Particularly - Judgment Search Results

Cornelius Vs. Naacp Leg. Def. Fund

Court: US Supreme Court

i do not find the precise characterization of the forum particularly helpful in reaching a decision everyone on the court agrees

Wainwright Vs. Witt

Court: US Supreme Court

elected or when they harbor political ambitions such pressures are particularly dangerous cf spaziano v florida 468 u s 447 468

Shri Loknath Chowdhury Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1986)50CTR(Cal)340,[1985]155ITR291(Cal)

ajit kumar sengupta j 1 this reference under section 256 1 of the i t act 1961 relates to the...

Wallace Vs. Jaffree

Court: US Supreme Court

is reluctan t to attribute unconstitutional motives to the states particularly when a plausible secular purpose for the state s program

Brij Mohan Vs. Sat Pal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC847; 1985(1)SCALE427; (1985)2SCC652; [1985]3SCR321; 1985(17)LC873(SC)

1 this appeal by the respondent in election petition no 7 of 1982 on the file of the punjab and...

Alexander Vs. Choate

Court: US Supreme Court

..... act had substantial leeway to explore areas in which discrimination against the handicapped posed particularly significant problems and to devise regulations to prohibit such discrimination see e g ..... programs must always choose from among various otherwise legitimate benefit and service options the particular option most favorable or least disadvantageous to the handicapped before we would find that .....

Francis Vs. Franklin

Court: US Supreme Court

claimed that the circumstances surrounding the firing of the gun particularly the slamming of the door and the trajectory of the

Wayte Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

believe wayte has failed to establish the other castaneda elements particularly the third furthermore even assuming that wayte did make out

Srish Chandra Choudhury Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court: Guwahati

saikia j 1 the writ petitioner as the general secretary deshi tripura laskart upajati kalyan samity agartala impugns the cabinet...

Lohia Machines Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC421; (1985)1CompLJ249(SC); (1985)44CTR(SC)328; [1985]152ITR308(SC); 1985(1)SCALE115; (1985)2SCC197; [1985]2SCR686

to be invalid cannot be considered to be relevant factors particularly when the statutory provision is clear for guiding the assessee