Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-20-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal not D-231-DB of 2009 Date of decision :20. 12.2012 Vijender @ Bunty ...Appellant VERSUS State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH *** Present : Mr.Akshay Kumar Goel, Advocate, Legal Aid Counsel, for the appellant. Mr.R.K.S.Brar, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent-State. *** INDERJIT SINGH, J Appellant Vijender @ Bunty has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and order of sentence dated 12.01.2009, passed by the Special Judge/Addl. Sessions Judge, Panchkula, vide which he has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years under Section 302 IPC. However, remaining accused have been acquitted. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that FIR in the present case has been register...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-17-2012
CRA No.908-SB of 2001 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal No.908-SB of 2001 Date of Decision :17. 12.2012 Ashok Kumar .......Appellant Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.Mehardeep Singh, Advocate, amicus curiae for the appellant. Mr.Rudraneel Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana. **** JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. The present criminal appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 10/12.07.2001, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon, (hereinafter as 'the trial Court').convicting the accused (herein appellant) for committing offence under Sections 307, 324 of the Indian Penal Code, (for short, 'the IPC') and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- or in default thereof, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month under Section 307 IPC; and rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-10-2012
Criminal Revision No.3926 of 2012 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.3926 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 10 ,2012 Jiwan Kumar Anand ...........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..........Respondent Coram: Hon'ble MRS.Justice Sabina Present: Mr.Munish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner....Sabina, J. Petitioner had faced trial in FIR No.63 dated 2.5.1999 under Sections 420,120-B of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (for short `IPC') along with other co-accused. Vide judgment/order dated 9.12.2010, Petitioner-Jiwan Kumar Anand, Varinder Kochar and Suresh Chander were convicted and sentenced qua the commission of offence punishable under Section 420 IPC. The other co-accused of the petitioner, namely, Hem Lata, Poonam Prabhkar and Pardeep Kalia were acquitted of the charges framed against them. Aggrieved against the order of his conviction and sentence, petitioner preferred an appeal. The appellate Court, vide judgment dated 15.11.2011, dis...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-07-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal not D-664-DB of 2008 Date of decision :07. 12.2012 Jasbir Singh ....Appellant VERSUS State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH *** Present : Mr.J.S.Brar, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms.Ritu Punj, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent-State. *** INDERJIT SINGH, J Appellant Jasbir Singh has preferred the present appeal against the judgment dated 11.08.2008 and order of sentence dated 12.08.2008, passed by the Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, vide which he has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year under Section 302 IPC. FIR in the present case has been registered on the statement of Smt.Daljit Kaur wife of deceased. She stated to the police that house of Shingara Singh, elder brother of her h...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-07-2012
Crl. Writ Petition No.1372 of 2012 (O&M) [ 1 ].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Writ Petition No.1372 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 7,2012 Sita ....................................................Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .............................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not?.2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana..RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) This petition is being entertained on a telegram made by Smt. Sita wife of Shambhu Parshad that her husband has been taken by the police on 28.7.2012 and no case has been registered against him. On notice, reply has been filed by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pehowa, District Kurukshetra. It has been stated that DDR No.22 dated 24.7.2012 was got lodged on a statement made by Gurpal Singh that his daughter Prabhdeep Kaur aged 22 years studying in M.A.Ist Crl. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-26-2012
Crl.Appeal not S-2887-SB of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.50634 of 2012 and Crl.Appeal not S-2887-SB of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision :26. 11.2012 Ram Balaf @ Ram Balak Chauhan ...Appellant versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE K.C.PURI Present : Mr.G.S.Verma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Sandeep Chhabra, DAG Punjab.K.C. PURI, J. (ORAL) CRM No.50634 of 2012 This is an application for suspension of sentence. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant has submitted that he does not press the application for suspension of sentence, however, arguments in the main appeal be heard. Therefore, the main appeal is being taken up today. Crl.Appeal not S-2887-SB of 2010 Challenge in this appeal is the judgment and order dated 30.10.2010 passed by Sh.Nirbhow Singh Gill, Addl.Sessions Judge, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar vide which the accused-appellant has been convicted under Section 489-C IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous im...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-23-2012
CWP No.11143 of 1995 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11143 of 1995 (O & M) Date of Decision: November 23, 2012 Som Dutt and others ....Petitioners Versus State Bank of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.Mr.Tarun Singla, Advocate, for the respondents. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this writ petition filed by the petitioneRs.challenge is to the action of the respondent-Bank in terminating their services on 27th July, 1995 whereas they had completed more than 5 years of continuous service in spite of retaining those persons who had joined after the petitioneRs.According to the petitioners this was in violation of Section 25G of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short 'the Act').A further prayer has also been made for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to retain the petitioners as Waiters in the canteen service of the resp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-19-2012
C.W.P.No.1144 of 2009 [1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.1144 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision:19. 11.2012 Surjit Kaur .Petitioner v. Punjab Agriculture University and others .Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.H.N.S.Gill, Advocate for respondent No.3..Rajesh Bindal J. The petitioner, who is widow of deceased-Khushpal Inder Singh, who was working as an Associate Professor Surgery in the Department of Vety. Surgery and Radiology, C.O.V.S.of the Punjab Agriculture University, Ludhiana, has approached this court for issuing a direction to the respondents to release the service benefits on account of service rendered by her deceased husband with the respondent-University. The husband of the petitioner was an Associate Professor Surgery in the Department of Vety. Surgery and Radiology, C.O.V.S.of the Punjab Agriculture University, Ludhiana. He applied for extra-ordinary leave f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-16-2012
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Appeal not D-197-DB of 2008 ..... Date of decision:16.11.2012 Daljit Singh alias Jit Singh alias Bhola and another ...Appellants v. State of Punjab ...Respondent .... Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Kumar Mittal Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh ..... Present: Mr. Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate for the appellants. Mrs. Ritu Punj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State. ...... Inderjit Singh, J.This appeal has been filed by appellants-Daljit Singh alias Jit Singh alias Bhola and Jagtar Singh sons of Ram Singh against the judgment and order dated 15.12.2007 passed by Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib whereby they have been held guilty for the offences under Sections 302, 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (`IPC' for short). Appellant-Daljit Singh has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of `5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-16-2012
CR No.4812 o1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4812 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: November 16, 2012 Suman Lata Pathak ...Petitioner Versus Raj Kamal Pathak ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sanjay Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1. Mr.KS Manrat, Advocate, for respondent No.5. A.N.JINDAL, J. (Oral) The order dated 23.4.2011, refusing the defendant's application for leading additional on the question of Will is under challenge. Heard. The arguments reveal that the defendant/petitioner Suman Lata Pathak had set up a Will dated 26.8.1976 allegedly executed by Ved Parkash Pathak, retired major from the Indian Army, in favour of Pushpa Pathak, who died on 11.9.2002 i.e.subsequent to the filing of the suit. The main controveRs.in the suit is with regard to the Will but no issue was framed in this regard. Had there been a specific issue regarding Will then the defendant coul...
Tag this Judgment!