Not - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: not Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 310 results (0.48 seconds)Dr. I. Devanand S/O I.i. Raju Vs. N.T.R University of Health Sciences ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-14-2004
Reported in: 2004(6)ALD474; 2004(6)ALT718
..... university local area to fill up the deficit by eliminating the reverse order the candidates not belonging to particular local area by replacing with the local candidates according to learned ..... castes scheduled tribes backward classes women etc are observed to the extent that these are not inconsistent with the andhra pradesh educational institution regulation of admission order 1974 whereas a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKompelli Venkataiah, S/O. Sayanna and ors. Vs. Mohd. Afzal Miya S/O No ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-17-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)ALD397
..... and sisters of the deceased the age of the first appellant but not the age of the deceased that is relevant for fixing the ..... relevant multiplier because petitioners 2 to 8 are not the legal heirs to the estate of the deceased and first ..... as basis as per hindu law of succession sister and brother are not legal heirs and dependent on deceased computation of compensation by tribunal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn the Matter Relating to Class of Persons Who Have Not Received their ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jul-09-2004
..... exasperation bordering on starvation highlighted some cases for the defaults which were committed in not submitting accounts diverting the coffers of state government companies and state corporations the matter ..... of the companies mentioned in the previous paragraph the issue of unpaid workers could not be avoided when these government companies challenged the debt recovery tribunal s proceeding the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjai Pal Singh Vs. Teerath Raj Tripathi and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-06-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)AWC2645
..... filing counter affidavit why action for disobedience of the order dated 28 5 1992 be not taken against him list on 7 7 1993 4 it further appears that pursuant to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSpecial Deputy Collector (La) Srbc Vs. Mallu Sunki Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-06-2004
Reported in: 2004(6)ALD428
..... per acre besides other statutory benefits in case interest on solatium and enhanced compensation has not been paid the same will also be paid to the claimants parties are directed to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUttaranchal Welfare Society Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-15-2004
Reported in: (2004)188CTR(All)525; [2004]268ITR214(All)
..... view taken by the addl cit cannot be said to be arbitrary this court does not sit as a court of appeal over the opinion of the ao under section 142 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVishambhar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-17-2004
Reported in: (2004)2UPLBEC1213
..... from service for forging his date of birth this is a serious matter it is not a fit case for interference under article 226 of the constitution of india the petition .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Chutki and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-27-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)AWC1865
..... dispose of this petition with the direction that possession of the land in dispute shall not be taken by the respondents except after paying the compensation mentioned in section 17 3a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Nargis and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-12-2004
Reported in: 2004ACJ1502; 2004(3)AWC1912
..... without giving any reason the supreme court held that the appeal of the insurer should not be dismissed on this ground because that would penalise the insurer who will suffer prejudice .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBritish India Corporation Ltd., Cawnpore Woollen Mills Branch Vs. Stat ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-26-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)AWC2660; [2004(102)FLR863]
..... since there were admittedly three vacant posts of winder the action of the employer in not confirming the workman concerned against one of those posts definitely amounts to unfair labour practice .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial