Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1970SC1061; 1970MhLJ934(SC); (1970)1SCC182; [1970]3SCR354
..... whose roll he is not entered--.section 41 of the act empowered a high court to make rules as to the qualifications and admission of proper persons to be 'advocates of the court' and subject to such rules to ..... now or hereafter entered as an advocate or vakil on the roll of any high court under the letters patent constituting such court, or under section 41 of this act, or enrolled as a pleader in the chief court of the punjab under section 8 of this act, shall be entitled to practice in all the courts subordinate to the court on the roll of which he is entered--and any person so entered who ordinarily practices in the court on the roll of which he is entered or some court subordinate thereto shall ..... , notwithstanding anything herein contained, be entitled, as such, to practice in any court in the territories to which this act extends other than a high court on whose roll he is not entered, or, with the permission of the court--in any high court on .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Privy Council
..... had already decided adversely to him in their judgment in that suit; he also submitted that as he was charged with offences which were criminal under the penal code he should not be dealt with under the letters patent unless and until he was convicted of these offences after a trial in the criminal courts. ..... 8, letters patent, of the court, and ordered his name to be struck off the roll of vakils practicing before them. ..... procedure the petitioner's counsel and the government advocate addressed the court, which reserved judgment, and thereafter found the four above charges fully established, and ordered the petitioner to be struck off the roll of vakils of the court. ..... 8, letters patent, with charges of a criminal nature against a practitioner unless and until these have been investigated by a criminal court, they regard it as eminently fitting that in such cases the criminal prosecution should precede any disciplinary decision. ..... 8, letters patent, prescribes no special procedure for dealing with complaints against the conduct of vakils practising before the court, and merely empowers the court "to remove or suspend from practice on reasonable cause" advocates, vakils or attorneys-at-law of ..... 8, letters patent. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... from the brief of the plaintiff in error the following description of the final and perfected form of the machine, and which is claimed to embody the various inventions and improvements covered by the several patents: "the inventions of these various patents can be more readily understood by first understanding the construction of this type of stone-crushing machines, which has become to be known as the 'gyratory type of stone crushers. ..... " "the defendants, further answering, say, upon information and belief, that some of the older ones of complainant's said patents show and describe improvements which are claimed in other and later of the complainant's said patents, and they further say that as to the said several patents by them herein and hereinbefore mentioned are shown and described devices, parts, or combination of parts that are substantially the same as the devices and ..... plate at the end of the shaft, all of which, except the metal plate, were present in the brown machine as made and sold more than two years before gates applied for the patent, and the metal plate was old and in use for the same purpose as in gates' machine long before his application. ..... we here perceive the double motion -- that is, "the revolving and rolling motion" -- which is a feature of the pearce patent, and the operation of the two machines is similar in that in both the pestle alternately closes upon and recedes from the sides of the outer shell, so that any substance or material to be ground is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... congress, by this legislation, evidenced an intention to put an end to controversy by providing a tribunal before which those interested could be heard and the rolls authoritatively made up of those who were entitled to participate in the partition of the tribal lands. ..... appeals from a decree of the circuit court of appeals affirming a decree of the district court in a suit brought by the united states upon the grounds of fraud and mistake to cancel an enrollment on the creek tribal roll and an allotment certificate and patent issued thereunder, page 260 u. s. ..... tribunal, when not impeached for fraud or mistake, conclusive of the question of membership in the tribe, when followed, as was the case here, by the action of the interior department confirming the allotment and ordering the patents conveying the lands, which were in fact issued. ..... under authority of acts of congress, the [dawes] commission to the five civilized tribes enrolled thomas atkins as a creek indian alive on april 1, 1899, the secretary of the interior approved, an allotment was selected for him, a patent issued and was recorded as required by page 260 u. s. ..... never existed, and that his enrollment came about through fraud and gross mistake of law and fact, the united states brought this proceeding against many defendants to annul the allotment certificate and patent and to quiet title in the tribe. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... in the course of enquiry, i ascertained that there were patent discrepancies in respect of roll nos. ..... 1126, i detected the following discrepancies in respect of history papers.roll nos.subjectcode no.marks in answer scriptmarks in tabulation sheets1126historypaper-i58there is overwriting as regards code number shown in answer script.1111911126historypaper-1140100190 in view of the above findings, examination of the answer scripts and relevant tabulation sheets of roll nos. ..... the discrepancies are as follows :roll nos.subjectcode no.marks in answer scriptmarks in tabulation sheets17sociologypaper-i5311519517sociologypaper-ii149149189298sociologypaper-i83104194298sociologypaper-ii18284184298political sciencepaper-i172109179913political sciencepaper-i158681881126political sciencepaper-i33581881126political sciencepaper-ii2421511913420political sciencepaper-i110138188 in respect of the roll no. ..... further, i found that no code number is written on theconcerned detached slips of roll nos. ..... for roll no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... prior to the application by the inventor or discoverer of a patent, shall be held to possess the right to use and vend ..... the subject of patents, with a proviso ..... patent shall be held invalid by reason of such purchase, sale, or use prior to the application for a patent ..... patent would have entitled him, had it been applied for, ..... patented ..... patent ..... patent, the great object of the patent laws, as declared in the 4th section of the act of 1837, ..... patent ..... patent, together with such changes as have been since made, for though they may be retrospective in their operation, that is not a sound objection to their validity; the powers of congress to legislate upon the subject of patents ..... patent ..... patent by harley, and that ..... patent, and prepared more than one set of papers for the purpose; made his application 17 february, 1835, for a patent ..... patent ..... patent, subject to the legal consequences of his previous acts, and connecting these with the want of an assertion of a right, to the use by the defendants of the invention patented ..... patent ..... patent rights, and these sections are operative, so far as they are applicable, notwithstanding the patent ..... patent when an original one was invalid by accident, inadvertence, or mistake, and without any fraudulent intent, by reason of the terms of the 3d section of the act of 1793 not having been complied with, "provided, however, that such new patent so granted shall in all respects be liable to the same matters of objection and defense as any original patent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : AIR1945Mad144; (1945)1MLJ106
..... legal practitioners act reads as follows:every person now or hereafter entered as an advocate or vakil on the roll of any high court under the letters patent constituting such court or under section 41 of this act or enrolled as a pleader in the chief court of the punjab under section 8 of this act, shall be entitled to practise in all the courts subordinate to the court on the roll of which he is entered and in all revenue offices situate within the local limits of the appellate ..... jurisdiction of such courtssubject nevertherless, to the rules in force relating to the language in which the court or office is to be addressed by pleaders or revenue agents; and any person so entered who ordinarily practises in the court on the roll of which he is entered or some court subordinate thereto shall, notwithstanding anything herein contained, be entitled as such to practise in any court in british india other than a high court on whose ..... office.these references have been made by reason of the words:and any person so entered who ordinarily prastises in the court on the roll of which he is entered or some court subordinate thereto shall notwithstanding anything herein contained, be entitled as such to practise in any court in british india other than a high court on whose roll he is not entered.the respondents have not ordinarily practised in the bombay high court or in courts subordinate thereto and if the section .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... in the course of enquiry, i ascertained that there were patent discrepancies in respect of roll nos. ..... 1126, i detected the following discrepancies in respect of history papers.roll nos.subjectcode no.marks in answer scriptmarks in tabulation sheets1126historypaper-i58there is overwriting as regards code number shown in answer script.1111911126historypaper-1140100190 in view of the above findings, examination of the answer scripts and relevant tabulation sheets of roll nos. ..... the discrepancies are as follows :roll nos.subjectcode no.marks in answer scriptmarks in tabulation sheets17sociologypaper-i5311519517sociologypaper-ii149149189298sociologypaper-i83104194298sociologypaper-ii18284184298political sciencepaper-i172109179913political sciencepaper-i158681881126political sciencepaper-i33581881126political sciencepaper-ii2421511913420political sciencepaper-i110138188 in respect of the roll no. ..... further, i found that no code number is written on theconcerned detached slips of roll nos. ..... for roll no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... him to enter upon record the proceedings in this cause antecedent to the granting by him of the rule to show cause why process should not issue, to repeal the patent in the proceedings mentioned and upon which the said rule was founded; that the said judge do award a process in the nature of a scire facias to the patentees to show cause ..... why the said patent should not be repealed, with costs of suit; that upon the return of such process as duly served, the said judge do proceed to try the cause upon the pleadings ..... of the district court upon the patentee, to show cause why process should not issue to repeal the patent, the patent is not repealed de facto by making the rule absolute, but the process to be awarded is in the nature of a scire facias at common law to the patentee to show cause why the patent should not repealed, with costs of suit, and upon the return of such process, duly served, ..... surprising if, after such anxious legislation, there should exist in the act a clause which in a summary manner enables any person to repeal his patent, and thus sweep away his exclusive property without interposing any guards by way of appeal, or any regular proceedings by which the validity of titles ..... as the patents are not enrolled in the records of any court, but among the rolls of the department of state, it was necessary to give some directions as to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ616Mad; (1998)IMLJ218
..... respondent, who while reiterating the submissions made before the learned single judge and adopting the reasons assigned by the learned single judge also contended that the labour court committed patent error in ignoring the attendance rolls produced to substantiate the claims that the five workmen who were treated by the labour court as workmen of the company in question were not really their workmen and that the learned single ..... the averments before the labour court were that the workmen were all working in the respondent management company, that the workmen in the company had never been kept on the rolls of the company for more than few years, they were all members of the intuc union, that they raised a charter of demands on november 15, 1983, and during the pendency of negotiations, the management issued a closure ..... the respondent-management contended that the claim of the workmen that the management never kept the workmen on rolls for more than few years and that they were meagrely paid is false. ..... ) the respondent-management, has not adverted to the attendance rolls and these aspects which go to the root of the matter as to the status of the five workmen in question, which are essentially necessary in finding out as to whether the dispute has been properly espoused and duly referred .....
Tag this Judgment!