Official Assignees - Judgment Search Results
The Official Assignee of Madras and ors. Vs. the Official Assignee of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-1918
Reported in: (1918)35MLJ533
by which, acting under Section 22 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, he stayed the proceedings of the Official Assignee of Madras in I.P. No. 83 of 1917. In O.S.A. No. 27 the Official Assignee of Madras … it is convenient that the estate should be administered by another jurisdiction. Great confusion might ensue if competing assignees or receivers were to have concurrent authority to realise the insolvent's estate independently of one another, instead of
The Official Assignee of Madras and ors. Vs. the Official Assignee of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-21-1923
Reported in: AIR1924Mad118(1); (1924)46MLJ580
not a partner in the firm and therefore was not included in the order adjudicating the firm. The Official Assignee of Rangoon did not oppose that application, perhaps being satisfied that it made no difference to him … a partner in the firm and therefore was not included in the order adjudicating the firm. The Official Assignee of Rangoon did not oppose that application, perhaps being satisfied that it made no difference to him as
The Official Assignee of Madras and anr. Vs. the Official Assignee of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-13-1923
Reported in: AIR1925Mad141; 79Ind.Cas.910; 83Ind.Cas.174
of 1918 and further to declare that the agreement to sell certain properties of the insolvent by the Official Assignee of Rangoon, dated the 25th February, 1918, and the sale of the 29th May, 1919, in favour … 1918 and further to declare that the agreement to sell certain properties of the insolvent by the Official Assignee of Rangoon, dated the 25th February, 1918, and the sale of the 29th May, 1919, in favour of
18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Official Assignee of Rangoon Vs. the Official Assignee of Madras a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-14-1924
Reported in: 91Ind.Cas.126
ORDER1. This is an application by the Official Assignee of Rangoon for leave to appeal to His Majesty in Council against the order on C.M.P. No. … ORDER1. This is an application by the Official Assignee of Rangoon for leave to appeal to His Majesty in Council against the order on C.M.P. No. 3032
The Official Assignee of Madras Vs. Vadavalli Ammal and C. Kesava Pill ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-07-1916
Reported in: 36Ind.Cas.524
limits of the original civil jurisdiction of this Court belongs to the insolvent, it being alleged by the Official Assignee that the purchase in the name of the insolvent's wife, effected three or tour years before the … of the original civil jurisdiction of this Court belongs to the insolvent, it being alleged by the Official Assignee that the purchase in the name of the insolvent's wife, effected three or tour years before the petition
Bandi Chalapathy Rao and anr. Vs. the Official Assignee
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-17-1977
Reported in: (1978)1MLJ316
the Judge sitting in insolvency ought not to have enquired into the Judge's summons taken out by the Official Assignee under Section 7 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act and given a judgment on the merits. Their … Judge sitting in insolvency ought not to have enquired into the Judge's summons taken out by the Official Assignee under Section 7 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act and given a judgment on the merits. Their contention
M.P.M. Murugappa Chetti Vs. the Official Assignee of Madras
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-22-1937
Reported in: (1938)40BOMLR1
proceedings in the Madras High Court. The petitioners will for convenience be referred to as the appellants. The Official Assignee of Madras represents a firm known as Ar. Ar. Sm., trading in British India and having a … in the Madras High Court. The petitioners will for convenience be referred to as the appellants. The Official Assignee of Madras represents a firm known as Ar. Ar. Sm., trading in British India and having a branch
Nalam Viswanatham Vs. the Official Assignee of Madras
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-14-1915
Reported in: 32Ind.Cas.795
the same order passed by Mr. Justice Bake well on a notice of motion taken out by the Official Assignee in the matter of the insolvency of Nalam Venkataratnam, who was adjudicated as an insolvent on the … same order passed by Mr. Justice Bake well on a notice of motion taken out by the Official Assignee in the matter of the insolvency of Nalam Venkataratnam, who was adjudicated as an insolvent on the 30th
Official Assignee, High Court, Bombay Vs. Haradagiri Basavanna Gowd an ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-01-1962
Reported in: AIR1963SC754; [1963]Supp(1)SCR809
December 13, 1950, an order of adjudication was passed. Pending the adjudication proceedings, the District Court appointed the Official Receiver as interim Receiver at the instance of the petitioning creditors. The Receiver was authorised to take possession … As a result of this order of adjudication all the properties of the insolvent vested in the Official Assignee of Bombay. The Official Assignee then moved the District Court at Bellary (I.A. No. 183 of 1950), and
Official Assignee, High Court, Madras Vs. T.R. Bhuvaneswari and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
passed by the learned Judge sitting in the Insolvency Jurisdiction on three applications taken out by the learned Official Assignee. 2. Heard Mr.N.V.Balaji, learned counsel appearing for the Official Assignee, Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, learned Standing Counsel for the second … by the learned Judge sitting in the Insolvency Jurisdiction on three applications taken out by the learned Official Assignee. 2. Heard Mr.N.V.Balaji, learned counsel appearing for the Official Assignee, Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free