Skip to content


Non Pros - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: non pros Page 1 of about 92 results (0.018 seconds)
Feb 19 1997 (FN)

Schenck Vs. Pro-choice Network of Western N. Y.

Court: US Supreme Court

the purpose that justified the requirement that even the two nonobstructive sidewalk counselors "cease and desist" if the "targeted person" did PRO-CHOICE NETWORK OF WESTERN N. Y. persed and returned later; prosecution of arrested protesters was difficult because patients were often reluctant

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 06 2006 (TRI)

Kwal Pro Exports Vs. the A.C.i.T.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

was stated that such amount represented the transactions of the non 100% EOU unit, which was availing benefit Under Section 80HHC

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 29 2001 (TRI)

Pro-quip Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Authority for Advance Rulings

sale of engineering drawings and designs by Pro-Quip Corporation, a non-resident American company to LPT which is an Indian company to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 29 2001 (HC)

In Re, Pro-quip Corporation

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2002)174CTR(Del)531

sale of engineering drawings and designs by Pro-Quip Corporation, a non-resident American company to LPT which is an Indian company to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 2017 (HC)

Pro Sportify Pvt. Ltd. Vs.the Commissioner of Entertainment Tax, Gnctd

Court: Delhi

and on a more relatable note, the Bar Council organizes non-ticketed events for its members where there is no entry fee A person who visited the Dome went there as a prospective buyer and not as a spectator or as one of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 1996 (FN)

Brown Vs. Pro Football, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

created a web of detailed rules spun by many different nonexpert antitrust judges and juries, not a set of labor rules

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 2018 (HC)

Pro Commissioner of Income-Tax-2 vs.m/s Chrys Capital Investment Advis ...

Court: Delhi

$~11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision 16.4.2018 + ITA3462018 PR....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 2017 (HC)

Pro Minerals Private Limited and Anr. Vs. Reserve Bank of India and Or ...

Court: Kolkata

power plant but having utilised the fund available out of non-establishment of such captive power plant for the purpose of meeting

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 2024 (SC)

M/s. Pro Knits Vs. The Board Of Directors Of Canara Bank

Court: Supreme Court of India

on the part of the respondents to follow the same. Non-observance of the mandatory Instructions contained in the said Notification has

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 1998 (TRI)

Pro Agro Seed Co. Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1998)(77)LC340Tri(Mum.)bai

(Appeals), Bombay. Therefore, we find that the impugned order is non-speaking. In view of the above discussion, the impugned order is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //