Orchard - Judgment Search Results
Orchard Vs. Alexander
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-01-1895
Orchard v. Alexander - 157 U.S. 372 (1895) U.S. Supreme Court
Orchard Vs. Hughes
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1863
Orchard v. Hughes - 68 U.S. 73 (1863) U.S. Supreme Court
Chembra Orchard Produce Ltd. and ors. Vs. Regional Director of Company ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-04-2008
Reported in: AIR2009SC1278; [2009]147CompCas677(SC); ILR2009NULL1022; JT2009(1)SC412; 2009(1)SCALE1; (2009)2SCC547; [2009]89SCL109(SC)
ORDER1. Leave granted.2. The short question which arises for determination in these Civil Appeals is whether an application filed by...
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
Orchard Apartment Owners Association Vs. Kerala Water Authority
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-05-2015
MARCH201514TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No.22146 of 2014 (P) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ORCHARD APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, MATHER ORCHARDS,VIDYANAGAR,KADAVANTHARA, COCHIN-682020,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MR.ISSAC
Venus Orchards Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Parekh Aluminex Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-25-2014
COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE VENUS ORCHARDS PVT.LTD.Versus PAREKH ALUMINEX LTD.& ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK
Mohan Aluminium Orchards Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M.P.E.B. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)MPHT429
ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. Petitioner is assailing the interlocutory order (P-11) passed by the Arbitrators on 17-8-2002 under Section 16(2) read...
Tej Bhan Matta Vs. Maxworth Orchards (India) Ltd.
Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC
Decided on: Dec-11-2001
of many applications filed against the respondent namely M/s. Maxworth Orchards (India) Ltd., having its registered office at 112, Sterling Road,
Anil Kumar Adya and ors. Vs. Maxworth Orchards (India) Ltd.
Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC
Decided on: Mar-19-2002
Reported in: I(2003)CPJ28MRTP
widely circulated advertisement in various newspapers, the respondent namely, Maxworth Orchards gave publicity to its scheme/project known as Max-Savale Mango Plus
Rita Mehta Vs. Maxworth Orchards India Ltd.
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: Oct-28-2003
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. Smt. Rita Mehta, the complainant, has filed the present complaint under Section 17(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer...
In Re: Chembra Orchard Produce Ltd.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-07-2004
Reported in: [2004]120CompCas1(Kar); (2004)2CompLJ551(Karn); 2004(4)KarLJ83
N. KUMAR J.1. The six companies have presented these company applications under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act,...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free