Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-25-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: February 25, 2014 I.A. No.10442/2013 in CS(OS) No.1299/2013 MEX SWITCHGEARS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Shailen Bhatia, Mr. Amit Jain, Ms. Ekta Nayar and Mr. Vaibhav Kashyap, Advs. versus MAX SWITCHGEARS PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through Mr. Vikas Chhabra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide the pending interim application being I.A. No.10442/2013 filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 of Code Of Civil Procedure 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC) in a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, corporate name, copyright, passing off, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc.2. The case of the plaintiff is that plaintiff i.e. Mex Switchgears Private Limited through its predecessor is the first adopter and user of the trade mark MEX since the year 1960 for electric switchgears, switches, ignition switche...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE25H DAY OF FEBRUARY20146TH PHALGUNA, 1935 OP(C).No. 2511 of 2013 () -------------------------- O.S. NO.2/2007 AND2002008 OF SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR. ....... PETITIONER/2ND DEFENDANT IN SUIT: --------------------------------------------------------- M.P.JACOB, MANGALAM HOUSE, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS.SRI.FEBIN J.VELUKARAN, SRI.J.ABHILASH. RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANTS: ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. GEETHA MATHEW, W/O.RENJI MATHEW, MALIECKAL HOUSE, 24/8, PEARL PALACE, GOVINDU STREET, T. NAGAR, CHENNAI-600 088.2. USHA CHERIAN, W/O.M.C. CHERIAN, MANALEL HOUSE, SHOBHA WIND FALL, E-423, SAHAKAR NAGAR, AMRUTHAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 030. *3. M.P.CHERIAN, S/O.PUNNOOSE, MANGALAM HOUSE, VANDANMEDU VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, PIN-685 554. (CORRECTED) * THE NAME OF R3 IS CORRECTED AS M.P. PUNNOOSE INS...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE25H DAY OF FEBRUARY20146TH PHALGUNA, 1935 OP(C).No. 2511 of 2013 () -------------------------- O.S. NO.2/2007 AND2002008 OF SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR. ....... PETITIONER/2ND DEFENDANT IN SUIT: --------------------------------------------------------- M.P.JACOB, MANGALAM HOUSE, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS.SRI.FEBIN J.VELUKARAN, SRI.J.ABHILASH. RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANTS: ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. GEETHA MATHEW, W/O.RENJI MATHEW, MALIECKAL HOUSE, 24/8, PEARL PALACE, GOVINDU STREET, T. NAGAR, CHENNAI-600 088.2. USHA CHERIAN, W/O.M.C. CHERIAN, MANALEL HOUSE, SHOBHA WIND FALL, E-423, SAHAKAR NAGAR, AMRUTHAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 030. *3. M.P.CHERIAN, S/O.PUNNOOSE, MANGALAM HOUSE, VANDANMEDU VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, PIN-685 554. (CORRECTED) * THE NAME OF R3 IS CORRECTED AS M.P. PUNNOOSE INS...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-25-2014
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:- 25th February, 2014 + CRIMINAL APPEAL5621999 NAND LAL Through ..... Appellant Mr. Akshay Sapra, Advocate. versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.Appellant Nand Lal by the impugned judgment dated 19 th April, 1999 has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short) for murder of Rubi Kumar in the intervening night between 15th and 16th December, 1992 at A-260, Mukandpur Colony, Delhi. The conviction arises out of FIR No.486/1992, police station Samaipur Badli, which became subject matter of Session Case No.135/1994. The appellant was also charged under Section 376 IPC, but has been acquitted. State has not preferred any appeal against the said acquittal. By order of sentence dated 29th April, 1999, the appellant has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.5,000/-. In...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Singapore Supreme Court
Decided on : Feb-25-2014
Choo Han Teck J: 1. The plaintiff is a Chinese woman married to a German of Caucasian descent. They have a son conceived in 2006 through an assisted fertilisation procedure commonly known as In-Vitro Fertilisation or "IVF" for short. In October 2010 the plaintiff delivered a daughter (named "Baby P" in this action) also conceived through IVF. When the IVF procedure was carried out in respect of Baby P, a mistake was made and the plaintiff's egg was fertilised with the sperm of a third party male ("the Donor") instead of the sperm of the plaintiff's husband. The plaintiff sued the defendants in the tort of negligence and breach of contract. 2. The first defendant is the company that owned the second defendant, which was the medical centre in which the IVF procedure was carried out on the plaintiff. The third defendant was the embryologist who was responsible for the collection and storage of the bottle containing the plaintiff's husband's sperms. The fourth defendant was the Chief Embry...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Decided on : Feb-25-2014
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The solitary appellant has preferred this appeal against his conviction for the offences under Sections 307 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo respectively rigorous imprisonment for 10 and 7 years with a fine of Rs. 1000/- each for both the offences, however, the sentences are to run concurrently, as awarded on 22nd June, 2002, by learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. “ II, Aurangabad, in connection with Session Trial No. 128/89 / 161/2002 arising out of Kutumba P.S. Case No. 10/89. 3. The case was instituted against unknown for the offences under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code on the Fardbeyan of one Yogendra Tiwary (P.W.6) recorded on 5th February 1989 at 04 hours by S.I. Mundrika Prasad (P.W.9) which reveals that at about 1.00 a.m. while the entire family members were sleeping suddenly the informant awoke on hearing the sound of firing and foun...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-24-2014
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on: February 24, 2014 I.A. Nos.19671/2013 & 596/2014 in CS(OS) No.2407/2013 STEELBIRD HI-TECH INDIA LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Diva Arora and Mr.Rajat Katiyar, Advs. versus S.P.S. GAMBHIR & ORS Through ..... Defendants Ms.Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Bitika Singh and Mr.Kapil Midha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of design under Registration No.241153, passing off, rendition of accounts, damages etc. The said suit was listed along with IA No.19671/2013 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC wherein this Court passed the interim order. Upon service, the defendants have filed reply to the interim application and also filed an application being I.A. No.596/2014 under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC for vacation of the ex parte ad-interim order passed on 6th December, 2013. Case of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-21-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE21T DAY OF FEBRUARY20142ND PHALGUNA, 1935 WP(C).No. 2244 of 2014 (E) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. KHADER, AGED57YEARS,S/O.ABOOBACKER, KARUPPAMVEETIL HOUSE, CHOWALLOOR PADI, KANDANISSERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT.2. KHAIS,S/O.KHADER, KARUPPAMVEETTIL HOUSE, CHOWALLOOR PADI, KANDANISSERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN,SENIOR ADVOCATE ADV. SMT.P.R.REENA RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE(LAW AND ORDER), POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN -695 001 2. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,THRISSUR,OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,THRISSUR, PIN- 695 003 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRISSUR EAST POLICE STATION, THRISSUR, PIN -680 004 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRISSUR EAST POLICE STATION, THRISSUR, PIN- 680 004 5. IQBAL, S/O.MOHAMMED KUTTY, KARAKETTIYATH HOUSE, GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT,PIN -680 101...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-21-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 02.2014 CO.PET.95/2011 REVELL GMBH & CO. KG ..... Petitioner versus M/s FORE SQUARE RETAIL PRIVATE LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Rekha Palli and Ms Punam Singh. For the Respondent : Mr Manik Dogra. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner company under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, inter alia, praying for winding up of the respondent company on the ground that the respondent company has failed and neglected to pay a sum of USD534696.20, due and payable by the respondent to the petitioner on account of supply of goods (Model Kits products, Paints Accessories, Airbrush, Metal and Slot Cars). The respondent disputes that any amount is due and payable to the petitioner. The respondent alleges that goods supplied by the petitioner were defective, hazardous and substandard and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-21-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE21T DAY OF FEBRUARY20142ND PHALGUNA, 1935 Bail Appl..No. 1091 of 2014 () ------------------------------- CRMC1162014 of SESSIONS COURT, MANJERI CRIME NO.94/2014 OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM ---------- PETITIONERS/ACCUSED :- ------------------------ 1. AFSAL @ MONU, AGED26YEARS, SON OF HAMZA, THONIKKADAVAN HOUSE, ALIPPARAMBA PO2 MUSTHAFA, AGED27YEARS, SON OF HAMZA THONIKKADAVAN MUTTATHIL HOUSE, ALIPPARAMBA PO.3. NASAR @ PALLA NASAR, AGED29YEARS, SON OF VEERAN, THONIKKADAVAN HOUSE, ALIPPARAMBA PO.4. ABDULLA, AGED25YEARS, SON OF HAMZA THONIKKADAVAN HOUSE, ALIPPARAMBA PO.5. NASAR @ SASI, AGED28YEARS, SON OF MOIDEENKUTTY, THONIKKADAVAN HOUSE ALIPPARAMBA PO.6. NOUFAL @ THANKAPPAN, AGED30YEARS, SON OF MOHAMMEDKUTTY, KOTTAKKAL HOUSE, ALIPPARAMBA PO.7. SHOUKATH, AGED25YEARS, SON OF HAMZA THONIKKADAVAN HOUSE, ALIPPARAMBA PO.8. RISHAD, AGED28YEARS, SON OF ABOOBACKER THONIKKADAVA...
Tag this Judgment!