Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 chapter 5 miscellaneous Page 6 of about 342 results (0.100 seconds)

K. Satyanarayana Murthy Vs. Secretary Regional Tranport Authority, Eas ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD354; 1998(6)ALT643

..... inconsistent in chapter v or any other law for the time being in force. section 99 deals with preparation and publication of proposals regarding road transport service of a state transport undertaking. section 100 deals with publication of proposal and a notification of the scheme after consideration of the objections to the proposal. section 104 ..... service. along with these applications, they seemed to be filing applications for grant of temporary stage carriage permits also.12. as stated supra, the regional transport authority has to meet at least once in two months to transact the pending business on its file including consideration of these applications. unfortunately, the authority ..... no.2. the orders obtained by her were already referred to while dealing with first route. the findings recorded by me with regard to first route hold good for this route also.roule no.3 rajaraina_theatre. mandapeta to kapileswarapuram:the distance of this route is about 15 kms. out of which 13 kms., are .....

State of Karnataka Vs. Mohammed Illyas

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR2812; 1994(3)KarLJ628

..... use of the vehicle in any public place (whether or not such vehicle is actually carrying any passenger or goods) save in accordance with the conditions of a permit granted or countersigned by a regional or state transport authority (or the commission) authorising the use of the vehicle in that place in the manner in which the ..... or an authority prescribed in this behalf under this act authorising the use of motor vehicle as a transport vehicle, section 2(47) defines a transport vehicle to mean a public service vehicle, a goods carriage, an educational institution bus or a private service vehicle. public service vehicle is defined by sub-section (35) to mean any ..... shall use or permit the use of the vehicle as a transport vehicle in any public place whether or not such vehicle is actually carrying any passengers or goods save in accordance with the conditions of a permit granted or countersigned by a regional or state transport authority or any prescribed authority authorising him the use of .....

M. Babu Rao and ors. Vs. Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies/Of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD582; 2005(4)ALT327; [2005]126CompCas708(AP); [2005]63SCL339(AP)

..... secretary, : 1978(2)elt284(sc) ; state of karnataka v. ranganatha reddy, : [1978]1scr641 ; k.s.e. board v. indian aluminium company, : [1976]1scr552 ; tripura goods transport association v. commissioner of taxes, : air1999sc719 .87. the question of invasion into the territory of another legislature must be determined not by the degree but by substance; the extent of ..... approved this decision in governor general v. madras, air 1945 f.c. 11 and observed that though a duty of excise and tax on the sale of goods may involve a factual overlapping, there was no overlapping in law, as the taxes were separate and distinct imposts. by giving a less wide meaning to the ..... or illegally collected and the restriction on the exercise of that right were both ancillary or subsidiary matters relating to the primary head of tax on sale of goods. this decision and the principle of ancillary and subsidiary powers spelt out in the above judgment were specifically approved by the bench of seven (7) judges .....

Lal Singh Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2001SC746; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)266; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1038(SC); 2001(1)ALT(Cri)304; (2001)2CALLT8(SC); 2001CriLJ978; (2001)3GLR2341; JT2001(1)SC410; 2001(1)SCALE284; (2001)3SCC22

..... ammunitions and explosives; accused no.3, 4 and 20 with the help of other accused created hideouts for accused no.1 for intensifying terrorist activities and for arranging transportation; accused no.1 alongwith accused devendrapal singh alias deepak (absconder) while staying at ahmedabad was in constant touch with accused gurjit singh dhaliwal alias pal alias sharma ( ..... proof which it was in the power of one side to prove, and in the power of the other to have contradicted'.32. smuggling is clandestine conveying of goods to avoid legal duties. secrecy and stealth being its covering guards, it is impossible for the preventive department to unravel every link of the process. many facts ..... of amir hassan at new sir syed nagar, aligarh. in 1992, he had arranged for another accommodation for them as the earlier was not found to be good by them. he stated that in the house of lal singh and mohd. sharief, they made plan to obtain fire arms for committing terrorist activities including killing .....

Lal Mohammad and ors. Vs. Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1999SC355; [1999(81)FLR162]; JT1998(9)SC351; (1999)ILLJ317SC; 1998(6)SCALE424; (1999)1SCC596; [1998]Supp3SCR343; (1999)1UPLBEC336

..... repairing, ornamenting, finishing, packing, oiling, washing, cleaning, breaking up, demolishing, or otherwise treating or adapting any article or substance with a view to its use, sale, transport, delivery or disposal, or[(ii) pumping oil, water, sewage or any other substance, or; (iii) generating, transforming or transmitting power, or[(iv) composing types for printing, ..... decision of this court in zaffar mohammad v. the state of west bengal, : 1976crilj190 , it was submitted that an 'article' means 'a piece of goods or property' meaning thereby, it should be a tangible substance. as we have already discussed earlier, raw materials like bolts and rails before they are embedded in ..... scheme of the definition of the term 'manufacturing process' as found in section 2(k) of the factories act. for this definition end product may be goods or otherwise. shri dave, learned counsel for the respondent strongly relied upon the decision of a constitution bench of this court in ardeshir h. bhiwandiwala ( .....

Sankar Kumar Bhattar and ors. Vs. Tehsildar-cum-revenue Officer and or ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1976Ori103

..... they were filed. in rejecting this contention, their lordships stated as follows:--'............this power does not depend upon the presentation of an application by the state transport undertaking for a permit. this power is exercisable when it is brought to the notice of the authority that there is an approved, scheme and, to give ..... applications were filed before approval of the scheme regional transport authority could not exercise its power to refuse to entertain his applications because the point of time indicated by the word 'entertain' refers to the time when ..... 2) (a) runs as follows :--'(2) for the purpose of giving effect to the approved scheme in respect of a notified area or notified route, the regional transport authority may, by order,--(a) refuse to entertain any application for the renewal of any other permit.'it was argued on behalf of the petitioner that as his .....

B.R. Enterprises Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2000)1GLR242; (1999)9SCC700; [2000]120STC302(SC)

..... ; mahant moti das v. s.p. sahi : air1959sc942 .the following passage in seervai, constitutional law of india (3rd edition), page 119 found approval in delhi transport corporation v. delhi transport corporation mazdoor congress : (1991)illj395sc . the court held:seervai in his book 'constitutional law of india' (third edition) has stated at page 119 that :.the ..... of public revenue or for a public purpose. it has been held in central inland water transport corporation ltd. v. brojo nath ganguly : (1986)iillj171sc :there must be no injury or harm to the public interest, public good and public welfare.thus, the decision to run state lottery has to be made with the ..... in england, usa and india on the meaning and scope of 'public policy'. in central inland water transport corporation v. brojo nath ganguly : (1986)iillj171sc , it held that there must be no injury or harm to the public interest, public good, and public welfare : in rattan chand hira chand v. askar nawaz jung (dead) by lrs. .....

K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... is section 110 which is the will of legislature. reference may be made to the decisions of this court in punjab sikh regular motor service, moudhapara, raipur v. regional transport authority & another air 1966 sc 1318, joginder singh & others v. deputy custodian-general of evacuee property & others air 1967 sc 145 and bharat ..... so great is the regime of the law for private property that it will not authorise the land violation if it - no, not even for the general good of the whole community. writings of the above mentioned political philosophers had also its influence on indian constitution as well. eminent domain 84. hugo grotius is credited ..... and vague powers upon the delegate without taking into account the preamble of the act as also other provisions of the statute in the event they provide good means of finding out the meaning of the offending statute. the question whether any particular legislation suffered from excessive delegation, has to be determined by the court .....

M/S. B.R. Enterprises Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1999SC1867; JT1999(3)SC431; 1999(3)SCALE171; [1999]2SCR1111

..... not be available where the plain and literal meaning from bare reading of any impugned provisions clearly shows that it confers arbitrary, uncanalised on unbridled power. the delhi transport corporation case (supra) was with reference to the challenge to the provisions relating to termination of service of a permanent employee. in the registrar of co-operative societies ..... . in support, he relied on the case of atiabari tea co. ltd v. the state of assam and ors. : [1961]1scr809 , and also the case of automobile transport (rajasthan) ltd. v. the state of rajasthan and ors. : [1963]1scr491 , where the restrictive interpretation given to article 303, namely, to be limited to the entries ..... public revenue or for a public purpose. it has been held in central inland water transport corp. ltd. and anr. v. brojo nath ganguly and anr. : (1986)iillj171sc :there must be no injury or harm to the public interest, public good and public welfare.94. thus, the decision to run state lottery has to be made .....

Babu Premarajan Vs. Superintendent of Police, Kasaragode and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2000Ker417

..... a situation where a single judge hearing a writ petition referred it to a division bench because of conflicting views on the question of issuance of permits by the regional transport authority. the conflict was in two division bench decisions. order of reference was made by subba rao, c. j. (as his lordship then was), which is reproduced in ..... relies least on his own opinion. and although, where discretion is left to a judge; he is to a great extent unfettered in its exercise, coke's definition still holds good, discretio est discemere per legem quid sit justum (o), and discretion, when applied to a court of justice, means sound discretion guided by law. it must be governed ..... laid down are only illustrative and not exhaustive and cannot be fit in a strait jacket formula, but depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case and to the good sense of the judge concerned. koshy, j. 72. i had the privilege of reading the elaborate order given by the hon'ble chief justice with regard to the .....