Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 section 23 general average Court: delhi Page 1 of about 190 results (0.180 seconds)

Jan 21 2015 (HC)

M/S Rameshwar Dass and Sons (Huf) Vs. M/S Caravel Logistics Pvt. Ltd. ...

Court : Delhi

..... the plaint. the proceedings are liable to be stayed under section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. it is further stated that provisions of section 26 of the multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 (act no.28 of 1993) are applicable. reliance has been placed on orchid electronics vs.vinitec electronics pvt. ltd. , 2007 (supp.) alr266(delhi). learned counsel for the ..... to enable to file the bill of lading. it appears that the bill of lading was not filed on record. on 04.04.2014, reliance on section 26 of the multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 was placed. it was specifically recorded in the order that the said act did not provide for statutory arbitration. it merely provided that the parties to a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2007 (TRI)

Punjab Metal Works (P) Ltd. Vs. Pareekh Marine Agencies Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... dispute arising hereunder or in connection herewith shall be determined by the courts in seoul and no other courts . (iv) contract of carriage is governed by the provisions of the multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 which has an overriding effect over all other enactments. (v) the complaint has been filed well beyond the period of nine months, as prescribed by the ..... multimodal transportation of goods act and is therefore barred by limitation. (vi) the entire claim under the petition has arisen under the combined transport document issued admittedly by the principal of the op, cho yang co. ltd., who has, since 11th september, 2001, been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2015 (HC)

M/S Rare Earth Overseas Vs. Container Corporation of India Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... that a provision as in section 103 of the railways act, is also to be found in the carriage of goods by road act, 2007, multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993, the carriage by air act, 1972 and the carriage of goods by sea act, 1925. the supreme court in nath bros. exim international ltd. vs. best roadways ltd. (2000 ..... petitioner, executing an export order placed by its foreign client based at ukraine, had on 9th april, 2010 deposited goods with the warehouse of the respondent situated at export warehouse, icd, tughlakabad, new delhi in order to transport the goods through the respondent to port of loading in the ships at mumbai port; (iii) that as per the ..... practice, the petitioner had also deposited the invoice shipping bills for export and packing list showing the value of the goods deposited as rs.6,06,282.75 paise; .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2006 (TRI)

Medpro Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)(110)ECC652

..... , storage, handling, packing or distribution of the goods as well as ancillary and advisory services in connection therewith, including but not limited to customs and fiscal matters, declaring the ..... procedures for clearing goods". further, fiata an international association of 'freight forwarders' situated in switzerland have also adopted an official description of 'freight forwarding and logistics services', which can be tailored to meet the flexible application of the services provided: freight forwarding and logistic services" means services of any kind relating to the carriage (performed by single mode of multimodal transport means), consolidation .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2017 (HC)

Container Corp. Of India vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... of the petitioner that for handling multimodal cargo, international maritime dangerous goods code (imdg) is operational since 01.01.2004. the code, referred to above, operates under solas convention, 1977 (safety for life at sea convention). the imdg code lays down the procedure for the multimodal transport and handling of hazardous cargo. all ..... been issued for minimizing the chances of mishap and losses. the guidelines are all comprehensive and take into account the precautions for storage and transportation of hazardous goods, cargo at different levels. emergency response instructions have also been issued and an awareness programme is also in the offing.45. it has ..... learned magistrate did not at all advert crl.rev.p.349/2017 page 15 of 20 to the facts that the storage, shipment and the transportation of the hazardous goods were subject to various regulations and the compliances to such regulations are mandatorily enforced; (v) the learned magistrate, without realizing that the icd, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 2018 (HC)

Vinayaga Marine Petro Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... :-"s.no mode date of shipment/dispatch of (i) (ii) (ii) transportation by sea by air from land-locked countries (iv) by post parcel registered by courier service multimodal transport (v) (vi) the date affixed on the bill of lading date of relevant airway bill provided this represents date on which goods left last airport in the country from which the import is effected ..... . date of dispatch of goods by rail, road or other recognized mode of transport to consignee in india through consignment basis. date .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 2007 (HC)

Lift and Shift India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Container Corporation of India Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(4)ARBLR286(Delhi); 2007(99)DRJ499

..... the award by the parties does not constitute an excepted matter is illegal. it is averred that the arbitrator has invoked the provisions of the multi-modal transportation of goods act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the 'mmtg act') which was not applicable to the contract between the parties. a plea has also been taken ..... approach the md for reference of disputes to arbitration.31. the dispute between the parties was with regard to the alleged shortages detected in the containers transported from moradabad to tuglakabad. the arbitrator found from the documents and evidence available that the containers had been delivered by the petitioner with the seals intact ..... dso-otkd were not referred to the arbitrator. the respondent did not raise any dispute in respect of the performance of the petitioner with regard to the transportation of containers from saharanpur, panipat, dso-otkd, either during or after the arbitration proceedings.5. it is also the submission of the petitioner that a perusal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2006 (HC)

Modi Distillery Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(1)ARBLR192(Delhi); 2007(94)DRJ101

..... the petitioner requested the excise commissioner, allahabad, u.p. to issue the necessary release order for such quantity of liquor from the distillery of the petitioner in u.p. for transportation from u.p. to delhi. release order was also issued by the respondent to the petitioner. 10. admittedly, the respondent issued 15 import permits numbering 1868 to 1882 dated 24th ..... and rs. 42.30 for pints per dozen on the usual terms and conditions and subject to further conditions that a provision as contained in section 64a of sale of goods act, 1930 may be made which is reproduced below:in contracts of sale, amount of increased or decreased taxes to be added or deducted (1) unless a different intention ..... stipulations to the payment of tax where tax was not chargeable at the time of the making of the contract, or for the sale or purchase of such goods tax-paid where tax was chargeable at the time;(a) if such imposition or increase so takes effect that the tax or increased tax, as the case may be, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2016 (HC)

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

..... to entertain complaints for abuse of dominance in respect of patent rights cannot be ousted. 175. the decision of the supreme court in chairman, thiruvalluvar transport corporation v. consumer protection council (supra), which was relied upon by the learned counsel for ericsson has no application in the facts of the present ..... as 'incorporeal property' and the expression 'movable property' included corporeal as well as incorporeal property. the court then proceeded to hold that import licences were 'goods'. the relevant extract from the said judgment is quoted below:- "19. in black's law dictionary (6th edition, 1990), the expression 'property' has been ..... imported by micromax. this court also directed the custom authorities to decide ericsson's objections, if any, in accordance with intellectual property rights (imported goods), enforcement rules, 2007 till further orders. in addition, the court also appointed a local commissioner to inspect the premises of micromax and collect documents .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1995 (HC)

Delhi High Court Bar Association and Another, Etc. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1995IAD(Delhi)1238; AIR1995Delhi323; II(1995)BC42; [1998]92CompCas849(Delhi)

..... the bill concerns the consignment of lubricated oil sent by first defendant at delhi to its customer defendant no. 2 at lucknow through the third defendant, a transporter. the bill is not honoured by the second defendant when presented for the first time. there is a great deal of correspondence between the bank, the ..... first and second defendants, and ultimately the bank instructs the third defendant, the transporter, to re-book the consignment to delhi. the third defendant informs the bank that the goods are lying undelivered at its u.p. border office, and the third defendant makes a claim against the bank for ..... rs. 'y' on account of transportation charges, demurrage/storage charges. the transporter also raises its counter-claim against defendants 1 and 2. various .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //