Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 chapter 5 miscellaneous Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.089 seconds)

Mar 30 2016 (SC)

Savelife Foundation and Anr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-30-2016

..... para 1(7) and 1(8) of the guidelines dated 12.5.2015 required standard operating procedure to be framed for the examination of the good samaritans. the central government, ministry of road transport and highways has issued notification on 21.1.2016 which is as under: no.rt-25035/101/2014-rs. whereas, the hon'ble supreme ..... road accident, as specified under section 134 of the motor vehicles act, 1988. notification dated 12.5.2015 issued by the ministry of road transport and highways containing guidelines for protection of good samaritans to be in force till appropriate legislation is framed by union legislature, is extracted hereunder: no.25035/101/2014-rs. whereas the hon ..... legislation is made by the union legislature. on 7.8.2015, this court has noted that notification dated 12.5.2015 laying down good samaritan guidelines has been issued by the ministry of road transport and highways, government of india. suggestions were invited so as to give more teeth to the guidelines. on 27.11.2015, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2016 (SC)

State of H.P and Ors Vs. Rajesh Chander Sood Etc Etc

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-28-2016

..... would not be possible to make payments, towards the recurring pension liability. the report also determined the viability of the scheme, with reference to the himachal road transport corporation, even if the staff strength is kept at the same level, as was then prevalent (- in 2003). the instant analysis resulted in the deduction, ..... should be in consonance with all legal and statutory obligations.55. it is equally true, that the power of administrative review can only be exercised, for a good and valid justification. such justification besides being founded on reasonable consideration, should also not be violative of any legal right - statutory or constitutional, vested in ..... action taken, in issuing the impugned repeal notification dated 2.12.2004 is concerned, whether the said power was exercised by the state government for good and valid reasons, and/or whether the same violated any statutory or constitutional right vested in the respondent-employees, shall be examined by us in the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //