Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-23-2012
HEMANT GUPTA, J. Appellant Prince Kumar son of Ravinder Kumar has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 and 307 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and rigorous imprisonment for 10 years respectively, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, by judgment and order dated 17.03.2006. The appellant has further been directed to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- under each head. In default, the appellant was directed to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The appellant has challenged his conviction and sentence with the filing of Criminal Appeal No.337-DB of 2006, while the complainant Ganesh Chander son of Bhajan Lal, cousin of the deceased, has filed Criminal Revision No.1871 of 2006 seeking setting aside of judgment and order dated 17.03.2006. Both the cases have been taken up for decision together by this common order. The prosecution case was set in motion on ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-01-2012
Sabina, J. Vide this judgment, the above mentioned Criminal Appeal No. 854-DB of 2005 and Criminal Revision No. 21 of 2006 shall be disposed of as these have arisen out of the same judgment/incident. Prosecution case was set in motion on the basis of the statement of the complainant Kuldip Singh. The complainant stated in his statement before Assistant Sub Inspector Vinod Kumar dated 30.4.2002 that at about 1.00 A.M. on the said date, he had reached his fields along with his brother Jagsir Singh and maternal uncle Shamsher Singh for taking turn of water. When he tried to divert the flow of water along with his brother Jagsir Singh, then Balwant Singh armed with .12 bore gun and his sons Jagtar Singh armed with saila and Iqbal Singh armed with dang came there raising lalkaras and tried to stop Jagsir Singh from taking turn of water. The moment Jagsir Singh tried to divert the water, Balwant Singh fired a shot at him from his 12 bore gun which hit him on the left side of his chest. Jagsi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-05-2012
This appeal has been filed by the appellants Gajender Parkash son of Kailash Chander and Kailash Chander son of Mukhtiar Singh appellants No.1 and 2 respectively against the judgment dated 13.7.2004 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani whereby the appellants have been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code (“IPC” - for short) and Kailash Chander (appellant No.2) has also been convicted for the offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and the order of sentence dated 14.7.2004 whereby the appellants have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life, besides, pay a fine of Rs.2000/- each for the offence under Section 302 IPC and undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years, besides, pay a fine of Rs.2000/- each for the offence under Section 307 IPC; besides, Kailash Chander (appellant No.2) has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence punishable under Secti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-09-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:09. .11.2012 1. LPA No.1509 of 2010 Baljit and others ...Appellants Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents.2. LPA No.1579 of 2010 Usha Rani and others ..Appellants Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents 3. LPA No.1616 of 2010 Bhim Singh and others ..Appellants Versus State of Haryana and another ..Respondents 4. LPA No.1768 of 2010 Subhash ..Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents 5. LPA No.168 of 2011 Daljit Singh and others ..Appellants Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents 6. LPA No.289 of 2011 State of Haryana and another ..Appellants Versus Dharam Singh and others ..Respondents LPA No.1509 o2. 7. LPA No.294 of 2011 State of Haryana and others ..Appellants Versus Darshan Singh and others ..Respondents 8. LPA No.416 of 2011 Baru Ram ..Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents 9. LPA No.851 of 2012 Rattan Kumar and others ..Appellants Versus State of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-09-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (i) Criminal Appeal not D-658-DB of 2007 Date of decision :09. 11.2012 Balwant ....APPELLANT VERSUS State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH *** Present : Ms.Aditi Girdhar, Advocate, as Legal Aid Counsel, for the appellant. Mr.R.K.S.Brar, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent-State. *** INDERJIT SINGH, J Appellant Balwant has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and order of sentence dated 15.06.2007, passed by the Sessions Judge, Hisar, vide which he has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years under Section 376 IPC. However, he has been acquitted under Section 506 IPC Brief facts of the prosecution case are that accused Balwant, who is father of the prosecutrix has committed rape upon ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-16-2012
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Appeal not D-197-DB of 2008 ..... Date of decision:16.11.2012 Daljit Singh alias Jit Singh alias Bhola and another ...Appellants v. State of Punjab ...Respondent .... Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Kumar Mittal Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh ..... Present: Mr. Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate for the appellants. Mrs. Ritu Punj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State. ...... Inderjit Singh, J.This appeal has been filed by appellants-Daljit Singh alias Jit Singh alias Bhola and Jagtar Singh sons of Ram Singh against the judgment and order dated 15.12.2007 passed by Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib whereby they have been held guilty for the offences under Sections 302, 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (`IPC' for short). Appellant-Daljit Singh has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of `5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-16-2012
CR No.4812 o1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4812 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: November 16, 2012 Suman Lata Pathak ...Petitioner Versus Raj Kamal Pathak ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sanjay Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1. Mr.KS Manrat, Advocate, for respondent No.5. A.N.JINDAL, J. (Oral) The order dated 23.4.2011, refusing the defendant's application for leading additional on the question of Will is under challenge. Heard. The arguments reveal that the defendant/petitioner Suman Lata Pathak had set up a Will dated 26.8.1976 allegedly executed by Ved Parkash Pathak, retired major from the Indian Army, in favour of Pushpa Pathak, who died on 11.9.2002 i.e.subsequent to the filing of the suit. The main controveRs.in the suit is with regard to the Will but no issue was framed in this regard. Had there been a specific issue regarding Will then the defendant coul...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-19-2012
C.W.P.No.1144 of 2009 [1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.1144 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision:19. 11.2012 Surjit Kaur .Petitioner v. Punjab Agriculture University and others .Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.H.N.S.Gill, Advocate for respondent No.3..Rajesh Bindal J. The petitioner, who is widow of deceased-Khushpal Inder Singh, who was working as an Associate Professor Surgery in the Department of Vety. Surgery and Radiology, C.O.V.S.of the Punjab Agriculture University, Ludhiana, has approached this court for issuing a direction to the respondents to release the service benefits on account of service rendered by her deceased husband with the respondent-University. The husband of the petitioner was an Associate Professor Surgery in the Department of Vety. Surgery and Radiology, C.O.V.S.of the Punjab Agriculture University, Ludhiana. He applied for extra-ordinary leave f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-23-2012
CWP No.11143 of 1995 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11143 of 1995 (O & M) Date of Decision: November 23, 2012 Som Dutt and others ....Petitioners Versus State Bank of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.Mr.Tarun Singla, Advocate, for the respondents. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this writ petition filed by the petitioneRs.challenge is to the action of the respondent-Bank in terminating their services on 27th July, 1995 whereas they had completed more than 5 years of continuous service in spite of retaining those persons who had joined after the petitioneRs.According to the petitioners this was in violation of Section 25G of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short 'the Act').A further prayer has also been made for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to retain the petitioners as Waiters in the canteen service of the resp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-26-2012
Crl.Appeal not S-2887-SB of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.50634 of 2012 and Crl.Appeal not S-2887-SB of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision :26. 11.2012 Ram Balaf @ Ram Balak Chauhan ...Appellant versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE K.C.PURI Present : Mr.G.S.Verma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Sandeep Chhabra, DAG Punjab.K.C. PURI, J. (ORAL) CRM No.50634 of 2012 This is an application for suspension of sentence. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant has submitted that he does not press the application for suspension of sentence, however, arguments in the main appeal be heard. Therefore, the main appeal is being taken up today. Crl.Appeal not S-2887-SB of 2010 Challenge in this appeal is the judgment and order dated 30.10.2010 passed by Sh.Nirbhow Singh Gill, Addl.Sessions Judge, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar vide which the accused-appellant has been convicted under Section 489-C IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous im...
Tag this Judgment!