Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 section 23 general average Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 23 results (0.155 seconds)

Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. Vs. the Owners and Parties Interested in ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR2001Cal213,(2001)2CALLT445(HC)

..... namely indian law will apply. the learned counsel submitted that in so far as indian law is concerned, namely the indian carriage of goods by sea act, 1925 has been amended by multi modal transportation of goods act, 1993 [hereinafter called. cgsa]. relying on clause 3(c) of article iii of cgsa of 1925, the learned counsel submitted ..... 'however, proof to the contrary shall not be admissible if the bill of ladinghas been transferred to a third party acting in good faith' has come by way of amendment to cgsa by the multi modal transportation of goods act, 1993 [act 28 of' 1993]. 28. before dealing with the rival submissions, this court proposes first to deal with ..... that after receiving the goods in his charge, the carrier or the master or the agent of the carrier shall, on demand of the shipper, .....

Pacific Carriers Limited Vs. M/S. Singhee Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. an ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2000)3CALLT216(HC)

..... outstanding claim of rs. 61,91,580/- upto 31.05.99. we have discussed the matter with your shri surender singhee and shri dilip bhattacharya of the bengal water transport association to-day and have forwarded the claim to our principle. m/s. pacific carriers ltd., singapore to settle your demurrage bill at rs. 32,00,000/- (equivalent ..... the engagement of the barges. since this letter is very relevant for our purposes, we reproduce hereinbelow the entire text of the letter for ready reference. it reads as under :-'multimode maritime private limited excellence in shipping services under one roof. feb 06, 1999. singhee marine services (p) ltd. marcantile buildings, 9/12, lal bazar street, 'e' block, ( ..... 000.00 (rupees thirty two lacs) equivalent to us $ 75000 (us $ seventy five thousand only) should be paid to us on or before 31st may '99 and the goods loaded in our barges be removed on or before the said date. if however you fail to do so, you shall pay us a further sum calculated @ rs. 35.00 .....

Tata Motors Limited and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... designated without any adjudicatory procedure before him and without any substantive law or principles before him.143. mr. pal referred to the decision of delhi transport corporation (supra) and submitted that it may also be characterized as excessive delegation of legislative function because what should be the amount and what principles ..... all lands not required by the land holder for their personal cultivation, distribution of the ownership and control of agricultural lands as passed to subserve common good. prevention of encroachment of public lands and removal of such encroachments or unauthorized occupation of vacant land.492. we have also considered the decision of ..... constitutional law of india. it would be absurd to suggest that the mindset of socialist and protectionist economic policies of 1950s and 1960s should hold good in the liberalization and globalization stance from mid eighties through the nineties and in the 21st centuries. the mindset of 21st century is unequivocally .....

M/S. Arun Kumar Samanta and Others Vs. M/S. Shree Ram Trading and Supp ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1994Cal156,98CWN934

..... act, 1890 the central government published an order being general order no. 74 whereby 'preferential tariff schedule' for transportation of goods was published and the central government thereby directed the railway administration and gave special facilities and/or preference to the transportation of goods/class of goods specified in (a) schedule to the said order. the said schedule provides priorities '(a) to (e)'. the movement .....

Gms Marine Company Limited Vs. the Owners and Parties Interested in th ...

Court : Kolkata

..... (now is vietnam shipbuilding industry group);- operator is vinashin ocean shipping company (now is vinashin ocean shipping one member company limited).vietnam's ministry of transport certifies the aforementioned information and proposes vietnam's consular department, concerned agencies and organizations to help and support vietnam's enterprise to resolve the aforesaid case ..... but transferred it to a shipping company against instalment payments. two actions in rem were brought in hong kong against the ship, philippine admiral, for goods supplied and disbursements made for the ship. another action ensued for damages on account of breach of a charterparty. the government of philippines invoked the ..... authority and the statements contained therein are accurate. item 18 in part i of the schedule to the act relates to 'certificate of origin of goods' issued by a recognised chamber of commerce. section 4 of that act defines a 'recognised chamber of commerce' as a chamber of commerce recognised .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bata India Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1993]201ITR884(Cal)

..... operate on selling cost which is the ordinary and normal incident of business. the provision cannot be construed as restricting anything and everything connected with sales, such as transportation of goods for sale, collection of sale proceeds and so on.'6. in the present case also, it is not the case of the revenue that the expenditure is ..... organisations, the assessee was merely ensuring smooth conduct of the business at its retail shops in the area and was not seeking to promote the market for its goods. in the question, the said sum has been wrongly referred to as 'miscellaneous advertisements'. as already stated, the amounts incurred for advertisements during festivals or other ..... . no element is there in the expenditure that could be termed as sales promotion. it is not a payment to solicit new market for its goods, but to keep up good relations with the population i,n the close neighbourhood. it is a practical necessity in the ordinary carrying on of the business. anyway, the necessity .....

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Anil Krishal Paul

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1993]88STC337(Cal)

..... gurakhu' which is alleged to be a notified commodity under the 1954 act and the permits had been issued on payment of taxes allowing the writ petitioner to transport the goods detailed in the said permits.7. by a letter dated 30th september, 1975, the writ petitioner objected to the insistence on permit to be obtained from ..... in west bengal, the assistant commissioner of commercial tax, howrah circle, and the officers subordinate to him did not allow 'gurakhu' purchased from orissa to be transported to west bengal through the check-post at the border of west bengal unless a permit under the 1954 act, was shown to the check-post authorities on the ..... the appropriate authority for the purpose of transportation of tobacco for hookah and/or tooth-gums, which includes 'gurakhu' across the west bengal border check-posts maintained by the .....

Sripati Charan Mondal and anr. Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2000)2CALLT353(HC),1999(2)CHN391

..... has referred to the definition of lorry as given in cambridge international dictionary. lorry, according to the said dictionary means 'a truck, a large vehicle used for transporting goods.' mr. drolia has also referred to rule 180 of the west bengal motor vehicles rules, 1989 which inter alia provides as follows :--'carriage of persons is ..... -a in the case of paradurang narayandes sarada v. subhash copal changale. 1989 acj 879 (bombay). relying upon the supreme court decision in the case of gujarat state road transport corporation v. bamanbhai prabhatbhai, 1987 acj 561 0(sc) and in the case of guragovekar v. filmena f. lobo, 1988 acj 585 (sc), the division bench observed as ..... . to say the least this position is conceded by mr. chaphekar. this concession of mr. chaphekar is based on the decisions of the supreme court in gujarat state road transportation corpn. v. ramanbhai prabhai, 1987 acj 561 (sc), and guru goverkar v. filomena f. lobo, 1988 acj 585 (sc). in guru govekar's case the supreme .....

Paschimbanga Bhumijibi Krishak Samiti and ors. Vs. State of West Benga ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1996)2CALLT183(HC),100CWN900

..... be taken over and distributed to others like land reforms. it is only one of the modes of distribution but not the only mode. nationalisation of the transport as also the units, the vehicles would be able to go to the farthest...' as possible and provide better and quicker and more efficacious facilities'. nationalisation ..... whereas the growth of livestock breeding, poultry farming and dairy which supply nourishment to the community is obviously considered to be extremely important for the common good. moreover, by reducing the ceiling of orchards and fisheries the production of fruit or fish is not reduced and the production continue in the hands of ..... embraces the entire material resources of the community. its task is to distribute such resources. its goal is so to undertake distribution as best subserves the common good. it reorganises, by such distribution, the ownership and control of material resources of the community. 'resources' is a sweeping expression and covers not only cash .....

Burrabazar Fire Works Dealers Association and ors. Vs. the Commissione ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1998Cal121

..... sound all of a sudden and results in a serious impact on health which is a nuisance and punishable under the law.59. in r. v. secretary of state for transport ex. p. richmond upon thames london borough council (no. 4), (1996) 4 all er 903, the court of appeal considered the power of the secretary of state acting under powers ..... . there cannot be any contrary conclusion than to hold that artificial sound created by modern technology cannot be tolerated by the living creatures and it cannot be said to be. good for the society. further the deepawali festival is a festival of light and not a festival of sound, and, accordingly, it cannot be said that it is a part ..... of action taken by the pollution control board but in view of the fact that the restriction that was imposed without any formal order was designed to do some public good and the object was not to expose the people to sound nuisance which is admittedly a pollution, this court is in a peculiar facts and circumstances of this case only .....