Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :05. 09.2013 Judgment pronounced on :23. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 1631/2013 PUNEET KAUSHIK AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr N.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv with Mr Praveen Anand, Ms. Divya Vijan, Ms. Ayushi Kiran & Ms. Neeti Wilson, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, CGSC with Mr. Rajnish K. Jha, Adv. & Dr. Kavita Taunk, Assistant Controller of Patents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The petitioners before this Court claim to have filed on 14.9.2012, in the Patents Office (India) at New Delhi, an international (PCT) application in terms of Rule 18.3 of the PCT Rules, enclosing therewith (i) Form-25 (in duplicate) on behalf of petitioner no.1 Puneet Kaushik (ii) Power of Attorney for Form-25 (copy) (iii) PCT Request along with Declaration of Inventorship (in duplicate) (iv) PCT Power of Attorney (v) complete specification along with drawings (in duplicate) (vi) PCT fee c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 458/2009 % Reserved on:11. h January, 2013 Pronounced on:15. h March, 2013 RECKITT BENKISER INDIA LTD Through: ...... Appellant Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shikha Sachdev, Advocate. Versus WYETH LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr. Vaishali Mittal, Advocate and Ms. Abhilasha Nautiyal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J 1.Reference has been made to this Full Bench, by a Division Bench of this court, vide the reference order dated 8.10.2010 in this FAO(OS), for this larger Bench to consider as to whether a Division Bench of this court in the case of Dabur India Ltd. Vs. Amit Jain & Anr. 2009 (39) PTC 10.(Del) (DB) has correctly held that publication abroad by existence of the design in the records of the Registrar of designs which is open for public inspection...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-19-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h March, 2013 % + IA No.11625/2012 (of the plaintiffs u/O 3.R-1&2 CPC) & IA No.17014/2012 & IA.No. 18679/2012 (both of the defendants u/O 3.R-4 CPC) in CS(OS) No.1866/2012 and Counter Claim 25/2013 SUGEN INC. & ORS. Through: ..... Plaintiffs Mr. C.R. Andhyarujina & Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Soumik Ghosal & Mr. Aditya Gupta, Advs. versus A. RAO & ANR. Through: ..... Defendants Mr. C. Mukund with Ms. Firdouse Wani, Ms. Ekta Bhasin & Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The three plaintiffs viz. Sugen Inc., Pfizer Inc & Pfizer Products India Pvt. Ltd. have instituted this suit against the two defendants i.e. defendant No.2 NATCO Pharma Ltd. and its President (Research & Development) & Additional Director Mr. A. Rao, for injunction from making, selling, distributing, advertising, exporting any product infringing the subject matter of Indian Patent N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-06-2013
* + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.S (OS) No.1361/2002 Date of Decision:06. 12.2013 PAWAN DEEP SINGH BAHL Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. J.Sai Deepak with Mr. Maanav Kumar, Adv. versus PRINCEP SUPPLY AGENCY CF+ ..... Defendant Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. The plaintiff has filed this suit seeking reliefs of permanent injunction, restraining piracy of industrial design, infringement of copyright and passing-off, along with rendition of accounts of profits, delivery-up and damages with respect to Registered Industrial Design No.182353.2. The plaintiff is the sole proprietor of the trading firm, A. Paul Instruments (Delhi). The plaintiffs case is that he, either by himself or through his licensees and sister-concerns, is engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of rail thermometers and related equipment. The specific product of the plaintiff, which is the subject-matter of the instant suit is called Plug with Thermostat or Mercury in Glass Thermos...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: May 01, 2013 + CM No.6436/2013 in RFA(OS) 92/2012 F. HOFFMANN- LA ROCHEE LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr.Shrawan Chopra, Ms.Prachi Agarwal, Advocates. versus CIPLA LTD. Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Pratibha M.Singh, Advocate with Ms.Anusuya Mehrotra, Ms.Ujjwala Jeremiah, Advocates. Mr. Anand Grover, Sr.Advocate instructed by with Ms.Neharika, Ms.Manika Arora, Mr.Mihir Samson, Ms.Suhrita Majumdar, Mr.Dominie Alvaves, Advocates for applicant in CM No.6436/2013. CM No.6433/2013 in RFA(OS) 103/2012 CIPLA LTD Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Pratibha M.Singh, Advocate with Ms.Anusuya Mehrotra, Ms.Ujjwala Jeremiah, Advocates. versus F HOFFMAN LA ROCHEE LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr.Shrawan Chopra, Ms.Prachi Agarwal and Ms.Nayantara Sanyal, Advocates. CM No.6436/2013 in RFA (OS) 92/2012 M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: May 01, 2013 + CM No.6436/2013 in RFA(OS) 92/2012 F. HOFFMANN- LA ROCHEE LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr.Shrawan Chopra, Ms.Prachi Agarwal, Advocates. versus CIPLA LTD. Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Pratibha M.Singh, Advocate with Ms.Anusuya Mehrotra, Ms.Ujjwala Jeremiah, Advocates. Mr. Anand Grover, Sr.Advocate instructed by with Ms.Neharika, Ms.Manika Arora, Mr.Mihir Samson, Ms.Suhrita Majumdar, Mr.Dominie Alvaves, Advocates for applicant in CM No.6436/2013. CM No.6433/2013 in RFA(OS) 103/2012 CIPLA LTD Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Pratibha M.Singh, Advocate with Ms.Anusuya Mehrotra, Ms.Ujjwala Jeremiah, Advocates. versus F HOFFMAN LA ROCHEE LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr.Shrawan Chopra, Ms.Prachi Agarwal and Ms.Nayantara Sanyal, Advocates. CM No.6436/2013 in RFA (OS) 92/2012 M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-15-2013
.* HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on : February 19, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 15, 2013 I.A. No.11874/2012 in CS(OS) 1446/2011 MICOLUBE INDIA LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Vikas Khera & Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advs. Versus RAKESH KUMAR Trading As SAURABH INDUSTRIES & ORS. ..... Defendants Through : Mr. N.K. Anand, Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Saif Khan, Mr. Monish Biala and Mr. Nischal Anand, Advs. Mr. Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jaspreet Sareen & Mr. Angad Varma, Advs. for the Interveners. AND CS(OS) 384/2008 & I.A. No.9537/2011, I.A. No.13404/2012 MOHAN LAL Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr. Ashok Goel & Mr. Ranjev Kumar, Advs. Versus SONA PAINT & HARDWARES ..... Defendants Through : Mr. Mohan Vidhani, Mr. Rahul Vidhani & Mr. Arun Jain, Advs. Ms. Pratibha M. Singh, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) CS(OS) No.1446/2011 & CS(OS) No. 384/2008 Page No.1 of 94 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH HON'BLE ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-06-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7881/2011 & CM 17837/2011 % Judgment dated 06.02.2013 SRI SAI AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through : Mr.Amit Khemka, Mr.Rishi Sehgal and Ms.Sanorita D. Bharali, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Jatan Singh, Advocate for the respondent no.1 Mr.T.K. Joseph, Advocate for the respondent no.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Pleadings are complete in the matter. With the consent of counsel for the parties, present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. Petitioner no.1 is stated to be an Ayurvedic Medical college and hospital. The college was established by petitioner no.2, which is stated to be a fully charitable society duly registered under the Societies Registration Act. The petitioner has been constituted with the primary object of the service of the cause of re-establishment and spread of Ayurveda, which is an aged old Ind...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-27-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 147/2011 % Judgment dated 27.02.2013 ADIDAS INDIA MARKETING PRIVATE LTD ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vijay Srivastava, Adv. versus HICARE INDIA PROPERTIES PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Arun Kathpalia, Mr.Santosh Kumar, Mr.Shoeb Alam and Mr.Vaibhav Choudhary, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI 1 Present objection petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for setting aside the Award dated 10.12.2010 passed by a former Judge of this Court. The impugned award was rendered by the learned Arbitrator on a claim filed by the respondent/claimant against the petitioner company for alleged breach of Agreement to Lease dated 02.08.2007.2. The facts, necessary to be noticed for disposal of the present petition, are that on 02.08.2007 an Agreement to Lease was executed between one Uppal Housing Limited and the petitioner company with respe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-15-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:19. 02.2013 Judgment delivered on:15. 05.2013 CS(OS) 384/2008 MOHAN LAL, PROPRIETOR OF MOURYA INDUSTRIES .....Plaintiff Through: Mr Ashok Goel & Mr Ranjeev Kumar, Advs. Vs SONA PAINT & HARDWARES .....Defendants Through: Mr Mohan Vidhani, Mr Rahul Vidhani & Mr Arun Jain, Advs. Ms Pratibha M. Singh, Advocate, amicus curiae. + CS(OS) 1446/2011 MICOLUBE INDIA LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr S.K. Bansal, Mr Vikas Khera & Mr Pankaj Kumar, Advs. Vs RAKESH KUMAR Trading as SAURABH INDUSTRIES & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr Pravin Anand & Mr Saif Khan Advs. Mr Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr Jaspreet Sareen & Mr Angad Varma, Advs. for the Interveners. Ms Pratibha M. Singh, Advocate, amicus curiae. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J CS(OS) No. 348/2008 CS(OS) No. 1446/2011 & IA Nos. 9537/2011 (by plaintiff), 13404/2012 (b...
Tag this Judgment!