Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-12-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. APPEAL No. 932/2009 % Judgment reserved on: 20th September, 2011 Judgment delivered on: 12th January, 2012 ASHOK NARANG ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rajender Kumar, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J..1. Vide the instant appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment dated 06.10.2009 whereby he was held guilty and convicted and by order on sentence dated 09.10.2009, he was sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 07 years for the offence under Section 363 Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 of which he stands convicted with payment of fine of ` 5,000/- for the said offence..2. He also sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 10 years for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 with payment of `5,000/-. Crl. Appeal No.932/2009 Page 1 of 70.3. He further sentenced to undergo R...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-05-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.12252/2004 % Date of Decision: 05.01.2012 Satish Chandra Sharma .... Petitioner Through Mr.Anoop Kumar Srivastava, Advocate Versus Union of India and Ors. .... Respondents Through Mr.Ravinder Agarwal, Central Government Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R.MIDHA ANIL KUMAR, J. * CM No.19240/2011 This is an application by the petitioner seeking early hearing of the writ petition filed by him against the order of his dismissal from the Central Reserve Police Force. The learned counsel for the respondents states that the application may be allowed and that the writ petition be heard. For the reasons stated in the application it is allowed. WP(C) No. 12252/2004 Page 1 of 23 WP(C) No.12252/2004 With the consent of the parties the writ petition is taken up for hearing for final disposal. The petitioner has sought the quashing of the order of dismissal dated 19th September, 2003 passed by the Comma...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : Feb-07-2012
Petitioner vide this petition has prayed that cut-off date mentioned in the Notification dated 29.09.2009 to the extent of pre and post distinctions of 01.01.2006 for grant of disability pension to those persons who have voluntarily retired prior to 2006 may be quashed. Petitioner was commissioned in Indian Army on 27.12.1982 in Army Medical Corps after having been found fit in all respect. He served with various medical units of Indian Army from 1983 to 1996. During 1996, due to peculiar nature of service and hazardous atmosphere, petitioner suffered two disabilities namely Tear Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medical Meniscus (Left) and subsequently he was placed in low medical category S1 H1 A3 P1 E1. On account of disabilities, petitioners movements became restricted causing difficulty in performance of his normal duties, therefore, he sought Page premature retirement after 15 years of service. Respondents vide order dated 07.01.1997 approved the request of the petitioner for premat...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-27-2012
ORAL: Mrs. Meera Chhibber, Member (J): 1. Applicant has sought direction to the respondents to appoint him for the post of Constable (Executive) Male Delhi Police Recruitment, 2009 along with all benefits and allowances with effect from 17.8.2011, i.e., the date of termination. 2. It is submitted by the applicant that he was appointed as Constable on 5.7.2010. He continued to perform his duties but show cause notice dated 12.1.2011 was issued to him (page 15) by alleging that at the time of filling the application form applicant did not mention details of the criminal proceedings in column No.15 (a) to (e) rather mentioned ‘No’ against each column whereas the police verification report received in Recruitment Cell, Delhi Police from SP/Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) revealed that a case FIR No. 31/2000 under Section 447/435 IPC, PS Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, was registered against him. He had thus suppressed his criminal involvement in the application as well as in the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-25-2012
ORAL: M.L. Chauhan, Member (J): 1. This is the second round of litigation. Earlier the applicant had filed OA No.3116/2010, which was decided on 20.09.2010 at the admission stage with liberty given to the applicant to file representation within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order claiming his seniority over the juniors and giving specific grounds on which he should be considered by the Respondents for re-engagement as casual labourer, absorption and regularization in appropriate post with the Respondents. Respondents were also directed to consider the said representation of the Applicant alongwith the copy of that OA as a supplementary representation and pass appropriate orders within a period of 02 months from the date of receipt of a copy of that order. Pursuant to the directions given by this Tribunal in the aforesaid terms respondents have passed the impugned order dated 14.03.2011 (Annexure A-1), which is under challenge in this OA and the applicant has prayed...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-16-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.585/2009 % Judgment reserved on : 8th December, 2011 Judgment delivered on: 16th January, 2012 ISHWAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anil Soni, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J..1. The instant appeal is being filed while assailing the judgment dated 08.07.2009 whereby, the appellant has been held guilty and convicted for the offence under Section 376 Indian Penal Code, 1860..2. Vide order on sentence dated 11.07.2009, he was sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years and to pay a fine of ` 7,000/-..3. The facts in brief of the case are that on 03.11.2008 on receipt of PCR Call, vide DD No. 19A, W/ASI Rakesh Kumari reached Surya Temple, Kabir Nagar, Street No.5, Shahdra, Delhi, where H.C. Karan Singh and Ct. Anil Kumar were already present. Smt. Sarita gave her statement to W/ASI Rakesh Kumari regarding commission of rape Crl.A.585/2009 Page 1 of 2...
Tag this Judgment!