Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on : Mar-06-2013
V.K. Gupta, Member(Judicial): 1. This appeal by the appellant/OP of complaint case No.846/2006 is directed against the order dated 21.01.2009 passed by District Forum(New Delhi), directing the appellant to refund Rs.3300/- as fee, Rs.30,000/- as compensation and Rs.5000/- as litigation charges. 2. In nut-shell the brief facts are that on 08.06.2006 a baby was born and the doctors directed the complainant for specific tests to ascertain the genitalai of the baby. The doctor further suggested following case. (i) Sodium, serum (ii) Potassium, serum (iii) Buccal simear/Barr Bodie (iv) Chromosome (Karyctype) 3. The baby was borne at Ram Chand Memorial Nursing Home, which advised that the tests to be conducted by the appellant/OP. Consequently on 09.06.2006 the baby was taken to the laboratory of the appellant for aforesaid tests which charged Rs.3300/-. Respondent/complainant was asking for the report and every time it was directed that the report will be given on 29.06.2006. On this date t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : May-13-2013
G. George Paracken, Member (J) Applicants in this joint Original Application are serving as Senior Field Assistants(M) [SFAs(M) for short] and Assistant Field Officers(M) [AFOs(M) for short] in Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB for short) under the Ministry of Home Affairs. They are aggrieved by the alleged illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory action on the part of the Respondents in not giving them the Grade Pays of Rs.2400/- and Rs.2800/- respectively w.e.f. 1.1.2006 as given to their counter-parts serving in the various organizations under the Cabinet Secretariat. 2. The brief background of the case is that SSB was originally under the Cabinet Secretariat. From 14.01.2001, its administrative control was transferred to the Ministry of Home Affairs. However, the other similar organizations such as ARC, SSF and RAW continued to be under Cabinet Secretariat. All those organizations including SSB were having the posts of SFA and AFO and their pay scales from time to time were as under:-Details o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : May-13-2013
V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J) MA 3625/2012: The applicant has filed the MA for condonation of delay in filing the OA No.4333/2012. He has stated in the said MA that on the permission of this Tribunal in OA No.399/2003, decided on 30.05.2003 (Annexure A12), he filed OA No.1755/2003 by challenging the Scheme of the respondents, i.e., New Recruitment and Assessment Scheme (NRAS), but the said OA was dismissed on 06.05.2004 on the ground of resjudicata. He further stated that the Honble High Court of Delhi dismissed the WP(C) No.10394/2004 and 23790/2005, which was filed against the said decision of this Tribunal dated 06.05.2004, vide its Judgment dated 23.05.2011, which was also upheld by the Honble Supreme Court in SLP (C) Nos.25894-95 of 2011 vide its order dated 24.09.2012. 2. However, the applicant stated that, in the present OA, the applicant has challenged the constitutional validity of another Scheme of the respondents, i.e., Merit And Normal Assessment Scheme (MANAS) and its Circular...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 403/1997 Judgment delivered on:12. 07.2013 RANDHIR SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. K.B. Andley, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.L. Yadav, Adv. Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP with Inspector Satyavirjaaula, P.S. Ashok Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR % JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. The appellants have preferred the present appeal to challenge the judgment of conviction dated 22.10.1997 and order on sentence dated 24.10.1997 thereby convicting the appellants to undergo imprisonment for life under Section 302/34 IPC and to pay fine of Rs. 500/- each and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment of three months each and to undergo rigorous imprisonment of one month each under Sections 323/34 IPC.2. Brief facts of the case as set up by the prosecution are that the accused persons and the complainant side are resident of the Village Bak...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. Appeal No. 1139/2012 Reserved on:17. h January, 2013 Date of Decision:18th February, 2013 % RAJIV @ DIWANJI Through ....Appellant Mr. Mukesh Kalia with Mr. Vikram Singh Saini and Mr. Mohit Popli, Advocates. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP. Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.Rajiv @ Diwanji, in this appeal, challenges his conviction under Section 302 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short). The impugned judgment dated 25th August, 2012, holds that the appellant had committed murder of Dalip Kumar Sajwani on 13th December, 2003, after abducting him. By order of sentence dated 27th August, 2012, for the offence under Section 302 IPC, the appellant has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of which he has to undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days. For the offence under Section 364 IPC, the appella...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :16. h May, 2013 Pronounced on :22. d May, 2013 + CRL.A. 214/2011 MUMTAZ Through : ...Appellant Ms.Charu Verma, Adv. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ...Respondent Through : Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL % G.P.MITTAL, J.1. In the recent past, Delhi - the Capital City of our Country has witnessed unprecedented protests by Aam Aadmi (common man) and there was public outcry to make the city safe for women who have been guaranteed equal rights to live with dignity. Delhi was referred to as Rape Capital by every newspaper highlighting instances and plight of rape victims. People from all strata of society came on the street with the demand of Death Penalty for Rapists. To address the concern of the citizens and to ensure speedy trial of rapists, Fast Track Courts were created to deal with the cases of sexual offences. Aim was to provide speedy justice and also send a strong message to the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :13. h May, 2013 Pronounced on :22nd May, 2013 % + W.P.(CRL) 545/2003 R.P.MALIK Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Aman Lekhi, Sr. Advocate with Mr.J.K.Chawla, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Saleem Ahmed, Addl. Standing Counsel for the State with ACP Sheel Nidhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. In the year 2003, the petitioner R.P.Malik filed this Criminal Writ Petition No.545/2003 invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 CrPC for issuance of appropriate writ or direction for quashing the FIR No.60/2000 under Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as P.C. Act) as well the chargesheet and the proceedings arising therefrom. In addition, the petitioner has also prayed for issuance of appropriate writ or direction to the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.10 lacs (in pr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: May 02, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 4387/2007 EX.CONST.AJAYVIR GULIA .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Shanker Raju, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Gautam Gupta, Advocate for Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: May 06, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 1026/2013 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI REPRESENTED BY: COMMISSIONER OF POLICE .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus RAVINDER SINGH Represented by: .....Respondent Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: May 13, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 7344/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.4387/07, 1026/13 & 7344/12 Represented by: Ms.Sonia Arora, Advocate with Mr.Varun Gupta, Advocate versus MAHESH KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Saurabh Ahuja, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HO...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: May 02, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 4387/2007 EX.CONST.AJAYVIR GULIA .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Shanker Raju, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Gautam Gupta, Advocate for Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: May 06, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 1026/2013 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI REPRESENTED BY: COMMISSIONER OF POLICE .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus RAVINDER SINGH Represented by: .....Respondent Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: May 13, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 7344/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.4387/07, 1026/13 & 7344/12 Represented by: Ms.Sonia Arora, Advocate with Mr.Varun Gupta, Advocate versus MAHESH KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Saurabh Ahuja, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HO...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: May 02, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 4387/2007 EX.CONST.AJAYVIR GULIA .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Shanker Raju, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Gautam Gupta, Advocate for Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: May 06, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 1026/2013 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI REPRESENTED BY: COMMISSIONER OF POLICE .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus RAVINDER SINGH Represented by: .....Respondent Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: May 13, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 7344/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.4387/07, 1026/13 & 7344/12 Represented by: Ms.Sonia Arora, Advocate with Mr.Varun Gupta, Advocate versus MAHESH KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Saurabh Ahuja, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HO...
Tag this Judgment!