Particularly - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: particularly Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.092 seconds)Regents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-1978
discrimination or segregation in the administration of disaster relief is particularly shocking and offensive to our sense of justice and fair
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNlrb Vs. Robbins Tire and Rubber Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-15-1978
..... while a case is pending would generally interfere with enforcement proceedings and more particularly did not intend to overturn the nlrb s longstanding rule against prehearing disclosure ..... reasonable possibility that disclosure would interfere with enforcement proceedings in my view absent a particularized showing of likely interference statements of all witnesses other than current employees in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-25-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621
..... scope of his experience it is a right which gives intellectual and creative workers in particular the opportunity of extending their spiritual and intellectual horizon through study at foreign universities ..... that arises for consideration is whether the fundamental rights conferred under part iii and particularly the rights conferred under article 19 are available beyond the territory of india the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPenn Central Transportation Co. Vs. New York City
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-26-1978
of a curiosity landmarks cannot be divorced from their settings particularly when the setting is a dramatic and integral part of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnand Oil Industries Vs. Labour Court, Hyderabad and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-28-1978
Reported in: AIR1979AP182
wages act that claims arising under the minimum wages act particularly those contemplated under s 20 are entirely outside the purview
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bhuramal Manickchand
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-31-1978
Reported in: [1980]121ITR840(Cal)
bimal chandra basak j 1 this reference under section 256 2 of the i t act 1961 hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNorthern Bengal Jute Trading Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax ( ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-30-1978
Reported in: [1982]136ITR41(Cal)
1 this reference under section 66 2 of the indian i t act 1922 at the instance of m s...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOrient Paper Mills Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-26-1978
Reported in: AIR1979Cal114,83CWN328
orderamiya kumar mookerji j 1 common questions of law and facts are involved in these rules all these rules were...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Ponnuswamy Vs. V.K.T. Periasami Pillai and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-06-1978
Reported in: (1980)2MLJ155
s ratnavel pandian j 1 the first defendant in o s no 185 of 1967 on the file of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalabhai Vallabhbhai and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-02-1978
Reported in: (1979)2GLR140
..... variety of foodgrains edible oilseeds or edible oils available at reasonable prices to the consumers particularly the vulnerable sections of the consumers and d the recommendations if any of the ..... the need for making the essential commodity available at reasonable prices to the consumers and particularly the vulnerable sections of the consumers the central government has given the previous approval .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial