Nutritive - Judgment Search Results
Academy of Nutrition Improvement and ors. Vs. Union of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-07-2011
exercised by the State Governments in regard to the respective areas within their jurisdiction, keeping in view the nutritional profiles of the populace in different parts of the respective state, whereas such a flexibility was not available
Shresta Nutritions Pvt Ltd vs Sun Agrovert
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-18-2026
JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2378 OF 2024 (A) BETWEEN: SHRESTA NUTRITIONS PVT LTD., AT NO.45, NAGAURU VILLAGE, NEAR MANTRI LAYOUT, HUSKUR MAIN ROAD, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH - 562
Premier Nutrition vs.industrial Progressive (India) Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1371/2016 & I.A. 9229/2014 PREMIER NUTRITION ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Girija Krishan Varma, Advocate versus INDUSTRIAL PROGRESSIVE (INDIA) LIMITED & ORS. Through: None. .....
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bharatpur Nutritional Products Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2003
Reported in: 117(2005)DLT660
radial road between E and F Blocks, the electric sub-station building is not affecting the approach to Bharatpur Nutritional Products Ltd., it is constructed abutting the boundary wall of Bharatpur Nutritional Products Ltd. beyond their plot and
Bharatpur Nutritional Products Ltd. Vs. Cit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2004
Reported in: [2005]144TAXMAN494(Delhi)
For the assessment year 1986-87 in ITA 4593/Delhi/1994, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal while deciding the appeal on 30-5-2003, considered that the addition of Rs. 75 lakhs in trading account was on the higher side and...
Modern Nutrition Company, Rep. by Its Managing Partner, Mr. Vinod Gupt ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-1996
Reported in: 1996(4)ALT1060
P.S. Mishra, C.J.1. Heard.2. Since facts in all connected cases are identical and a decision on the questions involved in one of them will determine finally the relief which the Court can grant, we propose to...
Sampre Nutritions Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Apr-16-2004
Reported in: (2004)(169)ELT42Tri(Bang.)
1. Appellant manufactures "Vicks Vitamin C Orange/Mango Drops" as job work for Procter & Gamble India Ltd. The wrapper states the following about the item and its contents : CONTAINS ADDED FLAVOURS AND PERMITTED COLOURS Mfd....
Sampre Nutritions Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: May-22-2006
1. These appeals have been filed against the (1) OIO No. 06/2005 dated 28.02.2005 and (2) OIA No. 55/2005 dated 29.04.2005 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Hyderabad-IV...
Fdc Limited vs.superstar Nutrition Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2017
DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 10.2017 CS(COMM) 1270/2016 & I.A. 10109/2017 FDC LIMITED ..... Plaintiff versus SUPERSTAR NUTRITION LIMITED & ANR ..... Defendants : Mr. Utkarsh Joshi, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the...
Block Vs. Commun. Nutrition Inst.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-04-1984
Block v. Commun. Nutrition Inst. - 467 U.S. 340 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Block v. Commun. Nutrition Inst., 467 U.S. 340 (1984)
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free