From

Ors V Union - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Feb 06 1996

Excell Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. V. Union of India and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-06-1996

Reported in: 1996(3)BomCR447; (1996)98BOMLR257; 1996(85)ELT225(Bom)

No. 4 of 1968 was before the Supreme Court in the case of Ahura Chemical Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India 1982 ECR 625D (SC) : ECR C 649 SC : 1981 ELT 613 (S.C.). The appellant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1996

Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. V. Union of India

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-06-1996

Reported in: 1996(86)ELT205(Bom)

Matched in: Parties Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. V. Union of India

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1992

Krishna Swami Vs. Union of India and Anotherwithraj Kanwar V. Union of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-27-1992

Reported in: AIR1993SC1407; JT1992(5)SC92; 1992(1)SCALE484; (1992)4SCC605; [1992]Supp1SCR53

suffice to say that both these petitions are a sequel to the decision in Sub-Committee on Judicial Accountability v. Union of India and Ors. : AIR1992SC320 - and were filed prior to Writ Petition No. 514 of 1992-Mrs. … and Ors. : AIR1992SC320 - and were filed prior to Writ Petition No. 514 of 1992-Mrs. Sarojini Ramaswami v. Union of India and Ors.- which has been disposed of by us earlier today by a separate judgment pronounced

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Dec 11 1973

M/S. Binani Bros. (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors. M/S. Pragdas Ma ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-11-1973

Reported in: (1974)3CTR(SC)18

Matched in: Parties M/S. Binani Bros. (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors. M/S. Pragdas Mathuradas V. Union of India and ors.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 27 1996

Hitech (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors. Tico Machines (P) ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-27-1996

Reported in: (1997)143CTR(AP)305

by learned counsel, may not arise.Here, we may add that in Srikakollu Subba Rao & Co. vs . Union of India : [1988]173ITR708(AP) a Division Bench of this Court upheld the validity of s. 43B of the … 1992 which are representative of the facts in the other writ petitions.2. The petitioners are challenging the constitutional validity of s. 43B and s. 36(1)(va) of the IT Act, 1961, in so far as they provide for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 1996

Abdul Sattar Vs. Union of India and ors. (Also Chatisgarh Bidi Leaves ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-13-1996

Reported in: (1996)135CTR(MP)352

convenient disposal of all the aforesaid writ petitions, the facts given in Writ Petition No. 1059/1996, Abdul Sattar vs. Union of India & Ors. are taken into consideration.3. The petitioner by this petition has prayed for issuance

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1999

Raj Kumar and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors. (Dina Nath and ors. V. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-02-1999

Reported in: [2000]242ITR584(P& H)

counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance on the decision of the Patna High Court in Santosh Verma v. Union of India : [1991]189ITR549(Patna) in this behalf. It would be apt to notice the relevant passage of this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2001

Mr. Jalil Ahmed Ansari and anr. Vs. the Development Commissioner and o ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2001

Reported in: 2001IVAD(Delhi)838; 91(2001)DLT747; 2001(59)DRJ9

Matched in: Parties Mr. Jalil Ahmed Ansari and anr. Vs. the Development Commissioner and ors. and Shri Madan Kaul V. Union of India and ors.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 1997

Jayamal Jayantilal Thakore Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax and or ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jun-18-1997

Reported in: (1998)144CTR(Guj)384

exercising their powers under Art. 226.Relying upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Mohammed Anis vs . Union of India , it was contended that since the power of the apex Court under Art. 142(1) cannot … that the respondent No. 4 Mr. Shankarsinh Waghela earlier belonged to the Bharatiya Janata Party and with a view to overthrow the elected council of ministers, he had revolted 'with muscle and money power .....' and misusing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1997