Parties - Judgment Search Results

Parties. Vs. Mrs. Anirudh Tiwari and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Kanchan 2014.08.06 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh C.O.C.P.No.1981 of 2014 2 parties. In the affidavit dated 8.11.2004, it is stated that the judgment Annexure P-5 would be complied with within

B. Party No. 2: Alingal Mohamed Kutty Vs. A. Party: Vaniyanthodi Pathu ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1968Ker70; 1968CriLJ351

itself it could clearly be seen that there is likelihood of a breach of peace ensuing if the parties are allowed to have their own way. The learned Magistrate was satisfied on the police report that to

Dr. Subramanian Swamy, President, All India Janatha Party, No. 1, Papa ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1998(1)CTC300

ORDER1. The petitioner herein has filed this petition against the order of the learned Sessions Judge directing the issuance of process inter alia contending that it is the Magistrate who is alone vested with the power...

Ratnakar Naik and ors. (Second Party Nos. 1 to 3) Vs. Golakh Chandra S ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1966Ori56; 1966CriLJ279

within the meaning of Sections 366 and 367, it must he a speaking order as under the statute parties arc called upon to file written statements and give evidence. The order being a judicial order, the Magistrate

Turu Majhi and ors., (2nd Party) Vs. the State (Bimal Mukherjee, 1st P ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1953Cal397,57CWN311

party started proceedings under Section 144. Criminal P.C. and an order was issued under that section restraining the parties from entering the lands. But that order was dissolved on 16-8-1951 -- the Sub-Divisional Magistrate recording a finding

Owners And Parties Interested In The Vessel M.v. Polaris Galaxy Vs. Ba ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6897-6898 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 19314-19315 OF2021 OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL M.V. POLARIS GALAXY … Appellant (s) Versus BANQUE CANTONALE DE GENEVE … Respondent (s)

Communist Party Of India Marxist Vs. Dinesh Kumar Khara

Court: Supreme Court of India

Income Tax Act 1961, unconstitutional on the ground that the non-disclosure of information regarding the funding of political parties is violative of the right to information of citizens under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The amendments which

Shiv Sena Party Vs. B.C. Deshmukh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Aliyasanthana can prevail over the provisions of Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act 11956 and Whether the Parties by their conduct can start a custom afresh, though such custom was not prevalent earlier but sought to

Janatha Dal Party Vs. the Indian National Congress and ors

Court: Supreme Court of India

for all purposes.3. The General Elections to the Lok Sabha were held in the year 1977. The opposition parties consisting of Congress (O) Group - led by Nijalingappa, Lok Dal headed by late Sri Charan Singh, Jana

Indian Democratic Party and anr Vs. U.O.i. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

respect of the State of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, directed as follows:“Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that State of Telangana has been created recently on 2.6.2014 and both