Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 68s information to competent authority Page 14 of about 631 results (0.080 seconds)

Ajitbhai Ismailbhai Pinjara Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2006)3GLR2074

..... 41 & 42 of the n.d.p.s.act keeping in mind the observations of the apex court in number of decisions. mr. sp tyagi, author of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985, 2005 edition, in the commentary to section 41, has summarized the scheme as under:-section 41 consists of three sub-sections. section 41(1) ..... 09.1999 whereby the appellant-original accused has been held guilty of the offences punishable under section 8(c) r/w section 21 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the ndps act) and has been sentenced to suffer r/i for 10 years and to pay a fine of rs. 1 lakh (rs. one lakh ..... government or the state government to enter into any building etc. for the purpose of conducting search and seizure. this can be done from personal knowledge regarding any narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances or information given by any person and taking down in writing. (mohd. jainulabdin v. state of manipur 1991 cr.lj 696)8. it is true that .....

Ram Bharosi Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2001(3)WLC252; 2002(1)WLN402

..... sub-section (1) of section 42 provides that any officer authorised under the act who received any information from any person, should take down in writing that any narcotic drug or psychotropic substances, in respect of which an offence punishable under chapter iv has been committed, may between sun rise and sun-set:(a) enter into and search any such ..... presence of a gazetted officer or a magistrate, and there has to be full compliance of section 50 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act and substantial or partial compliance would be violative of section 50 of the ndps act. the observations of delhi high court fully applies to the facts and circumstances of the present case as in ..... and sessions judge, dholpur, by which he has convicted accused appellant ram bharosi for offence under section 8/18 and 8/20 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance act, 1985 and sentenced him to undergo ten years rigorous imprisonment on each count and to pay of fine of rs. one lac each, .....

Babu Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2002(84)ECC765; 2002(3)WLN445; 2002(3)WLN445

..... 10/86 by which he while acquitting the accused appellant for the offence under section 18 of the narcotic drugs & psychotrophic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the ndps act'), convicted him for the offence under section 17 of the ndps act and sentenced to undergo ten years rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine of rs. one lac, in ..... above holding inter-alia that the prosecution has proved its case beyond all reasonable doubts against the accused appellant for the offence under section 17 of the ndps act only.aggrieved from the said judgment and order dated 31.8.1987 passed by the learned sessions judge, balotra, this appeal has been filed by the accused ..... the search, to conduct it properly and not to harm or wrong, such as planting of offending drugs by any interested party and to prevent fabrications of any evidence.10. the provisions of section 50 of the ndps act have been made with the intention to act as a safeguard against the vexatious and unfair dealings. the .....

AlfoodIn Ghosi Alias Alfoo Vs. the Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2231; 1992(2)WLN519

..... , in the ground of detention served along with the order of detention, in para no. 17, it is stated:--even though prosecution proceedings under narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, have been initiated against you, i am satisfied that there is compelling necessity, in view of the likelihood of your being released ..... year. the central government, by its order dated november 1, 1991, exercising its powers under section 9(f) of the prevention of traffic in narcotics drugs and psychotropic substances act, confirmed the order of detention dated august 12, 1991, and further directed that petitioner alfoodin ghosi be detained for a period of one ..... underground room of the workshop of babu lal suthar.3. the petitioner, in pursuance of this search, was arrested and a criminal case under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act was registered against the petitioner and he is facing trial. the petitioner, after his arrests, filed a bail application before the additional chief .....

Smt. Santosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1998CriLJ612; 1998(1)WLC90; 1997(2)WLN375

..... and opium and embezzlement of opium by cultivator have been provided. manufacture of drugs and preparations of psychotropic substances, illegal import into india, export from india or punishment of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, external dealings in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in contravention of section 12 and use of the premises for commission of ..... provisions of section 33 of the act. the punishment for illegal possession in small quantity for personsal consumption of any narcotic drug and psychotropic substances or consumption of such drug or substance is punishable under section 27 which provides the maximum imprisonment for a term of one year or with fine ..... above, in detail and the reasoning which has been given in our view is not the correct appreciation of law. persons dealing with narcotics drugs and psychotropic substances constitute a distinct class than those charged with commission of offence under the penal act. most of the offences under the penal .....

Kajod Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2002(2)WLN1

..... may be stated here that where a person is searched on suspicion and that suspicion is ruled out, but on the contrary, any narcotic drug is found, in that eventuality, provisions of section 50 of the ndps act would not be applicable. but, where before search, it has been revealed that accused was having contraband article, in such a ..... the case of the learned counsel for the accused appellant is that since personal search of the accused appellant was made, therefore, compliance of section 50 of the ndps act was necessary and in absence of this, whole trial against the accused, appellant stands vitiated and he is entitled to acquittal on this ground alone.8. the ..... the case was committed to the court of session.on 5.5.1992, learned sessions judge, bhiiwara framed charge for the offence under section 8/18 of the ndps act against the accused appellant. the charge was read over and explained to the accused appellant. the accused appellant denied the charge and claimed trial.during trial, the .....

The Superintendent of Customs Vs. Mohd. Younis Alias Ahmed

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... .511 of 2004 by judgment dated 23.08.2005 finding the accused/respondent not guilty of the charges under sections 21(c), 22(c) and 23(c) / 28 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (in short, the act). it is the prosecution case that on 27.06.2004, the prosecution agency viz., customs air intelligence unit intercepted the accused after ..... section 2(xiv) of the act. section 2(xiv) reads as under: narcotic drug & quot; means coca leaf, cannabis (hemp), opium, poppy straw and includes all manufactured drugs & quot; therefore, a salt or preparation of a psychotropic substance cannot be termed as a manufactured drug. 12. in view of the exhaustive definition of psychotropic substances contained in section 2(xxiii) of the act, cross-examination of .....

Myla Venkateswarlu Vs. State of A.P

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , referred to as a1 and a2 respectively) were convicted for offences punishable under section 8(c) read with section 20(b)(i) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, (for short, the ndps act) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months each and to pay a fine of rs.5,000/- each. in default of payment of ..... on the basis of the possession of the illicit article, recovered from the person during a search conducted in violation of the provisions of section 50 of the ndps act.the constitution bench noted that in baldev singh, it was clarified that it was not necessary that the information required to be given under section 50should be in ..... the search.6. in state of punjab v. baldev singh[1] the constitution bench of this court was considering the question whether compliance of section 50 of the ndps act was mandatory and if it is so, what is the effect in case of breach thereof. after considering the relevant judgments on the point, the constitution bench drew .....

Thana Singh. Vs. Central Bureau of Narcotics.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... substitution, constraints of proper storage space or any other relevant considerations, by notification published in the official gazette, specify such narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances or class of narcotic drugs or class of psychotropic substances which shall, as soon as may be after their seizure, be disposed of by such officer and in such manner ..... the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974 ), every court trying an offence under this act, shall treat the inventory, the photographs of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances and any list of samples drawn under sub-section (2) and certified by the magistrate, as primary evidence in respect of such offence."25. ..... as that government may from time to time, determine after following the procedure herein- after specified.(2) where any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance has been seized and forwarded to the officer- in- charge of the nearest police station or to the officer empowered under section 53 .....

Radhey Shyam Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... necessary for such area or areas as may be specification in the notification.' 5. by virtue of section 36a of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, all offences under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 are triable only by the special court constituted for the area in which the offence has been committed. ..... government standing counsel for the respondents.3. the only submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that since the appellant being tried under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, the trial could not have been by the general court martial under the army act, 1950 and it could have been by ..... and dismissed from service having been found guilty of the charge of unlawful possession of ganja in violation of section 20(b)(i) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985. the appellant was absolved from the charges of absenting himself without leave from his unit. the punishment imposed by the general .....