Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-23-2012
..... aspect whether „other advantage‟has to be read with „gaining pecuniary advantage‟in section 2(e) of mcoca, learned counsel for petitioner relied upon state of maharashtra v. jagain gagansingh nepali @ jagya and ors : crl. appeal no.20/2011 decided by full bench of bombay high court in august, 2011 wherein it has been observed as under:- “since the division bench ..... the organized crime can very well be proceeded against once sanction is obtained against them under section 23 (2) of mcoca. i am conscious in a case of jagain gagansingh nepali @ jagya and ors. (supra) the term “other advantage” used in section 2(e) of the maharashtra control of organized crime control of organized crime act, 1999 has been read as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-02-2012
..... under section 308 ipc against other syndicate members.15. mr. ohri also referred to a full bench judgment of the maharashtra high court in state of maharashtra vs. jagan gagansingh nepali @ jagya & anr. in criminal appeal no. 20 and 407 of 2011 decided on 5th august, 2011 wherein it has been held as under:"34. it can, thus, clearly be seen .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-12-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. APPEAL No. 932/2009 % Judgment reserved on: 20th September, 2011 Judgment delivered on: 12th January, 2012 ASHOK NARANG ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rajender Kumar, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J..1. Vide the instant appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment dated 06.10.2009 whereby he was held guilty and convicted and by order on sentence dated 09.10.2009, he was sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 07 years for the offence under Section 363 Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 of which he stands convicted with payment of fine of ` 5,000/- for the said offence..2. He also sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 10 years for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 with payment of `5,000/-. Crl. Appeal No.932/2009 Page 1 of 70.3. He further sentenced to undergo R...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-25-2012
ORAL: M.L. Chauhan, Member (J): 1. This is the second round of litigation. Earlier the applicant had filed OA No.3116/2010, which was decided on 20.09.2010 at the admission stage with liberty given to the applicant to file representation within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order claiming his seniority over the juniors and giving specific grounds on which he should be considered by the Respondents for re-engagement as casual labourer, absorption and regularization in appropriate post with the Respondents. Respondents were also directed to consider the said representation of the Applicant alongwith the copy of that OA as a supplementary representation and pass appropriate orders within a period of 02 months from the date of receipt of a copy of that order. Pursuant to the directions given by this Tribunal in the aforesaid terms respondents have passed the impugned order dated 14.03.2011 (Annexure A-1), which is under challenge in this OA and the applicant has prayed...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-27-2012
ORAL: Mrs. Meera Chhibber, Member (J): 1. Applicant has sought direction to the respondents to appoint him for the post of Constable (Executive) Male Delhi Police Recruitment, 2009 along with all benefits and allowances with effect from 17.8.2011, i.e., the date of termination. 2. It is submitted by the applicant that he was appointed as Constable on 5.7.2010. He continued to perform his duties but show cause notice dated 12.1.2011 was issued to him (page 15) by alleging that at the time of filling the application form applicant did not mention details of the criminal proceedings in column No.15 (a) to (e) rather mentioned ‘No’ against each column whereas the police verification report received in Recruitment Cell, Delhi Police from SP/Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) revealed that a case FIR No. 31/2000 under Section 447/435 IPC, PS Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, was registered against him. He had thus suppressed his criminal involvement in the application as well as in the ...
Tag this Judgment!