Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patent rolls Court: kerala Page 1 of about 1,011 results (0.021 seconds)

K.P. Satheesan Vs. the Advocate General, High Court of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1993Ker22

..... advocate shall not be a full-time salaried employee of any person, government, firm, corporation or concern, so long as he continues to practise and shall, on taking up any such employment intimate the fact to the bar council on whose roll his name appears, and shall thereupon cease to practise as an advocate so long as he continues in such employment.nothing in this rule shall aply to a law officer of the central government or the government of a state or of any ..... clause (f) of rule 2, chapter i, part iii of the bar council of india rules states that the name of an advocate appearing in the state roll shall not be on the electoral roll, if he is in full-time service or is in such part-time business or other vocation not permitted in the case of practising advocates by the rules either of the state ..... the courts can interfere with the election only if the very foundation of the election, namely, the electoral roll, is illegal, in the sense that it has been prepared in violation of the provisions of the rules disentitling a large number of members from exercising franchise or by including a ..... first step towards the conduct of the election, second respondent issued a preliminary electoral roll containing the names of all advocates, whose names are required to be included under ..... respondent may perhaps be entitled to seek election by virtue of the inclusion of his name in the electoral roll, his nomination should not have been accepted as he had given a patently false declaration. .....

Amaravila Krishnan Nair Vs. the Election Commissioner of India, New De ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1972Ker5

..... restraining respondents 1 to 3 from holding general election to the legislative assembly of the kerala state as on 17th september 1970 or in the alternative to declare as improper, void and illegal the revised electoral rolls of the assembly constituencies in the state of kerala as existing on 15th january 1970 (as asserted by the 1st respondent) and as revised again and published on or before 8th august 1970 as stated by the ..... 1st respondent in exhibit r5 and directing respondents 1 to 3 to effect a proper revision of the electoral rolls for the assembly constituencies in kerala state in conformity with the provisions contained in section 21 of the representation of the people act of 1951 before holding the general elections for the legislative assembly of the ..... rule 11 (c) of the registration of electors rules 1960, passed under the representation of the people act 1950, for short the rules, and that no legible copy of the electoral rolls as published on 15-1-1970 was given to the party represented by him as undertaken by the 2nd respondent in the conference, nor was sufficient time given according to the rules for filing ..... the interference might not be as patent as interference after the writ has ..... the true object is patently to hold up the election (which has now actually commenced) and whether or not such a declaration will be effective for the purpose, and whether or not it will .....

Commissioner, City Corporation Vs. Harihara Iyer

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1961Ker62

..... in the first of the two aforesaid cases, the question arose whether the income received by the appellants company under three separate agreements relating to its patent rights was from investment. ..... rolls royce ltd. .....

Vareed S/O. Kunnan Ouseph Vs. Mary, Daughter of Adattukaran Perinchu

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1969Ker103

..... , air 1953 sc 357, where it was held that an appeal lay under clause 15 of the letters patent (bombay) from the decision of a single judge of the high court in the exercise of the appellate jurisdiction conferred on the high court under section 76 of the trade marks act. ..... conferred by section 76 it has to exercise that jurisdiction in the same manner as it exercises its other appellate jurisdiction and when such jurisdiction is exercised by a single judge, his judgment becomes subject to appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent there being nothing to the contrary in the trade marks act,'9. ..... dealing with the contention that the judgment rendered by the single judge of the high court in an appeal preferred under section 76 was not subject to further appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent his lordship mahajan, j. .....

Thuravoor Grama Panchayath Vs. Peter Jerry

Court : Kerala

..... in that situation first appellate court was patently in error in interfering with the decree of the trial court refusing to grant damages in favour of the respondents. 25. .....

S. Prasannan Vs. the Controller General of Trademark and Others

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2012(3)KLT351; 2012(3)KLJ600

..... learned assistant solicitor general of india contended relying on rule 7 of the rules that the mere fact that there was a deficiency in the fee tendered along with the application for a patent is not a reason to hold that the application for a patent can be deemed to have been filed only when the deficiency in the fee was made good, that it was open to the second respondent to accept the fee in pat and to ..... per the proviso to clause (c) of sub rule (2) of rule 7 relied on by the learned assistant solicitor general when the fee payable on the request of examination of the application for patent was tendered, the second respondent could have accepted the demand drafts for rs.1,500/- and given time to the petitioner to make good the deficiency in the fee by replacing the stale demand draft ..... and in the receipt acknowledging payment of the fee of rs.1,000/- issued on 17.2.2005, it was mentioned that a formal receipt for application number will follow and therefore for all purposes the application for a patent can be said to have been filed only on 17.2.2005 and not on 19.1.2005 when the application was initially filed without the prescribed fee. ..... i accordingly overrule the contention raised by the learned assistant solicitor general that in the instant case, the application for a patent was filed on 19.1.2005 and hold that the application was filed only on 17.2.2005 when the fee of rs.1,000/- payable on that application was paid in full by the petitioner and received by the second .....

Kiranlal Vs. State of Kerala Represented by the Secretary to Governmen ...

Court : Kerala

the clearance to be given by the 5th respondent /state level authorisation committee for renal transplantation under the transplantation of human organs act , 1994 ('act' in short) and transplantation of human organs rules, 1995 ('rules' in short) is the subject matter involved . 2. the challenge stands is more as to the vires of the rules 4a(4)(v) or/and rule 6f(d)(iv) and seeks for a declaration that the conviction of 8th respondent/donor in crime no.258/01 of payyangadi police station in respect of offence under section 55(a) of the kerala abkari act (pending in appeal before the sessions court, thalasserry) is not an impediment for giving clearance for the kidney transplantation surgery to be performed in the 6th respondent's hospital. 3. this matter was heard yesterday and since the court felt the need to have some more clarification, it was posted today as "to be spoken to". heard mr. kaleeswaram raj, the learned counsel for the petitioner, mr. vijayaraghavan, the state attorney on behalf of the concerned respondents, particularly, respondent nos.2,5 and 6 and also mr. r.s. kalkura on behalf of the 7th respondent hospital, at length. it is sated that there is no much factual dispute and that the issue is more related to the scope and object of the relevant act/rules and also as to the contents /observation in ext.p16 certificate issued by the asst. superintendent of police , i.e., the 4th respondent, referring to the conviction of the donor in the sessions case. 4. the .....

V.O. John Vs. Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [2009]148CompCas411(Ker)

..... the special resolution was passed unanimously in the annual general meeting and considering the grave injustice caused by the stay order based on a patently illegal interpretation of law, we are of the view that the learned single judge was right in interfering with exhibit p9 by exercising supervisory jurisdiction to prevent failure of justice.24. ..... in these circumstances we set aside the order of the division bench and direct that the letters patent appeal filed against the judgment of the learned single judge would now be heard and decided on merits.13. ..... rule 18 of the bombay high court appellate side rules read with clause 15 of the letters patent provides for appeal to the division bench of the high court from the judgment of the learned single judge passed on a writ petition under article 226 of the constitution. ..... and if in deciding the matter, in the final order the court gives ancillary directions which may pertain to article 227, this ought not to be held to deprive a party of the right of appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent where the substantial part of the order sought to be appealed against is under article 226. ..... and, if in deciding the matter, in the final order the court gives ancillary directions which may pertain to article 227, this ought not to be held to deprive a party of the right of appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent where the substantial part of the order sought to be appealed against is under article 226. .....

K. Premavalli Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1998Ker231

..... secretary of state, air 1923 lahore 275 considered the scope of section 54 of the land acquisition act read with clause (10) of the letters patent and took the view that right of appeal to a bench of two judges is not impliedly barred by section 54 of the land acquisition act ..... taken by a single judge of the high court under the delhi rent control act as well as a decision taken by a division bench in the letters of patent are independent proceedings, and not a continuation of the proceedings under the delhi rent control act. ..... in any view, in that case, the madras high court held that a letters patent appeal is not maintainable mainly on the ground that the decision of the high court in appeal under section 54 of the land acquisition act is not a ..... , air 1944 nag 284 considered the scope of section 54 and held that appeal under the letters patent lies from the decision of a single judge to a division bench of the high court. ..... it follows that, if the act had not taken away the letters patent appeal, an appeal shall certainly lie from the judgment of the single judge to the high court ..... singh, air 1965 sc 1442 held that no appeal would lie under clause (10) letters of patent in a proceeding under the delhi rent control act. ..... the maintainability of the appeal under the letters of patent were also upheld by the full bench of the andhra pradesh high court in ..... court took the view that there is no bar in maintaining the letters of patent appeal in proceedings under the land acquisition act.15. .....

Balan Vs. Sivagiri Sree Narayana Dharma Sanghom Trust

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2006Ker58; 2006(4)CTC273; [2006(2)JCR94]; 2005(4)KLT865

..... following categories of judgment are excluded from the appealable judgments under the first limb of clause 10 of the letters patent:1) a judgment passed in exercise of appellate jurisdiction in respect of a decree or order made in exercise of appellate jurisdiction by a court subject to superintendence of the said high court in other words no letters patent appeal lies to the high court from a judgment of one judge of the high court passed in second appeal;2) ..... the bombay high court in anand issardas motiani 's case (supra) held that even though no appeal is filed mentioned under the letters patent to the division bench from the order of a single judge to division bench if interim orders are passed affecting the right of ..... whether an order passed under section 17b of the industrial disputes act in a writ petition is appealable under clause 10 of letters patent (patna) act wherein an appeal will lie only against judgment in employer in relation to management of central mine planning and design ..... were considering the meaning of the word 'judgment' occurring in the relevant clauses of letters patent of various high courts where appeal was provided only from judgment of the single judge and ..... was held that even though an application under section 24 cpc is in the nature of original proceeding, since only appeal is provided against judgment under the letters patent and application under section 24 cpc is to be treated as one to be filed on the appellate side and appeal will not lie. .....