Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 68s information to competent authority Page 4 of about 631 results (0.560 seconds)

Feb 21 1992 (HC)

Birendra Kumar Rai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1992CriLJ3866

..... representation to the advisory board, which directed the petitioner to address the same to the chairman, central advisory board (the prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1988) delhi high court, it was urged, reference of 'chairman' and 'delhi high court' shows unawareness of the detaining authority by ..... non-application of the mind of the detaining authority when it records in paragraph 21 of grounds of detention 'even though prosecution proceedings under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 are likely to be initiated against you', when, in fact, not only complaint against the petitioner was filed by the ..... long period or his likelihood of being released does not arise under 1985 act. thus, even if the detaining authority recorded '... prosecution proceedings under narcotics drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, are likely to be initiated against you' it cannot be held to show non-application of mind or unaware-ness which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2009 (HC)

Najmunisha Wife of Abdul Hamid Chandmiya @ Ladoo Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2009)3GLR1982

..... , substitution, constraints of proper storage space or any other relevant considerations, by notification published in the office gazette, specify such narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances or class of narcotic drugs or class of psychotropic substances which shall, as soon as may be after their seizure, be disposed of by such officer and in such manner as ..... j.1. both the instant appeals are preferred by the appellants under section 374 of the code of criminal procedure to read with section 36b of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the 'n.d.p.s. act') against the judgment and order rendered by the additional sessions judge, ..... of the accused under section 108 of the said act becomes relevant and admissible even though customs officers may be police officers.31.10. narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act is a complete code. section 67 of the act authorizes the authorized officer to record the statement in the form of information .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2005 (HC)

Chami Vs. Excise Inspector

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(1)KLT511

..... of the abkari act 1 of 1077 (in short 'the act') and section 22 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act (ndps act). at about 3.30 p.m. on 2.9.2005, the preventive officer, excise enforcement and anti-narcotic special squad along with party went to the toddy shop no. 33/05-06 of ottappalam excise ..... diazepam. it is not disputed that it is a schedule drug. under schedule h of the drugs and cosmetics rules permitted doses of diazepam can be used with prescription. it is also not disputed that diazepam is mentioned as a psychotropic substance under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 and it is item no. 194 in ..... the notification published under sub-clause vii(a) and xxiii(a) of section 2 of the ndps act specifying small quantity and commercial quantity. diazepam is a benzodiazepine derivative. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2003 (HC)

Husen Bhenu Malad Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2003CriLJ5070; (2003)4GLR916

..... is filed under section 374 (2) of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 ('the code' for short) read with section 36b of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 ('the ndps act' for short) through jail, is directed against a judgment and order dated february 4, 1997 rendered by special judge, kachchh at bhuj, in ..... jaya kumar's case (supra) similar question arose before a single judge of the andhra pradesh high court. in the said case the boxes containing psychotropic substances seized were not deposited in any police station. the learned single judge held that there was no question of affixing of seal of officer in ..... dated22.7.1994, alongwith the forwardingletter and its dated receipt 3318. inventory in original in respect ofseized charas prepared beforeexecutive magistrate, bhuj as perthe provisions of ndps act dated12.9.1994. 4719. original test report received fromfsl, ahmedabad alongwith letteraddressed to the superintendent ofcustoms, rcp, gadhuli dated 4.10.94. 342.8. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 1996 (HC)

Bajrangi Singh Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

..... thus the judgment of conviction and sentence so awarded does not require any interference. stringent provisions for the control and regulation of operation relating to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance is provided under this act as to keep check and break on the trafficking of such offences which has a nationwide effect because continuation of ..... neelam, j.1. the sole accused-appellant bajrangi singh preferred this appeal under section 374 cr. p.c. read with section 36(b) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 23-2-94 passed by the learned special judge, cachar, silchar in special case no. ..... counsel representing the accused-appellant has much of substance. in my considered opinion; there is non-compliance of the mandatory provisions of section 50 of the ndps act on which no evidence is so adduced coming from the mouth of any of the witnesses with regard to the present accused-appellant being informed with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2008 (SC)

Aslam Mohd. Merchant Vs. Competent Authority and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3621; 2008(3)KLT400; 2008(II)OLR(SC)393; 2008(10)SCALE383; 2008(2)LC855(SC); 2008AIRSCW4868; 2008CriLJ3621; 2008(3)Crimes122

..... brought on records.14. the relevant provisions of the smugglers and foreign exchange manipulators (forfeiture of property) act, 1976 (for short 'safema') and narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (ndps) are in pari materia.15. contentions were raised that the show cause notice shows complete non-application of mind on the ..... conference at vienna in february, 1971 ; and (d) any other international convention, or protocol or other instrument amending an international convention, relating to narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances which may be ratified or acceded to by india after the commencement of this act.8. section 68a of the act applies to persons specified ..... authority that acquisition of the property by them has nothing to do with the purported income derived by `mirchi' out of illicit trafficking of narcotic, drug and psychotropic substances.on behalf of the appellants, it was furthermore urged:(i) even a perusal of from the order passed by the competent authority, it .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2003 (HC)

Baljit Singh Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... the cases under the ndps act. the provisions for bail/bond are contained in chapter 13 of the code of criminal procedure. the title of the chapter reads 'provisions for bail/bonds.' 16. ..... a prosecution before a special court, shall be deemed to be a public prosecutor.' 15. a careful reading of section 36c shows that a special court under the ndps act exercises the same powers as are exercised by a court of sessions and all the provisions relating to bail/bonds contained in code of criminal procedure are applicable to ..... which is quoted herein below : 'in both the cases the preliminary question raised is regarding the maintainability of the application for pre-arrest bail in a case under the ndps act. moreso, in view of the recent decision of this court in the case of suresh dutta v. state of tripura, (2003) 1 glj 107. learned counsel for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2007 (HC)

Kenjengbam Arun Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Patna

..... 2003crilj4996 . in the present case even the formalities required by section 42 of the ndps act had been completed as per evidence of pw-2 when in fact the provisions of section 43 would cover the action of the authorities as the seizure was made ..... by virtue of provisions under sections 41, 42 and 43 of the aforesaid act. the powers of a gazetted officer is particularly mentioned in section 41(2) of the ndps act. such power was noticed and accepted by hon'ble the supreme court in the case of m. prabhulal v. assistant director, directorate of revenue intelligence reported in : ..... attempt was made by learned counsel for the appellant to raise an issue that seizure of the contraband ganja was not in accordance with requirements under the provision of ndps act, 1985. on going through the materials on records, we find that on facts this submission has no legs to stand. it is found that the authorities .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1990 (HC)

Kabul Alias Khudia Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992CriLJ1491; 1990(2)WLN461

..... steps to deport him.59. in the result, the appeal is partly allowed and the conviction and sentence passed under sections 20(ii) & 21 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, under sections 307 & 332, i.p.c. and under section 25 of the arms act is set aside and the accused appellant is hereby ..... welfare and to prevent by a rigid control of the possession of narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances, the danger to public health, and to guard society against the social evils. this act absolutely prohibits the use, sell, commission, possession, importation, exportation, purchase ..... the learned counsel for the accused-appellant, it is necessary to see the aims and objects of the relevant provisions of this act which was incorporated by the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 (61 of 1985) after repealing the opium act of 1978.10. the primary aim and object of the act, is to protect public .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 2008 (HC)

iqbal Moosa Patel S/O. Mohammed Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2008)2GLR1598

..... recording the conviction of the appellants-accused for the offences under section 8(c), read with sections 21 and 29, of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'ndps act') for possession and illegal smuggling and trafficking of heroin as a part of the conspiracy. the appellant in criminal appeal no. ..... for one year. 2. the facts of the prosecution case, briefly summarized, are that a conspiracy was hatched for interstate smuggling and trafficking/transportation of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances (heroin). a secret information was received by mr. k.c. chudasma, inspector, anti-terrorist squad, which he passed on to mr. vipul ..... that a secret information at exh.135 was received by mr. k.c. chudasama, police inspector, ats, gujarat state, about the illicit trafficking of narcotics drugs and psychotropic substance (brown sugar) in a truck bearing registration no. rj-04-g-1305, which was forwarded to the zonal director, ncb, ahmedabad by the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //