Object - Judgment Search Results

State of Karnataka Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC68; (1977)4SCC608; [1978]2SCR1

..... of the state principally and into allegations against other specified individuals incidentally the objects and subject matter of the central government notification become clearer by looking at ..... maintenance of national highways water ways and railways constructions to be undertaken for objects of national or military importance delegation of certain powers some arbitrations recognition throughout .....

Kishore Joo Vs. Guman Behari Joo Deo

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1978All1

..... gopi k aroradistrict magistrate hamirpurpresident rainpur temple trust charkhari 4 the judgment debtor filed an objection dated 21 9 1960 which was dismissed in default on 22 4 1961 subsequently the ..... subsequently raising the question that that application was not within limitation lastly 4 where no objection to the execution is taken but the application becomes partly or wholly fructuous and such .....

Wainwright Vs. Sykes

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in this regard subtler considerations as well militate in favor of honoring a state contemporaneous objection rule an objection on the spot may force the prosecution to take a hard look at its ..... strategy a rule which would require the client s participation in every decision to object or not to object to proffered evidence would make a shambles of orderly procedure united states ex rel .....

Bengal National Chamber of Commerce and Industry Vs. Commissioner of I ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1978]111ITR514(Cal)

..... profit the calcutta decisions are right in linking activities for profit with advancement of the object if you want immunity from taxation your means of fulfilling charitable purposes must be unsullied ..... by profit making ventures the advancement of the object of general public utility must not involve the carrying on of any activity for profit .....

Bandi Chalapathy Rao and anr. Vs. the Official Assignee

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1978)1MLJ316

..... discretion and the parties having by necessary implication surrendered to it and waived their objections after their preliminary objection was overruled cannot in this court as an appellate court reopen the question ..... we have already dealt with in our judgment rendered on 26th july 1977 the preliminary objection raised by the appellants that the court exercising jurisdiction under section 7 of the .....

Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras Vs. Madras Oil and Seeds ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1978]114ITR165(Mad)

..... charitable purpose includes relief of the poor education medical relief and advancement of any other object of general public utility not involving the carrying on of any activity for profit section ..... except 1968 69 there is therefore involvement in an activity for profit in achieving the object of the assessee namely promoting and protecting the trade in vegetable oil seeds vegetable oils .....

Nlrb Vs. Pipefitters

Court: US Supreme Court

..... regarded as primary thus if a contract clause is intended to preserve work its objective and the objective of pressure to enforce it is primary and therefore legitimate only if examination ..... the agreement against prefabricated products manufactured by nonunion companies and not against others the object of the pressure would not be primary enforcing the work preservation agreement but secondary .....

United Jewish Organizations Vs. Carey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... committee on reapportionment stated that these changes were made to overcome justice department objections by creating more substantial nonwhite majorities in two assembly districts and two senate ..... in ascertaining whether a given race classification truly furthers benign rather than illicit objectives an effort to achieve proportional representation for example might be aimed at aiding .....

Abood Vs. Detroit Bd. of Educ.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in determining what remedy will be appropriate if the appellants prove their allegations the objective must be to devise a way of preventing compulsory subsidization of ideological activity by ..... support from minority employees that the compelled contribution is necessary to serve overriding governmental objectives this placement of the burden of litigation not the court s gives appropriate protection .....

Nixon Vs. Administrator of General Services

Court: US Supreme Court

..... electronic surveillance requires some intrusion into private communications unconnected with any legitimate governmental objectives yet this fact has not been thought to render surveillance under the ..... punishing or penalizing appellant rather the reports justified the act by reference to objectives that fairly and properly lie within congress legislative competence preserving the availability .....