Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-02-2012
..... under section 308 ipc against other syndicate members.15. mr. ohri also referred to a full bench judgment of the maharashtra high court in state of maharashtra vs. jagan gagansingh nepali @ jagya & anr. in criminal appeal no. 20 and 407 of 2011 decided on 5th august, 2011 wherein it has been held as under:"34. it can, thus, clearly be seen .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-23-2012
..... aspect whether other advantagehas to be read with gaining pecuniary advantagein section 2(e) of mcoca, learned counsel for petitioner relied upon state of maharashtra v. jagain gagansingh nepali @ jagya and ors : crl. appeal no.20/2011 decided by full bench of bombay high court in august, 2011 wherein it has been observed as under:- since the division bench ..... the organized crime can very well be proceeded against once sanction is obtained against them under section 23 (2) of mcoca. i am conscious in a case of jagain gagansingh nepali @ jagya and ors. (supra) the term other advantage used in section 2(e) of the maharashtra control of organized crime control of organized crime act, 1999 has been read as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-21-2012
* + $~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.1472/2010 & Crl.M.(Bail) No.697/2012 Date of Decision: RAJ KUMAR @ GUDDU Through 21st December, 2012. ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. Versus THE STATE OF DELHI Through Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J 1.By way of the present appeal, the appellant assails the judgment dated 2nd June, 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, finding him guilty of commission of the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and the order of the same date whereby he was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment along with fine of Rs.5,000/- in default whereof, simple imprisonment for three months for the commission of the said offence.2. As per the prosecution, Gajraj Singh Yadav- PW 5.an employee of the MTNL posted at Gulabi Bagh, Delhi, was residing at House No.173, Page 1 of 51 Libaspur, Delhi with his family comprising of his deceased...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : Dec-20-2012
G. George Paracken: 1. The challenge in this Original Application is against the order dated 23.11.aggrieved by the impugned Annexure A-1 show cause notice dated 03.03.2011 proposing to cancel his candidature for the post of Constable (Executive) Male in Delhi Police. He is also aggrieved by the Annexure A-2 order dated 02.03.2011 by which his candidature has been cancelled. 2. This case was earlier heard and disposed of by a co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal vide its order dated 15.11.2011. In fact, this O.A was allowed and the respondents were directed to give appointment to the applicant to the post of Constable (Exe.) on the ground that his case was squarely covered by the earlier order of a co-ordinate Bench in Dharam Veer Singh Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. (OA 164/2010) decided on 25.11.2010 having its operative part as under: 6. It is not possible to agree with the arguments of the Respondents in view of the fact that the candidature of the Applicant has not been cancelle...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h September, 2012 Date of Decision:19th December, 2012 % + (1) Criminal Appeal No. 384/2012 ASHA Through ....Appellant Mr. Jitender Sethi and Mr. Rohit Bhargava, Advocates. Versus STATE Through (2) Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP. Criminal Appeal No. 433/2012 ANAND SINGH @ DHAMMAL ....Appellant Through Mr. Jaideep Malik, Advocate. Versus STATE Through (3) Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP. Criminal Appeal No. 434/2012 ANAR SINGH Through ....Appellant Mr. Sunil Dalal and Mr. Ashish Sharma, Advocates. Versus STATE Through (4) Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP. Criminal Appeal No. 443/2012 SHAILENDER @ BABLEY Through ....Appellant Mr. Mohit Mathur, Mr. Pawan Mathur and Mr. Vikram Panwar, Advocates. Versus STATE Through (5) Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP. Criminal Appeal No. 455/2012 ASHOK KHATRI & ANR. Through ....Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail and Mr. Vishal Sehijpal, Advocates. Versus STATE Through (6) Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, AP...
Tag this Judgment!