Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patent rolls Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 5,552 results (0.139 seconds)

May 20 2002 (SC)

P.V. Hemalatha Vs. Kattamkandi Puthiya Maliackal Saheeda and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC2445; 2002(5)ALT19(SC); 2002(2)BLJR1626; [2002(3)JCR34(SC)]; JT2002(Suppl1)SC494; 2002(2)KLT792(SC); 2002(4)SCALE662; (2002)5SCC548; [2002]3SCR1098

..... court could be availed of in relation to the territory falling in malabar district of erstwhile madras state and now forming new state of kerala, came to the conclusion that clause 36 of madras letters patent of high court does not cover a situation as is obtaining in cases before them where the two judges differed on all issues of fact and law, have delivered two different judgments and not found necessary ..... that the expression 'other jurisdiction' used in section 52 preceded by such words 'original and appellate' is an expression of wide import and would, therefore, include clause 36 of letters patent of madras high court which governs subject matter of power and jurisdiction of one or more judges of that high court in the event of difference of opinion between them. ..... it is on such understanding of the procedural provisions contained in the code, travancore-cochin act, and the kerala act read with clause 36 of the letters patent of madras high court that the judges forming the division bench came to the conclusion that there is no other option before them except to confirm the decree of the subordinate court in accordance with sub ..... the two learned judges also considered the argument, which is now being advanced before us on behalf of the petitioner, that the letters patent of the high court of madras containing clause 36 could be invoked to resolve the difference of opinion between two judges both on questions of fact and law by referring the case for the opinion of one or more .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2009 (SC)

Mahesh Chandra Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC199; 2009(9)SCALE206; (2009)8SCC273; 2009(3)SLJ385(SC); 2009(7)LC3083(SC)

..... we quote herein below the relevant paragraphs from the judgment in nihal chand (supra), which read as follows:.this court under its powers conferred on it by the letters patent is entitled to enrol advocates for practising in this court and courts subordinate to it, vide clause 7 which runs as follows:and we do hereby authorize and empower the said high court of judicature at allahabad to approve, admit ..... now or hereafter entered as an advocate or vakil on the roll of any high court under the letters patent constituting such court, or under section 41 of this act, or enrolled as a pleader in the chief court of the punjab under section 8 of this act, shall be entitled to practice in all the courts subordinate to the court on the roll of which he is entered----and any person so entered who ordinarily practices in the court on the roll of which he is entered or some court subordinate thereto shall ..... lays down that where on receipt of a complaint or otherwise a state bar council has reason to believe that any advocate on its roll has been guilty of professional or other misconduct, it shall refer the case for disposal to its disciplinary committee. ..... section 30 provides that subject to the provisions of this act, every advocate whose name is entered in the common roll shall be entitled as of right to practise throughout the territories to which this act extends in all courts including the supreme court and before any tribunal or any other authority before whom such advocate is by or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 1969 (SC)

Prof. Chandra Prakash Agarwal Vs. Chaturbuj Das Parikh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC1061; 1970MhLJ934(SC); (1970)1SCC182; [1970]3SCR354

..... whose roll he is not entered--.section 41 of the act empowered a high court to make rules as to the qualifications and admission of proper persons to be 'advocates of the court' and subject to such rules to ..... now or hereafter entered as an advocate or vakil on the roll of any high court under the letters patent constituting such court, or under section 41 of this act, or enrolled as a pleader in the chief court of the punjab under section 8 of this act, shall be entitled to practice in all the courts subordinate to the court on the roll of which he is entered--and any person so entered who ordinarily practices in the court on the roll of which he is entered or some court subordinate thereto shall ..... , notwithstanding anything herein contained, be entitled, as such, to practice in any court in the territories to which this act extends other than a high court on whose roll he is not entered, or, with the permission of the court--in any high court on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2000 (SC)

Punjab and Sind Bank and ors. Vs. Sakattar Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2001(88)FLR383]; (2001)ILLJ174SC; 2000(7)SCALE686; 2001(1)LC149(SC); (2001)1UPLBEC304

..... the high court, therefore, declared that the order striking out the name of the respondent from the rolls of the bank is a nullity due to the patent violation of the principles of natural justice and the appellants' order also suffered from many defects such as non-application of mind to the matter. ..... the appellants pleaded that the respondent had remained unauthorisedly absent for a period of 190 days and, therefore, made himself liable to be removed from the rolls of the bank in terms of para 17 of the bipartite settlement and para 522 of the sastri award. ..... orderrajendra babu, j.the respondent challenged the order of termination effected by means of striking out his name from the muster roll of the appellant-bank by a writ petition filed in the high court of punjab & haryana. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2006 (SC)

Surendranagar Distt. Panchayat and anr. Vs. Gangaben Laljibhai and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR548]; JT2006(6)SC64; (2006)IIILLJ320SC; 2006(6)SCALE408; (2006)9SCC132; 2007(1)SLJ63(SC)

..... thus in most cases, the workman (claimant) can only call upon the employer to produce before the court the nominal muster roll for the given period, the letter of appointment or termination, if any, the wage register, the attendance register etc. ..... the above judgments further lay down that mere non-production of muster rolls per se without any plea of suppression by the claimant workman will not be the ground for the tribunal to draw an adverse inference against the management. ..... appellants challenge correctness of the judgment rendered by a division bench of the gujarat high court dismissing the letters patent appeal filed by the appellants. ..... mere non-production of the muster roll for a particular period was not sufficient for the labour court to hold that the workman had worked for 240 days as claimed.6. ..... the writ petitions filed were dismissed and so was the letters patent appeal as indicated above. ..... the labour court noted that the details pertaining to attendance of the respondent have been produced, and zerox copies of the salary register and muster roll have also produced. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 1952 (SC)

Aswini Kumar Ghosh and anr. Vs. Arabinda Bose and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC369; [1953]4SCR1

..... the allahabad high court thus :- 'not only by the letters patent but by the civil procedure code, an advocate may act for his client in this court in the manner in that statute set forth and do all things that a pleader, that is, a vakil, may do, provided always that he be upon the roll of the court's advocates' : bakhtawar singh v. ..... act and section 2 enacts so far as material here :- 'notwithstanding anything contained in the indian bar councils act, 1926, or in any other law regulating the conditions subject to which a person not entered in the roll of advocates of a high court may, be permitted to practise in that high court every advocate of the supreme court shall be entitled as of right to practise in any high court whether or not he is ..... to the proper interpretation of its scope, and inasmuch as that clause supersedes only those provisions of the bar councils act, and of any other law which exclude persons not entered in the roll of advocates of a high court from the right to practise in that court, the enacting clause must be construed as conferring only a right co-extensive with the disability removed by the opening ..... non-obstante clause are to supersede, not the whole of the indian bar councils act but, only that part of it which regulates the conditions subject to which a person not entered in the roll of advocates of a high court may be permitted to practise in that high court, that is to say, that the supersession of the indian bar councils act is only to the same .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 1972 (SC)

The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh Vs. the State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC231; (1973)1SCC261; [1973]2SCR1073; 1973(5)LC513(SC)

..... and reasons of the bill which came to be enacted as the act the main features were stated to be as follows:(1) the establishment of an all india bar council and a common roll of advocates, and advocate on the common roll having a right to practice in any part of the country and in any court, including the supreme court;(2) the integration of the bar into a single class of legal practitioners known ..... material, is reproduced below :section 8(1) 'no person shall be entitled as of right to practice in any high court unless his name is entered in roll of the advocates of the high court maintained under this act:provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to any attorney of the high court. ..... council of india was to direct that the name of such person shall, without payment of any fee, be removed from the roll of the first named state bar council and entered in the roll of the other bar council and the state bar councils concerned were enjoined to comply with such a direction. ..... bar council had to send the bar council of india an authenticated copy of the roll of advocates prepared by it for the first time and thereafter communicate all alterations and ..... provision it appears that in the indian stamp act article 30 continued to be so framed as to make a provision for levy of a duty on entry as an advocate on the roll of any high court under the indian bar councils act 1926 or in exercise of the power conferred on such court by letters patent or by the legal practitioners act 1879. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2024 (SC)

Gaurav Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... india; or (iii-a) after undergoing a course of study in law, the duration of which is not less than two academic years commencing from the academic year 1967-68, or any earlier academic 5 part a5 to qualify to be admitted as an advocate on a state roll, a person must: (a) be a citizen of india; (b) complete the age of twenty-one years; (c) obtain a degree in law; (d) fulfil such other conditions as may be specified in the rules made by the sbcs under chapter iii; and (e) pay an ..... according to section 28(2), the sbcs can make rules providing for the: (a) time within which and form in which an advocate shall express an intention for the entry of their name in the state roll under section 20; (b) form in which an application shall be made to the sbcs for admission as an advocate and how such application shall be disposed of by the enrolment committee of the sbcs; (c) conditions subject to which a person may be admitted as an ..... the committee recommended setting up of the sbcs and an all-india bar council, uniform minimum qualification for admission to the roll of advocates, a common roll of advocates maintained by the respective sbcs, and permitting the enrolled advocates to practice in any court in india, including the ..... the establishment of the high courts by letters patent in the presidencies of calcutta, bombay, and madras brought all courts in the territories of british india under a unified ..... the letters patent also allowed the high courts to enroll advocates, vakils, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 1971 (SC)

Oriental Textile Finishing Mills, Amritsar Vs. Labour Court, Jullundur ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1972SC277; [1972(24)FLR216]; 1972LabIC157; (1971)IILLJ505SC; (1971)3SCC646; [1972]1SCR490

..... them to join duty by a date specified therein and subsequently by another letter called upon them to justify their absence failing which they were informed that their names would be struck off from the muster roll;(5) that notwithstanding those notices and the willingness of the management to take them back the respondent gave no reply and continued the strike till they were informed by letters dated 25-2-59, 4-3-59 and 17-3-59 that their ..... uptil today you did not report yourself for duty by which it is clearly patent that you do not want to work in the factory. ..... the standing orders contemplated termination of employment by the employer and in those cases there could be no doubt that the appellant had terminated the employment of the respondents by removing their names from the muster roll without giving them any notice of such removal. ..... a letters patent appeal was filed by the management against this decision but later it was dismissed as ..... from the muster rolls, the respondents sat outside the mill gate and in spite of persuasion by the labour officer as well as by the management who were genuinely desirous of their resuming work, they did not join duty and as a ..... view of your these illegal activities the management has struck off your name from the muster roll of the mills w.e.f. 4-3-59.8. ..... you will not give any satisfactory reply then your name will be struck off from the muster roll of the factory. ..... show cause as to why your name be not struck off from the muster roll of the factory. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2007 (SC)

Vijay Kumar and ors. Vs. Whirlpool of India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR370]; (2008)ILLJ308SC; 2008(2)MhLj155; 2008MPLJ475(SC); (2008)1SCC119; 2007AIRSCW7323

..... challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the division bench of the punjab and haryana high court dismissing the letters patent appeal filed by the appellants questioning the legality of the judgment rendered by a learned single judge dismissing the writ petition. 2. ..... according to the appellants all of them continued to be on rolls beyond 30.6.1995 and, therefore, they are entitled to be benefits. 5. ..... the present appellants filed letters patent appeal which was dismissed as noted above. 4. ..... , faridabad and ballabgarh on the rolls of (its various specified divisions) as on 30.6.1995, (hereinafter called eligible workmen). ..... the stand of the appellants of continuance beyond 30.6.1995 is also disputed on the ground that learned single judge has referred to various documents to conclude that none of the appellants were in fact on the rolls of the employer as on 30.6.1995. ..... in support of the appeal, learned counsel for the appellants submitted that stress in the settlement was on 'permanent workmen on the rolls of specified divisions on 30.6.1995'. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //