Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-09-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:09. .11.2012 1. LPA No.1509 of 2010 Baljit and others ...Appellants Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents.2. LPA No.1579 of 2010 Usha Rani and others ..Appellants Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents 3. LPA No.1616 of 2010 Bhim Singh and others ..Appellants Versus State of Haryana and another ..Respondents 4. LPA No.1768 of 2010 Subhash ..Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents 5. LPA No.168 of 2011 Daljit Singh and others ..Appellants Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents 6. LPA No.289 of 2011 State of Haryana and another ..Appellants Versus Dharam Singh and others ..Respondents LPA No.1509 o2. 7. LPA No.294 of 2011 State of Haryana and others ..Appellants Versus Darshan Singh and others ..Respondents 8. LPA No.416 of 2011 Baru Ram ..Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents 9. LPA No.851 of 2012 Rattan Kumar and others ..Appellants Versus State of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-10-2012
Criminal Revision No.3926 of 2012 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.3926 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 10 ,2012 Jiwan Kumar Anand ...........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..........Respondent Coram: Hon'ble MRS.Justice Sabina Present: Mr.Munish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner....Sabina, J. Petitioner had faced trial in FIR No.63 dated 2.5.1999 under Sections 420,120-B of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (for short `IPC') along with other co-accused. Vide judgment/order dated 9.12.2010, Petitioner-Jiwan Kumar Anand, Varinder Kochar and Suresh Chander were convicted and sentenced qua the commission of offence punishable under Section 420 IPC. The other co-accused of the petitioner, namely, Hem Lata, Poonam Prabhkar and Pardeep Kalia were acquitted of the charges framed against them. Aggrieved against the order of his conviction and sentence, petitioner preferred an appeal. The appellate Court, vide judgment dated 15.11.2011, dis...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-07-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal not D-664-DB of 2008 Date of decision :07. 12.2012 Jasbir Singh ....Appellant VERSUS State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH *** Present : Mr.J.S.Brar, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms.Ritu Punj, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent-State. *** INDERJIT SINGH, J Appellant Jasbir Singh has preferred the present appeal against the judgment dated 11.08.2008 and order of sentence dated 12.08.2008, passed by the Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, vide which he has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year under Section 302 IPC. FIR in the present case has been registered on the statement of Smt.Daljit Kaur wife of deceased. She stated to the police that house of Shingara Singh, elder brother of her h...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-05-2012
This appeal has been filed by the appellants Gajender Parkash son of Kailash Chander and Kailash Chander son of Mukhtiar Singh appellants No.1 and 2 respectively against the judgment dated 13.7.2004 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani whereby the appellants have been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code (“IPC” - for short) and Kailash Chander (appellant No.2) has also been convicted for the offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and the order of sentence dated 14.7.2004 whereby the appellants have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life, besides, pay a fine of Rs.2000/- each for the offence under Section 302 IPC and undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years, besides, pay a fine of Rs.2000/- each for the offence under Section 307 IPC; besides, Kailash Chander (appellant No.2) has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence punishable under Secti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-26-2012
Crl.Appeal not S-2887-SB of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.50634 of 2012 and Crl.Appeal not S-2887-SB of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision :26. 11.2012 Ram Balaf @ Ram Balak Chauhan ...Appellant versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE K.C.PURI Present : Mr.G.S.Verma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Sandeep Chhabra, DAG Punjab.K.C. PURI, J. (ORAL) CRM No.50634 of 2012 This is an application for suspension of sentence. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant has submitted that he does not press the application for suspension of sentence, however, arguments in the main appeal be heard. Therefore, the main appeal is being taken up today. Crl.Appeal not S-2887-SB of 2010 Challenge in this appeal is the judgment and order dated 30.10.2010 passed by Sh.Nirbhow Singh Gill, Addl.Sessions Judge, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar vide which the accused-appellant has been convicted under Section 489-C IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous im...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-20-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal not D-231-DB of 2009 Date of decision :20. 12.2012 Vijender @ Bunty ...Appellant VERSUS State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH *** Present : Mr.Akshay Kumar Goel, Advocate, Legal Aid Counsel, for the appellant. Mr.R.K.S.Brar, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent-State. *** INDERJIT SINGH, J Appellant Vijender @ Bunty has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and order of sentence dated 12.01.2009, passed by the Special Judge/Addl. Sessions Judge, Panchkula, vide which he has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years under Section 302 IPC. However, remaining accused have been acquitted. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that FIR in the present case has been register...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-23-2012
HEMANT GUPTA, J. Appellant Prince Kumar son of Ravinder Kumar has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 and 307 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and rigorous imprisonment for 10 years respectively, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, by judgment and order dated 17.03.2006. The appellant has further been directed to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- under each head. In default, the appellant was directed to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The appellant has challenged his conviction and sentence with the filing of Criminal Appeal No.337-DB of 2006, while the complainant Ganesh Chander son of Bhajan Lal, cousin of the deceased, has filed Criminal Revision No.1871 of 2006 seeking setting aside of judgment and order dated 17.03.2006. Both the cases have been taken up for decision together by this common order. The prosecution case was set in motion on ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-17-2012
CRA No.908-SB of 2001 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal No.908-SB of 2001 Date of Decision :17. 12.2012 Ashok Kumar .......Appellant Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.Mehardeep Singh, Advocate, amicus curiae for the appellant. Mr.Rudraneel Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana. **** JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. The present criminal appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 10/12.07.2001, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon, (hereinafter as 'the trial Court').convicting the accused (herein appellant) for committing offence under Sections 307, 324 of the Indian Penal Code, (for short, 'the IPC') and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- or in default thereof, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month under Section 307 IPC; and rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-16-2012
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Appeal not D-197-DB of 2008 ..... Date of decision:16.11.2012 Daljit Singh alias Jit Singh alias Bhola and another ...Appellants v. State of Punjab ...Respondent .... Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Kumar Mittal Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh ..... Present: Mr. Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate for the appellants. Mrs. Ritu Punj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State. ...... Inderjit Singh, J.This appeal has been filed by appellants-Daljit Singh alias Jit Singh alias Bhola and Jagtar Singh sons of Ram Singh against the judgment and order dated 15.12.2007 passed by Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib whereby they have been held guilty for the offences under Sections 302, 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (`IPC' for short). Appellant-Daljit Singh has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of `5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-19-2012
C.W.P.No.1144 of 2009 [1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.1144 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision:19. 11.2012 Surjit Kaur .Petitioner v. Punjab Agriculture University and others .Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.H.N.S.Gill, Advocate for respondent No.3..Rajesh Bindal J. The petitioner, who is widow of deceased-Khushpal Inder Singh, who was working as an Associate Professor Surgery in the Department of Vety. Surgery and Radiology, C.O.V.S.of the Punjab Agriculture University, Ludhiana, has approached this court for issuing a direction to the respondents to release the service benefits on account of service rendered by her deceased husband with the respondent-University. The husband of the petitioner was an Associate Professor Surgery in the Department of Vety. Surgery and Radiology, C.O.V.S.of the Punjab Agriculture University, Ludhiana. He applied for extra-ordinary leave f...
Tag this Judgment!