Package - Judgment Search Results

Indian Bank, Esplanade Branch Vs. Mona Packaging Products Rep. by Its ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2007)6MLJ1557

and movables sold.W.P. No. 29611/05 has been preferred by M/s.Mona Packaging Products (Borrower), challenging auction sale notice issued under the Recovery

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. N. Jayaprakash, Package India TIn Fabri ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (2006)202CTR(Ker)111; [2006]285ITR369(Ker); 2006(2)KLT808

K.S. Radhakrishnan, Actg. C.J.1. Income-tax Appeal No. 149 of 2001 is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order...

Federation of Packaged Drinking Water Manufacturers Vs. Union of India ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR2005Guj270; 2006FAJ265; (2006)1GLR528

unless and until there is standard declared for pouches for packaged drinking water which is required under the provisions of the

Four Packages Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

or legal effect, for the unlading or delivery of said packages or their contents had been granted by the collector of

Associated Packaging Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(63)ECC182

case of appellants CCE, Mehsana and respondents M/s. Shree Ram Packaging, in the appeal memorandum, the department has described the product,

Standard Packagings and ors. Vs. Union of India

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1985(4)ECC299; 1985(20)ELT314(AP)

kraft paper which is used only for the purpose of packaging, is bonded with another kraft paper by employing bitumin as

Swastik Packaging Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1985)(5)LC2446Tri(Delhi)

of the said goods be not confiscated. Appellants M/s. Swastik Packaging, Bombay, by their reply dated 4-9-81 submitted that they had

Ankit Packaging Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(92)ECC97

essential facts for considering the issue are that M/s Ankit Packaging Ltd. is a small scale unit engaged in the manufacture

Super Packaging Ltd. Vs. Assam Financial Corpn.

Court: Guwahati

is stated that any proposal beyond the purview of the package shall be put up before the Board for decision, we

Essel Packaging Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2000)(68)ECC405

be done in the case of sales to M/s. Courtaulds Packaging. Hence by applying to its product a price based on