Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1317/2012 Reserved on :17. h April, 2013 Date of Decision:26. h April, 2013 % RAM LAL ..... Appellant Through Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH SANJIV KHANNA, J:1. The appellant Ram Lal impugns his conviction vide judgment dated 15th October, 2009. under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder of Kalam on 6th September, 2006 at about 9.30-10.00 p.m. He has been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/-, which, upon realization, is to be equally distributed amongst the family members of the deceased.2. There is ample evidence to show that Kalam died a homicidal death pursuant to injuries suffered by a sharp edged weapon. Dr. Sapna (PW-3), who was working as a Junior Resident at Safdarjung Hospital, had examined Kalam and had prepared his MLC (Ex.PW3...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 526/2012 Reserved on:12. h December, 2012 Date of Decision:07. h February, 2013 % Anil @ Anu and Anr. Through ....Appellants Mr. Pradeep K. Bakshi, with Mr. Jitender Ratta, Advocates. Versus Respondent STATE OF NCT Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. GARG SANJIV KHANNA, J.Anil @ Annu and Narinder @ Vicky, by this appeal, impugn their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 vide judgment dated 20th December, 2011, arising out of FIR No. 368/2007, P.S. Uttam Nagar, Delhi, for murder of Deepak on 3rd May, 2007 at about 11.00 PM. By the order of sentence dated 21st December, 2011, they have been directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each, in default of which they have to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.2. The fact that Deepak died an unnatural death in the intervening night of 3rd ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-04-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 01.2013 CRL. A. 388/1997 HARGIYAN SINGH ... Appellant ... Respondent versus STATE Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent /State : Mr Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Amicus Curiae with Mr Pankaj Kumar and Mr Prakash Chandra : Ms Richa Kapur CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MS JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J 1.This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 09.04.1997 delivered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdara, Delhi in Sessions Case No.105/1996 arising out of FIR No.232/1990 under Section 302 IPC registered at police station Nand Nagri. By virtue of the said judgment, the appellant Hargiyan has been convicted for the murders of Smt. Rukmani and Mohd Sharif and the appellant has been held guilty of the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. He was also convicted for the offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. This appe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :13. h MAY, 2013 DECIDED ON :31. t MAY, 2013 + CRL.A. 1037/2012 & CRL.M.B.Nos.285/2013 & 1633/2012 BAIJ NATH MITTAL Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Rebecca M.John, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kushdeep Gaur & Mr.Harsh Bora, Advocates. versus STATE THR.C.B.I. Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Spl.P.P. AND + CRL.A. 1090/2012 & CRL.M.B.1701/2012 MUKESH KUMAR GUPTA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Vishal Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Kushdeep Gaur & Mr.Harsh Bora, Advocates. versus STATE THR.CBI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Spl.P.P. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.CRL.M.B.Nos.285/2013 & 1633/2012 in CRL.A.1037/2012 & CRL.M.B.1701/2012 in CRL.A.1090/2012 1. The appellants- Baij Nath Mittal and Mukesh Kumar Gupta seek suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. I have heard the counsel for the appellants and learned Spl.P.P. Apparently, allegations against the appellants are very serious whereby they allegedly...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :13. h MAY, 2013 DECIDED ON :31. t MAY, 2013 + CRL.A. 1037/2012 & CRL.M.B.Nos.285/2013 & 1633/2012 BAIJ NATH MITTAL Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Rebecca M.John, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kushdeep Gaur & Mr.Harsh Bora, Advocates. versus STATE THR.C.B.I. Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Spl.P.P. AND + CRL.A. 1090/2012 & CRL.M.B.1701/2012 MUKESH KUMAR GUPTA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Vishal Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Kushdeep Gaur & Mr.Harsh Bora, Advocates. versus STATE THR.CBI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Spl.P.P. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.CRL.M.B.Nos.285/2013 & 1633/2012 in CRL.A.1037/2012 & CRL.M.B.1701/2012 in CRL.A.1090/2012 1. The appellants- Baij Nath Mittal and Mukesh Kumar Gupta seek suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. I have heard the counsel for the appellants and learned Spl.P.P. Apparently, allegations against the appellants are very serious whereby they allegedly...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :24. 07.2013 Judgment delivered on:29. 07.2013 + CRL.A. 791/2010 KAMAL KISHORE SINGH @ PANDIT Appellant Through: Mr.A.K.Trivedi, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, Addl. Public Prosecutor. + CRL.A. 1014/2010 MUNNI LAL Through: .Appellant Mr.R.K.Anand, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, Addl. Public Prosecutor. + CRL.A. 1239/2010 TILISRA Through: .Appellant Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, Addl. Public Prosecutor. CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1. The appellants are aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 15.4.2010 vide which they had been convicted for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 120B (1) of the IPC. Accused Munni Lal and Tilisra had been further convicted under Section 45...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:16.9.2013 + CRL.A. 1154/2010 DEVENDER @ D K ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Anita Abraham, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J (oral) 1 On 02.4.2006, DD No.54B (Ex.PW-3/A) was recorded in the local police station P.S. Shalimar Bagh which was to the effect that at 6.37 PM on the same day at Kela Gown, Railway Colony one unknown person had received injuries who had been removed to the hospital by the PCR. 2 H.C.Mohd. Aftab (PW-17) posted in the PCR North-West Zone, Model Town had removed the injured (Sachin) to the BJRM from the aforenoted place of incident and had informed the local police pursuant to which Ex.PW-3/A had been registered. 3 Investigation was entrusted to ASI Kartar Singh (PW-10) who along with Constable Satender (PW-2) reached the spot. On reaching the spot they learnt tha...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :21. t October, 2013 DECIDED ON :19. h November, 2013 + CRL.A. 473/2000 ANIL TANEJA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.L.Yadav, Mr.Lokesh Chandra & Mr.M.Shamikh, Advocates. VERSUS STATE OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Anil Taneja (A-1) and Madan Lal (A-2) challenge their conviction in case FIR No.256/1998 registered at PS Moti Nagar in Sessions Case No.112/1998. By a judgment dated 17th July, 2000 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judgment, they were held guilty under Sections 304 and 323 IPC respectively. A-1, in addition, was convicted under Section 27 Arms Act. By an order dated 19.07.2000, A-1 was awarded various prison terms with fine while A-2 was released on probation. The prosecution case emerged out of the record is as under:- 2. On 26.06.1998 at about 12.30 a.m. at shop No.26-27, Subzi Market, Moti Nagar, an alte...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 238/2002 TAPAS Judgment delivered on: December 03, 2013 ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sumit Verma, Advocate versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By this appeal filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the appellant seeks to challenge the judgment and order on sentence dated 22.08.2001 and 01.09.2001, respectively, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, has convicted the appellant for committing an offence punishable under Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life together with imposition of fine of Rs.100/- and in default of payment of fine, the appellant was directed to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for two days.2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :03. d DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :19. h DECEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 597/2000 ANIL @ BITTOO Through : ....Appellant Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate with Mr.Ram Kumar, Advocate. versus .Respondent STATE Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Anil @ Bittoo (the appellant) questions the correctness and legality of a judgment dated 19.09.2000 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.603/96 arising out of FIR No.441/93 PS Ashok Vihar whereby he was held guilty for committing offence under Section 307 IPC and by an order dated 23.09.2000 awarded RI for three and a half years with fine ` 1,500/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 20.12.1993 at about 08.50 P.M. in a gali outside House No.J-II/41, Wazirpur, JJ Colony, Delhi, he and his associates Rangila, Tika Ram and Pawan Kumar (since acquitted) inflicted injuries to Mane Ram and Raj Rani. First Information Report was lodged after...
Tag this Judgment!