Pacification - Year 1900 - Judgments

Apr 16 1900 (FN)

Doherty Vs. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-16-1900

..... concluded that the transaction between the lake superior and mississippi railroad company and the northern pacific railroad company was in legal effect a consolidation of the two corporations and that ..... states for the district of minnesota by the united states against the northern pacific railroad company the northern pacific railway company and others sought to have cancelled and annulled a patent .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 1900 (FN)

United States Vs. Northern Pacific R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-16-1900

..... the district of minnesota a bill of complaint against the northern pacific railroad company and others the object of the suit was ..... cancellation and annulment of a certain patent granted to the northern pacific railroad company by the united states on april 22 1895 ..... are so made and given to and accepted by said northern pacific railroad company upon and subject to the following conditions namely that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 08 1900 (FN)

Northern Pacific R. Co. Vs. Amacker

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-08-1900

..... c 217 a grant of public land was made to the northern pacific railroad company to aid in the construction of its railroad and ..... his amended declaratory statement indeed it had undoubtedly lapsed long before northern pacific railway v de lacey 174 u s 622 we need therefore only ..... sixth section of the act making the land grant to the northern pacific railway company 13 stat 365 369 did not vest in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 1900 (FN)

Wisconsin, Minnesota and Pacific Railroad Vs. Jacobson

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-10-1900

..... court declared as follows that it is the duty of the defendants the wisconsin minnesota pacific railroad company and the willmar sioux falls railway company and they should be and are ..... while it is 380 miles between the two places by way of the wisconsin minnesota pacific railroad and its connections and it requires forty six to forty eight hours to transport .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 08 1900 (FN)

United States Vs. Oregon and California R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-08-1900

..... of indemnity lands on the proposed line of the northern pacific railroad company between wallula and portland nor was there any ..... railroad and telegraph line between portland oregon and the central pacific railroad in california the oregon company to construct that part ..... under authority from the board of directors of the northern pacific railroad company i have designated on the accompanying map in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 1900 (FN)

Stearns Vs. Minnesota

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-03-1900

..... such taxation is the question involved lands belonging to the northern pacific railway company are also involved in this litigation and the ..... granted and when the state of minnesota said that the northern pacific railroad company might construct its road through the state and ..... taxation created in 1857 in favor of the minnesota and pacific railroad company subsequently passed with the lands and as a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 09 1900 (FN)

Credits Commutation Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-09-1900

..... by oliver ames samuel carr and others against the said union pacific railway company been appointed receivers therefor and against f gordon ..... now or to be constructed with the railroad of the union pacific railway company and that they have therefore a right to ..... under no obligation to intervene in the litigation against the union pacific railway company to preserve their alleged right to form a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 21 1900 (FN)

Tarpey Vs. Madsen

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-21-1900

..... company our decision is that the motion of the central pacific railway company to strike out dismiss and expunge the depositions ..... definitely ascertained in the latter of the two cases kansas pacific railway company v dunmeyer the same elimination of oral testimony ..... official recognition of the preemption claim while the cases of kansas pacific railway co v dunmeyer and hastings dakota railway co v .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 08 1900 (FN)

Louisville and Nashville R. Co. Vs. Behlmer

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-08-1900

..... recently after elaborate argument and great consideration been passed upon by this court in texas pacific railway v interstate commerce commission 162 u s 197 the facts as stated by ..... sailing vessels from europe to new orleans connecting these under through arrangements with the southern pacific company to san francisco that unless the defendant company charges substantially the rates specified in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 08 1900 (FN)

Wilcox Vs. Eastern Oregon Land Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-08-1900

..... above act of july 2 1864 granting lands to the northern pacific railroad company by different mesne conveyances beginning with a deed ..... july 2 1864 relating to the construction of the northern pacific railroad only granted lands that were not reserved sold granted ..... not within any line of definite location established by the northern pacific railroad for the reasons stated in united states v oregon .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Pacification - Judgment Search Results