Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 68s information to competent authority Page 9 of about 631 results (0.097 seconds)

Satnamsingh Son of Gurudayal Singh Sodi. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

..... for the offence punishable under section 18 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, but the accused pleaded not guilty to the said charge and claimed to be tried. 7. to substantiate the charge levelled against the accused ..... is produced at exhibit 62. accordingly, after completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against the accused for the offence punishable under section 18 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985. 6. thereafter, learned sessions judge & special judge, nanded, framed charge against the accused on 20-8-1999 at exhibit 17, ..... & special judge, nanded, in special case (ndps) no. 24/1998, thereby convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under section 18 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985, for the alleged unlawful possession of 685 gms. opium, and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for term of 12 years and .....

Badrilal Sharma Vs. State by the Intelligence Officer

Court : Chennai

..... the person to be searched to the nearest gazetted officer or magistrate without the possibility of the person to be searched parting with possession of any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance, or controlled substance or article or document, he may, instead of taking such person to the nearest gazetted officer or magistrate, proceed to ..... the state government, if he has reason to believe from personal knowledge or information given by any person and taken down in writing that any narcotic drug, or psychotropic substance, or controlled substance in respect of which an office punishable under this act has been committed or any document or other article which may ..... which constitutes an offence punishable under any of the provisions of sections 19, 24 and 27-a and for offences involving commercial quantity of any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance and from the circumstances of the case it may be reasonably inferred that he was determined to carry out his intention to commit the .....

intelligence Officer, Dri Vs. Amjad HuseeIn Khan and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(90)ECC906

..... giving evidence and/or producing the documents in respect of an inquiry made by him (investigating officer ncb) in connection with the alleged dealing in possession of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance in the seizure etc. the learned single judge came to the conclusion that the summons which had been issued in itself infringed article 20(3) of ..... present case also the summons was issued for giving evidence and/or producing documents in respect of the inquiry in connection with the transportation and/or smuggling of psychotropic substance i.e. 517 kgs. of mandrax tablets seized by dri on 19.6.2000. at the bottom of that summons it is mentioned that the ..... . the powers for the purpose of search, seizure, arrest i.e. investigation and prosecution have been given to certain officers mentioned in section 42 of the ndps act if the officer has reason to believe either from personal knowledge or information given by any person that any offence under the provisions of this act has been .....

Rasheed S/O Ammenshaik, Vs. the State of Karnataka, Through Santhpur P ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007CriLJ2316; ILR2007KAR1168; 2007(3)KarLJ393

..... crime no. 62/2006 (fir no. 21/06) of santapur police station, aurad taluk, registered for the offences punishable under sections 20(b)(ii)(c) of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'ndps act' for short). these petitioners were found transporting 224 kgs. of ganja contained in six gunny bags in a scorpio car on 11.6.2006 at about ..... enacted for the purpose of declaring law relating to narcotic drugs to make stringent provisions for the control and regulation of operations relating to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, to provide for the forfeiture of the property derived from or used to illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, to implement the provisions of international conventions of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances and for the matters connected therewith. this is .....

Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Regional Unit ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR1909; 2008(3)KarLJ626; ILR2008(2)Kar1909; 2008(3)KLJ626; 2008(1)KCCR405; 2008(2)AIRKarR188; 2008CriLJNOC549

..... passed by the special judge, mangalore in spi. case 49/2001 acquitting the accused for the offence under section 8 c r/w section 21 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1995.2. according to the prosecution, on 7.2.2001 on receiving reliable information, as per the directions of the assistant director of revenue ..... accused was carrying huge quantify of 5 kgs of heroin and he could neither produce the license or permit and for what purpose he was carrying the narcotic drug that is, for scientific or medical purpose, it is nothing but illegal possession of contraband34. section 20 provides for punishment for carrying such contraband and in ..... institution, or a hospital or dispensary maintained or supported by government or local body or by charity or voluntary subscription, which is not authorised to possess any psychotropic substance under the 1945 rules, or any person who is no so authorised under the 1945 rules, may possess a reasonable quantity of such substance as may .....

State of Karnataka Vs. Chetan Tayal S/O. Late Nandakishore Tayal and M ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008(5)KarLJ127; 2007(6)SCC410; (2007)3SCC(Cri)189; (2007)2Crimes105(SC); JT2007(7)SC47; 2007(4)KCCRSN272(SC).

..... denominations which were concealed beneath the office table kept inside the chambers of respondent nos. 1 and 2 with the common intention of selling the charas i.e. narcotic drugs and to circulate the counterfeit currency notes. therefore, cw.1 mr. mohan, acp, ulsoor gate police station seized them under a mahazar in the presence of ..... is that, the court-below grossly erred in discharging the respondents-accused for the aforesaid offences in spite of the seizure of contraband charas i.e. narcotic drugs and the counterfeit notes. the reasons assigned by the trial court that the contraband charas and the counterfeit notes could be planted by the persons who are ..... the mandatory provisions may cause some prejudice to the respondents-accused persons but whether the respondents-accused are entitled for discharge in serious offences committed under the ndps act and the provisions of ipc. is a question to be answered after trial. the trial court also erred in holding that as the respondents-accused .....

Pentapati Venkata Satyanarayana Murthy Vs. State

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(2)ALD344; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)496; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)502; 1999CriLJ4190

..... of the state government if he has reason to believe from personal knowledge or information given by any person and taken down in writing, thatany narcotic drug, or psychotropic substance, in respect of which an offence punishable under chapter iv has been committed or any document or other article which may furnish evidence of ..... (c) produce, manufacture, possess, sell, purchase, transport, warehouse, use, consume, import inter-state, export inter-state, import into india, export from india or tranship any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance except for medical or scientific purposes and in the manner and to the extent provided by the provisions of this act or the rules or orders made thereunder and ..... dated 6-4-1993 rendered in cc no.22 of 1992 under which the accused has been convicted for contravention of section 8(c) of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 punishable under section 15 of the act and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for 10 years and also to pay a fine of .....

Jeenatbi W/O Mohd. Sabir Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1997(2)MPLJ21

..... and when she was apprehended narcotic drug was seized from that house. the panchnama of seizure shows that on taking search, the raiding party found that the opium was stored in polythene bag which was ..... of section 36 knowledge is presumed. even then prosecution cannot be exonerated from bringing it to the notice of court that the accused was in exclusive possession of narcotic drug.15. it is pertinent to note that it is a case when the investigating agency visited the said house, husband of applicant ran away and applicant was found ..... held that :-'in absence of evidence connecting that accused with recovery, conviction was liable to be set aside.'in that case the court found that the place from where narcotic drug was recovered, was accessible to anybody.2. mst. phool kunwarbai v. state of m.p reported in 1994(1) efr 600, where this court held that -'when .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Rattan Mallik @ Habul

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3042; 2009(1)SCALE51; (2009)2SCC624; 2009(1)LC346(SC):2009AIRSCW3648:2009(4)LHSC2710

..... suspending the sentence awarded by the trial court to the respondent for having committed offences under sections 8/27a and 8/29 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (for short 'the ndps act') and granting him bail.4. since in this appeal we propose to deal with the short question, viz. whether the high court, ..... while accepting the prayer for grant of bail, had kept in view the parameters of section 37 of the ndps act, we deem it unnecessary to ..... consideration of the application filed by the respondent for suspension of sentence and for granting of bail, keeping in view the parameters of section 37 of the ndps act, enumerated above. we further direct that the bail application shall be taken up for consideration only after the respondent surrenders to custody. the respondent is directed .....

Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Kishan Lal and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1991SC558; (1991)93BOMLR136; 1991CriLJ654; 1991(1)Crimes467(SC); 1991(33)ECC32; 1991(52)ELT328(SC); JT1991(1)SC258; 1991(1)KLT547(SC); 1991(1)MhLj204; 1991(I)OLR(SC)305;

..... analogous provision in other special enactments. rule 184 of the defence and internal security of india rules, 1971 which is analogous to section 37 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act runs as follows: rule 184. notwithstanding anything contained in the crpc, 1898 (v of 1898) no person accused or convicted of a ..... language of the provision, the court should adopt literal construction if it does not lead to an absurdity.as already noted, section 37 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act starts with a non-obstante clause stating that notwithstanding anything contained in the crpc, 1973 no person accused of an offence prescribed therein ..... arose under the tada act. we shall refer to this judgment at a later stage after analysing the scope and effect of section 37 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act. 6. section 37 as amended starts with a non-obstante clause stating that notwithstanding anything contained in the crpc, 1973 no person accused .....