Object - Judgment Search Results

Asian Paints (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1988)(15)ECC189

..... case shri pattekar reiterated the same plea however shri rajagopalachari has contended that the cross objection is not maintainable and in this connection he has relied on the tribunal s decision ..... to be ultra vires cannot be invoked 23 what remains for consideration is the cross objection filed by the respondent collector according to the collector the appellate collector committed an error .....

ins Vs. Cardoza-fonseca

Court: US Supreme Court

..... circuit the court interpreted the standard to require asylum applicants to present specific facts through objective evidence to prove either past persecution or good reason to fear future persecution id ..... in sum the words congress has chosen well founded fear are ambiguous they contemplate some objective basis without specifying a particular evidentiary threshold there is no reason to suppose this .....

Suhas Y. Chogle Vs. Sixth Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1988)25ITD445(Mum.)

..... assessee filed a further appeal to the tribunal the department also filed a cross objection 5 the objections taken before the tribunal by the assessee were inter alia as under i the ..... section 144 after having participated in the proceedings under section 144b without raising any objection thereto but this objection had no substance the doctrine of promissory estoppel did not apply here consent .....

Ganesh Steel Rolling Mills and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1988(34)ELT509(Cal)

..... for importation or in case of their inability to grant no objection certificate so that the petitioner could apply for direct import ..... canalising agent that the said canalising agent would release no objection certificate to the extent of demand of the petitioners and ..... petitioners made repeated requests and representations for issuing of no objection certificate in terms of para 223 l a then only .....

Lakshmimoni Das and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1987Cal326,(1987)1CALLT371(HC),92CWN72

..... cannot be considered to secure economic justice and would be against one of the objectives specified in the preamble and hence destructive of the basic structure of the constitution ..... is no reasonable basis for making suchclassification accordingly such classificationhaving no nexus with the object sought to beachieved is ex facie arbitrary anddiscriminatory and offends article 14 of theconstitution .....

Ramesh B Desai and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1990]69CompCas33(Delhi)

..... central government has issued guidelines by way of circulars in order to ensure that this object is achieved and unnecessary expenditure is avoided it was submitted that once the central government ..... ceased to be the chairman his married daughter still held considerable shares and thus the objection still held valid even after reconstitution of the sole selling agency company learned counsel advanced .....

Parkash Singh Badal and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1987P& H263

..... the disqualifications mentioned in art 191 1 and should therefore vacate his seat the whole object of democratic elections is to constitute legislative chambers composed of members who are entitled to ..... the disqualifications mentioned in art 191 i and should therefore vacate his seat the whole object of democratic elections is to constitute legislative chambers composed of members who are entitled to .....

Nishi Prem Vs. Javed Akhtar and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1988Bom222

..... he had seen possessing marijuana and making hashish therefrom the newsman filed a petition objecting to summons directing his appearance before a grand jury investigating narcotics violations considerding the question ..... summons both on the ground that the interrogatories were misdirected irrelevant and for an object which was entirely outside the ambit of the suit and on the ground that the .....

Shri Sachidanand Pandey and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC1109; (1987)1CompLJ211(SC); JT1987(1)SC425; 1987(1)SCALE311; (1987)2SCC295; [1987]2SCR223; 1987(1)LC641(SC)

..... earlier we have extracted the report of public undertakings committee the substance of the objection of the public undertakings committee was that the facilities available in the begumbari land ..... still remain sufficient land for accommodating the existing facilities the chief minister considered the objections and noted that if further facilities were necessary for the zoo government would provide .....

Arizona Vs. Hicks

Court: US Supreme Court

..... wish to go beyond such a cursory examination of the object however they must have probable cause this distinction between a ..... suspicion not probable cause in the traditional sense that the object is or contains a fruit instrumentality or evidence of crime ..... more extensive examination cursory inspections including picking up or moving objects for a better view require only a reasonable suspicion see .....