Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-18-1995
Reported in : JT1995(3)SC581; 1995(2)SCALE772; 1995Supp(3)SCC475; [1995]3SCR377
..... all necessary input for growing sugarcane such as seeds, fertiliser, technical know-how, guarantee, finance for crop loan and also undertakes an activity of harvesting and transporting of sugarcane. the application points out that the claim of the non-members was not justified as when there was a glut then it were the karkhanas ..... the sugar factories such as sugarcane crushing, sugar recovery, sugar bags produced, quantity sold as levy and free, income from other items, cost relating to harvesting and transport of cane, sugar factory wages, power, fuel chemical and other expenses, depreciation provision etc. etc. according to the affidavit broadly these principles related to, (a) ..... and it is not possible to transport the sugarcane in adequate quantity to any of such factories. the affidavit further points out that in those areas where there is adequate sugarcane supply or they have good potential for growing sugarcane but there is no sugar factory they have been kept free so that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-03-1995
Reported in : AIR1995SC1715; 1995(2)CTC208; [1995(71)FLR211]; JT1995(4)SC348; (1995)IILLJ728SC; (1995)2MLJ48(SC); 1995(3)SCALE440; (1995)5SCC75; 1994Supp(1)SCC268; [1995]3SCR1118; 1995(2
..... reddy, j.1. leave granted in all special leave petitions.2. the respondents in these appeals are the employees of the appellant-corporation, viz., rajasthan state road transport corporation. pursuant to disciplinary enquiries held against them on charges of misconduct, their services were terminated. they filed civil suits for a declaration that the order terminating their ..... say that they constitute statutory provisions themselves.19. so far as the meaning and ambit of section 13-a of the standing orders act is concerned, a good amount of debate took place before us. certain decisions of the high courts have also been brought to our notice. the section provides that 'if any question ..... covered by principle no. 3 stated above.25. it is the principle no. 2, and particularly the qualifying statements in para 24, that has given rise to good amount of controversy. according to principle no. 2, if the dispute is an industrial dispute arising out of a right or liability under the general or common .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-24-1995
Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)387; AIR1996SC750; 1996LabIC757; 1995(7)SCALE138; (1996)1SCC560; [1995]Supp5SCR679
..... contained, every common carrier shall be liable to the owner for loss of or damage to any property (including container, pallet or similar article of transport used to consolidate goods) delivered to such carrier to be carried where such loss or damage shall have arisen from the criminal act or any of his agents or servants ..... agencies provided in the consumer protection act are not forums which have jurisdiction to entertain the complaints in which claims for loss or damage to goods entrusted to a carrier for transportation is seriously disputed. the contention raised by shri dcsai in this regard is accordingly rejected.31. coming to the question of liability of ..... placed by the appellant reads:9. in any suit brought against a common carrier for the loss, damage or non-delivery of 'goods (including containers, pallets or similar article of transport used to consolidate goods) entrusted to him for carriage, it shall not be necessary for the plaintiff to prove that such loss, damage or non- .....
Tag this Judgment!