution of India and by the law settled by the Apex Court in the case of L.Chandra Kumar 120 (Supra). He further relied upon the Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs Alapan Bandopadyaya reported in (2022) 3 SCC133in support of his submission. (e) That the very notification was the subject matter of challenge before the Kalaburagi Bench of this Court in W.P.No.200032/2023 which was dismissed in view of law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of L.Chandra Kumar (supra) for want of jurisdiction. Thus, he submitted that the impugned order apart from being inconsistent to the order passed by the Coordinate Bench for want of jurisdiction also raises the territorial jurisdiction as it covers the recruitments in respect of candidates from Gulbarga District. (f) That a decision rendered without impleading proper and necessary party is liable to be ignored by a party who is affected by the same is against the principles of natural justice. That in the instant case, since the names of the appellants were included in the provisional list and they not having been made party to 121 the writ petition, the impugned order is liable to be ignored as not binding on them. (g) It is further contended that policy of reservation in terms of Government order dated 12.12.1986 is in force for more than 36 years and without a prayer or a challenge to the same, learned Single Judge could not have quashed the notification. That the entire process of recruitment was based on the said order dated 12.12.1986, which prescribes determination of income of the husband of a married woman and not of her parents. That as per the notification instructions have been issued to comply with the requirement of notification and since the recruitment pertains to civil posts same would fall within the provisions of Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act and challenge to the same would only be before Administrative Tribunal.
10. Sri.P.S.Rajagopal, learned Senior counsel appearing for learned counsel for appellants in W.A.No.886/2013 submitted that; 122 a) The very relief sought in the writ petition is seeking quash of provisional select list dated 18.11.2022 and for direction to respondent No.3 to consider the case of the petitioners under category 2A, 2B and 3A and 3B in the final select list. He submits the entire issue pertains to a service concerning post of civil service of the state. Thus, in terms of paragraph 99 of L.Chandra Kumar's case jurisdiction of the High Court is ousted. b) Learned Senior counsel referred to provisions of Education Department Services, Karnataka State Civil Services Rules 1978 more particularly Rule 7 thereof providing for reservation of posts. He insisted that since the said Rules provide for recruitment to State Civil Services, provision of Section 15 and 28 of the Act, 1984 would apply excluding the jurisdiction of the High Court. (c) Adverting to the reasoning assigned by learned Single Judge at paragraph 8 of the impugned order with reference to Judgments of the Apex Court in the case of L.Chandra Kumar (supra) and T.K.Rangarajan 123 (supra) learned Senior counsel submitted that the facts of the case in T.K.Rangarajan are distinguishable in that, a case of "unprecedented extraordinary situation having no parallel" had involved. While the facts of the present case do not meet the factual situation of T.K.Rangarajan as there is no such extraordinary situation involved. (d) That there is no whisper in the writ petition regarding approaching the Tribunal not being adequate and efficacious remedy. He contended that learned Single Judge had made out a new case which is not pleaded by the parties. In support of his contentions he referred to the Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Trozan & Co., Ltd., (1953) 1 SCC456paragraph 38 and the Judgment in the case of State of W.B Vs W.B. Registration Copywriters Association (2009) 14 SCC132 (e) Learned Senior counsel further submitted that concept of creamy layer at the national level was brought in the year 1992. As for as the State of Karnataka, the 124 same was introduced much prior to 04.03.1977. The Government order was issued on 28.12.1983 and a subsequent order dated 12.12.1986 is in the form of instruction to the candidates and to the authority issuing the income certificate. That there has been no challenge to any of the orders namely order dated 28.12.1983 and the order dated:12.12.1986. As such no mandamus could have been issued. (f) The provisions of Karnataka Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes (Reservation of Appointments Etc.,) Act, 1990, Karnataka Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes (Reservation of Appointments Etc.,) Rules, 1992 and the Government orders issued under the provisions of Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India. The said Government Order apart from laying down modalities of operation of reservation has clarified that to compute "family income" in respect of women candidates who are married the income of the parents should not be added to her income and in 125 such case only income of their husband should be taken into consideration. (g) That since the said Government orders have been passed in furtherance to the aforesaid Acts the same have become statutory orders and while making appointments to any office in the civil service of the State of Karnataka or a civil post under the State of Karnataka appointment or posts shall be reserved for scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other backward classes to such extent and in such manner as may be specified from time to time. Rule 7 of the Recruitment Rules stipulates that the reservation of post shall be in accordance with the norms and extent provided under Rule 9 of the Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitments) Rules, 1977. (h) That the recruitment notification in the instant case stipulated that candidates claiming reservation as persons belonging to other backward classes, category-2A, 2B, 3A and 3B should submit along with their applications, caste cum income certificates in Form `F' stipulated under 126 Order dated 08.02.2023 in accordance with Rules 3A(2) and (3) of Reservation Rules. Thus, he submitted that learned Single Judge contrary to the aforesaid rules and the recruitment notification which are not even challenged, erroneously relied upon an inapplicable Judgment in the case of Surinder Singh Vs Punjab State Electricity Board reported in (2014) 15 SCC676to hold that while computing the family income in the case of married woman even the income of parents could be taken into consideration. (i). That learned Single Judge erred in holding that the selecting authority acted without jurisdiction in rejecting the reservation claim of the petitioners on the premise that validity of the reservation certificates can be adjudicated only by District Caste and Income Verification Committee constituted under the Act and Rules.
11. Sri. Naik Nityanand Venkataraman, Sri.Mithun G.A., and Sri.Harish M.G., for the appellants 127 submitted their arguments supplementing the submission made by the learned Senior counsel.
12. Sri.K.N.Phanindra, learned Senior counsel appearing for the counsel for respondent Nos. 24 to 47 who were the petitioners in the writ petition submitted that; (a) the core issue that was before the learned Single Judge was with regard to jurisdiction of the DDPI in interpreting the caste certificate and income certificate issued by the competent authorities. That since the said issue did not pertain to process of recruitment the writ petition was entertainable. That the judicial review is part of the basic structure of the Constitution of India. That the issue of “maintainability” of a writ petition being different from the issue of “entertainability” of the petition, there is no express constitutional bar in maintaining a writ petition. That learned Single Judge in excise of his discretionary any power has given the finding with regard to the entertainability of the writ petition and with regard to the 128 jurisdiction of Deputy Director of Public Instruction in interpreting the caste certificate and income certificate, as such there is no infirmity in the impugned order. (b) He submitted that the finding of the learned Single Judge is based on the Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of T.K.Rangarajan (supra) as it involved several thousands of candidates and the issue was only relating to interpretation of the caste and income certificate. (c) That the learned Single Judge came to the conclusion that the caste verifying certificate is to be issued only on the income of the parents and the said conclusion has been arrived at based on the Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Surinder Singh vs. Punjab Electricity Board and others (2014) 15 SCC767 Sunita Singh vs. State of U.P. (2018) 2 SCC492 Ashok Bhushan Takhur vs. State of Bihar (1995) 5 SCC403and on the basis of judgment dated 19.11.2018 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of 129 State of Karnataka vs. Smt. Yogeshwari and another (W.P.No.24119/2018). (d) As regard the issue concerning Deputy Director of Public Instruction having jurisdiction to interpret the caste and income certificate, the learned Single Judge relying upon the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Executive Director, KEA vs. State and another 2018 SCC Online Kar.4112 has held that such interpretation can only be by authority which has issued the certificate and not the selecting authority. e) Thus, he submitted the aforesaid core issues and the finding given by the learned Single Judge is based on the precedents and to the said extent the writ petition was entertainable and no infirmity could be found. (f) Bringing to the notice of this Court the subsequent events that have taken place after passing of the impugned order, whereby the State Government conducted the proceedings on 07.02.2023 under the Chairmanship of Ministry of Primary and Secondary 130 Education resolving to implement the direction issued by the learned Single Judge, learned Senior counsel submitted that the State Government has published new provisional list on 27.02.2023 and after considering the objections to the said provisional list, the State Government has published the final selection list on 08.03.2023. As such, the writ appeals have become infructuous as nothing survives for consideration in view of the subsequent development. He submitted that if the appellants are aggrieved by the selection list dated 08.03.2023 they have separate cause of action and have to agitate the same before the appropriate forum. In support of his submission, learned Senior counsel relies upon the Judgment of the Apex Court in the cases of Ramachandraprasad Singh vs. Sharad Yadav (2021) 13 SCC794 Pasupulipi Venkateshwaralu vs. The Motor and General Traders (1975)1 SCC770and K.N. Rajakumar vs. V. Nagarajan and others (2022) 4 SCC617 Thus, he seeks for dismissal of the writ appeals. 131
13. Sri. Vikram Huilgol, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent-State submitted that subsequent to the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge a final selection list has been prepared taking into consideration both the Government order dated 12.12.1986 and the directions issued by the learned Single Judge. A total number of 67892 candidates were found eligible for selection in all the subjects, namely, English Language, Social Studies in Kannada, Urdu and Marati Medium , Mathematics and Science in Kannada, Urdu and Marati Medium, Biological science in Kannada, Urdu and Marati medium including Kalyana Karnataka Region. That out of said 67,892 eligible candidates a list in the ratio of 1:2 was prepared and instead of 30,000 required candidates only 22,432 candidates were selected on roster and merit basis from all 35 districts, as some of the categories did not have twice the required number of candidates. That even though in some districts candidates are more they cannot be selected as the selection is district wise. In other words, an applicant who applied in a 132 particular district and wrote competitive exam in that district cannot be considered for some other district. That out of the 22,432 eligible candidates selected as above, after considering the income certificate of both husband and parents a list consisting of 13,342 candidates was prepared based on merit cum roster. Out of them 8,376 are women candidates 4,973 are male candidates and 3 are transgender. That on account of redoing the exercise by applying both circular dated 12.12.1986 and the judgment of learned Single Judge and by redrawing of a fresh list based on the individual merits of the candidates 451 candidates who were present in the earlier selection list dated 18.11.2022 have not found place in the revised selection list published on 08.03.2023. Thus, he submits that the final selection list is based on the order of the learned Single Judge and the Government order dated 12.12.1986 and that there is no departure from the reservation policy of the Government. Hence, seeks for dismissal of the appeals.
14. Heard. Perused the records. 133
15. Considering pleading and reliefs sought in the writ petition, reasons assigned by learned Single Judge in the impugned order, grounds urged in these appeals and the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, at the outset what needs to be considered is; a) Whether writ petition as filed seeking the reliefs thereunder is entertainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India?.
16. In this regard at the first instance it is necessary to point out the nature and scope of the issue involved in the matter. It is beneficial to refer the impugned notification dated 21.03.2022 issued by the respondent- State Department of Public Education, Selection and Appointment Authority and District Deputy Director (Administration), Bangalore North Taluk. The title of the notification is "Recruitment Notification". The subject mentioned therein is the “recruitment to the post of Graduate Primary Teacher (for class 6 to
8) for the years 2020-21 to be filled by direct recruitment through District 134 Level Competitive Examination”. The said notification further refers to Karnataka Education Department Services (Public Education Department)(Recruitment)(Special) Rules, 2022, under which the same is issued. It further clarifies that the said notification for selection is issued for public information following the prevailing Rules as per the Recruitment Rules, Reservation Rules and Government Orders issued from time to time mentioned in reference for selection.
17. The aforesaid Rules 2022, have been framed by the State Government in exercise of powers conferred by Section 3 and 8 of the Karnataka State Civil Services Act, 1978. The recruitment process as mentioned in the notification consist of a competitive examination and preparation of select list on the basis of marks secured in the competitive examination with the weightage added in terms of Rule 6. Rule 7(i) of the Rules, 2022 stipulate that the reservation of post shall be in accordance with extant orders of Government and extant law including current orders of the State Government relating to reservation of 135 posts for the persons belonging to Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes and other backward classes. Rule 8 under the heading "Selection List" envisages publication of provisional select list, receiving and considering objections, if any, to the provisional select list and publication of final select list thereafter.
18. The policy providing for reservation of posts for the persons belonging to Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes and other backward classes is traceable to the Government order dated 28.12.1983 which was issued under clause (4) of Article 16 of the Constitution of India providing the meaning of the phrase "family income" and the manner and method of its computation. The said order provides that while computing "family income" in the case of married women candidate income of her parents should not be added and only the income of her husband to be taken into consideration if they are staying separately as an independent family. If they are living in a joint family income of the candidate along with income of the joint 136 family should be taken into consideration for calculation of family income. In the case of candidate who is a widow her income alone shall be taken into consideration irrespective of whether or not she lives independently.
19. By another order dated 12.12.1986 the Government reiterated the modalities of operation of reservation.
20. With effect from 01.06.1992 the Karnataka Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other backward classes (Reservation of Appointments etc.) Act, 1990 (hereinafter referred to as `Reservation Act') was enforced. By the said Act all the Government Orders issued under clause(4) of Article 16 of the Constitution of India became statutory orders and it mandated that while making appointment to any office in a civil service of State of Karnataka or a Civil Post under the State of Karnataka, appointments or posts shall be reserved for Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes and other backward classes to such extent and in such manner as may be specified from 137 time to time in the order made by the Government under clause (4) of Article 16 of the Constitution of India. The Act defines other backward classes to mean Communities, Castes and Tribes notified by the State Government from time to time under clause (4) of Article 15 and clause (4) of Article 16 of Constitution of India. The Act further provides mechanism and protocol for issuance of caste certificate, income and caste certificates and their validation.
21. In exercise of powers conferred under Section 13 of the Reservation Act, the State framed the Rules called the Karnataka Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes (Reservation of Appointment etc.) Rules, 1992. The order dated 08.02.2000 issued by the Government under the Rules stipulates that the income and caste certificate being issued to the candidates belonging to backward classes other than category-I to be in Form F. 138
22. Thus, the recruitment notifications subject matter of the present lis which were issued for each District in the State on the same day stipulated that the candidates claiming reservation as persons belonging to other backward classes, category 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B to submit along with their applications caste cum income certificate in Form F as stipulated under the Government Order dated 08.02.2000 in accordance with Rule 3-A(2) and (3) on or before 22.04.2022 being the last date for submission of applications. The notification further states that the reservation certificates which are not as per the formats prescribed by Government Order dated 08.02.2000 and not issued in accordance with Rule 3-A(2) and (3) and if received after the stipulated date for receipt of applications, would be rejected.
23. Thus, the above undisputed material facts would reveal that the primary school teacher post of which recruitment is sought is a 'civil post' governed by the Karnataka Education Department Services(Department of Public Instruction) (Recruitment) Rules, 1967 and 139 Amendment Rules, 2017. Thus, the said post being civil post under the State is governed under the Rules framed under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 read with Section 8 of the Karnataka Civil Services Act, 1978.
24. The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 has been promulgated for adjudication or trial by the Administrative Tribunals of disputes and complaints with respect to recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or of any State or any local or other authority within the territory of India under the control of Government of India or of any corporation or society owned or controlled by the Government in pursuance of Article 323A of Constitution and the matters connected therewith are incidental thereto.
25. Section 15 of the Act, 1985 provides for exclusive jurisdiction of the Administrative Tribunal in relation to recruitment and matter concerning recruitment to any civil service or the State or to any civil post under 140 the State. In other words the matters involving recruitment or matter concerning recruitment are to be dealt with adjudicated and determined by the Administrative Tribunal in terms of Section 15 of the Act, 1985.
26. Section 28 of the Act, 1985 exclude the jurisdiction of all courts except the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution of India and the Labour Courts and other authorities under the Industrial Disputes Act.
27. The Apex Court in the case of L.Chandra Kumar Vs Union of India reported in (1997) 3 SCC261has held that the Administrative Tribunals constituted under Act, 1985 have jurisdiction to consider all the matters covered under the Act including issue relating to constitutional validity of the provisions relating to recruitment of employees and regulations governing the service conditions. The Apex Court has further held that all decisions of Administrative Tribunals would be subject to 141 the scrutiny by the Division Bench of their respective High Courts. Paragraph 93 and 94 of the said judgment of the Apex Court are extracted hereunder;
"93. Before moving on to other aspects, we may summarise conclusions on the jurisdictional powers of these Tribunals. The Tribunal are competent to hear matters where the vires of statutory provisions a for the High Courts and the Supreme Court which have, under questioned. However, in discharging this duty, they cannot act as substitute constitutional set-up, been specifically entrusted with such an obligation Their function in this respect is only supplementary and all such decisions of the Tribunals will be subject to scrutiny before a Division Bench of the respective High Courts. The Tribunals will consequently also have the power a to test the vires of subordinate legislations and rules. However, this power of the Tribunals will be subject to one important exception. The Tribunals shall not entertain any question regarding the vires of their parent statutes following the settled principle that a Tribunal which is a creature of an Act cannot declare that very Act to be unconstitutional. In such cases alone, the High Court concerned may be approached directly. All other decisions of b these Tribunals, rendered in cases that they are specifically empowered to adjudicate upon by virtue of their parent statutes, will also be subject to scrutiny before a Division Bench of their respective High Courts. (We may add that the Tribunals will, however, continue to act as the only courts of first instance in respect of the areas of law for which they have been constituted. By this, we mean that it will not be open for litigants to directly approach the High Courts even in cases where they question the vires of statutory legislations (except, as mentioned, where the legislation which creates the particular Tribunal is challenged) by overlooking the jurisdiction of the Tribunal concerned.
94. The directions issued by us in respect of making the decisions of Tribunals amenable to scrutiny before a Division Bench of the respective High Courts 142 will, however, come into effect prospectively i.e. will apply to decisions rendered hereafter. To maintain the sanctity of judicial proceedings, we have invoked the doctrine of prospective overruling so as not to disturb the procedure in relation to decisions already rendered".
28. Further the Apex Court in the case of Union of India vs. Allapan Bandyopadhyay reported in (2022) 3 SCC133following its judgment passed in L.Chandra kumar's case at paragraph 38, 39 and 40 has held as under;
"38. When once a Constitution Bench of this Court declared the law "all decisions of Tribunals created under Article 323-A and Article 323-B of the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Tribunal concerned falls", of the Constitution will be subject to the scrutiny before a Division Bench It is impermissible to make any further construction on the said issue. The will cover and take within its sweep orders passed on applications or otherwise b expression "all decisions of these Tribunals used by the Constitution Bench to another Bench of the Tribunal in exercise of the power under Section 25 of in the matter of transfer of original applications from one Bench of the Tribunal the Act.
39. In other words, any decision of such a Tribunal, including the one a Division Bench of a High Court within whose jurisdiction the Tribunal passed under Section 25 of the Act could be subjected to scrutiny only before concerned falls. This unambiguous exposition of law has to be followed scrupulous while deciding the jurisdictional High Court for the purpose of bringing in challenge against-an-order of transfer of an original application from one Bench of 143 Tribunal to another Bench in the invocation of Section 25 of the Act.
40. The law thus declared by the Constitution Bench cannot be revisited by the bundle of facts to ascertain whether they would confer territorial jurisdiction a Bench of lesser quorum or for that matter by the High Courts by looking into to the High Court within the ambit of Article 226(2) of the Constitution. We are of the considered view that taking another view would undoubtedly result in indefiniteness and multiplicity in the matter of jurisdiction in situations when a decision passed under Section 25 of the Act is to be called in question especially in cases involving multiple parties residing within the jurisdiction of different High Courts albeit aggrieved by one common order passed by the Chairman at the Principal Bench at New Delhi".
29. Thus, from the aforesaid factual aspect of the matter, applicable provisions of law and the judgments of the Apex Court it is clear that in the matters of recruitment process, it is the Tribunal under the Act, 1985 which is the court of first instance and the role of Division Bench of the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Tribunal is situated is only in exercise of and judicial review under Article 226/227 of constitution of India.
30. The Apex Court in the case of Rajendra Diwan vs. Pradeep Kumar Ranibala reported in (2019) 20 SCC143at para 86 has held as under; 144
"86. In exercise of its extraordinary power of superintendence and/or judicial review under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the High Courts restrict interference to cases of patent error of law which go to the root of the decision; perversity; arbitrariness and/or unreasonableness; violation of principles of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction and usurpation of powers. The High Court does not re-assess or re-analyse the evidence and/or materials on record. Whether the High Court would exercise its writ jurisdiction to test a decision of the Rent Control Tribunal would depend on the facts and circumstances of the case. The writ jurisdiction of the High Court cannot be converted into an alternative appellate forum, just because there is no other provision of appeal in the eye of the law".
31. Viewed in that light the next question that arises is whether the reasoning assigned by learned Single Judge while answering issue No.1 regarding maintainability of the writ petition is justified. As seen at paragraph 8 of the impugned order though learned Single Judge has taken note of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of L.Chandra Kumar has chosen to rely upon judgment of the apex court in the case of T.K.Rangarajan vs. State of Tamil Nadu reported in (2003) 6 SCC581 The facts which involved in the case of T.K.Rangarajan as narrated at para 2 therein reveal that the Tamil Nadu Government had terminated services of all employees who had resorted to strike for their demands. The said 145 'unprecedented action' was challenged before the High Court of Madras by filing petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, in which by an interim order the learned Single Judge had directed the State Government that the suspension and dismissal of employees without conducting any enquiry be kept in abeyance until further orders and the such employees were directed to resume the duty. The said interim order was questioned in the writ appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court which set aside the interim order by arriving at a conclusion that without exhausting alternative remedy of approaching the Administrative Tribunal, writ petitions were not maintainable. The said case also involved total detention of about 2211, out of which 74 were ladies and only 165 male and 7 female personals had been released on bail. Considering the pathetic conditions of arrestees who were mainly clerks and subordinate staff the Court had directed their release on bail. This order of the Division Bench was challenged by filing an appeal seeking similar reliefs under Article 32 of the Constitution. The Apex Court 146 in the aforesaid factual background of the matter at paragraphs 5 held that,
"5. At the outset, it is to be reiterated that under Article 226 of the Constitution the High Court is empowered to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction to meet unprecedented extraordinary situation having no parallel. It is equally true that the extraordinary powers are required to be sparingly used. The fact of the present case reveal that this was most extraordinary case which called for interference by the High Court as the State Government has dismissed about two Lakhs employees for going on strike. " (Emphasis supplied by us) 32. At paragraph 6 and 7 taking note of the law laid down in the case of L.Chandrakumar, and also the observation of the Court at para 77, 78 and 81 of Keshvananda Bharathi case, at para 10 has held as under;
"10. There cannot be any doubt that the aforesaid of judgment of the larger Bench of this Court and we respectfully agree with same. However, in a case like this , thousand of employees are directed to approach the Tribunal, the Tribunal would not be in a position to render justice to the cause. Hence, as stated earlier because of very very exceptional circumstances that arose in the present case, there was no justifiable reason for the High Court not to entertain the petition on the ground of alternative remedy provided under the statute."
(Emphasis supplied by us) 147 33. It is further seen in the said judgment the larger issue involved was also with regard to the consideration of fundamental right to go on strike.
34. As rightly pointed out by Sri. P.S.Rajagopal, learned Senior counsel appearing for some of the appellants, that the facts obtained in the case of T.K.Rangarajan (supra) on completely different and distinct from that of the facts involved in the case at hand. In the instant case it is only rejection of caste and income certificates of some of the candidates during the recruitment process. Their names are only figured in a selection provisional list. No vested right as such is created in their favour except expectation of being selected. This cannot be construed as "an unprecedented extraordinary situation having no parallel", as pointed out by the Apex Court in its judgment in T.K.Rangarajan's case.
35. It is also relevant to note at this juncture that a similar petition seeking quash of endorsement had been filed in W.P.No.200032/2023 (S-RES) before learned Single 148 Judge at Kalburagi Bench of this court and another batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.5009/2023 (S-RES) connected with other matters were filed before learned Single Judge of this Court. Taking note of the law laid by the Apex Court in the case of L.Chandra Kumar (supra) and relevant provisions the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, these writ petitions were dismissed/disposed of by orders dated 12.01.2023 and 26.5.2023 respectively, reserving liberty to the petitioners their in to approach the Tribunal constituted under the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985.
36. As rightly pointed out by Sri. Lakshminarayan, learned Senior counsel appearing for some of the appellants the aforesaid orders passed by the Coordinate Benches in dismissing the writ petitions and the impugned order in entertaining the writ petition on the very ground of jurisdiction by interpreting the law laid down by the Apex Court in the L.Chandra Kumar's case has lead to an irreconcilable anomalous situation. 149
37. Necessary to note at this juncture the submissions made by Sri. K.N.Phanindra, learned Senior counsel who sought to make a distinction between "maintainability" and "entertainability" of a writ petition. True it is that any writ petition in exercise of review jurisdiction of the high Court under Article 226 and 227 is maintainable. The question whether relief sought therein in the given facts and the position of law could be entertained?.. As noted in the instant case, in view of statutory bar contained under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and the legal position enunciated by the Apex Court in L.Chandra Kumar's case, it is very clear that the Tribunals constituted under the Act, 1985 are the courts of first instance in the matters pertaining to the process of recruitment and it is only a Division Bench of the respective High Courts vested with power of judicial review against the decision/orders passed by the Tribunals.
38. For the aforesaid reasons and analysis, we are of the considered view that the writ petition filed by the respondent Nos. 27 to 47 seeking reliefs as sought for 150 therein, under the facts and circumstances of the case could not have been entertained that too solely relying upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of T.K.Rangarajan (supra), facts of which are palpably different and distinguishable.
39. Since our conclusion on the entertainability of the writ petition having been arrived at in the negative, we refrain from expressing any opinion on the merits or otherwise of the contentions raised on the two other issues dealt with by learned Single Judge. It is therefore, appropriate that impugned order be set aside and all the contentions regarding the said issues be kept open to be urged before the Tribunal.
40. Before parting, it is necessary and imperative to note, at the cost of repetition, that in the affidavit dated 24.08.2023 filed on behalf of the respondents -State it is deposed that in terms of the notifications dated 21.03.2022 issued for each of the 35 Districts 15,000 posts were notified for recruitment of Graduate Primary Teachers 151 in Government primary schools (6 to 8 standard) (5,000 for Kalyana Karnataka District and 10,000 for other Districts). It is further deposed that 1,06,083 applicants had participated, out of which a total number of 67,892 candidates were found eligible for selection in all subjects. That out of said 67,892 eligible candidates an eligible list in the ratio of 1:2 was prepared and instead of 30,000 candidates only 22,432 were selected on roster and merit basis from all 35 Districts. It is deposed that it is because some of the categories did not have required number of candidates, as such, there was a shortfall in numbers of candidates selected in specific subject. It is further deposed that subsequent to the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge a selection list in the ratio of 1:1 was prepared and published on 08.03.2023. That the said list was prepared taking into consideration both the Government order dated 12.12.1986 and the order of the learned Single Judge. In that, out of 22,432 eligible candidates, income certificate of both husband and parents was considered and a list consisting of 13,352 candidates 152 was prepared on the basis of merit cum roster. Out of this 8,376 are women candidates, 4,973 are male candidates and 3 are transgenders. It is further deposed that on account of re-doing the exercise by applying both circular dated 12.12.1986 and the order of the learned Single Judge while drawing up a fresh list on the basis of individual merits of the candidates 451 candidates whose names were enlisted in the earlier selection list dated 18.11.2022 have been left out and have not found place in the revised selection list published on 08.03.2023.
41. Referring to aforesaid contents of the affidavit and the documents produced at Annexure-R1, R2, R3 R4, R5 and R6 to the said affidavit, Sri. Vikram Huilgol, learned Additional Advocate General submitted that the respondent-State Government be permitted to proceed with appointments at least in respect of the said 13352 candidates. He submitted that acute shortage of teachers is impacting the State function in imparting education which is a constitutional obligation of the State. He further submitted that the candidates whose names that were 153 found in the earlier selection list dated 18.11.2022 and did not find place in the revised selection list published on 08.03.2023 is only numbering 451 and the names of the remaining candidates were in any case existed in the said earlier selection list dated 18.11.2022. He submitted that the State would ensure that such appointments would be subject to the outcome of the challenge being made by the petitioners in these petitions.
42. In response, it was contended on behalf of the appellants that if such a process is adopted same would adversely affect the carrier prospects of the appellants. It is also contended on behalf of the appellants that the effect of the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge is that around 350 selectees are now substituted by another set of 350 candidates. Therefore, it is contended on behalf of the appellants that even the appellants herein be appointed against the admitted vacant posts subject to outcome of the challenge being raised by them. 154
43. In response, learned Additional Advocate General, submitted that the request of the appellants to accommodate them in the selection process was not practicable inasmuch as different notifications were issued for each of the 35 districts and the candidates who have applied in one district cannot be considered for another district merely because vacancy available in other districts. Also because the requirement in each district varies as the notification has been issued considering the local requirement arising on subject wise. Such accommodation of the appellants would also impact the reservation roster.
44. We have given our anxious consideration to the aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the State and the appellants. It is not in dispute that the Deputy Director of Public Instruction the appointing authority had rejected the candidature of the writ petitioners on the premise of they not furnishing the caste cum income certificates as prescribed in the notifications and had brought them under General Merit Category. This issue however requires 155 consideration in a properly constituted petition before the Administrative Tribunal as held by us hereinabove.
45. Thus, considering imminent requirement of the Graduate Primary School Teachers and large vacancy across the State and in the interest of the students of 6 to 8 standards who are left high and dry for want of teachers, we are of the considered view that the respondent-State be permitted to proceed with appointing teachers from 13352 selected candidates as per the list dated 08.03.2023 produced at Annexure-R6 to the affidavit. It is however made clear since it is deposed in the affidavit that the said list at Annexure-R6 has been prepared and published on 08.06.2023 by taking into consideration income certificate of both husband and parents, as well as on merit cum roster, the appointment of the candidates who have not submitted the caste cum income certificate in the form prescribed in the notification and which is not in terms of Government Order dated 12.12.1986, and who are included in the list in view of the 156 order passed by learned Single Judge be deferred until the outcome of the result of the challenge.
46. As regards the remaining 451 posts since it is contended that their names have been excluded purely on the merit basis, it is clarified that if in the event the eligibility of such candidates who have not furnished the caste cum income certificate in the prescribed form is held to be invalid, such posts may be filled from amongst the candidates who have been excluded on merits and the candidates who have submitted certificates in the prescribed form.
47. We further make it clear that this provision enabling the State Government to proceed with the process of appointment is made under the peculiar fact situation of the matter wherein the present litigation has brought the process of appointment of teachers of class 6 to 8 across the State to a grinding halt only on account of rejection of application of some of the candidates by the Deputy 157 Director of Public Instruction for want of caste cum income certificate in the prescribed form. With the above observation, writ appeals are partly allowed. Impugned order dated 30.01.2023 passed in W.P.No.23752/2022 (GM-CC) is set aside. Respondent- State is permitted to proceed appointing the teachers in the lines of observation made in paragraphs 45 and 46 hereinabove. Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE SBN/RU