Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 941/2010 SURESH @ BONA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate along with the appellant (in judicial custody) versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP CRL.A. 1211/2010 VIKAS @ SUNIL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate along with the appellant (in judicial custody) versus STATE Through: % ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP Date of Decision: July 02, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Suresh @ Bona & Vikas @ Sunil seek to challenge the impugned order dated 30th January, 2010 and 6th February, 2010 whereby both the appellants were convicted for offence under Section 302/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.15,000/- each, in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months each.2. The factual matrix of the case is:- 3. On 17th September, 2007 on receipt...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-22-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. A. 201/2003 Date of Decision:22. d July, 2013 NARESH @ KOKI Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Hem C. Vashisht, Adv. along with appellant in person versus STATE OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Ms. Fizani Husain, APP CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 22nd February, 2003 and order on sentence dated 7th March, 2003 arising out of Sessions Case No.133/2000 in case FIR No. 268/2000, PS Sangam Vihar under Sections 302/307/34 IPC vide which the appellant along with co-accused was held guilty of offence under Section 324/34 IPC and 326/34 IPC. All the accused were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of five years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- each under Section 326/34 IPC, in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment of six months. Further rigorous imprisonment for one year was awarded to each of the accused persons under Section 324/34 IPC. Th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-30-2013
$~01. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.APPEAL NO.1100/2010 Judgment reserved on 5th July , 2013 Judgment delivered on 30th August, 2013 % RAHUL KUMAR RAMAN BHAI CHOUDHARY ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Vijay Kumar and Mr.Rajiv Kumar, Advs. Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Richa Kapoor, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G.S.SISTANI, J 1.Challenge in this appeal, filed under Section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, is to the judgment dated 27.3.2009 and the order on sentence dated 27.3.2009 whereby the appellant has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.20,000/- has been imposed for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC; rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act 1959. The appellant has further been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-03-2013
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on:03. 09.2013 + RC. Rev. No.247/2013 & C.M. No.10716/2013 (for stay) THE PUNJAB STATE CO-OPERATIVE SUPPLY & MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED (M/S MARKFED) ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Brijender Chahar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vineet Bhagat & Mr.Akash Tyagi, Advs. along with Mr.Shiv Kumar, Senior Manager (Law) in person. versus AMIT GOEL & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. and Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Lalit Gupta, Ms.Payal Gupta & Mr.Ashish Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of the present petition under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the petitioner has assailed the order dated 13th May, 2013 passed by the Additional Rent Controller (04), South, New Delhi in an eviction petition filed by the respondents (petitioners therein) in respect of House no. C-212 Defence Colony, New Delhi 110024 (hereinafter ref...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-04-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:4. 09.2013 + CRL.A. No.432 /2010 NARESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Ms.AshaTiwari, Advocate versus STATE Through: + CRL.A. No. 321/2010 ARUN KUMAR @ HANNI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State ..... Appellant Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State AND + CRL.A. No. 717/2010 SANJIV @ SANJAY @ MANJAN ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR CRL.A. Nos.432 /321/717 of 2010 Page 1 JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By this order we propose to decide three separate Criminal Appeals preferred by Naresh Kumar, Arun Kumar and Sanjeev, accused in FIR No. 965/07 to challenge the judgment dated 11.02.2009 and or...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:10.09.2013 Judgment delivered on:17.09.2013 CRL.A. 1064/2010 MOHD. ISLAM .... Appellant Through Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. versus STATE Through + ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State CRL.A. 414/2011 CHANDER SINGH Through .... Appellant Mr. S.K. Pandey, Adv. versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 There are two appellants before this Court. Both of them are aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 26.03.2010 and 29.03.2010 vide which they have been convicted for the offence under Sections 302,201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and had been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for a period of three months each for the offence under Section 302/34 of the IPC; for the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h September, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 501/2013 STATE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State. versus LALITA ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 13958/2013 (delay) 1. This application has been filed by the State seeking condonation of 94 days delay in filing the present petition for leave to appeal.2. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, present application is allowed. Delay in filing the petition for leave to appeal is condoned.3. Application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 501/2013 4. By this petition under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), the State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 11.03.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), (North-West) Rohini, Delhi in Sessions Case No.12/2009 whereby the respondent was acquitted of the charge...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: October 08, 2013 + W.P.(CRL) 861/1997 U.S. PANDEY PRESIDENT OF W.A.S. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Petitioner in person versus UOI & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate CONT.CAS.(CRL) 3/1998 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION In Re: UMA SHANKAR PANDEY ..... Contemnor Represented by: Contemnor in person CONT.CAS.(CRL) 17/2008 UMA SHANKAR PANDEY PRESIDENT OF W.A.S. Represented by: ..... Petitioner Petitioner in person versus UOI & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Sh.Uma Shankar Pandey is a person who believes that he has been let down by the society and the State and therefore in desperation he turns to the legal system for help. This Bench had the benefit of hearing him for about two hours on September 23, 2013, an hour and a half on September 25, 2013 and for two hours o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: October 08, 2013 + W.P.(CRL) 861/1997 U.S. PANDEY PRESIDENT OF W.A.S. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Petitioner in person versus UOI & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate CONT.CAS.(CRL) 3/1998 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION In Re: UMA SHANKAR PANDEY ..... Contemnor Represented by: Contemnor in person CONT.CAS.(CRL) 17/2008 UMA SHANKAR PANDEY PRESIDENT OF W.A.S. Represented by: ..... Petitioner Petitioner in person versus UOI & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Sh.Uma Shankar Pandey is a person who believes that he has been let down by the society and the State and therefore in desperation he turns to the legal system for help. This Bench had the benefit of hearing him for about two hours on September 23, 2013, an hour and a half on September 25, 2013 and for two hours o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: October 08, 2013 + W.P.(CRL) 861/1997 U.S. PANDEY PRESIDENT OF W.A.S. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Petitioner in person versus UOI & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate CONT.CAS.(CRL) 3/1998 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION In Re: UMA SHANKAR PANDEY ..... Contemnor Represented by: Contemnor in person CONT.CAS.(CRL) 17/2008 UMA SHANKAR PANDEY PRESIDENT OF W.A.S. Represented by: ..... Petitioner Petitioner in person versus UOI & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Sh.Uma Shankar Pandey is a person who believes that he has been let down by the society and the State and therefore in desperation he turns to the legal system for help. This Bench had the benefit of hearing him for about two hours on September 23, 2013, an hour and a half on September 25, 2013 and for two hours o...
Tag this Judgment!