Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 08, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 12, 2014 % + CRL.A. 979/2012 HEERA LAL @ HEERA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey, Mr.Shiv Chopra and Ms.Megha, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Rajeev Vimal, PS Kalyan Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Heera Lal is convicted of the offence of robbery and murder of Jagan Singh Chauhan and awarded imprisonment for life.2. The case of prosecution rest on circumstantial evidence in the form of statements of Umesh Chauhan PW-1 and Tushar Chauhan PW-2 having last seen Heera Lal with the deceased on the night of June 07, 2010, recovery of shirt of Heera Lal which was found to be blood stained with human blood of B group origin which tallied with that of deceased and the recovery of weapon of offence an iron r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1402/2010 NEPAL AIRLINES CORPORATION Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Ramashankar, Advocate with Mr.Shivam Garg, Advocate. versus GIRISH KUMAR SINGH Through : ..... Defendant. None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiff Nepal Airlines Corporation formerly known as Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation has instituted the instant suit for recovery of ` 80,18,000/- with interest pendente-lite and future.2. As per averments in the plaint, the plaintiff carries on its business in India having its principal office at 44, Janpath, New Delhi. The defendant established an enterprise known as Nepal Travel Information Centre, based in Bombay. Subsequently, offices were established in other cities including Delhi at 13/29, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi. The plaintiff is an international airline carrying on its business operations in India. In December, 1995, the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1402/2010 NEPAL AIRLINES CORPORATION Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Ramashankar, Advocate with Mr.Shivam Garg, Advocate. versus GIRISH KUMAR SINGH Through : ..... Defendant. None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiff Nepal Airlines Corporation formerly known as Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation has instituted the instant suit for recovery of ` 80,18,000/- with interest pendente-lite and future.2. As per averments in the plaint, the plaintiff carries on its business in India having its principal office at 44, Janpath, New Delhi. The defendant established an enterprise known as Nepal Travel Information Centre, based in Bombay. Subsequently, offices were established in other cities including Delhi at 13/29, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi. The plaintiff is an international airline carrying on its business operations in India. In December, 1995, the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:16. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 3761/2014 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra & Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advs. versus SHENZHEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.M.S.Ananth, Adv. for D-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.24487/2014 (U/s 149 CPC) Court fee has been deposited. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.24485/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. The plaintiff Micromax Informatics Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as "Micromax") has filed this suit for permanent injunction for restraining infringement of the Ambient Services And Application Distributions Agreement (entered into by Micromax and defendants No.2 and 3 herein); damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. against the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:16. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 3761/2014 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra & Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advs. versus SHENZHEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.M.S.Ananth, Adv. for D-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.24487/2014 (U/s 149 CPC) Court fee has been deposited. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.24485/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. The plaintiff Micromax Informatics Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as "Micromax") has filed this suit for permanent injunction for restraining infringement of the Ambient Services And Application Distributions Agreement (entered into by Micromax and defendants No.2 and 3 herein); damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. against the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 27, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 810/2014 JEET SINGH @ JEETU & ANR Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Kaushal Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Tarkeshwar Singh, SHO Nand Nagri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Jeet Singh @ Jeetu and Kalu @ Neeraj both sons of Chattarsen have been convicted for the offence of murder of Deewan, on the strength of testimony of Chet Ram PW-6 the brother of the deceased vide the impugned judgment dated April 29, 2014 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `10,000/- each vide order dated May 07, 2014.2. Learned counsel for the appellants contends that the presence of Chet Ram at the spot when the incident took place has not been proved as PW-4 Raghunath who informed the police does not depo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 27, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 810/2014 JEET SINGH @ JEETU & ANR Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Kaushal Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Tarkeshwar Singh, SHO Nand Nagri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Jeet Singh @ Jeetu and Kalu @ Neeraj both sons of Chattarsen have been convicted for the offence of murder of Deewan, on the strength of testimony of Chet Ram PW-6 the brother of the deceased vide the impugned judgment dated April 29, 2014 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `10,000/- each vide order dated May 07, 2014.2. Learned counsel for the appellants contends that the presence of Chet Ram at the spot when the incident took place has not been proved as PW-4 Raghunath who informed the police does not depo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 12, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 121/2014 JAI RAM @ VICKY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Shahid Azad, Ms.Sonali Karwasra and Mr.Gaurav Bhatt, Advs. versus STATE Represented by: .... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Jai Ram @ Vicky has been convicted along with R for the murder of Ishwanti mother of R and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.2. Learned counsel for Jai Ram challenging the circumstances held against Jai Ram by the learned Trial Court contends that the prosecution has led no evidence to show that Jai Ram and R were in love with each other. It is also not proved that the mobile phone allegedly recovered from Jai Ram belonged to the deceased. The evide...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 12, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 121/2014 JAI RAM @ VICKY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Shahid Azad, Ms.Sonali Karwasra and Mr.Gaurav Bhatt, Advs. versus STATE Represented by: .... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Jai Ram @ Vicky has been convicted along with R for the murder of Ishwanti mother of R and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.2. Learned counsel for Jai Ram challenging the circumstances held against Jai Ram by the learned Trial Court contends that the prosecution has led no evidence to show that Jai Ram and R were in love with each other. It is also not proved that the mobile phone allegedly recovered from Jai Ram belonged to the deceased. The evide...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-23-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:23. d December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 4039/2014 MAKE MY TRIP(INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Prashant Gupta, Adv. with Mr.Kanishk Kumar, Adv. versus MAKE MY TOURS PVT. LTD. & ORS. Through None. ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) I.A. No.26297/2014 This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 CPC seeking exemption from filing true typed copies of documents. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, subject to said documents being produced at the time of admission/denial of the documents. The application is disposed of. CS(OS) No.4039/2014 Let the plaint be registered as a suit. Issue summons to the defendants through all modes of service including e-mail in addition, returnable on 13th February, 2015. I.A. No.26296/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. Issue notice to the defendants, returnable on 13th February, 2015.2. Plaintiff has filed...
Tag this Judgment!