Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 section 23 general average Page 3 of about 1,244 results (0.237 seconds)

Jun 21 2010 (FN)

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. Vs. Regal-beloit Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of containers can occur when the contents are damaged by rough handling, seepage, or theft, at some unknown point. see h. kindred & m. brooks, multimodal transport rules 143 (1997). indeed, adopting the court of appeals approach would seem to require rail carriers to open containers at the port to check if damage has ..... ninth circuit s interpretation, there might be no venue in which to sue the receiving carrier. that interpretation would also undermine cogsa and international, container-based multimodal transport: cogsa s liability and venue rules would apply when cargo is damaged at sea and carmack s rules almost always would apply when the damage occurs on ..... lading. the initial carrier in that instance receives the property at the shipment s point of origin for overseas multimodal import transport, not for domestic rail transport. (today s decision need not address the instance where goods are received at a point in the united states for export. nor is it necessary to decide if carmack .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2000 (HC)

Pacific Carriers Limited Vs. M/S. Singhee Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. an ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2000)3CALLT216(HC)

..... outstanding claim of rs. 61,91,580/- upto 31.05.99. we have discussed the matter with your shri surender singhee and shri dilip bhattacharya of the bengal water transport association to-day and have forwarded the claim to our principle. m/s. pacific carriers ltd., singapore to settle your demurrage bill at rs. 32,00,000/- (equivalent ..... the engagement of the barges. since this letter is very relevant for our purposes, we reproduce hereinbelow the entire text of the letter for ready reference. it reads as under :-'multimode maritime private limited excellence in shipping services under one roof. feb 06, 1999. singhee marine services (p) ltd. marcantile buildings, 9/12, lal bazar street, 'e' block, ( ..... 000.00 (rupees thirty two lacs) equivalent to us $ 75000 (us $ seventy five thousand only) should be paid to us on or before 31st may '99 and the goods loaded in our barges be removed on or before the said date. if however you fail to do so, you shall pay us a further sum calculated @ rs. 35.00 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 2018 (HC)

Vinayaga Marine Petro Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... :-"s.no mode date of shipment/dispatch of (i) (ii) (ii) transportation by sea by air from land-locked countries (iv) by post parcel registered by courier service multimodal transport (v) (vi) the date affixed on the bill of lading date of relevant airway bill provided this represents date on which goods left last airport in the country from which the import is effected ..... . date of dispatch of goods by rail, road or other recognized mode of transport to consignee in india through consignment basis. date .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 2004 (HC)

Patel Roadways Ltd., (Formerly Patel Roadways Private Ltd.) Vs. Seshas ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : II(2005)ACC174; 2006ACJ2802

..... its branch office is at vadalur, where from they undertook to carry the consignment of the 1st plaintiff, to the destinations marked. if the carrier accepts the goods for transport, for all persons indiscriminately, then automatically the defendant roadways, should come within the umbrella of common carrier. the burden is upon the carrier to plead in detail ..... within the description of a 'common carrier', the ingredients are:(i) it must exercise as a public employment(ii) it should undertake to carry the goods for persons generally in the transportation of goods for hire, as a business irrespective of the person i.e. for all persons indiscriminately. on the other hand, if it is shown, that ..... the common carrier arises from the public employment, in which it is engaged. in this case, the defendant/appellant, publicly professes to undertake, for hire, transport of all such goods as are entrusted to it, even as admitted by d.w.1. it is not the case of d.w.1 that the company had limited class .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2015 (HC)

M/s. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Pr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... the identified suppliers referred to in the contract; the material so purchased to be inspected by the owner prior to its transportation from the state where the goods are manufactured; and, thereafter, for the goods to be transported by the contractor to the work site of the owner in the other state where it is to be used in the ..... held that the terms of the contract indicated that the respondent had a dual role to play - one as seller of the goods and the other as that of a transporter or the carrier of the goods. the same person can, no doubt, play a dual role and, merely because both the contracts are entrusted to the same person ..... the supply contract refers to the suppliers of material from whom the contractor is required to purchase the goods. after the goods are purchased from these pre-identified suppliers, most of whom are dealers outside the state, the goods are then transported by the contractor from outside the state to the state of andhra pradesh (now the states of telangana .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2016 (HC)

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

..... to entertain complaints for abuse of dominance in respect of patent rights cannot be ousted. 175. the decision of the supreme court in chairman, thiruvalluvar transport corporation v. consumer protection council (supra), which was relied upon by the learned counsel for ericsson has no application in the facts of the present ..... as 'incorporeal property' and the expression 'movable property' included corporeal as well as incorporeal property. the court then proceeded to hold that import licences were 'goods'. the relevant extract from the said judgment is quoted below:- "19. in black's law dictionary (6th edition, 1990), the expression 'property' has been ..... imported by micromax. this court also directed the custom authorities to decide ericsson's objections, if any, in accordance with intellectual property rights (imported goods), enforcement rules, 2007 till further orders. in addition, the court also appointed a local commissioner to inspect the premises of micromax and collect documents .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1995 (HC)

Delhi High Court Bar Association and Another, Etc. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1995IAD(Delhi)1238; AIR1995Delhi323; II(1995)BC42; [1998]92CompCas849(Delhi)

..... the bill concerns the consignment of lubricated oil sent by first defendant at delhi to its customer defendant no. 2 at lucknow through the third defendant, a transporter. the bill is not honoured by the second defendant when presented for the first time. there is a great deal of correspondence between the bank, the ..... first and second defendants, and ultimately the bank instructs the third defendant, the transporter, to re-book the consignment to delhi. the third defendant informs the bank that the goods are lying undelivered at its u.p. border office, and the third defendant makes a claim against the bank for ..... rs. 'y' on account of transportation charges, demurrage/storage charges. the transporter also raises its counter-claim against defendants 1 and 2. various .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 2005 (HC)

B. Archana Reddy and ors. Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its Secretary, La ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(6)ALD582; 2005(6)ALT364

..... pena 515 us 220 : (1995) 132 l.ed. 2d 158 (for short, adarand constructors-1). in this case, the united states department of transportation through its central federal lands highway division awarded contract to mountain gravel and construction company. the contract provided that if the prime contractor hires sub-contractors certified as ..... repercussion, has inherent limitation on it. it should be exercised to effectuate the purpose of the act. in legislations enacted for general benefit and common good the responsibility is far graver. it demands purposeful approach. the exercise of discretion should be objective. test of reasonableness is more strict. the public ..... objective, it would also fail to answer doctrine of fairness. it is now well settled that fair procedure in administration sine qua non to good democratic governance. any public authority entrusted with an enquiry concerning public affairs must ensure that such enquiry is informed of fairness to minimize complaints of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2004 (HC)

Ugar Sugar Works Limited (Distillery Unit) Vs. State of Karnataka and ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004(5)KarLJ525

..... 1987. apart from the said rules, the provisions of karnataka excise (distillery and warehouse) rules, 1967 also makes several provisions regulating allotment of rectified spirit, its transportation, storage etc., rule 31 of the said later set of rules empowers the respondents to allot rectified spirit to the arrack manufacturers who take the delivery of the ..... of rectified spirit sold to arrack manufacturers. it was further contended that the decision of the supreme court in bihar distillery's case, was no longer holding good in the light of the judgment of their lordships in deccan sugar and abkari company limited v. commissioner of excise, andhra pradesh, (2004)1 scc 243. ..... that the distilleries would be entitled towards price would be a reasonable amount within the meaning of section 9 of sub-section (2) of the sale of goods act, 1930. the government had on the basis of data collected by a qualified chartered accountant come to the conclusion that in the case of captive distilleries .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1999 (HC)

Brij Lal Bishnoi Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2000)125PLR323

..... by the respondents were not proved on record. in accordance with the law settled by the hon'ble supreme court of india in the cases of a.p. state road transport corporation v. p. venkaiah and ors.,9 a.i.r. 1997 supreme court 2600 and special deputy collector and another v. kurra sambasiva rao and ors.,10 a.i.r ..... raised by the parties. thus, 1 have no hesitation in arriving at a conclusion that the entire acquired land falls within the municipal limits of district hisar and has a good location with substantial potential for its development for residential and commercial purposes. (a) merits or otherwise of adoption of belting system:-11. the learned counsel appearing for the claimants relying .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //