Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.476/1998 Reserved on:28. h February, 2014 Date of Decision:3. d April, 2014 % SHANKAR LAL@SHANKAR Through ..... Appellant Mr. Rajan Bhatia, Advocate. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Additional Public Prosecutor. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J: Shankar Lal @ Shankar by the impugned judgment dated 30th September, 1998 stands convicted under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder of his uncle Mukesh Kumar. Said Mukesh Kumar was son of Mishri Lal from his second wife, whereas the appellant herein is son of Rohtas, who was born from the first wife of Mishri Lal. By order on sentence dated 6th October, 1998, the appellant has been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.5000/-, in default of which, he has to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six months.2. The main contention or plea raised in the appeal ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h March, 2014 Pronounced on:3. d April, 2014 + CRL. A. 807/2010 GIANSHREE ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. Appellant Gianshree impugns the judgment dated 12.10.2009 and the order on sentence dated 23.10.2009 whereby she along with one Dharambir @ Dharmender @ Kala (subsequently held to be a juvenile and released after his conviction was upheld) was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). For the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC, the appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1500/- or in default to undergo Simple Imprisonment for two months. For the offence punishable under Section 201/34 IPC, the appellant was...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Apr-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Kang Gursharan Singh 2014.04.07 10:50 Letters Patent Appeal No.80 of 2005 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : APRIL03 2014 The Punjab State Cooperative and Marketing Federation Limited ......APPELLANT VERSUS Rajinder Singh and others ....RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN PALLI PRESENT: Mr.Vikas Singh, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for the private respondents. Mr.HS Sethi, Additional Advocate General, Punjab..KAUL,, CJ. (Oral) SANJAY KISHAN KAUL On 31.1.2014, the present case was adjourned to 8.5.2014. At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, the matter, which is on the regular board of this Court, is taken up for hearing, and is being disposed of. Employees of the Punjab State Federation of Consumers Cooperative Wholesale Stores Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'Constofed').a Cooperative Society registered under the Punjab Coo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Apr-03-2014
1. The Appellants/Petitioners challenge an order passed by a Sole Arbitrator under Section-16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (œAct?) upholding the Respondents' objection to the jurisdiction of the Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes referred to arbitration. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to in this order with reference to their respective designations in Arbitration Petition No.257 of 2013. 2. The Petitioner and Respondents were partners in a firm by the name of M/s Laxmi Centre. The firm was constituted under a Deed of Partnership dated 25 June 1976, a further Deed of Partnership dated 7 September 1985 and a Supplementary Deed of Partnership dated 4 March 1997. The partnership was at will. There was an arbitration clause in the Deed. Disputes and differences arose between the parties. A dissolution notice was served by the Petitioner on the Respondents. Subsequently, the Petitioner invoked the arbitration agreement between the parties and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-02-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: April 02, 2014 + CRL.A.694/1999 ABDUL RASHEED Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akshay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CRL.A.1/2000 MOHD. YAMEEN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akshay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: + CRL.A.4/2000 ABDUL HAMID ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akshay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: Crl.A. Nos. 694/1999, 1/2000 & 4/2000 ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J1 The challenge in these appeals is to the impugned judgment dated 24.11.1999 and the order on sentence dated 29.11.1999, passed by the learned Additional ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Apr-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Kang Gursharan Singh 2014.04.04 12:27 Civil Writ Petition No.21175 of 2013 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : APRIL02 2014 PREETI ......PETITIONER VERSUS THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE SUPPLY AND MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN PALLI PRESENT: Sarvshri Vivek Malik and Saran Suri, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr.Manav Bajaj, Advocate, for Mr.Sumeet Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Respondent No.4 ex-parte vide order dated 14.01.2014. Mr.Vishal Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.5 and 6..SANJAY KISHAN KAUL KAUL,, CJ. (Oral) The Haryana State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'Hafed')/respondent No.1 invited tenders on 23.7.2012 for construction of a godown of the capacity of 45,000 Metric Ton in Round V under Private Ent...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Australia High Court
Decided on : Apr-02-2014
1. FRENCH CJ, CRENNAN AND BELL JJ. Section 12(2) of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ("the Liability Act") directs a court, when awarding damages relating to the death of or injury to a person, to disregard the amounts (if any) by which the claimant's gross weekly earnings would, but for the injury or death, have exceeded three times the amount of average weekly earnings at the date of the award ("the s 12(2) limitation"). The s 12(2) limitation applies to awards of damages for past and future economic loss due to the deprivation or impairment of earning capacity, for past economic loss due to loss of earnings, and for "the loss of expectation of financial support"[1]. The latter expression is apt to describe an award of damages under the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 (NSW) ("the Relatives Act"). The issue presented by the appeal is whether, in the case of an award of damages for the loss of expectation of financial support, the s 12(2) limitation is to be construed as applying ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Decided on : Apr-02-2014
1. In spite of repeated calls, none turns up to represent the appellant. However, Shri Mrityunjay Kumar, learned Advocate has volunteered himself to assist the Court as Amicus Curiae and is acclaimed. 2. Sole appellant, Ram Dayal Rai has been found guilty for an offence punishable under Sections 148 IPC, 323/149 IPC, 448/149 IPC, 379/149 IPC, 307 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo RI for one year, RI for six months, RI for six months, RI for one year, RI for seven years as well as fined of Rs. 5000/- in default thereof, to undergo RI for six months additionally, RI for five years as well as fined Rs. 2000/- in default thereof, to undergo RI for three months respectively with a further direction to run the sentences concurrently vide judgment of conviction dated 17.01.2012 and sentence dated 21.01.2012 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Banka in connection with Sessions Trial No. 390/1999, challenged the same under present appeal. 3. PW-6, Vijay Rai who als...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-01-2014
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4294 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (C) No.27829 of 2012) Manmohan Sharma Appellant Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. Respondents With CIVIL APPEAL No.4295 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (C) No.28259 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL No.4296 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (C) No.28410 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL No.4297 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (C) No.28542 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL No.4298 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (C) No.28633 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL No.4299 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (C) No.28793 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL No.4300 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (C) No.31756 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL No.4301 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (C) No.31793 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL No.4302 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (C) No.31818 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL No.4303 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (C) No.31819 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL No.4304 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (C) No.31820 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL No.4305 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (C) No.31821 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL No.4306 O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : Apr-01-2014
1. The above applications were filed in NGT against the proposed widening of sectoral roads involving cutting of number of trees in front of National Media Centre (NMC). The Project Proponents stated to be involved in the project are Haryana Development Authority (HUDA) and DLF Ltd. The main contention of the applicants is that there will be significant air and noise pollution problems due to movement of traffic in the area due to cutting of trees which were acting as a buffer and reducing noise and dust pollution. Incidentally, an email was received by NGT from Haryali Welfare Society addressed to the Hon'ble Chief Minister of Haryana and the Copy was sent to NGT raising the similar issues pertaining to the cutting of trees by DLF/HUDA, which was treated as an Application no. 120/2013. Regarding this Application No. 120/2013, NGT passed the order restraining the Respondents from cutting/felling or uprooting any tree on the site in question on 2/08/2013. Besides these two applications,...
Tag this Judgment!