Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 chapter 5 miscellaneous Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Page 10 of about 94 results (0.132 seconds)

Dec 30 1981 (SC)

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

..... with the air, defective or unhealthy packaging may cause damage to all consumers of goods and so also illegal raising of railway or bus fares may affect the entire public which wants to use the railway or bus as a means of transport. in cases of this kind it would not be possible to say that any ..... reliefs reliance was placed upon two decisions of this court, namely, shewpujanrai indrasanrai ltd. v. the collector of customs : 1958crilj1355 and y. mahaboob sheriff v. mysore state transport authority : [1960]2scr146 .630. on the other hand, counsel for the contesting respondents denied that the appointing authority has failed to discharge its obligation to provide adequate ..... were severable and they were struck down and order was upheld. in this connection, reliance was also placed on the decision of y. mahaboob sheriff v. mysore state transport authority : [1960]2scr146 wherein the question was whether a permit granted for one year was according to law. section 58(1)(a) read with section 58(2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1973 (SC)

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... and social programme the state is to own or control the key industries and services, mineral resources, railways, waterways, shipping and other means of public transport. in 1945 the working committee said that the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of individuals and groups was to be prevented. social control ..... that the constitution imposed against laws which contravened these rights and the effective remedy supplied under article 32. indeed the framers of the constitution took good care not to confer the fundamental rights in absolute terms because that was impractical. knowing human capacity for distorting and misusing all liberties and freedoms, ..... constitution fourth amendment act was intended to remove the barriers of articles 14, 19 and 31(2) in respect of land legislation considered essential for public good. 1097. state legislatures cannot remove the fetter. they have no power to amend the constitution. parliament cannot remove the fetter by ordinary law. by amendment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1969 (SC)

Harakchand Ratanchand Banthia and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC1453; (1969)2SCC166; [1970]1SCR479

..... reserve bank of india, the price at which any gold may be bought or sold, and(b) regulate by licences, permits or otherwise, the manufacture, distribution, transport, acquisition, possession, transfer disposal, use or consumption of gold.4. chapter iii contains a number of restrictions relating to the manufacture, acquisition, possession or delivery ..... (c) a group of productive or profit making enterprises or organisations that have a similar technological structure of production and that produce or supply technically substitutable goods, services or sources of income.' it was said that if the word 'industries' is construed in this wide sense, entry 27 of list ii ..... in section 2(j) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 should be construed as an activity systematically or habitually undertaken for production and distribution of goods or for rendering material services to the community at large and that such an activity generally involved cooperation of the employer and the employees and its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 1969 (SC)

Bennett Coleman and Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Punya Priya Das Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC426; [1969(19)FLR32]; 1970LabIC512; (1969)IILLJ554SC; (1969)2SCC1; [1970]1SCR181

..... a dispute about dismissal and reinstatement, it would be outside the words of the definition 'in connection with employment or non-employment'.a similar question was canvassed in central provinces transport services ltd. v. raghunath : (1957)illj27sc in connection with the c.p. & berar industrial disputes settlement act, xxiii of 1947. section 2(10) of that act ..... representation which is the basis for the rule must be clear and unambiguous and not indefinite, upon which the party relying on it is said to have, in good faith and in belief of it, acted. the statement of account prepared at the time when the respondent gave the said receipt appears to indicate that the benefit ..... told that unless he passed a receipt in full settlement of his claims, the letter of acceptance would not be issued to him. there appear to be two good reasons why the respondent's case cannot be easily discarded. firstly, since his resignation was accepted with effect from october 21, 1963 and even a letter to that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //