Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : Feb-07-2012
Petitioner vide this petition has prayed that cut-off date mentioned in the Notification dated 29.09.2009 to the extent of pre and post distinctions of 01.01.2006 for grant of disability pension to those persons who have voluntarily retired prior to 2006 may be quashed. Petitioner was commissioned in Indian Army on 27.12.1982 in Army Medical Corps after having been found fit in all respect. He served with various medical units of Indian Army from 1983 to 1996. During 1996, due to peculiar nature of service and hazardous atmosphere, petitioner suffered two disabilities namely Tear Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medical Meniscus (Left) and subsequently he was placed in low medical category S1 H1 A3 P1 E1. On account of disabilities, petitioners movements became restricted causing difficulty in performance of his normal duties, therefore, he sought Page premature retirement after 15 years of service. Respondents vide order dated 07.01.1997 approved the request of the petitioner for premat...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-01-2012
SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral) 1. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed to issue writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 27.5.2011 passed by the Delhi School Tribunal in appeal No.41 of 2003 whereby the tribunal has held that the foundation in the present case is totally illegal and non est. There cannot be any superstructure in the absence of a foundation. All proceedings conducted by the respondent school (petitioner herein) on the basis of the charge-sheet which did not exist in the eyes of law are illegal and without any authority of law. 2. It is, further, recorded that the inquiry report, show-cause notice relating to proposed penalty and finally the impugned orders removing the appellant (respondent herein)from the service are hence illegal and the same were set aside. The Learned tribunal also directed, the petitioner (respondent herein) to be reinstated in service with 50% of the back-wages and all other consequential benefits. 3. Mrs. Jyoti Singh, learned Senior Advocate a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-27-2012
ORAL: Mrs. Meera Chhibber, Member (J): 1. Applicant has sought direction to the respondents to appoint him for the post of Constable (Executive) Male Delhi Police Recruitment, 2009 along with all benefits and allowances with effect from 17.8.2011, i.e., the date of termination. 2. It is submitted by the applicant that he was appointed as Constable on 5.7.2010. He continued to perform his duties but show cause notice dated 12.1.2011 was issued to him (page 15) by alleging that at the time of filling the application form applicant did not mention details of the criminal proceedings in column No.15 (a) to (e) rather mentioned ‘No’ against each column whereas the police verification report received in Recruitment Cell, Delhi Police from SP/Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) revealed that a case FIR No. 31/2000 under Section 447/435 IPC, PS Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, was registered against him. He had thus suppressed his criminal involvement in the application as well as in the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Feb-10-2012
ORAL: Mrs. Meera Chhibber, Member (J) 1. Applicant has challenged letter dated 12.3.2010 and sought a direction to the respondents to get him medically examined by an independent Medical Board at Dr. R.M.L. Hospital, New Delhi or at Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, or in any other Govt. Hospital as per the Medical requirement of the Railways for the post of Assistant Loco Pilot (hereinafter referred to as ALP) and the case of the applicant may be considered for his appointment to the post of ALP on the basis of the medical report given by an independent Medical Board. 2. The brief facts, as stated by the applicant are in the year 2008 Railway Recruitment Board Chandigarh had invited applications for the post of Apprentices Assistant Loco Pilot had applied for it and was declared successful and sent offer of appointment vide letter dated 25.9.2009 (page 12). Thereafter, he was sent for medical examination vide letter dated 5.11.2009. Applicant was declared unfit in A-1 category (page 13)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jun-01-2012
MANMOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral) I.A. No.11246/2012, I.A. No.11247/2012 and I.A. No.11248/2012 (u/S 151 CPC for exemption) These applications have been filed by the plaintiffs under Section 151 of CPC, seeking exemption from filing the original, fair typed copies of the dim documents and documents in legal size and translated copies of the international registration certificates at this stage. Heard. For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed and eight weeks time is granted to file the same. The applications are disposed of. CS(OS) 1787/2012 Let the plaint be registered as a suit. Additional affidavit and documents are taken on record. Issue summons to the defendant, on filing of process fee and registered AD cover within one week, returnable on 30.07.2012. I.A. No.11245/2012 (u/O XXXIX, R.1 and 2 CPC) 1. Issue notice for the date fixed. 2. In this application, the plaintiffs are seeking an injunction against the defendant from using the word MAERSK as part of its co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-24-2012
SANJIV KHANNA, J.: 1. Deepak Khosla has preferred this intra-Court appeal impugning the order dated 4thJanuary, 2012 passed by the learned single Judge. The impugned order in paragraph 15 gives two directions; that the appellant would not appear in any Court either in person or as an attorney of a third party, as he does not have inherent right to appear and argue; that the appellant should be medically examined whether he was suffering from any mental disorder. The SHO of the police station Tilak Marg was directed to get the appellant admitted in the Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences (IHBAS, for short), Shahdara, Delhi. The Medical Superintendent of IBHAS was directed to submit a report within a week. The appellant was ordered not leave the premises of IHBAS and the SHO of the concerned police station was asked to provide adequate security. 2. By order dated 6thJanuary, 2012, in appeal, operation of the second direction in the impugned order was stayed. Medical records...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-21-2012
* + $~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.1472/2010 & Crl.M.(Bail) No.697/2012 Date of Decision: RAJ KUMAR @ GUDDU Through 21st December, 2012. ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. Versus THE STATE OF DELHI Through Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J 1.By way of the present appeal, the appellant assails the judgment dated 2nd June, 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, finding him guilty of commission of the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and the order of the same date whereby he was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment along with fine of Rs.5,000/- in default whereof, simple imprisonment for three months for the commission of the said offence.2. As per the prosecution, Gajraj Singh Yadav- PW 5.an employee of the MTNL posted at Gulabi Bagh, Delhi, was residing at House No.173, Page 1 of 51 Libaspur, Delhi with his family comprising of his deceased...
Tag this Judgment!