Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-22-2012
..... on 04.08.1996 javed khan pointed out room no. 106 in satyam hotel, pahar ganj and informed the police that on 14.05.1996 he alongwith his associate sonu nepali stayed there and kept then in the evening handed over the bag with explosives to wazid; javed khan also identified rajan arora to whom he had paid the room rent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-26-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:26. 11.2012 TEST. CASE No.45/2009 NAVAL MAHAJAN Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. K.G. Seth, Advocate NEHA ARORA .....Respondent Through: None AND + TEST. CASE No.46/2009 NAVAL MAHAJAN Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. K.G. Seth, Advocate NEHA ARORA .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) IAs No. 21194/2012 (O. 6 R. 17 CPC) in Test. Case No. 45/2009 and 21193/2012 (O. 6 R. 17 CPC) in Test. Case No. 46/2009 These are two applications for amendment of Test. Case Nos. 45/2009 and 46/2009. For the reasons stated in the applications, they are allowed and the amended petitions in both the cases are taken on record. The applications stand disposed of. TEST. CASE Nos.45/2009 and 46/2009 1. The Test. Case No.45/2009 is a petition for grant of Letter of Administration which was initially filed before the learned District Judge, Delhi on 23.03.2009. The petition was filed by ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-26-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:26. 11.2012 TEST. CASE No.45/2009 NAVAL MAHAJAN Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. K.G. Seth, Advocate NEHA ARORA .....Respondent Through: None AND + TEST. CASE No.46/2009 NAVAL MAHAJAN Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. K.G. Seth, Advocate NEHA ARORA .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) IAs No. 21194/2012 (O. 6 R. 17 CPC) in Test. Case No. 45/2009 and 21193/2012 (O. 6 R. 17 CPC) in Test. Case No. 46/2009 These are two applications for amendment of Test. Case Nos. 45/2009 and 46/2009. For the reasons stated in the applications, they are allowed and the amended petitions in both the cases are taken on record. The applications stand disposed of. TEST. CASE Nos.45/2009 and 46/2009 1. The Test. Case No.45/2009 is a petition for grant of Letter of Administration which was initially filed before the learned District Judge, Delhi on 23.03.2009. The petition was filed by ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-06-2012
4. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:06. 12.2012 % FAO(OS) 299/2012 GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Trideep Pais Mr. Ashwath Sitaraman and Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocates. versus NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sachin Dutta, CGSC for the respondent No.1/NHPC. Mr. Rajat Navet & Ms. Prachi V. Sharma, Advocates for the respondent No.2/Alstom. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. Admit.2. Learned counsel for the respondents accept notice.3. Heard learned counsel for the parties.4. A contract was entered into on 03.02.1984 between respondent No.1- National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as NHPC), a Government of India undertaking and three Canadian entities with respect to Chamera Hydel Project in Himachal Pradesh. One of the entities was Canadian General...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-10-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.C. Rev. No.3/2011 Date of Decision:10. 12.2012 SH. RAVINDER SINGH ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Milan Malhotra, Adv. Versus ...Respondent SH. DEEPESH KHORANA Through: Mr. Rajat Malhotra & Mr. Deepesh Khorana, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. This petition is being field under Sec. 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act against the impugned order dated 13.10.2010, whereby the Ld. ARC dismissed the leave to defend application in Eviction Petition No. 17/2009, filed by the petitioner herein. The brief facts giving rise to this petition are as follows.2. The petitioner herein is the tenant in respect of a shop admeasuring 7ft X 10ft, in the ground floor of property bearing No. 89, Moti Nagar, New Delhi. In 2009, the landlord, who is the respondent herein, filed petition for eviction of the suit shop, claiming that it was required bona fide by the respondent for his 29 year old unmarried son who wants to open a computer busin...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-14-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:03. 12.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:14. 12.2012 + WP (C) No. 4717/2011 & CM No.9555/2011 PANACEA BIOTECH LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Shri Rajesh Mahna with Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Mr. Ankit Singh, Advocates Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Sh. Vineet Bhatia, Advocate CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The writ petitioner is a public limited company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of pharmaceutical products registered with the Department of Trade and Taxes. It has been purchasing goods based on the strength of the Registration certificate. It impugns the determination of the respondent authorities that the consideration it received for the sale of its cars, should be included in its total turnover for the relevant assessment year. WP(C) No. 4717/2011 Pag2. The Sales Tax Officer (Assessing Authority, the third Respondent), for...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-14-2012
44 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4231/2012 NANDINI BHATNAGAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Bhaduri, Advocate with Mr. Krishna Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with ASI Narender Singh, PS CWC Nanak Pura, New Delhi. Mr. Atul Aggarwal and Mr. Deepak Jain, Advocates for complainant. Complainant in person. Date of Decision:14. h December, 2012 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J : (Oral) Crl.M.A. 19845/2012 (exemption) in Crl.M.C. 4231/2012 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. Accordingly, present application stands disposed of. Crl.M.C. 4231/2012 & Crl.M.A. 19844/2012 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging the condition imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, whereby the petitioner has been directed not to leave the boundary of the NCT of Delhi as well as the NCR and the count...
Tag this Judgment!