Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 chapter 5 miscellaneous Page 1 of about 342 results (0.494 seconds)

Liverpool and London S.P. and I Asson. Ltd. Vs. M.V. Sea Success I and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2003(9)SC218; 2003(10)SCALE1; (2004)9SCC512

..... been placed on the inland vessels act, 1917 (as amended in the year 1977), the merchant shipping act, 1956 (as amended in 1983) and multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 (as amended in 2000) and in that view of the matter the pedantic and regressive view should be discouraged specially in the light of ..... from time to time. [see national insurance co. ltd., chandigarh v. nicolletta rohtagi and ors.].71. the multimodal transportation of goods (amendment) act 2000 inter alia provides for responsibilities and liabilities of the multimodal transport operator. by reason of act 44 of 2000 a proviso has been added. section 5 of the said act ..... 5. in section 7 of the principal act, in sub-section (1), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:- 'provided that the multimodal transport operator shall issue the multimodal transport document only after obtaining and during the subsistence of a valid insurance cover.' circulars:72. the insurance association has issued a circular dated 20th .....

Unique Pharmaceutical Laboratories Vs. Stalco Freight International Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR134; II(2006)BC459; 2005(6)BomCR829

..... of lading that the court at united arab emirates will have exclusive jurisdiction?5. whether the suit is within the period of limitation under the terms of multimodal transportation of goods act 1993?6. whether the plaintiffs prove that the defendants are liable/responsible to deliver the cargo to the consignee directly despite the fact that the ..... suit. it has been thereafter contended that the suit is barred by law of limitation under the provisions of the multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993. it has been contended that the contract is governed by the said multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 and, therefore, the suit ought to have been filed within nine months from the accrual of cause ..... it is the case of the plaintiff that the said cargo was stuffed into f.c.l. container bearing no. apls 279834 and in respect of transportation of the said goods, the 2nd respondent issued a bill of lading no. mum/yer/0317 dated 25.3.2001 at mumbai. it is the case of the plaintiffs that .....

Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. Vs. the Owners and Parties Interested in ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR2001Cal213,(2001)2CALLT445(HC)

..... namely indian law will apply. the learned counsel submitted that in so far as indian law is concerned, namely the indian carriage of goods by sea act, 1925 has been amended by multi modal transportation of goods act, 1993 [hereinafter called. cgsa]. relying on clause 3(c) of article iii of cgsa of 1925, the learned counsel submitted ..... 'however, proof to the contrary shall not be admissible if the bill of ladinghas been transferred to a third party acting in good faith' has come by way of amendment to cgsa by the multi modal transportation of goods act, 1993 [act 28 of' 1993]. 28. before dealing with the rival submissions, this court proposes first to deal with ..... that after receiving the goods in his charge, the carrier or the master or the agent of the carrier shall, on demand of the shipper, .....

M/S Rare Earth Overseas Vs. Container Corporation of India Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... that a provision as in section 103 of the railways act, is also to be found in the carriage of goods by road act, 2007, multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993, the carriage by air act, 1972 and the carriage of goods by sea act, 1925. the supreme court in nath bros. exim international ltd. vs. best roadways ltd. (2000 ..... petitioner, executing an export order placed by its foreign client based at ukraine, had on 9th april, 2010 deposited goods with the warehouse of the respondent situated at export warehouse, icd, tughlakabad, new delhi in order to transport the goods through the respondent to port of loading in the ships at mumbai port; (iii) that as per the ..... practice, the petitioner had also deposited the invoice shipping bills for export and packing list showing the value of the goods deposited as rs.6,06,282.75 paise; .....

State of Karnataka Vs. Dundamada Shetty

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR2605; 1994(3)KarLJ378

..... not survivepoint no.6-partial ownership rights. theyhave to follow chapter-v of the karnataka minor minerals concession rules as wellas rule 62a of the rules while transporting such quarried granite in so faras rule 62a applies to such material.point no.7-they have full ownershiprights. they have not to follow any regulatory procedure ..... connection, therefore, has to be rejected.the learned advocate general, however, was right when he contended that for deciding whether mr. justice urs' judgment laid down good law or not the matter would be at large before this full bench, even though the judgment was confirmed by a non-speaking order by the division bench of ..... quarrying of minor minerals by the owners themselves, no regulatory procedure of the karnataka minor minerals concession rules, 1969 shall be applicable. however, at the stage of transporting of such quarried granite, rule 62a of the rules will have to be complied with insofar as the said rule applies to the said exercise. this will .....

In Re: Noise Pollution - Implementation of the Laws for Restricting Us ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC3136; 2005(3)AWC2685(SC); 2005(5)BomCR553; 121(2005)DLT547(SC); [2005(4)JCR4(SC)]; JT2005(6)SC210; (2005)5SCC733

..... social development.79. for purposes of this law, 'environmental noise' means the sound that is emitted in the course of industrial production, construction, transportation and social activities and that impairs the living environment of the neighbourhood.80. the competent administrative department for environmental protection under the state council shall, ..... manufactured and sold for export purpose may be excluded from the purview of the firecrackers' noise standards provided they follow the rules for manufacturing of goods for export. this will enable the manufacturers to compete in the world market with the other suppliers of firecrackers. the firecrackers manufactured for export shall ..... to be sold in india. in case these firecrackers are found being sold in indian territory, then the manufacturer and the dealer selling these goods should be held liable.how to check/control noise pollution169. the need for checking noise pollution as highlighted by the petitioners and several interveners .....

Steel Authority of India Ltd. and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. National Union Wa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2001SC3527; [2001(91)FLR182]; (2002)1GLR792; JT2001(7)SC268; 2001LabIC3656; (2001)IILLJ1087SC; 2001(5)SCALE626; (2001)7SCC1; 2001(4)SCT1(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC228; 2001DGLS(soft)1084:2001(111)CLR349

..... of contract labour in the concerned establishment in the process, operation or work of handling of foodgrains including loading and unloading from any means of transport, storing and stocking. the respondents claimed absorption of contract labour in the concerned establishment of the appellant. a division bench of the high court ..... 'contractor', in relation to an establishment, means a person who undertakes to produce a given result for the establishment other than a mere supply of goods or articles of manufacture to such establishment, through contract labour or who supplies contract labour for any work of the establishment and includes a subcontractor.72. ..... products through central marketing organisation, a marketing unit of the appellant, having network of branches in different parts of india. the work of handling the goods in the stockyards of the appellants, was being entrusted to contractors after calling for tenders in that behalf. the government of west bangal issued notificated .....

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

..... continued existence of snail darter which was an endangered species would be completely jeopardised.126. two other decisions were referred to by sh. shanti bhushan - arlington coalition on transportation v. john a. volpe (1972) 458 f.2d 1323 and environmental defense fund, inc. v corps of engineers of united states army (1971) 325 f. supp ..... area on the right bank of the proposed reservoir exhibited a highly degraded ecosystem which was in contract to the left bank area where there was fairly good forest cover which formed part of shoolpaneshwar wildlife sanctuary. with regard to the study of fauna, the said report indicated that a well-balanced and viable ..... to the early implementation of the sardar sarovar project. the question of environmental protection also needs serious attention. i wish you and the people of surendranagar a good monsoon.88. from the documents and the letters referred to hereinabove, it is more than evident that the government of india was deeply concerned with the .....

Shree Rama Multi-tech Ltd. and anr. Vs. Asset Reconstruction Company ( ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2007)2GLR1230

..... to the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of sheela barse v. union of india reported in : air1988sc2211 .43.2 in the case of sarguja transport service v. state transport appellate tribunal, m. p., gwalior and ors. reported in : [1987]1scr200 , the hon'ble supreme court held that where the petitioners withdraw a petition filed before high court ..... will lose it. in order to prevent a litigant from abusing the process of the court by instituting suits again and again on the same cause of action without any good reason the code insists that he should obtain the permission of the court to file a fresh suit after establishing either of the two grounds mentioned in sub-rule (3 .....

B. Archana Reddy and ors. Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its Secretary, La ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(6)ALD582; 2005(6)ALT364

..... pena 515 us 220 : (1995) 132 l.ed. 2d 158 (for short, adarand constructors-1). in this case, the united states department of transportation through its central federal lands highway division awarded contract to mountain gravel and construction company. the contract provided that if the prime contractor hires sub-contractors certified as ..... repercussion, has inherent limitation on it. it should be exercised to effectuate the purpose of the act. in legislations enacted for general benefit and common good the responsibility is far graver. it demands purposeful approach. the exercise of discretion should be objective. test of reasonableness is more strict. the public ..... objective, it would also fail to answer doctrine of fairness. it is now well settled that fair procedure in administration sine qua non to good democratic governance. any public authority entrusted with an enquiry concerning public affairs must ensure that such enquiry is informed of fairness to minimize complaints of .....