Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-29-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8717 OF2022Sansera Engineering Limited Appellant Versus Deputy Commissioner, Large Tax Payer Unit, Bengaluru Respondent JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 23.07.2021 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Writ Appeal No.249/2020, whereby the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the appellant herein and has confirmed the common judgment and order dated 22.11.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petitions, upholding the order passed by the respondent rejecting the 1 claim of the appellant for rebate on the ground that the claim was barred by time/limitation prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the original writ petitioner/appellant herein has preferred the present appeal.2. The facts leading to the p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-16-2022
REPORTABLE2022INSC1293IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9252-9253 OF2022(arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 7860-7861 of 2018) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY APPELLANT(S) BOARD & ORS. VERSUS THOMAS JOSEPH ALIAS .RESPONDENT(S) THOMAS M. J.& ORS. WITH Civil Appeal Nos. 9256-9257 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7886-7887 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9254-9255 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7875-7876 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9262 -9263 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7880-7881 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9264 -9265 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7863-7864 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9266 -9267 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7882-7883 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9268 -9269 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7884-7885 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9270 -9271 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7870-7871 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9258 -9259 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7873-7874 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9260 -9261 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7878-7879 of 2018 JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J., 1. Leave granted in all the captioned Special Leave Petitions.2. Since th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-20-2022
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1301 OF2019RISHIRAJ @ TUTUL MUKHARJEE & ANR. ..Appellants VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ..Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1302 OF2019HANI @ KOUSTUBH SAMDARIYA ..Appellant VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ..Respondent AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1303 OF2019VIJAY @ HALLO JAISWAL & ANR. ..Appellants VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR. ..Respondents JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1. These appeals by special leave, at the instance of accused, named; (1) Rishiraj @ Tutul Mukharjee, (2) Samrat @ Laltu Mukharjee, (3) Vijay @ 1 Hallo Jaiswal, (4) Ajay @ Chhotu @ Jijji Jaiswal and (5) Hani @ Koustubh Samadriya, challenge the common judgment and order dated 10.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal Nos.452, 492, 522 and 538 of 2012.2. The present proceedings arise out of the registration of crime pursuant to First Information Report No.187 of 2010 dated 09.06.2010, lodge...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-23-2022
Crl.A.847/2022 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No 847 of 2022 P R Adikesavan Appellant Versus The Registrar General, High Court of Respondents Madras and Another JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1The appeal arises from the judgment dated 25 March 2022 of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court convicting appellant under Section 2(c)(iii) read with Section 12(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 and sentencing him two weeks of simple imprisonment. Crl.A.847/2022 2 2 Insolvency proceedings were initiated against the appellant under the provisions of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act 1909. On 12 March 2021, a Single Judge of the Madras High Court issued a non-bailable warrant seeking the presence of the appellant on 26 March 2021. On 31 March 2021, when a team of the police tried to execute the warrant, the appellant and fifty other advocates gheraoed the police and prevented them from executing the order. The Deputy Co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jun-03-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. No.1000 of 2003 (Recommendation of CEC dated 20.11.2003) WITH I.A. Nos.982984 of 2003 AND I.A. Nos.10261028 of 2004 AND I.A. Nos. 11231124 of 2004 AND I.A. Nos.11971199 of 2004 AND I.A. Nos. 12101211 of 2004 AND I.A. Nos.12501251 of 2004 AND I.A. No.1412 of 2005 AND I.A. No.1512 of 2006 AND I.A. No.1992 of 2007 AND1I.A. No.3880 of 2015 AND I.A. No.96949 of 2019 AND I.A. No.117831 of 2019 AND I.A. No.65571 of 2021 In the Matter of: WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.202 of 1995 In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad ..Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India and Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.These proceedings originate from the Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India registered as W.P. (Civil) No.202 of 1995 (T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India and Ors.), which is in the nature of a public interest litigation. It was instituted for protection of forest lands in the Nilgiris district of t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jun-24-2022
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No../2022 (arising out of SLP(Crl.) No../2022 @ Diary No.34207/2018) ZAKIA AHSAN JAFRI . APPELLANT versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. . RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT1 There is a delay of 216 days in filing of this special leave petition against the judgment and order dated 5.10.2017 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad1 in Criminal Revision Application No.205/2014. Even though the explanation offered in the application for condonation of delay is blissfully vague and bereft of any material facts and particulars, keeping in mind the 1 for short, the High Court 2 subject matter involved, we deemed it appropriate to ignore/condone the delay and proceeded to hear the matter on merits.2. We must note that the respondents had faintly objected to the hearing of this matter on merits owing to unexplained delay in filing of the petition. However, they have a serious objection to the joining of Ms. Teesta S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-04-2022
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF JULY, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1335 OF2018BETWEEN: Sri. Muniraju S/o Narayanappa Aged about 40 years R/o Araluru Village Bengaluru Permanent Address: Pakarahalli Village Taluk: Bangarpet Kolar District 563101. ...Appellant (By Sri. N.S. Sampangiramaiah - Advocate) AND: State of Karnataka Rep. by Sub-Inspector of Police Bangarpet Police Station Bangarpet, Kolar District Rep. by the State Public Prosecutor High Court of Karnataka Bengaluru 560 001. ...Respondent (By Smt. Rashmi Jadhav - HCGP) 2 This Criminal Appeal filed under Sec.374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13.04.2018 in Sessions Case No.147/2016 passed by the learned III-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Kolar (sitting at K.G.F.) and by acquitting him of the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-11-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4105-4107 OF2022Gregory Patrao and Ors. Appellant(s) Versus Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in First Appeal No.259 of 2021 and other allied first appeals, by which the High Court has set aside the judgment and award passed by the learned Reference Court and has remanded the matter to the Reference Court to decide the references afresh after affording an opportunity to all the parties including respondent No.1 herein - M/s. Mangalore Refineries & Petrochemicals Ltd., Mangalore (MRPL), the original claimants / original landowners have preferred the present appeals. 12. The lands belonging to the original claimants/original landowners/appellants herein were acquired under Section 28(4) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Dev...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jul-20-2022
- 1 - WA No.100139 of 2022 C/W WA No.100062/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JULY, 2022 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT WRIT APPEAL No.100139 OF2022(LA-RES) C/W WRIT APPEAL NO.100062 OF2022(LA-RES) IN WA NO.100139/2022 BETWEEN:1. MR. GOPAL S/O GOVIND KARJOL AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. KHB COLONY,MUDHOL2 MR. UMESH S/O. GOVIND KARJOL AGE. 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. KHB COLONY, MUDHOL, MODHOL TALUK DIST. BAGALKOT3 MR. ARUN S/O. GOVIND KARJOL AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. KHB COLONY, MUDHOLD, MUDHOL TALUK AND DIST. BAGALKOT APPELLANTS (BY SRI. C V ANGADI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT - 2 - WA No.100139 of 2022 C/W WA No.100062/2022 M S BUILDING, BENGALURU- 560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT (R AND R) LAND ACQUISITION, EX- OFFICIO SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, UPPER...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jul-20-2022
- 1 - WA No.100139 of 2022 C/W WA No.100062/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JULY, 2022 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT WRIT APPEAL No.100139 OF2022(LA-RES) C/W WRIT APPEAL NO.100062 OF2022(LA-RES) IN WA NO.100139/2022 BETWEEN:1. MR. GOPAL S/O GOVIND KARJOL AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. KHB COLONY,MUDHOL2 MR. UMESH S/O. GOVIND KARJOL AGE. 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. KHB COLONY, MUDHOL, MODHOL TALUK DIST. BAGALKOT3 MR. ARUN S/O. GOVIND KARJOL AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. KHB COLONY, MUDHOLD, MUDHOL TALUK AND DIST. BAGALKOT APPELLANTS (BY SRI. C V ANGADI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT - 2 - WA No.100139 of 2022 C/W WA No.100062/2022 M S BUILDING, BENGALURU- 560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT (R AND R) LAND ACQUISITION, EX- OFFICIO SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, UPPER...
Tag this Judgment!