Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 section 23 general average Page 14 of about 1,244 results (0.213 seconds)

The State of Bihar and anr. Vs. Kedar Sao and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3650; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)670; 2003CriLJ4903; JT2003(7)SC276; 2003(6)SCALE639; (2004)9SCC344

..... the trucks used for its transportation. the appeal filed before the appellate authority viz., the district magistrate-cum-collector, kaimur, bhabhna, was also dismissed on 24.1.1996. further revision filed ..... adulteration act, 1954 and fruit products order 1955 and the case of a prosecution under the former enactment of a licencee selling an adulterated goods while dealing with such goods under a licence granted under order issued under the essential commodities act, 1955, this court held that despite the patent differences in their main ..... the divisional forest officer, who is the authorised officer for the purpose, initiated proceedings to show cause against the confiscation and forfeiture of the seized trucks and goods. after hearing the respondents and others, by an order dated 25.9.1995, the authorised officer ordered confiscation of the illegal khair wood as well as .....

Shailesh R. Shah Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2002)3GLR447

..... functioning of the biosphere. without a safe, reliable and stable water supply, human and economic development would not be possible. nearly every decision whether about housing, transportation, economic growth or developmental work is linked to the use of the water resources of the community. fresh water is as essential to sustainable development as it ..... 66 of that act. for ensuring sufficient water supply for meeting with the reasonable requirement of the residents of the city, the commissioner may 'construct, maintain in good repair, alter, improve and extend water works either within or without the city', under section 189(2)(a) of the act; and, 'all municipal water works ..... the rainy season. it was submitted that the water policy should be announced and implemented to ensure that the posterity is assured of water supply suited to good health of the community.6.1 the learned counsel relied upon the decision of the supreme court in hinchlal tiwari v. kamaladevi and ors., reported in .....

State of West Bengal and anr. Vs. E.i.T.A. India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC4126; JT2003(3)SC365; 2003(3)SCALE361; (2003)5SCC239; [2003]2SCR668; [2003]131STC111(SC)

..... section 66, section 67, section 69 and section 70 shall apply mutatis mutandis.(10) where the commissioner or the authorised officer has reason to believe that a person transporting goods has contravened the restrictions and conditions provided in sub-section (4) or section (5) or an owner or a lessee of a warehouse fails to comply with ..... impugned act, which imposed the tax and made the producer liable to pay the same could not, therefore, be impugned on the ground of legislative incompetence.22. in tripura goods transport association and anr. v. commissioner of taxes and ors. : air1999sc719 , sections 29, 30, 32, 36-a, 38-b and 2(b) of the tripura sales ..... name, address and number of certificate of registration of consignor or consignee, if registered, and thereafter,--(a) if the authorized officer is satisfied that the person transporting the goods is not liable to pay tax under sub-section (1), he shall immediately allow movement of the road vehicle, or(b) if the authorized officer is .....

ispat Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2006(202)ELT561(SC); JT2006(12)SC379; 2006(9)SCALE652

..... commissioner of customs informed the appellant that as per rule 9 of the customs valuation rule, 1988, the freight incurred on barges and other associated charges in transportation of the goods from bfl to the dharamtar jetty has also to be added for determining the correct assessable value for the purpose of calculating duty.5. the appellant sent its ..... of import is deemed to be the bfl or dharamtar jetty it would make no difference to the conclusion we have arrived at because the cost of transportation of the imported goods has already been included for delivery at the dharamtar jetty and has already been paid to the seller in the cif or fob contract. hence, a ..... 2000ecr750(sc) , also is not relevant because that decision also is a case relating to landing charges and has nothing to do with the question as to whether transportation charges for transporting the goods from the mother ship by barge to the place approved under section 8(a) has to be added for the purpose of valuation of the .....

The Ugar Sugar Works Ltd. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Ta ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR3223; [2005]139STC413(Kar)

..... taxes in karnataka, bangalore and anr., 93 stc 247, took the view that the freight charges collected separately by the assessee from the wholesaler for the purpose of transporting goods from the factory site to the door of the buyer is required to be excluded while computing the taxable turnover of the assessee. further, in the same case ..... question that came up for consideration before the supreme court was, whether the freight charges collected separately by the assessee from the wholesaler for the purpose of transportation of the goods from the factory site to the door of the buyer, could be included in the sales turnover of the assessee for the purpose of computation of sales ..... which are incurred by the dealer either expressly or by necessary implication of and on behalf of the purchaser after the sale when the dealer undertakes to transport the goods and to deliver the same or where the expenditure is incurred as an incident of sale and the said rule was not intended to exclude from the .....

Shiv Lal Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1997Raj93; 1997(2)WLC203; 1997(1)WLN56

..... on 21-3-1974. however, as regards the present dispute, it is further alleged that the appellant did not carry out the contracted work of handling and transporting goods as per terms of the contract and he stopped work on 31-3-1974. the appellant was required to execute contracted work as per the agreement entered ..... hearing both the parties, the learned district judge vide his order dated 7-10-1978, holding that there was an agreement about the work of handling and transportation of goods between the respondent (corporation) and the appellant (contractor) and that a dispute had arisen in respect of the work under contract and there is a specific ..... his work after 31-3-1974 and hence the respondent terminated the contract forthwith and, thereafter, fresh tenders were invited and the work of handling and transportation of the goods was carried out through the new contractor. as per the terms of the contract, the appellant was responsible for the losses incurred by the respondent-corporation .....

Shree Prakash Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... may be prescribed and the seller is himself the producer of the agricultural produce offered for sale at such place or any person employed by such producer to transport the same and the buyer is a person who purchases such produce for his own use or if the agricultural produce is sold by retail sale to ..... as stated above. the act hasbeen enacted to amend and consolidate the law relating to trade marks, to providefor registration and better protection of trade marks for goods and services and forthe prevention of the use of fraudulent marks. it has nothing to do with the sale andpurchase of agricultural produce which the state legislature is ..... godowns. the company has also appointed distributor in various parts of the country for destributing the said products to retail dealers. the c & s agents invoice the goods to the distributor of the respondent-company received from the company's representatives. the patliputra cands owned by the petitioner has been appointed as clearing and sales agent .....

Lal Singh Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2001SC746; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)266; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1038(SC); 2001(1)ALT(Cri)304; (2001)2CALLT8(SC); 2001CriLJ978; (2001)3GLR2341; JT2001(1)SC410; 2001(1)SCALE284; (2001)3SCC22

..... ammunitions and explosives; accused no.3, 4 and 20 with the help of other accused created hideouts for accused no.1 for intensifying terrorist activities and for arranging transportation; accused no.1 alongwith accused devendrapal singh alias deepak (absconder) while staying at ahmedabad was in constant touch with accused gurjit singh dhaliwal alias pal alias sharma ( ..... proof which it was in the power of one side to prove, and in the power of the other to have contradicted'.32. smuggling is clandestine conveying of goods to avoid legal duties. secrecy and stealth being its covering guards, it is impossible for the preventive department to unravel every link of the process. many facts ..... of amir hassan at new sir syed nagar, aligarh. in 1992, he had arranged for another accommodation for them as the earlier was not found to be good by them. he stated that in the house of lal singh and mohd. sharief, they made plan to obtain fire arms for committing terrorist activities including killing .....

Gajraj Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ811

..... deposit.18. from the above judgment, it is clear that some reasonable amount has to be deducted on account of expenses in relation to maintenance of the land, transportation of agricultural produce and other incidental expenses, which a grower is bound to incur. in different cases, multiplier of different years have been applied by the court right ..... he was deposing incorrectly or that the location given by him of the acquired land was not correct. pw-6 nirdesh kumar stated that his land was of good quality for agricultural purpose. they were selling their agricultural produce to mother dairy as well as taking it to azadpur mandi. the above evidence produced by the claimants ..... bench of this court in the case of pt. jain ram singh v. uoi and ors. : air1989delhi310 held that the transactions of adjoining villages can also be good guide when instances are not available in village itself. this view has met the approval of the supreme court as well as followed by different benches of this court. .....

Sethi Transport and ors. Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : [1997]226ITR274(Orissa)

..... dues of the contractor. that question, however, is not relevant for the purpose of the present case.10. the bombay high court in the case of bombay goods transport association v. cbdt : [1994]210itr136(bom) , specifically considered the question of validity of the circular of the board bearing no. 681 (see [1994] 206 ..... that the provisions of section 194c shall apply to all types of contracts for carrying out any work including transport contracts ; the term 'transport contracts' would, in addition to contracts for transportation and loading and unloading of goods, also cover contracts for plying of buses, ferries, etc., along with staff (driver, conductor, cleaner, etc ..... the petitioners is that they are owners of trucks who are engaged in the business of transportation of goods from different destinations on payment of hire charges for vehicles. the petitioners contend that they are not transport contractors and the work done by them does not come within the purview of section 194c of .....