Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1968Delhi462
Hardayal Hardy, J.(1) The title of the suit gives the names of two plaintiffs, but in reality the plaintiff is only one as the second plaintiff Goodwill Pictures Limited is merely the old name of the first plaintiff Goodwill India Limited. The suit is for a declaration that the plaintiffs are the owners of certain immovable property the market value of which according to them is Rupees fifty p. lacs, and that they are nto liable to be dis-possessed there from by defendants I to 5 without adequate compensation being given to lhem in the course of acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.(2) The plaintiffs originally based their claim to relief on a saledeed executed in their favor by defendants 6 and 7. Later, they filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure for amendment of the plaint by incorporating therein an alternative plea that in case they are nto held to be the absolute owners of the property in dispute by virtue of its purchase...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Ashutosh Kumar, J. 1. CM Appln. 4619/2016 (under Order 41, Rule 19 CPC) and CM Appln. 4620/2016 (under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the restoration appeal) and CM Appln. 4621/2016 (condonation of delay in re-filing the restoration appeal) Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, learned advocate appearing for UOI, files reply to the aforesaid applications today in the Court. The same is taken on record. 2. Heard counsels for the parties. 3. CM Appln. No. 4619/2016 is an application for restoration of the LA.APP.No. 585/2011 which stood dismissed on 16.05.2012, though for non-prosecution but the order also disclosed that since the case of the appellant/applicant would be governed by the judgment passed by the Delhi High Court in Land Acquisition Appeal no. 115/2011 (Jai Prakash v. Union of India and Anr.), which was dismissed, the appeal of the applicant is also required to be dismissed. 4. The land of the applicant in village-Bamnoli was acquired vide award no. 01/200...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 724/2017 & I.As. 12269/2017, 12271/2017, 6985/2018, 8949/2018 AND167812018 UTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATION LTD. AND ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Advocate with Ms. Suhasini Raina, Ms. Gitanjali Mathew and Ms. Disha Sharma, Advocates versus 1337X.TO AND ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Advocate as Amicus Curiae with Ms. Mamta Jha, Advocate. Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Advocate with Mr. Ramnish Khanna, Advocate for D-8. Mr. Abhishek Bakshi, Advocate for defendant No.10. Ms. Suruchi Thapar, Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate for defendant No.19. Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, Advocate with Mr. Aditya Shandilya and Mr. Tushar Bhardwaj, Advocates for Reliance Jio Ltd. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Advocate for defendants No.25 and 26. WITH CS (COMM) 724/2017 & Ors. Page 1 of 99 + CS(COMM) 768/2018 & I.As. 4329/2018, 4331/2018, 10396/2018 AND167822018 UTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.& ORS. ....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 724/2017 & I.As. 12269/2017, 12271/2017, 6985/2018, 8949/2018 AND167812018 UTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATION LTD. AND ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Advocate with Ms. Suhasini Raina, Ms. Gitanjali Mathew and Ms. Disha Sharma, Advocates versus 1337X.TO AND ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Advocate as Amicus Curiae with Ms. Mamta Jha, Advocate. Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Advocate with Mr. Ramnish Khanna, Advocate for D-8. Mr. Abhishek Bakshi, Advocate for defendant No.10. Ms. Suruchi Thapar, Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate for defendant No.19. Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, Advocate with Mr. Aditya Shandilya and Mr. Tushar Bhardwaj, Advocates for Reliance Jio Ltd. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Advocate for defendants No.25 and 26. WITH CS (COMM) 724/2017 & Ors. Page 1 of 99 + CS(COMM) 768/2018 & I.As. 4329/2018, 4331/2018, 10396/2018 AND167822018 UTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.& ORS. ....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 724/2017 & I.As. 12269/2017, 12271/2017, 6985/2018, 8949/2018 AND167812018 UTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATION LTD. AND ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Advocate with Ms. Suhasini Raina, Ms. Gitanjali Mathew and Ms. Disha Sharma, Advocates versus 1337X.TO AND ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Advocate as Amicus Curiae with Ms. Mamta Jha, Advocate. Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Advocate with Mr. Ramnish Khanna, Advocate for D-8. Mr. Abhishek Bakshi, Advocate for defendant No.10. Ms. Suruchi Thapar, Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate for defendant No.19. Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, Advocate with Mr. Aditya Shandilya and Mr. Tushar Bhardwaj, Advocates for Reliance Jio Ltd. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Advocate for defendants No.25 and 26. WITH CS (COMM) 724/2017 & Ors. Page 1 of 99 + CS(COMM) 768/2018 & I.As. 4329/2018, 4331/2018, 10396/2018 AND167822018 UTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.& ORS. ....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 724/2017 & I.As. 12269/2017, 12271/2017, 6985/2018, 8949/2018 AND167812018 UTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATION LTD. AND ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Advocate with Ms. Suhasini Raina, Ms. Gitanjali Mathew and Ms. Disha Sharma, Advocates versus 1337X.TO AND ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Advocate as Amicus Curiae with Ms. Mamta Jha, Advocate. Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Advocate with Mr. Ramnish Khanna, Advocate for D-8. Mr. Abhishek Bakshi, Advocate for defendant No.10. Ms. Suruchi Thapar, Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate for defendant No.19. Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, Advocate with Mr. Aditya Shandilya and Mr. Tushar Bhardwaj, Advocates for Reliance Jio Ltd. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Advocate for defendants No.25 and 26. WITH CS (COMM) 724/2017 & Ors. Page 1 of 99 + CS(COMM) 768/2018 & I.As. 4329/2018, 4331/2018, 10396/2018 AND167822018 UTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.& ORS. ....
Tag this Judgment!