Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-06-2022
- 1 - WP No.58467 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION No.58467 OF2013(L-RES) BETWEEN: M/S STUMPP SCHUELE & SOMAPPA PVT. LTD., ELECTRONICS DIVISION POST BOX NO.1905 BULL TEMPLE ROAD BANGALORE-560019 REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER-HR & ADMIN. SRI.K.NARAYANA AGED ABOUT64YEARS ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.N. MURTHY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE-PH) AND: SRI. BASAVARAJA.M S/O LATE SRI.NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT64YEARS R/AT:NO.207, 2ND CROSS KEMPEGOWDANAGAR BANGALORE-560019 RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RUDRAPPA.P, ADVOCATE-PH) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED AWARD DATED0307.2013, IN ID NO.42/2007 AT ANNEXURE-U PASSED BY THE INDUSTRIAL - 2 - WP No.58467 of 2013 TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS DEEMED FIT I...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-12-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.121 OF2022VINOD KATARA .PETITIONER(S) Versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH .RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.1. Personal liberty of a person is one of the oldest concepts to be purported by national courts. As long ago as in 1215, the English Magna Carta provided that: "No free man shall be taken or imprisoned.... but..... by law of the land." 1 2. Today, the concept of personal liberty has received a far more expansive interpretation. The notion that is accepted today is that liberty encompasses these rights and privileges which have long been recognized as being essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by a free man and not merely freedom from bodily restraint. There can be no cavil in saying that lodging juveniles in adult prisons amounts to deprivation of their personal liberty on multiple aspects.3. This Writ Application under Article 32 of the Constitution is at the instance ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-13-2022
- 1 - WP No.12765 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION No.12765 OF2022(L-RES) BETWEEN:1. SHRI N MADHUBABU S/O M NARAYANA AGED ABOUT53YEARS WORKING IN BHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED JALAHALLI POST BENGALURU-560013 R/A G-1, SHRUSHTI ANMOL APARTMENTS SIDDALINGESHWARA LAYOUT TINDLU, VIDYARANYAPURA BENGALURU-97 2. BHARAT ELECTRONICS WORKERS UNION REGISTERED TRADE UNION UNDER THE TRADE THE TRADE UNION ACT, 1926 (REG NO.27/50-81) (REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT154 SHRI LAKSHMI NIVAS FIRST FLOOR SHRI JAYAKRISHNA COMPLEX DODDA BOMMASANDRA VIDYARANYAPURA BENGALURU-97 PETITIONERS (BY SRI K.SUBBA RAO, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI L.MURALIDHAR PESHWA, ADVOCATE) AND:1. BHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED (A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENTERPRISES) - 2 - WP No.12765 of 2022 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR JALAHALLI POST BENGALURU-560013 2. MANAGER(HR) CO BHARAT ELE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-19-2022
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9202 OF2019MRS. ETHEL LOURDES DSOUZA LOBO ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS LUCIO NEVILLE JUDE DE SOUZA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.9203 OF2019JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The present appeals arises from a judgment rendered by the Bombay High Court, Goa Bench1. The dispute arises out of inventory proceedings2 under Chapter XVII by Articles 1369 to 1447 of the Portuguese Civil Procedure Code (hereafter the Code).2. Inventory proceedings in the present case arose and were initiated on account of the death of Lt. Guilherme Caetano Souza and his wife, Maria Guilhermina Augusta Lourdes Aguiar Souza. These proceedings were initiated in 1985 for partition of the estate of the said deceased.3 There were six heirs of the deceased (hereafter referred to by their names) - i.e., Pedro (survived by the petitioner, Ethel 1 In WP No.671/2010 dated 10.08.2012 2 Described in Treatise of Civil Code, by Dr. L...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-21-2022
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA R.F.A.NO.1520/2006 (PAR) BETWEEN1 MRS. M.A. SALDANHA ADULT D/O LATE GREGORY COELHO R/AT COELHO HOUSE, SPRINGFILED POST COONOOR, NILGIRIS DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU.2. MRS. MOIRA CELINE COELHO ADULT D/O LATE GREGORY COELHO, R/AT5/D, ALSA MANOR, HARRINGTON ROAD, CHENNAI-31.3. ALBERT JOSEPH COELHO ADULT, S/O LATE GREGORY COELHI, R/A COELHO HOUSE, KANKANADY, MANGALORE-575002 4. ETHELBERT JOSEPH COELHO ADULT2S/O LATE GREGORY COELHI, R/A COELHO HOUSE, KANKANADY, MANGALORE-575002 5. MISS ROWINA COELHO ADULT S/O LATE GREGORY COELHO, R/A COELHO HOUSE, SPRINGFILED, COONOOR, NILGIRIS DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU.6. MRS. DIANA COELHO W/O ISODORE ROBERT COELHO ADULT, R/O SILVER CLOUD ESTATE GUDLOOR, NILGRIS, TAMILNADU7 MISS CARMEN COELHO D/O ISODORE ROBERT COELHO ADULT, R/O SILVER CLOUD ESTATE, GUDLOOR, NILGRIS, TAMILNADU. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. B.V. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE) AND1 RUTH LO...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-22-2022
- 1 - WP No.33097 of 2018 C/W WP No.29288 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION No.33097 OF2018(L-TER) C/W WRIT PETITION No.29288 OF2018(L-RES) IN WP NO.33097 OF2018(L-TER) BETWEEN: SMT. C. SUJATHA AGED ABOUT43YEARS D/O SRI. CHANDRAPPA, R/AT NO.35, 2ND MAIN ROAD, NEAR KRISHNA CHOULTRY MEENAKSHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560079 PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAIK V.S.,ADVOCATE) AND: THE MANAGEMENT OF KARNATAKA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD., BEEJA BHAVAN BELLARY ROAD HEBBAL BENGALURU-24 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR RESPONDENT (BY SRI. R.S. HEGDE, ADVOCATE) - 2 - WP No.33097 of 2018 C/W WP No.29288 of 2018 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE FIRST ADDL. LABOUR COURT, BENGALURU VIDE ANNEX-A; QUASH THE AWARD DATED54.2018 PASSED BY THE FIRST ADDL. LABOUR COURT, BENGALURU IN I.D. No.15 OF2015THE CERTIFIE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-22-2022
- 1 - WP No.33097 of 2018 C/W WP No.29288 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION No.33097 OF2018(L-TER) C/W WRIT PETITION No.29288 OF2018(L-RES) IN WP NO.33097 OF2018(L-TER) BETWEEN: SMT. C. SUJATHA AGED ABOUT43YEARS D/O SRI. CHANDRAPPA, R/AT NO.35, 2ND MAIN ROAD, NEAR KRISHNA CHOULTRY MEENAKSHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560079 PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAIK V.S.,ADVOCATE) AND: THE MANAGEMENT OF KARNATAKA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD., BEEJA BHAVAN BELLARY ROAD HEBBAL BENGALURU-24 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR RESPONDENT (BY SRI. R.S. HEGDE, ADVOCATE) - 2 - WP No.33097 of 2018 C/W WP No.29288 of 2018 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE FIRST ADDL. LABOUR COURT, BENGALURU VIDE ANNEX-A; QUASH THE AWARD DATED54.2018 PASSED BY THE FIRST ADDL. LABOUR COURT, BENGALURU IN I.D. No.15 OF2015THE CERTIFIE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-29-2022
1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.10834 OF2010SUKHBIRI DEVI & ORS. APPELLANTS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.1. This appeal by Special Leave is directed against the judgment and order in RSA No.79/2007 dated 25.08.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi. The appellants were plaintiffs in Suit No.410 of 2000 on the file of the Court presided over by Shri Vidya Prakash, Civil Judge, Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as the Trial Court), filed seeking reliefs mainly against the 5th Respondent. The Trial Court framed a preliminary issue on the question of limitation, evidently, upon forming the opinion that case may be 2 disposed of on an issue of law and that it warrants postponement of settlement of other issues until after that issue has been determined and to deal with the suit in accordance with the decision on that issue. Accordingly, the Trial Court framed a preliminary question as to whether the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-30-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF SEPTEMBER,2022 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.142 OF2018BETWEEN: SRI.VENKATESHA, S/OVENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT32YEARS, R/AT LAKKUR VILLAGE, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI JAVEED S., ADV.) AND: STATE BY S.P.P, BY DODDABELAVANGALA POLICE STATION, REPT.BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI VIJAYAKUMAR MAJAGE, ADDL. SPP.) T HIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION DATED0811.2017 AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED CRL.A.142/2018 2 20.11.2017 PASSED BY THE VII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN S.C.NO.333/2011, CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION376AND302OF IPC. THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT ON2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-13-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.242 OF2022SUBRAMANYA ..APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA ..RESPONDENT JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.1. This statutory criminal appeal is at the instance of a convict accused charged with the offence of murder of one Kamalamma (deceased) and is directed against the judgment and order of conviction passed by the High Court of Karnataka dated 02.07.2019 in the Criminal Appeal No.473 of 2013 by which the High Court allowed the acquittal appeal filed by the State of Karnataka against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Chikmagalur dated 20.12.2012 in the Sessions Case No.59 of 2011 and held the appellant herein guilty of the offence of murder punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, the IPC). The High Court sentenced the appellant herein to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs. 25,000/ and in the event of default of payment of...
Tag this Judgment!