Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 chapter 5 miscellaneous Sorted by: old Page 12 of about 342 results (1.265 seconds)

Geier Vs. American Honda Motor Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... be designed to create less risk of serious airbag-induced injuries than current air bags, particularly for small women and young children"); u. s. dept. of transportation, national highway traffic safety administration, national accident sampling system crashworthiness data system 1991-1993, p. viii (aug. 1995) (finding that airbags caused approximately 54,000 ..... install such a safety feature actionable under theories of negligence or defective design. the court holds that an interim regulation motivated by the secretary of transportation's desire to foster gradual development of a variety of passive restraint devices deprives state courts of jurisdiction to answer that question. i respectfully dissent ..... tort claims. i express no opinion on the possible merit, or lack of merit, of those claims. i do observe, however, that even though good-faith compliance with the minimum requirements of standard 208 would not provide honda with a complete defense on the merits,6 i as- systems such as .....

Divyalakshmi Plastic Indus. Pvt. Vs. C.C.E. and C. (A)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2000)(70)ECC805

..... is proper and correct oh the basis of information supplied by m/s. supreme in dustries giving admissible deduction on transport charges and central excise duty paid, which sells the branded goods as supreme industries goods to wholesale dealer with their price. the sale price is different from the price declared in price lists by the ..... at bombay, as the first wholesale transaction of the goods has taken place from supreme industries and not from ..... sold to m/s. supreme industries and the delivery of the goods was at bombay, and not at factory gate the assessable value will be the price at which goods were sold by supreme industries to their dealers, after allowing deduction of transportation charges incurred from the appellants factory to their customer's factory gate .....

Patel Roadways and Another Vs. Manish Chhotalal Thakkar and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2001ACJ180; ILR2000KAR3286; 2000(6)KarLJ216

..... and driver was obviously not a party.16. the question whether a driver is a necessary party was specifically considered by this court in general manager, karnataka state road transport corporation v vijayalaxmi. justice venkatachaliah (as he then was) speaking for the division bench stated the law thus:'7. what remains to be considered is the contention that ..... petition filed without impleading the driver or drivers of the vehicles involved in the accident is not maintainable having regard to the decision of this court in karnataka state road transport corporation, bangalore v smt. biyabi alias kundan bai and others. the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that this matter is a pure question of law, and ..... resulting in several deaths.25. p.w. 2 is examined as the eye-witness. he has stated he was travelling in the said lorry goa-6062 along with his goods; that at about 1.30 a.m. on 1-5-1994, the said lorry which was driven at a high speed in a rash and negligent manner and the .....

Babu Premarajan Vs. Superintendent of Police, Kasaragode and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2000Ker417

..... a situation where a single judge hearing a writ petition referred it to a division bench because of conflicting views on the question of issuance of permits by the regional transport authority. the conflict was in two division bench decisions. order of reference was made by subba rao, c. j. (as his lordship then was), which is reproduced in ..... relies least on his own opinion. and although, where discretion is left to a judge; he is to a great extent unfettered in its exercise, coke's definition still holds good, discretio est discemere per legem quid sit justum (o), and discretion, when applied to a court of justice, means sound discretion guided by law. it must be governed ..... laid down are only illustrative and not exhaustive and cannot be fit in a strait jacket formula, but depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case and to the good sense of the judge concerned. koshy, j. 72. i had the privilege of reading the elaborate order given by the hon'ble chief justice with regard to the .....

Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Kamlaben Valjibhai Vora

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2002ACJ780; (2001)3GLR2528

..... as such sustained any neurological defect.74. according to the evidence of the claimant, he spent more than rs. 20,000/- under the head of medical expenses, transport charges, special diet and other miscellaneous charges. the tribunal has only awarded an amount of rs. 8,000/- under these heads. after having considered the voluminous documentary evidence ..... very clear from the record produced by the university and the evidence of dr. bhatt that the deceased was a brilliant teacher and he had also a very good academic record, during the course of his service as assistant research scientist in the university. he had made many research papers in his subject. deceased dr. talati ..... common law, a bailee though he is only liable, in the absence of a special contract, for negligence, must show that the loss of or damage to goods in his care was not attributable to fault on his part.' contributory and composite liability : when?24. the contention that the driver of the passenger matador was .....

New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Rfeeka Sultan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT288

..... of india, is the question for determination in this case. it arises in circumstances being narrated hereinafter.1. mahmood ul hassan (40-45) was employed with m.p. state road transport corporation, earning rs. 1400/- per month, apart from allowances and other facilities. while he was going towards crossing from bus stand on 18-2-1996, truck no. cpd 8250 driven ..... paragraph 16, it is said :'para 16: in view of what is indicated above, we hold that hemendra dutta choudhury's case (1987) 2 glr 450, does not lay down good law and the insurer is bound by section 96(2) (section 149 of 1988 act) in the appellate forum also and the right of appeal is restricted to raising contentions ..... as section 173 of the act. with great respect, we are of the opinion that the decision in gaya prasad's case, 1992 acj 200 (mp), does not lay down good law, to the extent it holds that an appeal does not lie under section 173 of the act against determination of a claim for compensation under section 140 of the .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rafeeka Sultan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001ACJ648; 2000(3)MPLJ561

..... constitution of india, is the question for determination in this case. it arises in circumstances being narrated hereinafter.mahmood-ul-hassan (40-45) was employed with m.p. state road transport corporation, earning rs. 1,400 per month, apart from allowances and other facilities. while he was going towards crossing from bus stand on 18.2.86, truck no. cpd 8250 ..... ). in para 16 it is said:(16) in view of what is indicated above, we hold that hemendra dutta choudhury's case 1988 acj 813 (gauhati), does not lay down good law and the insurer is bound by section 96(2) (section 149 of 1988 act) in the appellate forum also and the right of appeal is restricted to raising contentions ..... as section 173 of the act. with great respect, we are of the opinion that the decision in gaya prasad's case, 1992 acj 200 (mp), does not lay down good law, to the extent it holds that an appeal does not lie under section 173 of the act against determination of a claim for compensation under section 140 of the .....

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

..... continued existence of snail darter which was an endangered species would be completely jeopardised.126. two other decisions were referred to by sh. shanti bhushan - arlington coalition on transportation v. john a. volpe (1972) 458 f.2d 1323 and environmental defense fund, inc. v corps of engineers of united states army (1971) 325 f. supp ..... area on the right bank of the proposed reservoir exhibited a highly degraded ecosystem which was in contract to the left bank area where there was fairly good forest cover which formed part of shoolpaneshwar wildlife sanctuary. with regard to the study of fauna, the said report indicated that a well-balanced and viable ..... to the early implementation of the sardar sarovar project. the question of environmental protection also needs serious attention. i wish you and the people of surendranagar a good monsoon.88. from the documents and the letters referred to hereinabove, it is more than evident that the government of india was deeply concerned with the .....

Virginia Tobacco Growers Association Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD720; 2001(1)ALT20

..... newspaper 'enadu', dated 31-10-2000, it is seen that the excise officers of the karnataka stale having received information that under the guise of tobacco bales, opium is being transported to karnataka, raided some villages in miduthura mandal in kurnool district and found tobacco purchased unauthorisedly by one person, stored in the godown of one pillata monaf of miduthuru mandal ..... approach inasmuch as the restrictions is bound to be irksome and painful to the citizen even-though it may be for the public good therefore, a just balance must be struck in relation to the restriction and the public good that is done to the people at large. it is obvious that, however, important the right of a citizen or an individual .....

ipca Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2001)70TTJ(Mumbai)991

..... for formulation unit sum of rs. 4,14,932 being the, miscellaneous income derived from the said undertaking as detailed below .cash discountrs. 83,498miscellaneous income (insurance claim. transporters claim, sales-tax refund, etc.)rs. 3,31,434 rs. 4,14,93214. the assessee had claimed deduction under section 80-ia to the tune of rs. ..... activity with a view to arrive at the net profit or loss for the purpose of clause (c) of section 80hhc(3) from export of manufacturing goods and trading goods. at the cost of repetition, i should emphasise that the loss worked out under either of the said sub-clauses cannot be ignored., even though the ..... section 80hhc(3)(c), the profit from the exports, which is allowable as deduction from the taxable income, is the composite profit from export of own manufactured goods and the goods manufactured by others. if the composite profit is a loss, the assessing officer observed that there is no question of deduction under section 80h11c. the assessing officer .....