Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 145 publication of official journal Court: karnataka Page 35 of about 989 results (2.259 seconds)

Sep 02 2015 (HC)

Rangappa and Others Vs. Nagappa and Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

(Prayer: This RSA is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. Praying to set-aside the order dated 6.10.2012 passed by the learned district judge, Koppal, dismissing the I.A.No.1 for condonation of delay in filing the appeal and consequently dismissing the RA.83/2011, by confirming the judgment and decree dated 26.7.2010 passed by the learned senior Civil Judge, Koppal, in O.S.No.69/2007, and Etc.) 1. Though the matter is listed for admission, by content the matter is taken up for final hearing. 2. This is a appellants/plaintiffssecond appeal against the judgment and decree dated 6.10.2012 made in R.A.No.83/2011 on the file of the District Judge, Koppal, dismissing the appeal on the ground of delay of 380 days in filing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 26.07.2010 made in O.S.No.69/2007 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Koppal, dismissing the suit for declaration and permanent injunction. 3. The plaintiffs filed the suit for declaration that the sale deed dated 19.0...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 2017 (HC)

Irfan Pasha Vs. State by Commercial Street

Court : Karnataka

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF MARCH2017BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA WRIT PETITION NOS.7267-7270/2017 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.6005/2017 (GM-RES) C/W IN W.P NOS.7267-7270/2017 BETWEEN:1. IRFAN PASHA S/O LATE ABDUL MAJEED, AGED ABOUOT30YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE RUHI NAAZ, AGED ABOUT23YEARS, W/O IRFAN PASHA, R/AT NO827 4TH CROSS, OPP.INDIAN MEDICAL, GOVINDPURA MAIN ROAD, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-560045 2. WASEEM AHMED S/O MOHAMMED NASSERULLA, AGED ABOUT30YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE SURAIYA SULTANA, AGED ABOUT24YEARS, W/O WASEEM AHMED, 2 R/AT NO.1209, B-32, BDA FLATS, AUSTIN TOWN, BANGALORE-560047 3. MOHAMMED SADIQ @ MAZHAR S/O LATE MOHAMMED YUSUFF, AGED ABOUT35YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS WIF ZAIBA TABASSUM, AGED ABOUT21YEARS, W/O MOHAMMED SADIQ @ MAZHAR, R/AT NO.21, 4TH CROSS, RAJAPUTRA PETE, HOSAKOTE, BANGALORE-562114 4. MOHAMMED MUJEEB ULLA @ MOULA S/O LATE SHAIKH AMEERJAN, AGED ABOUT45YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS WI...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2004 (HC)

Shree Vinayaka Dev Idagunji and ors. Vs. Shivaram and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR2125; 2004(2)KarLJ460

ORDERN.S. Veerabhadraiah, J.1. This revision is by the defendants questioning the findings recorded on Issues 24, 25, 26, 29 and 30 in the negative in O.S. No. 10 of 2001 on the file of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Honnavar, dated 27-8-2001.2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:The plaintiffs claiming to be the hereditary Archaks from time immemorial and have been performing their duties called 'Poojapali'. This practice has been in vogue since ancient times, consistent with the custom. The plaintiffs' family have been exercising their right continuously, peacefully, openly and reasonably to the knowledge of all without protest or obstruction. This has moral and legal recognition apart from that of the public. This is a religious mandate and a question of right Purohit being a symbolic Sacred Fire is 'the leader' and not the servant as the niruktha and etimological interpretation and origin go. His duty is to secure the individual devotees 'Adhi Bhautika', 'Adhi D...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2016 (HC)

N.R. Bhat Vs. State by CBI/SPE, Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

(Prayer: Crl.A filed u/s.374(2) Cr.P.C. by the Adv. for the Appellant against the Judgment dt. 30.9.06 passed by the XXI Addl. C.C. and S.J., and Spl. Judge for CBI cases, B'lore, in Spl.C.C.No.131/2000 convicting the Appellant/Accused No.1 for the offences p/u/ss. 120-B, 409, 467, 471 and 477A of IPC and u/ss.13(1)(c) r/w (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for a period of 5 years and also to pay fine of Rs.25000/- I.D., to undergo S.I. for a period of 6 months for the offence p/u/s.409 of IPC and further sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for a period of 1 year and also to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- I.D., to undergo S.I. for 3 months for the offence p/u/s.120-b of IPC and further sentencing him to undergo R.I. for a period of 2 years and also to pay fine of Rs.1000/- I.D., to undergo S.I. for a period of 1 month for the offence p/u/s.13(1)(c) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and for the offences p/u/ss.467, 471, 477A of IPC...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2016 (HC)

N R Bhat Vs. State by Cbi/Spe

Court : Karnataka

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF APRIL2016BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2191/2006 BETWEEN N R BHAT S/O LATE N GOVIND BHAT AGED ABOUT66YRS R/O NO72835, I MAIN I CROSS, VYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE-560003 ... APPELLANT (By Sri: P.S. RAJAGOPAL SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI: PUTTEGOWDA, ADV.) AND STATE BY CBI/SPE BANGALORE ... RESPONDENT (By Sri: C H JADHAV, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI: HEGDE DEVARU GANAPATHI, ADV.) CRL.A FILED U/S.374(2) CR.P.C. BY THE ADV. FOR THE APPELLANT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DT. 30.9.06 PASSED BY THE XXI ADDL. C.C. & S.J., & SPL. JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, B'LORE, IN SPL.C.C.NO.131/2000 CONVICTING2THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.1 FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/SS. 120-B, 409, 467, 471 AND477 OF IPC AND U/SS.13(1)(c) R/W (2) OF THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988 AND SENTENCING HIM TO UNDERGO R.I. FOR A PERIOD OF5YEARS AND ALSO TO PAY FINE OF RS.25000/- I.D., TO UNDERGO S.I. FOR A PERIOD OF6MONTHS FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.409 OF IPC AND ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 2024 (HC)

Smt. Lakkamma @ Lakshmamma Vs. Smt. Jayamma

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - NC:2024:KHC:20988-DB RFA No.6 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF JUNE, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.6 OF2013BETWEEN:1. SMT.LAKKAMMA @ LAKSHMAMMA WIFE OF DODDEGOWDA @ DODDAIAH AGED ABOUT59YEARS2 SRI KRISHNA SON OF LAKKAMMA @ LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT32YEARS (APPEAL AGAINST APPELLANT NO.2 DISMISSED V/O.DATED132.2014) 3. SRI. DEVARAJ SON OF LAKKAMMA @ LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT31YEARS4 SRI. SHANTHARAJ SON OF LAKKAMMA @ LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT28YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT GANESH NAGAR CHANNARAYAPATNA TOWN HASSAN DISTRICT-573 116.-. 2 - NC:2024:KHC:20988-DB RFA No.6 of 2013 THE SECOND APPELLANT IS HARD OF HEARING AND MENTALLY INCAPABLE OF TAKING DECISION BY HIS OWN AND HENCE HE IS REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, NAMELY; SMT. LAKKAMMA @ LAKSHMAMMA WIFE OF DODDEGOWDA @ DODDAIAH AGED ABOUT59YEARS THE FIRST APPELLANT TO THIS APPEAL. APPELLANTS (B...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2023 (HC)

Sri Shailesh Kumar V Vs. State Ofkarnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF JANUARY, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2797 OF2022BETWEEN: SRI SHAILESH KUMAR V., S/O VENKATESH L ., AGED ABOUT24YEARS R/A BANDESANDRA VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU RURAL 560 105. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI JAYSHAM JAYASIMHA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SURYANGAR POLICE STATION ANEKAL REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001.2. SMT.JAYAMMA W/O KENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT42YEARS JANATHA COLONY IGGALURU VILLAGE ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU RURAL 560 081. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP FOR R1; 2 R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO A.QUASH THE FIR BEARING CR.NO.115/2020 REGISTERED BY THE SURYANAGAR POLICE STATION, ANEKAL FOR ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S.143, 147, 323, 324, 365, 504, 506 R/W SEC.149 OF IPC1860AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS CRIMINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2002 (HC)

Vincent Britto Vs. Mrs. Eunice Britto

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2002Kant179; ILR2002KAR2455; 2002(2)KarLJ600

V.G. Sabhahit, J.1. This appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore in O.S. No. 1 of 1988, dated 12-12-1994.2. The facts of the case in brief leading up to this appeal are as follows.-- The parties would be referred to with reference to their rank before the Probate Court.Vincent Britto, S/o. Denis J. Britto filed an application for grant of probate under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act before the District Judge, Dakshina Kannada on 7-3-1987 seeking for issue of probate annexed to the Will. It is averred in the application that Ms. Elizabeth Britto died on 17-9-1986 within the jurisdiction of District Court, Mangalore. She had executed last Will and testament in the presence of witnesses whose names appear on the foot thereof and the plaintiff is the Executor appointed under the Will since Mr. Ben Britto has declined to act as an executor by his let...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2001 (HC)

Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Bangalore Vs. the Mysore Lamp ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2001(91)FLR511]; ILR2001KAR4116; 2001(4)KarLJ360; (2001)IILLJ965Kant

1. This appeal is directed against the order of the Employees' State Insurance Court in Employees' State Insurance Application No. 106 of 1990 disposed of on 6-5-1998.2. In brief the facts that led to the filing of this appeal are as under:The applicant is Mysore Lamp Works Limited which is a State Government undertaking engaged in the manufacturing of electrical lamps employing about 1,500 employees covered under the Employees' State Insurance Act ('the Act' for short). The respondent is the applicant before the Employees' State Insurance Court. The contribution period applicable to the employees of the respondent was from 1-4-1988 to 30-9-1988. It is also an admitted fact that the respondent-Company deducted contributions from the employees for the period 1-4-1988 to 30-6-1988 on the ground that at the relevant point of time they fell under the definition of employee by virtue of drawing less than Rs. 1,600/- per month as wages. The contention of the applicant before the Corporation ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 2000 (HC)

Dr. B. Kumar and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR3187; 2000(6)KarLJ296

ORDER1. The petitioners have filed these petitions praying for a writ of certiorari quashing Orders No. HFW 109 HS 96, dated 6th March, 1996 and No. HFW 109 PTD 96, dated 2-5-1997, produced at Annexure-D and F respectively, and for a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to relieve respondent 3 forthwith and initiate action for filling up the post of Director strictly in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Institute.2. The facts leading to the filing of these writ petitions, briefly stated, are as follows:Jayadeva Institute of Cardiology ('the Institute' for short) was established and registered as a society under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act with the sole objective of providing comprehensive care to cardiothoracic patients. The Governing Council is the Supreme Authority vested with the power to function within the framework of the memorandum of association, rules and bye-laws of the Institute. During December 1995 a notification dated 11-12-...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //