Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Page 4 of about 61 results (0.200 seconds)

S.K. Networks Company Ltd. Vs. Amulya Exports Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2007Bom15; 2007(3)BomCR458

..... reproducing clause 6 of the rules of bill of lading. this act further provides and deals with multimodal transport contract and transport operator and determine also along with other sea act and other acts. the liability and responsibility is of multimodal transport operators for loss of damage to the goods. it further simplifies the procedure with a view to reducing and eliminating interpretation in the continuous ..... of trade, commerce and business at national or international level.23. the multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 (act 28 of 1993) came into force on 16th october, 1992 which provides for regulation of the multimodal transportation of goods from any place in india to a place outside india, on the basis of multimodal transport contract and for a matter connected there with. this act of 28 of .....

Essar Oil Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2006)102TTJ(Mum.)614

..... on charter fully equipped, manned and supplied is a business profit under article 7. it is further held that income from use, maintenance, rental of containers used for transport of goods or...is income from operation of ships and, therefore, business profit.41. even if for the sake of argument one holds that the case is not covered by ..... .24. shri manoj kumar further contended that the articles relied on by the assessee-company in the singapore dtaa are not applicable to the present case. as the transportation of goods was undertaken between two indian ports, the case does not fall under article 8. once the assessee's case is out of article 8, the assessee is straight ..... received or deemed to accrue or receive in india. he submitted that the freight was earned by m/s hmpl for rendering services in the indian waters and the goods was transported between indian ports. therefore, it is obvious that the income earned by m/s hmpl was earned out of business connection with india. m/s hmpl is .....

Unique Pharmaceutical Laboratories Vs. Stalco Freight International Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR134; II(2006)BC459; 2005(6)BomCR829

..... of lading that the court at united arab emirates will have exclusive jurisdiction?5. whether the suit is within the period of limitation under the terms of multimodal transportation of goods act 1993?6. whether the plaintiffs prove that the defendants are liable/responsible to deliver the cargo to the consignee directly despite the fact that the ..... suit. it has been thereafter contended that the suit is barred by law of limitation under the provisions of the multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993. it has been contended that the contract is governed by the said multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 and, therefore, the suit ought to have been filed within nine months from the accrual of cause ..... it is the case of the plaintiff that the said cargo was stuffed into f.c.l. container bearing no. apls 279834 and in respect of transportation of the said goods, the 2nd respondent issued a bill of lading no. mum/yer/0317 dated 25.3.2001 at mumbai. it is the case of the plaintiffs that .....

Geetanjali Woollen Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M.V. X-press Annapurna and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR31

..... of taking over of liability and that till and until the said liability is discharged, the plaintiff will not be entitled to obtain a bill of lading for the goods put on transport by sea being the suit consignment. this issue has also been raised by the defendant no. 1 and 4 and defendant no. 2 while contesting the matter on ..... were prepared and were cleared by the customs authorities at bombay and consequently the said two containers were handed over to the defendant no. 3 for the purpose of transportation of the said goods and the 3rd defendant issued three mate receipts bearing no. 2905, 2906 and 2907 all dated 1.4.1998. according to the 3rd defendant the said mate ..... are supplied. in the present case we are dealing with different situation. here is the case where the goods are lost by virtue of non-issuacne of bill of lading. the business of the 1st defendant vessel is to transport the goods by sea and normally as a matter of course the ship owner is entitled to book the said cargo .....

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Concord Commercials (P) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)94TTJ(Mum.)913

..... ) ltd. (supra) and a few other cases alone. in fact, the very same issue was considered by different benches of the tribunal in a number of cases, like, (3) reliance transport & travels ltd. v. dy. cit (ita no: 1733/bom/1991, dt. 27th april, 1992)sitcon commercials (p) ltd. v. asstt. cit (ita no. 8036/bom/1992, dt. ..... engaged in the business of generation or distribution of electricity or any other form of power or in the construction of ships or in the manufacture or processing of goods or in mining would fall within the purview of "industrial company" as defined in section 2(6)(c) of the finance act, 1969, notwithstanding the fact that ..... " appearing in the definition of investment company in clause (ii) of section 109 means "substantially" or "primarily". if the business of the company consists mainly in dealing in goods or merchandise, it cannot be held to be an "investment company" within the meaning of clause (ii) merely because, for one reason or the other, its income from business .....

Pukhrajmal Sagarmal Lunkad (Deceased Through L.Rs.) and ors. Vs. the M ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(2)ALLMR271; (2005)107BOMLR685

..... , roads and communications, construction, alteration and removal of buildings, bridges and other structures; allotment or reservation of lands for roads, open spaces, gardens, recreation grounds, schools, markets, green belts, dairies, transport facilities, and public purposes of all kinds; drainage, lighting; water supply, preservation of objects of historical or national interest or beauty and of buildings used for religious purposes; imposition of ..... done under bombay town planning act.it is as such evident that the judgments delivered by the supreme court interpreting the provisions of the b.t.p. act would hold good while interpreting the similar provisions in the m.r.t.p. act. bearing this position in mind, we proceed to deal with the points raised in this petition. as point .....

Electronics Corporation of India Limited a Service Engineers Union Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(3)BomCR699; [2004(101)FLR880]; (2004)IIILLJ971Bom; 2004(4)MhLj151

..... sets in a year was to be allotted to each retainer. each retainer was to be paid certain amount per set from which he was expected to pay for the transportation and the cost of the components supplied by the company, the retainer was not permitted to charge any amount from the customers. under one of the clause of the agreement ..... deemed to be accepted. the company having raised its preliminary issue and having challenged the competence, validity and maintainability of the reference itself, it is for the company to make good its challenge in the first instance by evidence, oral and/or documentary. thereafter, if at all, the burden would shift on the other side.14. in my view, it was .....

The Icici Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit, Special Range 36

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... of the asset has been given in favour of rseb which is normally given. rseb has been made liable to the assessee for any loss or damage occurring during transportation, delivery, etc. which is contrary to the legal position that a lessee would be liable for the loss only while the asset is in his possession. since the ..... 19(2), only then can the set of rules prescribed for the purpose in sections 20 to 24 can be applied. section 2(14) defines "specific" goods or "ascertained" goods as goods which have been identified and agreed upon by the parties. in the assessee's case, the two high efficiency boilers have been identified and agreed upon by ..... by itself decide the issue. the decisive issue is whether there was an intention on the part of the parties to really convey and require the property in the goods. their intention is to be gathered from surrounding circumstances. these would include the negotiations held between the parties in the initial stages and during the pre-documentation period .....

Mid East Port Folio Management Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2003)87ITD537(Mum.)

..... of the asset has been given in favour of rseb which is normally given. rseb has been made liable to the assessee for any loss of damage occurring during transportation, delivery, etc. which is contrary to the legal position that a lessee would be liable for the loss only while the asset is in his possession. since the ..... 19(2), only then can the set of rules prescribed for the purpose in sections 20 to 24 can be applied. section 2(14) defines "specific" goods or "ascertained" goods as goods which have been identified and agreed upon by the parties. in the assessee's case, the two high efficiency boilers have been identified and agreed upon by ..... by itself decide the issue. the decisive issue is whether there was an intention on the part of the parties to really convey and acquire the property in the goods. their intention is to be gathered from surrounding circumstances. these would include the negotiations held between the parties in the initial stages and during the pre-documentation period .....

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Vicco Laboratories

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2003)(162)ELT572Tri(Mum.)bai

..... on account of alleged misdeclaration of price was issued arid the notice was adjudicated by the order dated 24.3.1975 holding that no deduction was permissible for transport charges, sales tax etc. the assessees' appeal against this order was partly allowed by holding that sales tax, if included in the price, should be ..... connection we find that the show cause notice dated 2.5.97 which is relevant for the purpose of this case makes an oblique reference to the goods not being manufactured exclusively in accordance with the formulae prescribed in authoritative books, although the products contained ingredients mentioned in such formulae, and not being sold ..... against the provisional assessment orders. the court also stayed the show cause notices subject to the assessees executing bond and bank guarantees for removal of the goods under provisional assessment procedure. another writ petition was filed in the bombay high court by the assessees and the court directed the department to decide the .....